First Trimester Bleeding: Evaluation and Management

 

Am Fam Physician. 2019 Feb 1;99(3):166-174.

  Patient information: See related handout on bleeding in early pregnancy, written by the authors of this article.

  Related letter: Progestin Therapy Not Likely to Be Harmful in Women with First Trimester Bleeding

Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations.

Approximately one-fourth of pregnant women will experience bleeding in the first trimester. The differential diagnosis includes threatened abortion, early pregnancy loss, and ectopic pregnancy. Pain and heavy bleeding are associated with an increased risk of early pregnancy loss. Treatment of threatened abortion is expectant management. Bed rest does not improve outcomes, and there is insufficient evidence supporting the use of progestins. Trends in quantitative β subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) levels provide useful information when distinguishing normal from abnormal early pregnancy. The discriminatory level (1,500 to 3,000 mIU per mL) is the β-hCG level above which an intrauterine pregnancy should be visible on transvaginal ultrasonography. Failure to detect an intrauterine pregnancy, combined with β-hCG levels higher than the discriminatory level, should raise concern for early pregnancy loss or ectopic pregnancy. Ultrasound findings diagnostic of early pregnancy loss include a mean gestational sac diameter of 25 mm or greater with no embryo and no fetal cardiac activity when the crown-rump length is 7 mm or more. Treatment options for early pregnancy loss include expectant management, medical management with mifepristone and misoprostol, or uterine aspiration. The incidence of ectopic pregnancy is 1% to 2% in the United States and accounts for 6% of all maternal deaths. Established criteria should be used to determine treatment options for ectopic pregnancy, including expectant management, medical management with methotrexate, or surgical intervention.

Approximately 25% of pregnant women experience bleeding before 12 weeks' gestation.1,2  The differential diagnosis includes nonobstetric causes, bleeding in a viable intrauterine pregnancy, early pregnancy loss, and ectopic pregnancy. Physical examination findings, laboratory testing, and ultrasonography can be used to diagnose the cause of first trimester bleeding and provide appropriate management. A glossary of terms used in this article is available in Table 1.36

WHAT IS NEW ON THIS TOPIC

A meta-analysis evaluating the accuracy of a single progesterone test to predict pregnancy outcomes for women with first trimester bleeding showed that a progesterone level less than 6 ng per mL (19.1 nmol per L) reliably excluded viable pregnancy, with a negative predictive value of 99%.

Guidelines for ultrasound diagnosis of early pregnancy loss have been established to decrease the likelihood of false diagnosis and of intervening in a desired viable pregnancy.

Oral mifepristone (Mifeprex), 200 mg, followed 24 hours later by misoprostol, 800 mcg vaginally, is the most effective regimen for medical management of early pregnancy loss and, when available, should be recommended over misoprostol alone.

 Enlarge     Print

SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Clinical recommendationEvidence ratingReferences

The initial β-hCG level should be considered when following the rate of β-hCG increase in early pregnancy. In viable intrauterine pregnancies with initial β-hCG levels of less than 1,500 mIU per mL, 1,500 to 3,000 mIU per mL, or greater than 3,000 mIU per mL, there is a 99% chance that the β-hCG level will increase by at least 49%, 40%, and 33%, respectively, over 48 hours.

B

10

Rho (D) immune globulin (Rhogam) should be administered to Rh-negative women with early pregnancy loss, especially when it occurs later in the first trimester.

C

12

Early pregnancy loss can be definitively diagnosed in women with ultrasound findings of a mean gestational sac diameter of 25 mm or greater and no embryo or embryonic cardiac activity when the crown-rump length is at least 7 mm.

C

4, 5

Clinicians should expect to see a gestational sac on transvaginal ultrasonography when β-hCG levels reach 1,500 to 3,000 mIU per mL.

B

10, 15

Bed rest or progestins should not be recommended to prevent early pregnancy loss in patients with first trimester bleeding because these interventions have not been proven effective.

C

3, 18, 19

Expectant management, medical management, and uterine aspiration are safe methods for treating anembryonic gestations and fetal demise. Patient preference should guide treatment decisions.

A

2023, 28

Oral mifepristone (Mifeprex), 200 mg, followed 24 hours later by misoprostol, 800 mcg vaginally, is the most effective regimen for medical management of early pregnancy loss and, when available, should be recommended over misoprostol alone.

A

26

Treatment for incomplete abortion should rely on shared decision making. Patients should be informed that expectant management is more than 90% effective.

A

22, 24


β-hCG = β subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin.

A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, go to https://www.aafp.org/afpsort.

SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Clinical recommendationEvidence ratingReferences

The initial β-hCG level should be considered when following the rate of β-hCG increase in early pregnancy. In viable intrauterine pregnancies with initial β-hCG levels of less than 1,500 mIU per mL, 1,500 to 3,000 mIU per mL, or greater than 3,000 mIU per mL, there is a 99% chance that the β-hCG level will increase by at least 49%, 40%, and 33%, respectively, over 48 hours.

B

10

Rho (D) immune globulin (Rhogam) should be administered to Rh-negative women with early pregnancy loss, especially when it occurs later in the first trimester.

C

12

Early pregnancy loss can be definitively diagnosed in women with ultrasound findings of a mean gestational sac diameter of 25 mm or greater and no embryo or embryonic cardiac activity when the crown-rump length is at least 7 mm.

C

4, 5

Clinicians should expect to see a gestational sac on transvaginal ultrasonography when β-hCG levels reach 1,500 to 3,000 mIU per mL.

B

10, 15

Bed rest or progestins should not be recommended to prevent early pregnancy loss in patients with first trimester bleeding because these interventions have not been proven effective.

C

3, 18, 19

Expectant management, medical management, and uterine aspiration are safe methods for treating anembryonic gestations and fetal demise. Patient preference should guide treatment decisions.

A

2023, 28

Oral mifepristone (Mifeprex), 200 mg, followed 24 hours later by misoprostol, 800 mcg vaginally, is the most effective regimen for medical management of early pregnancy loss and, when available, should be recommended over misoprostol alone.

A

26

Treatment for incomplete abortion should rely on shared decision making. Patients should be informed that expectant management is more than 90% effective.

A

22, 24


β-hCG = β subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin.

A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, go to https://www.aafp.org/afpsort.

 Enlarge     Print

TABLE 1.

Definition of Terms Related to First Trimester Bleeding and Early Pregnancy Loss

TermDefinition

Anembryonic gestation

Ultrasonography shows gestational sac with mean diameter ≥ 25 mm and no yolk sac or embryo

Complete abortion

Complete passage of all products of conception

Early pregnancy loss

Nonviable intrauterine pregnancy within the first 12 6/7 weeks of gestation

Ectopic pregnancy

A pregnancy outside the uterine cavity (most commonly in a fallopian tube)

Embryonic demise

Ultrasonography shows embryo with crown-rump length ≥ 7 mm and no cardiac activity

Incomplete abortion

Some, but not all, of the products of conception have passed

Intrauterine pregnancy of uncertain viability

Transvaginal ultrasonography shows intrauterine gestational sac with no embryonic cardiac activity (and no findings of definite pregnancy failure [Table 2])

Nonviable pregnancy

Pregnancy that cannot result in live birth (e.g., ectopic pregnancy, early pregnancy loss)

Pregnancy of unknown location

Positive urine or serum pregnancy test with no intrauterine or ectopic pregnancy shown on transvaginal ultrasonography

Recurrent pregnancy loss

More than two consecutive pregnancy losses

Spontaneous abortion

Spontaneous loss of pregnancy before 20 weeks' gestation

Threatened abortion

Bleeding before 20 weeks' gestation in the presence of an embryo with cardiac activity and a closed cervix

Viable pregnancy

Pregnancy that can potentially result in a live birth


Information from references 3 through 6.

TABLE 1.

Definition of Terms Related to First Trimester Bleeding and Early Pregnancy Loss

TermDefinition

Anembryonic gestation

Ultrasonography shows gestational sac with mean diameter ≥ 25 mm and no yolk sac or embryo

Complete abortion

Complete passage of all products of conception

Early pregnancy loss

Nonviable intrauterine pregnancy within the first 12 6/7 weeks of gestation

Ectopic pregnancy

A pregnancy outside the uterine cavity (most commonly in a fallopian tube)

Embryonic demise

Ultrasonography shows embryo with crown-rump length ≥ 7 mm and no cardiac activity

Incomplete abortion

Some, but not all, of the products of conception have passed

Intrauterine pregnancy of uncertain viability

Transvaginal ultrasonography shows intrauterine gestational sac with no embryonic cardiac activity (and no findings of definite pregnancy failure [Table 2])

Nonviable pregnancy

Pregnancy that cannot result in live birth (e.g., ectopic pregnancy, early pregnancy loss)

Pregnancy of unknown location

Positive urine or serum pregnancy test with no intrauterine or ectopic pregnancy shown on transvaginal ultrasonography

Recurrent pregnancy loss

More than two consecutive pregnancy losses

Spontaneous abortion

Spontaneous loss of pregnancy before 20 weeks' gestation

Threatened abortion

Bleeding before 20 weeks' gestation in the presence of an embryo with cardiac activity and a closed cervix

Viable pregnancy

Pregnancy that can potentially result in a live birth


Information from references 3 through 6.

