New Drug Reviews

Transdermal Oxybutynin (Oxytrol) for Urinary Incontinence


Am Fam Physician. 2004 Dec 15;70(12):2351-2352.


Oxytrol is a new transdermal patch form of the drug oxybutynin, which has long been used for urinary incontinence. Oxybutynin, via an anticholinergic effect, relaxes the detrusor muscle of the bladder. The transdermal form of the drug was developed to address the side effect of dry mouth. The patch avoids first-pass metabolism in the liver, reducing the active metabolite N-desethyloxybutynin, the main cause of dry mouth.

View/Print Table

NameStarting dosageDose formApproximate monthly cost*

Transdermal oxybutynin (Oxytrol)

1 patch topically, alternating sites every 3 to 4 days

Transdermal patch, 3.9 mg per day


*—Average wholesale cost, based on Red Book, Montvale, N.J.: Medical Economics Data, 2004.

†—Monthly cost based on 10 patches, with one used every 3 days for 30 days.

NameStarting dosageDose formApproximate monthly cost*

Transdermal oxybutynin (Oxytrol)

1 patch topically, alternating sites every 3 to 4 days

Transdermal patch, 3.9 mg per day


*—Average wholesale cost, based on Red Book, Montvale, N.J.: Medical Economics Data, 2004.

†—Monthly cost based on 10 patches, with one used every 3 days for 30 days.


Oxtybutynin should not be used in patients with urinary retention, gastric retention, or uncontrolled angle-closure glaucoma.1 Because oxybutynin is metabolized in the liver and excreted via the kidney, patients with renal or hepatic impairment may experience a more pronounced response to the drug. The FDA pregnancy rating for this drug is category B.


Dry mouth is the most common complaint with the oral anticholinergic drugs oxybutynin and tolterodine. The incidence of dry mouth is reported as roughly 10 percent in the package labeling.1 In one study, the transdermal form of oxybutynin caused dry mouth in fewer patients than the immediate-release oral form (30 versus 94 percent, P <.001, number needed to treat=1.8).2 The transdermal formulation of oxybutynin has not been compared with the extended-release oral formulation. Another study compared transdermal oxybutynin with extended-release oral tolterodine, and found a similar rate of dry mouth (4.1 versus 7.3 percent).3 The difference in the rate of dry mouth between studies (4.1 percent versus 10 percent versus 38 percent) may be due to differences in definition, population, and measurement. Other anticholinergic side effects such as constipation and somnolence are reduced slightly with the patch as compared with oral therapy.1,3 Skin irritation and itching occurs in 10 to 20 percent of patients, and about one in 10 patients will stop using the patch due to these symptoms. Patch adhesion is good, with less than 1 percent partially or totally detaching.1,3


Few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of transdermal oxybutynin. It has been compared with immediate-release oral oxybutynin and extended-release tolterodine, but only in previously treated patients. In 74 patients, mostly women, who previously responded to oral oxybutynin, the transdermal form produced a similar decrease in the number of episodes of incontinence to oral oxybutynin (7.3 to 7.4 episodes per day while on placebo and 2.4 to 2.6 episodes per day while on treatment).2 When compared with long-acting tolterodine (Detrol LA) in both urge and mixed incontinence, transdermal oxybutynin and tolterodine produced a similar modest decrease in the number of incontinence episodes from 7 to 9 episodes per day to 5 to 7 episodes per day (P <0.05 compared with placebo).3 Neither study reported the number of patients who were completely continent or a decline in the frequency of nighttime micturition. Older studies with the oral form showed more impressive results, but it is not clear whether that was due to different populations used or different dosing.4,5


Transdermal oxybutynin will cost patients approximately $100 per month, similar to the cost of the extended-release forms of oxybutynin and tolterodine, and much more than the generic version of immediate-release oxybutynin ($15 to 30 per month).


The transdermal patch is applied to the abdomen, buttock, or hip, rotating sites every 3 to 4 days.

Bottom Line

The transdermal patch of oxybutynin is no more effective than the short- or long-acting oral form. The patch costs more, but causes less dry mouth. Skin reactions will cause about 10 percent of patients to stop using it.

The Author

PAMELA DULL, M.D., is assistant clinical professor, Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus.


show all references

1. Oxytrolproductmonograph.WatsonPharma, Inc. Accessed online November 22, 2004, at:;p=17....

2. Davila GW, Daugherty CA, Sanders SW, Transdermal Oxybutynin Study Group. A short-term, multicenter, randomized double-blind dose titration study of the efficacy and anticholinergic side effects of transdermal compared to immediate release oral oxybutynin treatment of patients with urge urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2001;166:140–5.

3. Dmochowski RR, Sand PK, Zinner NR, Gittelman MC, Davila GW, Sanders SW. Transdermal Oxybutynin Study Group. Comparative efficacy and safety of transdermal oxybutynin and oral tolterodine vesus placebo in previously treated patients with urge and mixed urinary incontinence. Urology. 2003;62:237–42.

4. Homma Y, Paick JS, Lee JG, Kawabe K, Japanese and Korean Tolterodine Study Group. Clinical efficacy and tolerability of extended-release tolterodine and immediate-release oxybutynin in Japanese and Korean patients with an overactive bladder: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. BJU Int. 2003;92(7):741–7.

5. Sussman D, Garely A. Treatment of overactive bladder with once-daily extended-release tolterodine or oxybutynin: the antimuscarinic clinical effectiveness trial (ACET). Curr Med Res Opin. 2002;18:177–84, and Staskin DR. Methodologic shortcomings inherent in a post-hoc analysis. Curr Urol Rep. 2002;3:431–3.

STEPS drug updates cover Safety, Tolerability, Effectiveness, Price, and Simplicity. Each update provides an independent review of a new medication by an author without financial association to the drug manufacturer.

The series coordinator is Allen F. Shaughnessy, Pharm.D., Tufts University Family Medicine Residency Program, Boston, Mass.



Copyright © 2004 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions

More in AFP

Editor's Collections

Related Content

More in Pubmed


Jan 2022

Access the latest issue of American Family Physician

Read the Issue

Email Alerts

Don't miss a single issue. Sign up for the free AFP email table of contents.

Sign Up Now

Navigate this Article