New Drug Reviews

Denosumab (Prolia) for Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis


Am Fam Physician. 2012 Feb 15;85(4):334-336.

  Related letter: Denosumab Is an Option for Treatment of Osteoporosis

Denosumab (Prolia) is a subcutaneously administered human monoclonal antibody that decreases bone resorption by inhibiting the formation and activity of osteoclasts. Specifically, its antiresorptive activity results from inhibiting receptor activator of nuclear factor-κ B ligand (RANKL), a protein needed for osteoclast formation and activity. It is licensed for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in women with high fracture risk, those in whom alternative osteoporosis agents have not been effective, or those who cannot tolerate other agents.1

 Enlarge     Print

DrugDosageDose formCost of one year of therapy*

Denosumab (Prolia)

60 mg subcutaneously every six months

Prefilled syringe and single-use vial containing 60 mg of denosumab per 1 mL


*—Average wholesale cost, based on Micromedex.

DrugDosageDose formCost of one year of therapy*

Denosumab (Prolia)

60 mg subcutaneously every six months

Prefilled syringe and single-use vial containing 60 mg of denosumab per 1 mL


*—Average wholesale cost, based on Micromedex.


Data on the long-term safety of denosumab are limited; the largest clinical trial enrolled approximately 7,800 women and followed them for three years.2 The most serious safety issue is the risk of hypocalcemia, which occurs in about 2 percent of women who receive Prolia.1 The risk is higher in patients with renal impairment. Denosumab is contraindicated in patients with preexisting hypocalcemia. Serious infections were more common in treated patients (4.1 versus 3.4 percent of those who received placebo),2 and the risk of infection may be increased in immunocompromised patients. Rates of opportunistic infections are similar between treated and untreated patients.1,2 Patients should seek prompt medical attention if they develop symptoms of infection. As with bisphosphonates, denosumab use has been associated with osteonecrosis of the jaw. The long-term complications from suppressing bone remodeling with denosumab are unknown; atypical fractures and delayed fracture healing have been reported in patients receiving bisphosphonates. Denosumab is a U.S. Food and Drug Administration pregnancy category C drug.1


Back pain, extremity pain, hypercholesterolemia, musculoskeletal pain, and cystitis occur in more than 5 percent of women receiving Prolia, and are more common than with placebo.1 In clinical trials, dropout rates because of adverse effects were similar between treated patients and those receiving placebo.2


Compared with weekly administration of alendronate (Fosamax), denosumab significantly increases bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with low bone mass.3 Among postmenopausal women who had received alendronate for at least six months, those switched to denosumab significantly increased bone mineral density at one year versus those who continued receiving alendronate.4

The risk of hip fracture was slightly decreased in high-risk postmenopausal women after three years of denosumab therapy, compared with those receiving calcium and vitamin D replacement therapy (400 to 800 IU of vitamin D; 0.7 versus 1.1 percent; P = .04).2 The average age of participants was 72 years, and the average dual energy x-ray absorptiometry score was –2.5 to –4 at the lumbar spine or total hip; about one in four of the women had at least one pre-existing vertebral fracture. Treatment was more effective at decreasing the likelihood of other nonvertebral fractures (6.5 versus 8 percent) and new radiographic vertebral fractures (2.3 versus 7.2 percent), although clinically apparent vertebral fractures were decreased to a lesser extent (0.8 versus 2.6 percent).2

Denosumab has not been directly compared with oral or intravenous bisphosphonates or with therapeutic doses of calcium and vitamin D for fracture prevention. It has also not been studied in combination with other osteoporosis agents.


Prolia costs $1,980 for one year of therapy, plus physician's or nurse's fees for administration as well as monitoring of calcium, phosphorus, and magnesium levels. Overall, Prolia is more expensive than oral or intravenous bisphosphonates.


The recommended dosage of Prolia is 60 mg administered subcutaneously every six months. No dosage adjustments are necessary in patients with renal or hepatic impairment. Patients receiving Prolia should also take at least 1,000 mg of calcium and 400 IU of vitamin D daily. Denosumab must be stored in the refrigerator and allowed to come to room temperature before injection. The manufacturer recommends administration by a health care professional.1 Calcium, phosphorus, and magnesium levels should be monitored in women receiving Prolia.

Bottom Line

Prolia is an expensive method of preventing osteoporotic hip fractures, and is associated with significant adverse effects. Safer, less expensive options exist for preventing fracture in high-risk women.

Address correspondence to Gretchen L. Johnson, PharmD, BCPS, at Reprints are not available from the author.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations to disclose.


show all references

1. Prolia [package insert]. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Amgen Inc.; 2010. Accessed November 24, 2010....

2. Cummings SR, San Martin J, McClung MR, et al.; FREEDOM Trial. Denosumab for prevention of fractures in post-menopausal women with osteoporosis [published correction appears in N Engl J Med. 2009;361(19):1914]. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(8):756–765.

3. Brown JP, Prince RL, Deal C, et al. Comparison of the effect of denosumab and alendronate on BMD and biochemical markers of bone turnover in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: a randomized, blinded, phase 3 trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2009;24(1):153–161.

4. Kendler DL, Roux C, Benhamou CL, et al. Effects of denosumab on bone mineral density and bone turnover in postmenopausal women transitioning from alendronate therapy. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25(1):72–81.

STEPS new drug reviews cover Safety, Tolerability, Effectiveness, Price, and Simplicity. Each independent review is provided by authors who have no financial association with the drug manufacturer.

The series coordinator for AFP is Allen F. Shaughnessy, PharmD, Tufts University Family Medicine Residency Program at Cambridge Health Alliance, Malden, Mass.

A collection of STEPS published in AFP is available at



Copyright © 2012 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions

More in AFP

Editor's Collections

Related Content

More in Pubmed


May 2022

Access the latest issue of American Family Physician

Read the Issue

Email Alerts

Don't miss a single issue. Sign up for the free AFP email table of contents.

Sign Up Now

Navigate this Article