History and Physical Examination

Vaginal bleeding in early pregnancy requires prompt attention. A review of the menstrual history and prior ultrasonography can help establish gestational dating and determine whether the pregnancy location is known. Patients should be asked about pain and the amount of bleeding. Bleeding equal to or heavier than a menstrual period and bleeding accompanied by pain are associated with an increased risk of early pregnancy loss.2,7 Patients should be assessed for signs and symptoms of hypovolemia. Vital signs indicating hemodynamic instability or peritoneal signs on physical examination require emergent evaluation. A speculum examination can help identify nonobstetric causes of bleeding, such as vaginitis, cervicitis, or a cervical polyp. If products of conception are visible on speculum examination, the diagnosis of incomplete abortion can be made and treatment offered. Further evaluation is needed unless a definitive nonobstetric cause of bleeding is found or products of conception are seen (Figure 1).8

FIGURE 1.

Evaluation of first trimester bleeding. (β-hCG = β subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin.)

Adapted with permission from Reproductive Health Access Project. First trimester bleeding algorithm. November 1, 2017. https://www.reproductiveaccess.org/resource/first-trimester-bleeding-algorithm/. Accessed November 10, 2017.


FIGURE 1.

Evaluation of first trimester bleeding. (β-hCG = β subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin.)

Adapted with permission from Reproductive Health Access Project. First trimester bleeding algorithm. November 1, 2017. https://www.reproductiveaccess.org/resource/first-trimester-bleeding-algorithm/. Accessed November 10, 2017.

Laboratory Testing

β-HUMAN CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN

The β subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) can be detected in the plasma of a pregnant woman as early as eight days after ovulation.9 Quantitative β-hCG levels can provide useful information in early pregnancy. The rate of β-hCG increase is less rapid as the level increases. For symptomatic women with a viable intrauterine pregnancy, initial β-hCG levels of less than 1,500 mIU per mL, 1,500 to 3,000 mIU per mL, or more than 3,000 mIU per mL will increase over 48 hours by at least 49%, 40%, or 33%, respectively.10 A slower rate of increase suggests early pregnancy loss or ectopic pregnancy. By approximately 10 weeks' gestation, the β-hCG level typically plateaus or decreases, after which serial ultrasonography is the preferred diagnostic tool.11

RH FACTOR

Rh factor testing should be performed if Rh status is not known at the time of presentation. Rho(D) immune globulin (Rhogam) is indicated within 72 hours for all Rh-negative patients with abdominal trauma or ectopic pregnancy, and in those who undergo uterine aspiration. Rho(D) immune globulin can also be administered within 72 hours of early pregnancy loss, especially later in the first trimester, although the risk of alloimmunization is estimated to be 1.5% to 2% in this setting.12 There is insufficient evidence for or against the use of Rho(D) immune globulin in Rh-negative patients who present with threatened abortion. A 50- or 120-mcg dose is recommended before 12 weeks' gestation, although 300 mcg can be administered if lower doses are not available.3 After 12 weeks, a 300-mcg dose should be given.12

PROGESTERONE

Measurement of serum progesterone may be useful in distinguishing between an early viable or nonviable pregnancy, especially in the setting of inconclusive ultrasonography. A meta-analysis evaluating the accuracy of a single progesterone test to predict pregnancy outcome in women with first trimester bleeding showed that a level less than 6 ng per mL (19.1 nmol per L) reliably excludes viable pregnancy, with a negative predictive value of 99%.13 A low progesterone level cannot distinguish intrauterine pregnancy from ectopic pregnancy.13

HEMOGLOBIN

A baseline hemoglobin level should be documented for all women with bleeding during pregnancy. All patients should be instructed to seek care if they have symptoms of anemia or heavy bleeding, quantified as soaking through more than two sanitary pads per hour for two consecutive hours.3

Ultrasonography

The embryologic events of early pregnancy occur in a predictable, stepwise fashion. Deviations from this established pattern should raise suspicion for early pregnancy loss or ectopic pregnancy (Table 2).4,5 Guidelines have been established for ultrasound diagnosis of early pregnancy loss to decrease the risk of false diagnosis and intervention in a desired viable intrauterine pregnancy.

 Enlarge     Print

TABLE 2.

