Obsessed with coding, or patient care?
Fam Pract Manag. 1998 Jun;5(6):11.
To the Editor:
In Dr. Carole Guillaume's article “Coding and Documentation Made Easier” (April 1998), she correctly writes that, in spite of level 4 (or even 5) history taking and decision making, the ultimate code for a new patient visit is dictated by the lowest level of the three patient-visit components: history, physical exam and decision making. Because most family physicians will neither perform nor document the mandated 18 elements of the physical exam to qualify for a comprehensive visit, the new patient office visit will rarely, if ever, qualify as anything more than a 99203. In the case described by Dr. Guillaume, the ultimate coding level was 99202!
In essence, family physicians are penalized for focusing their energies on key components of the patient's history or aspects of decision making, rather than simply going through the motions of performing (and documenting) elements of the physical examination that are not relevant to the patient's care!
What do patients complain about more: “My doctor never listens to me” or “My doctor forgot to palpate my apical pulse”?
It is time for all physicians to join ranks in combating stupidity on the part of those who would force us to shift our focus from the care of patients to an obsession with coding, as well-outlined in Dr. Guillaume's tear-out coding reference. If I were teaching residents again, I would encourage them to throw away their coding references and spend more time listening to and thinking about their many interesting patients — and documenting their findings.
WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU
Send your comments to email@example.com. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting AAFP permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. We cannot respond to all letters we receive. Those chosen for publication will be edited for length and style.
Copyright © 1998 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact firstname.lastname@example.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions
More in FPM
Related Topic Searches
MOST RECENT ISSUE
Access the latest issue
of FPM journal
The Adolescent Health Consortium Project has clarified clinical preventive service recommendations for adolescents and young adults.
Here's how to succeed in the four performance categories of the Merit-based Incentive Payment System.