FPIN's Help Desk Answers
Hypnosis for Surgical Pain
Am Fam Physician. 2017 Dec 15;96(12):online.
How effective is hypnosis for surgical pain?
Hypnosis provides small to moderate improvements in surgical pain and burn debridement pain in adults. (Strength of Recommendation [SOR]: B, based on a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [RCTs].) In children, the effects of hypnosis are mixed, but hypnosis decreases the pain of invasive procedures. (SOR: B, based on a systematic review of RCTs and a controlled trial with mixed results, and a meta-analysis of RCTs.)
A 2013 meta-analysis of 34 RCTs (N = 2,597) compared hypnosis with standard care for pain, emotional distress, medication use, and other outcomes in patients undergoing surgery.1 Trials with attention controls (i.e., patients in the control group received attention for the same length of time as the hypnosis group) were included, whereas studies with overlap interventions (e.g., behavioral therapy, guided imagery) were excluded. The median age of patients was 40 years, and 60% of participants were women. Surgeries included elective procedures (with general or local anesthesia) and burn debridement (no anesthesia). Hypnosis was performed by script, but the technique varied (face-to-face or recorded), as did the time hypnosis was performed within the surgical period (before, during, or after). Outcomes were rated by patients or observers using different scales, so effect size was calculated using Hedges' g. Hypnosis resulted in a small to medium positive effect on pain (effect size = 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26 to 0.61) and emotional distress (effect size = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.69). The numbers of trials and patients pooled for each outcome were not reported. Sensitivity analysis showed decreased effect size in the more methodologically rigorous studies.
A 2009 systematic review of 12 small RCTs and one controlled trial (N = 528) compared the effect of hypnosis or a hypnosis-like intervention with a control or alternative intervention in patients three to 19 years of age with procedure-related pain.2 The type of hypnosis varied (hypnosis, self-hypnosis, indirect suggestion, direct suggestion, imagery). Time dedicated to hypnotherapy ranged from minutes to hours, and sometimes hypnotherapy occurred days before the procedure in addition to at the time of the procedure. Comparison interventions included standard of care, distraction, cognitive behavior therapy, and topical anesthetic. Several procedures were studied, including bone marrow aspiration, lumbar puncture, voiding cystourethrography, and the Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum. Outcomes were often assessed by observers. Studies were not pooled for meta-analysis. One study found hypnosis and hypnosis-like imagery more effective in reducing pain than standard medical care. Three of the four studies contrasting hypnosis with distraction found hypnosis to be more effective at reducing pain. Limitations include lack of pooled data, lack of individual study details and data, and absence of treatment manuals to assure treatment consistency.
A 2008 meta-analysis of 28 RCTs (N = 1,039) compared 14 psychological interventions, including hypnosis, with standard or attention care in patients two to 19 years of age who had pain or distress from needle-related procedures.3 Five studies (N = 163) of hypnosis for bone marrow aspiration and lumbar punctures found significant improvements in self-reported pain (four trials; N = 146; standard mean difference [SMD] = −1.5; 95% CI, −2.7 to −0.27) and distress (four trials; N = 146; SMD = −2.2; 95% CI, −3.7 to −0.71), and behavioral measures of distress (five trials; N = 163; SMD = −1.1; 95% CI, −1.8 to −0.35).
1. Tefikow S, Barth J, Maichrowitz S, Beelmann A, Strauss B, Rosendahl J. Efficacy of hypnosis in adults undergoing surgery or medical procedures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Psychol Rev. 2013;33(5):623–636.
2. Accardi MC, Milling LS. The effectiveness of hypnosis for reducing procedure-related pain in children and adolescents: a comprehensive methodological review. J Behav Med. 2009;32(4):328–339.
3. Uman LS, Chambers CT, McGrath PJ, Kisely S. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials examining psychological interventions for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents: an abbreviated Cochrane review. J Pediatr Psychol. 2008;33(8):842–854.
Help Desk Answers provides answers to questions submitted by practicing family physicians to the Family Physicians Inquiries Network (FPIN). Members of the network select questions based on their relevance to family medicine. Answers are drawn from an approved set of evidence-based resources and undergo peer review. The strength of recommendations and the level of evidence for individual studies are rated using criteria developed by the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (http://www.cebm.net).
The complete database of evidence-based questions and answers is copyrighted by FPIN. If interested in submitting questions or writing answers for this series, go to http://www.fpin.org or e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org.
This series is coordinated by John E. Delzell Jr., MD, MSPH, Assistant Medical Editor.
A collection of FPIN's Help Desk Answers published in AFP is available at http://www.aafp.org/afp/hda.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions
More in AFP
MOST RECENT ISSUE
Dec 1, 2019
Access the latest issue of American Family Physician