Ultrasound Findings in Normal Early Pregnancy and Early Pregnancy Loss

Ultrasound findingNormal early pregnancySuspicious for early pregnancy loss*Diagnostic of early pregnancy loss

Gestational sac (measured by mean sac diameter)

Appears four to five weeks after last menstrual period

Mean sac diameter of 16 to 24 mm and no embryo Absence of embryo with cardiac activity seven to 13 days after ultrasonography shows gestational sac without yolk sac Small gestational sac relative to size of embryo (< 5 mm difference between mean sac diameter and crown-rump length)

Mean sac diameter ≥ 25 mm and no embryo Absence of embryo with cardiac activity ≥ 2 weeks after ultrasonography shows gestational sac without yolk sac

Yolk sac

Appears 5.5 weeks after last menstrual period

Absence of embryo with cardiac activity seven to 10 days after ultrasonography shows gestational sac and yolk sac Enlarged yolk sac (> 7 mm)

Absence of embryo withcardiac activity ≥ 11 days after ultrasonography shows gestational sac and yolk sac

Embryo (measured by crown-rump length and embryonic cardiac activity)

Appears six weeks after last menstrual period; embryonic cardiac activity appears at 6.5 weeks

Crown-rump length < 7 mm and no embryonic cardiac activity Absence of embryo ≥ 6 weeks after last menstrual period Empty amnion (amnion seen adjacent to yolk sac with no visible embryo) Embryonic heartbeat ≤ 85 beats per minute

Crown-rump length ≥ 7 mm and no embryonic cardiac activity


*—Ultrasonography should be repeated in seven to 10 days to assess viability.

Information from references 4 and 5.

TABLE 2.

Ultrasound Findings in Normal Early Pregnancy and Early Pregnancy Loss

Ultrasound findingNormal early pregnancySuspicious for early pregnancy loss*Diagnostic of early pregnancy loss

Gestational sac (measured by mean sac diameter)

Appears four to five weeks after last menstrual period

Mean sac diameter of 16 to 24 mm and no embryo Absence of embryo with cardiac activity seven to 13 days after ultrasonography shows gestational sac without yolk sac Small gestational sac relative to size of embryo (< 5 mm difference between mean sac diameter and crown-rump length)

Mean sac diameter ≥ 25 mm and no embryo Absence of embryo with cardiac activity ≥ 2 weeks after ultrasonography shows gestational sac without yolk sac

Yolk sac

Appears 5.5 weeks after last menstrual period

Absence of embryo with cardiac activity seven to 10 days after ultrasonography shows gestational sac and yolk sac Enlarged yolk sac (> 7 mm)

Absence of embryo withcardiac activity ≥ 11 days after ultrasonography shows gestational sac and yolk sac

Embryo (measured by crown-rump length and embryonic cardiac activity)

Appears six weeks after last menstrual period; embryonic cardiac activity appears at 6.5 weeks

Crown-rump length < 7 mm and no embryonic cardiac activity Absence of embryo ≥ 6 weeks after last menstrual period Empty amnion (amnion seen adjacent to yolk sac with no visible embryo) Embryonic heartbeat ≤ 85 beats per minute

Crown-rump length ≥ 7 mm and no embryonic cardiac activity


*—Ultrasonography should be repeated in seven to 10 days to assess viability.

Information from references 4 and 5.

DISCRIMINATORY LEVEL

The discriminatory level is the β-hCG level above which an intrauterine pregnancy is expected to be seen on transvaginal ultrasonography.14 When combined with β-hCG levels greater than the discriminatory level, ultrasonography that does not show an intrauterine pregnancy should raise concern for early pregnancy loss or ectopic pregnancy. The discriminatory level varies with the type of ultrasound machine used, the sonographer, and the number of gestations. A recent study found a 99% probability that an intrauterine gestational sac will be detected at a β-hCG level of 3,510 mIU per mL.14 Currently, a discriminatory level of 1,500 to 3,000 mIU per mL is typically used.10,15 However, ultrasonography can be diagnostically useful in symptomatic women at any β-hCG level. Signs of ectopic pregnancy (e.g., adnexal mass, fluid in the cul-de-sac) can be seen on ultrasonography well below the discriminatory level.

Pregnancy of Unknown Location

Pregnancy of unknown location describes the scenario in which a pregnancy test is positive, but neither intrauterine nor ectopic pregnancy is shown on ultrasonography. In stable patients, close monitoring of symptoms, serial quantitative β-hCG testing, and ultrasonography are recommended4 (Figure 2 8,10,14,15). Pregnancy of unknown location can be diagnostically challenging because the increase in β-hCG level can be similar among women with an early viable pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, or early pregnancy loss.10 Because pregnancy of unknown location does not exclude ectopic pregnancy, and because rupture of ectopic pregnancy can occur at any β-hCG level, serial measurements should be obtained until a definitive diagnosis is made or until the level is undetectable.16 Patients should be counseled about warning signs of ectopic pregnancy, including shoulder pain, pelvic pain, and dizziness.

FIGURE 2.

Evaluation of first trimester bleeding in pregnancy of unknown location. (β-hCG = β subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin.)

Adapted with permission from Reproductive Health Access Project. First trimester bleeding algorithm. November 1, 2017. https://www.reproductiveaccess.org/resource/first-trimester-bleeding-algorithm/. Accessed November 10, 2017, with additional information from references 10, 14, and 15.


FIGURE 2.

Evaluation of first trimester bleeding in pregnancy of unknown location. (β-hCG = β subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin.)

Adapted with permission from Reproductive Health Access Project. First trimester bleeding algorithm. November 1, 2017. https://www.reproductiveaccess.org/resource/first-trimester-bleeding-algorithm/. Accessed November 10, 2017, with additional information from references 10, 14, and 15.

Threatened Abortion

The diagnosis of threatened abortion should be made in patients with bleeding and an ultrasound-confirmed viable intrauterine pregnancy. The rate of early pregnancy loss is approximately 11% after a live fetus has been detected on ultrasonography.17 The risk of early pregnancy loss is increased when subchorionic hemorrhage (Figure 36) and bleeding are present. When an intrauterine pregnancy is detected on ultrasonography but viability is uncertain, repeat ultrasonography should be performed in seven to 10 days to confirm viability.3,5 In these cases, a normal increase in the β-hCG level or a normal progesterone level can be reassuring.

FIGURE 3.

Subchorionic hemorrhage (SCH) appears as a sonolucent area adjacent to the gestational sac, which contains an embryo (E) and yolk sac (YS).

Reprinted with permission from Deutchman M, Tubay AT, Turok D. First trimester bleeding. Am Fam Physician . 2009;79(11):989.


FIGURE 3.

Subchorionic hemorrhage (SCH) appears as a sonolucent area adjacent to the gestational sac, which contains an embryo (E) and yolk sac (YS).

Reprinted with permission from Deutchman M, Tubay AT, Turok D. First trimester bleeding. Am Fam Physician . 2009;79(11):989.

Threatened abortion should be managed expectantly. There is insufficient evidence to support the use of progestin for the prevention of early pregnancy loss.3,18 Bed rest does not improve outcomes and may cause psychological harm in patients with subsequent early pregnancy loss.19 Patients should be reassured that nothing they did caused the bleeding.

Early Pregnancy Loss

Expectant management, medical management, and uterine aspiration are safe and effective treatments for early pregnancy loss. Patient satisfaction, mental health outcomes, infection rates, and future fertility are similar between these treatments.2022 Mental health outcomes are better when patients are included in the decision-making process, and shared decision making should guide management.23

EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT

Watchful waiting is recommended as first-line treatment for patients with incomplete abortion; more than 90% of these patients will complete the process spontaneously within four weeks.24 Watchful waiting is less effective in patients with an anembryonic gestation or embryonic demise, with completion rates at one month of 66% and 76%, respectively.24 Patients who choose expectant management over uterine aspiration experience more days of bleeding, longer time to completion, and higher rates of unplanned surgical intervention.20,21 Serious complications are rare, and patients who opt for expectant management should be informed that it is safe to wait as long as they wish as long as there are no signs of infection or hemorrhage. Patients may switch to medical management or uterine aspiration at any time.

MEDICAL MANAGEMENT

A Cochrane review found that medical management with misoprostol (Cytotec) in women with incomplete abortion does not improve rates of completed abortion or decrease the need for unplanned surgical procedures compared with expectant management.22 In contrast, medical management is more effective than expectant management for the treatment of anembryonic gestation or embryonic demise.25 The most effective regimen for medical management is 200 mg of oral mifepristone (Mifeprex) followed 24 hours later by 800 mcg of vaginally administered misoprostol.26 Success rates at two days with this regimen are 84% vs. 67% in those treated with misoprostol alone. Many regimens for using misoprostol alone have been studied, and none has been proven optimal.22 One common regimen is 800 mcg vaginally, with a repeat dose in 24 to 48 hours if the first dose is unsuccessful.27 Besides the expected cramping and vaginal bleeding, common adverse effects include nausea and diarrhea.22

UTERINE ASPIRATION

Uterine aspiration is the preferred procedure for surgical management of early pregnancy loss. Compared with sharp curettage, vacuum aspiration is associated with decreased pain, shorter procedure duration, and less blood loss.28 Office-based uterine aspiration is safe, less expensive, and often more convenient than treatment in the operating room.29,30 Choices about analgesia during the aspiration procedure should be made with the patient's input.

FOLLOW-UP

Completed early pregnancy loss should be confirmed by one of the following: visualization of products of conception on examination or after uterine aspiration; ultrasonography showing the absence of an intrauterine pregnancy after previous ultrasonography documenting an intrauterine pregnancy; or a decrease in β-hCG levels by at least 50% at two days or 87% at seven days.31 Once completion is confirmed, the β-hCG level does not need to be followed to zero, except in women with pregnancy of unknown location, or if gestational trophoblastic disease is being considered because of abnormal uterine bleeding or symptoms of malignancy.32

Patients who wish to use contraception after early pregnancy loss can start immediately. All women who may conceive should be counseled to take folic acid. It is safe to try to conceive again immediately; those who attempt to conceive within the first three months after early pregnancy loss have higher rates of pregnancy and live birth compared with those who wait longer.33,34 Although a Cochrane review found insufficient evidence that psychological support after pregnancy loss improves well-being, the decision to refer for counseling should be made on an individual basis.35

Ectopic Pregnancy

The incidence of ectopic pregnancy is 1% to 2% in the United States.36 Ruptured ectopic pregnancies account for 6% of all maternal deaths, with a higher rate in black patients.36 Risk factors include pelvic inflammatory disease, previous tubal surgery, previous ectopic pregnancy, and in utero exposure to diethylstilbestrol.37  Criteria for surgical, medical, or expectant management are described in Table 3.6,15,38,39

 Enlarge     Print

TABLE 3.

Criteria for Management of Ectopic Pregnancy

Expectant management

β-hCG level < 1,000 mIU per mL and decreasing

Ectopic or adnexal mass < 3 cm or not detected

Minimal pain or bleeding

No embryonic cardiac activity

No evidence of tubal rupture

Patient reliable for follow-up and has no barriers to accessing health care

Medical management with methotrexate

Absence of embryonic cardiac activity

β-hCG level < 2,000 mIU per mL

Ectopic mass ≤ 3.5 cm

No medical contraindication (hematologic dysfunction; liver, kidney, or pulmonary disease; immunodeficiency; peptic ulcer disease; breastfeeding; sensitivity to methotrexate; alcohol abuse)

Patient reliable for follow-up and has no barriers to accessing health care

Stable vital signs and few symptoms

Unruptured ectopic pregnancy

Surgical management

Advanced ectopic pregnancy (high β-hCG level, large mass, embryonic cardiac activity)

Contraindications to observation or methotrexate

Patient unreliable for follow-up or has barriers to accessing health care (individualization of intervention)

Uncertain diagnosis

Unstable vital signs or signs of hemoperitoneum


β-hCG = β subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin.

Information from references 6, 15, 38, and 39.

TABLE 3.

Criteria for Management of Ectopic Pregnancy

Expectant management

β-hCG level < 1,000 mIU per mL and decreasing

Ectopic or adnexal mass < 3 cm or not detected

Minimal pain or bleeding

No embryonic cardiac activity

No evidence of tubal rupture

Patient reliable for follow-up and has no barriers to accessing health care

Medical management with methotrexate

Absence of embryonic cardiac activity

β-hCG level < 2,000 mIU per mL

Ectopic mass ≤ 3.5 cm

No medical contraindication (hematologic dysfunction; liver, kidney, or pulmonary disease; immunodeficiency; peptic ulcer disease; breastfeeding; sensitivity to methotrexate; alcohol abuse)

Patient reliable for follow-up and has no barriers to accessing health care

Stable vital signs and few symptoms

Unruptured ectopic pregnancy

Surgical management

Advanced ectopic pregnancy (high β-hCG level, large mass, embryonic cardiac activity)

Contraindications to observation or methotrexate

Patient unreliable for follow-up or has barriers to accessing health care (individualization of intervention)

Uncertain diagnosis

Unstable vital signs or signs of hemoperitoneum


β-hCG = β subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin.

Information from references 6, 15, 38, and 39.

SURGICAL MANAGEMENT

Surgical management is indicated for patients with contraindications to medical treatment or failed medical treatment, and for patients who are hemodynamically unstable. Ruptured ectopic pregnancy is associated with peritoneal signs and requires emergency surgery, although most patients present with bleeding or pain before rupture.39

Surgical treatment options include salpingectomy or salpingostomy, which are appropriate if the location of the pregnancy is the fallopian tube, but not if there is a less common location. Salpingostomy is preferred for patients who wish to preserve fertility; however, it may result in inadequate evacuation of products of conception and a recurrence of symptoms. Laparoscopy is the preferred surgical approach. Laparotomy is reserved for patients who are hemodynamically unstable. A Cochrane review found no difference in success rates between laparoscopic salpingostomy and medical treatment with systemic methotrexate, as well as no differences in tubal patency or subsequent fertility rates.40

MEDICAL MANAGEMENT

Medical management is safe and effective in carefully selected patients. There are different treatment protocols, but the single-dose regimen is most common.15 This includes an intramuscular injection of 50 mg of methotrexate per m2, followed by close monitoring of symptoms and measurement of β-hCG levels four and seven days after injection. β-hCG levels should decrease by at least 15% from days 4 to 7; once this occurs, levels should be monitored weekly until undetectable, which may take five to seven weeks. Treatment failure is assumed if the β-hCG level plateaus or increases from days 4 to 7. In this case, a repeat dose of methotrexate may be given, although surgery may be required if the patient is symptomatic.

EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT

Patients undergoing expectant management must receive extensive counseling on the risk of tubal rupture and the importance of close surveillance. β-hCG levels should be obtained every 48 hours to confirm that they are decreasing, then weekly until they reach zero. No specific range of decrease is considered normal as long as the patient is asymptomatic and the decrease continues.39 Surgical management is indicated if the patient experiences increased abdominal pain or if β-hCG levels increase.38

FOLLOW-UP

Patients with previous ectopic pregnancy have higher rates of ectopic pregnancy and early pregnancy loss in subsequent pregnancies. However, those who have a viable intrauterine pregnancy after an ectopic pregnancy have similar reproductive outcomes compared with patients who have not had a previous ectopic pregnancy.41 β-hCG levels in patients with ectopic pregnancy should be followed to zero, after which no further workup is indicated.15

This article updates a previous article on this topic by Deutchman, et al.6

Data Sources: An evidence summary generated from Essential Evidence Plus was reviewed and relevant studies referenced. Additionally, a PubMed search was completed in Clinical Queries using the following key terms: first trimester bleeding, threatened abortion, miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, and discriminatory zone. The search included meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, guidelines, and reviews. Also searched were the Cochrane database, the Agency for Health-care Research and Quality, DynaMed, and the National Guideline Clearinghouse. Search dates: August 3, 2017, to October 21, 2018.

The Authors

show all author info

ERIN HENDRIKS, MD, is a clinical assistant professor in the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor....

HONOR MACNAUGHTON, MD, is an associate professor in the Department of Family Medicine at Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass.

MARICELA CASTILLO MACKENZIE, MD, is a clinical assistant professor in the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Michigan Medical School.

Address correspondence to Erin Hendriks, MD, at ehendrik@med.umich.edu. Reprints are not available from the authors.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations.

References

show all references

1. Everett C. Incidence and outcome of bleeding before the 20th week of pregnancy: prospective study from general practice. BMJ. 1997;315(7099):32–34....

2. Hasan R, Baird DD, Herring AH, Olshan AF, Jonsson Funk ML, Hartmann KE. Association between first-trimester vaginal bleeding and miscarriage. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(4):860–867.

3. Committee on Practice Bulletins–Gynecology. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists practice bulletin no. 150. Early pregnancy loss. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(5):1258–1267.

4. Rodgers SK, Chang C, DeBardeleben JT, Horrow MM. Normal and abnormal US findings in early first-trimester pregnancy: review of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound 2012 consensus panel recommendations. Radiographics. 2015;35(7):2135–2148.

5. Doubilet PM, Benson CB, Bourne T, et al.; Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Multispecialty Panel on Early First Trimester Diagnosis of Miscarriage and Exclusion of a Viable Intrauterine Pregnancy. Diagnostic criteria for nonviable pregnancy early in the first trimester. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(15):1443–1451.

6. Deutchman M, Tubay AT, Turok D. First trimester bleeding. Am Fam Physician. 2009;79(11):985–994.

7. Johns J, Jauniaux E. Threatened miscarriage as a predictor of obstetric outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(4):845–850.

8. Reproductive Health Access Project. First trimester bleeding algorithm. November 1, 2017. https://www.reproductiveaccess.org/resource/first-trimester-bleeding-algorithm/. Accessed November 10, 2017.

9. Stewart BK, Nazar-Stewart V, Toivola B. Biochemical discrimination of pathologic pregnancy from early, normal intrauterine gestation in symptomatic patients. Am J Clin Pathol. 1995;103(4):386–390.

10. Barnhart KT, Guo W, Cary MS, et al. Differences in serum human chorionic gonadotropin rise in early pregnancy by race and value at presentation. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(3):504–511.

11. Barnhart KT, Sammel MD, Rinaudo PF, Zhou L, Hummel AC, Guo W. Symptomatic patients with an early viable intrauterine pregnancy: HCG curves redefined. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(1):50–55.

12. Committee on Practice Bulletins–Obstetrics. Practice bulletin no. 181: prevention of Rh D alloimmunization. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(2):e57–e70.

13. Verhaegen J, Gallos ID, van Mello NM, et al. Accuracy of single progesterone test to predict early pregnancy outcome in women with pain or bleeding: meta-analysis of cohort studies. BMJ. 2012;345:e6077.

14. Connolly A, Ryan DH, Stuebe AM, Wolfe HM. Reevaluation of discriminatory and threshold levels for serum β-hCG in early pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(1):65–70.

15. Barnhart KT. Clinical practice. Ectopic pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(4):379–387.

16. ACOG practice bulletin no. 193: tubal ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(3):e91–e103.

17. Poulose T, Richardson R, Ewings P, Fox R. Probability of early pregnancy loss in women with vaginal bleeding and a singleton live fetus at ultra-sound scan. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;26(8):782–784.

18. Wahabi HA, Fayed AA, Esmaeil SA, Al Zeidan RA. Progestogen for treating threatened miscarriage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(12):CD005943.

19. McCall CA, Grimes DA, Lyerly AD. “Therapeutic” bed rest in pregnancy: unethical and unsupported by data. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(6):1305–1308.

20. Nanda K, Lopez LM, Grimes DA, Peloggia A, Nanda G. Expectant care versus surgical treatment for miscarriage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(3):CD003518.

21. Trinder J, Brocklehurst P, Porter R, Read M, Vyas S, Smith L. Management of miscarriage: expectant, medical, or surgical? Results of randomised controlled trial (miscarriage treatment (MIST) trial). BMJ. 2006;332(7552):1235–1240.

22. Kim C, Barnard S, Neilson JP, Hickey M, Vazquez JC, Dou L. Medical treatments for incomplete miscarriage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;(1):CD007223.

23. Wieringa-De Waard M, Hartman EE, Ankum WM, Reitsma JB, Bindels PJ, Bonsel GJ. Expectant management versus surgical evacuation in first trimester miscarriage: health-related quality of life in randomized and non-randomized patients. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(6):1638–1642.

24. Luise C, Jermy K, May C, Costello G, Collins WP, Bourne TH. Outcome of expectant management of spontaneous first trimester miscarriage: observational study. BMJ. 2002;324(7342):873–875.

25. Neilson JP, Hickey M, Vazquez J. Medical treatment for early fetal death (less than 24 weeks). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(3):CD002253.

26. Schreiber CA, Creinin MD, Atrio J, Sonalkar S, Ratcliffe SJ, Barnhart KT. Mifepristone pretreatment for the medical management of early pregnancy loss. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(23):2161–2170.

27. Zhang J, Gilles JM, Barnhart K, Creinin MD, Westhoff C, Frederick MM; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Management of Early Pregnancy Failure Trial. A comparison of medical management with misoprostol and surgical management for early pregnancy failure. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(8):761–769.

28. Tunçalp O, Gülmezoglu AM, Souza JP. Surgical procedures for evacuating incomplete miscarriage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(9):CD001993.

29. Westfall JM, Sophocles A, Burggraf H, Ellis S. Manual vacuum aspiration for first-trimester abortion. Arch Fam Med. 1998;7(6):559–562.

30. Blumenthal PD, Remsburg RE. A time and cost analysis of the management of incomplete abortion with manual vacuum aspiration. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1994;45(3):261–267.

31. Butts SF, Guo W, Cary MS, et al. Predicting the decline in human chorionic gonadotropin in a resolving pregnancy of unknown location. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(2 pt 1):337–343.

32. Soper J, Mutch D, Schink J, et al.; Committee on Practice Bulletins–Gynecology, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin no. 53. Diagnosis and treatment of gestational trophoblastic disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(6):1365–1377.

33. Schliep KC, Mitchell EM, Mumford SL, et al. Trying to conceive after an early pregnancy loss: an assessment on how long couples should wait. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(2):204–212.

34. Sundermann AC, Hartmann KE, Jones SH, Torstenson ES, Velez Edwards DR. Interpregnancy interval after pregnancy loss and risk of repeat miscarriage. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(6):1312–1318.

35. Murphy FA, Lipp A, Powles DL. Follow-up for improving psychological well being for women after a miscarriage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(3):CD008679.

36. Creanga AA, Shapiro-Mendoza CK, Bish CL, Zane S, Berg CJ, Callaghan WM. Trends in ectopic pregnancy mortality in the United States: 1980–2007. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(4):837–843.

37. Ankum WM, Mol BW, Van der Veen F, Bossuyt PM. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 1996;65(6):1093–1099.

38. Craig LB, Khan S. Expectant management of ectopic pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;55(2):461–470.

39. Barash JH, Buchanan EM, Hillson C. Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy. Am Fam Physician. 2014;90(1):34–40.

40. Hajenius PJ, Mol F, Mol BW, Bossuyt PM, Ankum WM, van der Veen F. Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(1):CD000324.

41. Madhra M, Otify M, Horne AW. Ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med. 2017;27(8):245–250.

 

 

Copyright © 2019 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions


More in AFP


Editor's Collections


Related Content


More in Pubmed

MOST RECENT ISSUE


Nov 15, 2020

Access the latest issue of American Family Physician

Read the Issue


Email Alerts

Don't miss a single issue. Sign up for the free AFP email table of contents.

Sign Up Now

Navigate this Article