Coding Level-IV Visits Without Fear
Use this worksheet to quickly assess whether you can code a 99214.
Fam Pract Manag. 2006 Feb;13(2):34-38.
Colleagues frequently tell me that they want to code more level-IV established patient (99214) visits. They have a notion that they are seeing many patients whose visits and documentation would qualify for that level of charge. However, they end up undercoding to 99213 (level III) to be safe because they are unsure of the exact requirements and fear being audited. This is unfortunate because proper coding could potentially reap an extra $20,000 per year, assuming a physician's daily schedule includes at least 20 visits and at least two of those visits could be coded at level IV instead of level III, resulting in an additional $100 per day or $500 per week.
Often, physicians are seeing patients whose visits would qualify. By documenting correctly, they would simply be getting paid more for the work they are already doing.
Documenting a level-IV established patient visit is not terribly difficult. It only requires a few extra items as compared to a level-III visit. The worksheet was designed to assist with level-IV coding. It will help you quickly assess whether your current patient encounter has what it takes and will clarify what needs to be included in your documentation. You may want to refer to it as you read further about how to use the worksheet, which is based on Medicare's 1995 Documentation Guidelines for Evaluation and Management Services.
ESTABLISHED PATIENT LEVEL-IV (99214) WORKSHEET
Click below to download this worksheet, which also includes level-IV established patient examples.
Three key components
Any evaluation and management (E/M) service has three key components: history, exam and medical decision making. For an established patient visit, two of the three components must meet specific criteria when you're performing documentation-based billing. The criteria for an established patient level-IV visit are summarized on the worksheet and explained below.
History. The history component is fairly straightforward. Start the note with a chief complaint. Then add an extended history of present illness (HPI) that includes four or more descriptive elements (location, quality, severity, duration, timing, context, modifying factors or associated symptoms) about the chief complaint. Do not forget that only four are required. If you want or need to add more, please do so.
Next, a pertinent past, family and social history needs to be noted. This involves documenting at least one specific item from any of the three history areas. A classic example is “non-smoker.” That's one powerful notation that fulfills your history requirement.
Finally, document an extended review of systems by noting two to nine systems that are associated in some way with the chief complaint.
In most cases, the criteria for this section will be the easiest to fulfill. This is considered a detailed history, and once it is attained, you only need one of the next two components to meet the necessary criteria for an established patient level-IV visit.
Exam. The note's exam portion is a little more challenging because you might not have the time or the need to perform a detailed exam in a short visit or with a straightforward complaint. To meet the criteria here, five to seven body areas or other symptomatic-related organ systems must be examined and documented. The body areas include the head, neck, chest, abdomen, genitalia, back and each extremity. The organ systems include constitutional (e.g., vital signs), eyes, ENT (ears, nose, throat), cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, musculoskeletal, skin, neurologic, psychiatric and hematologic. Remember, a notation indicating “negative” or “normal” is sufficient to document normal findings.
Medical decision making. This component is often the deciding factor as to whether your visit reaches level-IV status. It is divided into three sections – diagnosis, data and risk – that are used to determine the complexity of the patient encounter. To qualify for a level-IV charge, only two of the three sections must meet specific criteria. The diagnosis and data sections can be simplified with a point-scoring system.
The diagnosis section deals with the number of possible diagnoses or the management options that must be considered. A point system can be applied to this section with 3 points needed to meet the 99214 criteria. Basically, if your patient has a new, previously undiagnosed problem, you have met the criteria for this component. If you plan to obtain additional work-up (e.g., blood work or an X-ray), you earn 4 points. If no additional work-up is planned, you earn 3 points.
If you are dealing with an established, previously diagnosed problem, decision making will be less complex, and the patient will have to have more than one problem to meet the level-IV criteria. An established problem that has worsened earns 2 points. An established problem that is stable earns only 1 point. In this case, you could add up three stable problems or have one stable and one worsening problem and score 3 points for the diagnosis section.
The data section deals with the amount and complexity of data to be ordered or reviewed. Like the diagnosis section, the data section requires 3 points to qualify for a level-IV code. The easiest way to achieve 3 points here is to order an X-ray, ECG or blood work, and to independently review the results yourself at the time of the E/M encounter. Ordering the test earns 1 point, and personally reviewing the results earns 2 points.
Another way to earn 3 points is ordering or reviewing multiple tests. Ordering clinical lab tests (e.g., blood work), radiologic tests (e.g., X-ray) and procedural tests (e.g., stress tests or pulmonary-function testing) all earn 1 point each.
Finally, you can earn 2 points for both review and summarization of old records and discussion of the case with another health care provider. Combine that with ordering any testing, and 3 points are achieved.
The risk section is based on the overall risk associated with the presenting problems, diagnostic procedures and management options. The highest level of risk in any one of these three categories determines the overall risk. Therefore, the worksheet focuses only on the presenting problem, as it is often the easiest to quickly identify if the patient encounter is of moderate risk, which is required for a level-IV code.
For the presenting problem to be of moderate risk, your patient needs to have one chronic illness with mild exacerbation, two or more stable chronic illnesses, an undiagnosed new problem with uncertain prognosis (e.g., lump in breast or chest pain), an acute illness with systemic symptoms (e.g., pyelonephritis) or an acute complicated injury (e.g., head injury with loss of consciousness).
The other two categories of risk usually follow suit with the presenting problem. Moderate risk diagnostic procedures (e.g., cardiac stress testing, endoscopy, deep needle biopsy, cardiac catheterization, lumbar puncture or thoracentesis) and management decisions (e.g., minor surgery, prescription drug management, IV fluids or closed fracture treatment) would usually be ordered or performed on patients with one of the qualifying presenting problems listed above.
Another way to qualify for a level-IV code is time-based billing. Often those quick acute illness visits turn into much longer visits than anticipated due to patient needs. If you spend at least 25 minutes with the patient and more than half of that time was spent in counseling, then you have qualified for a level-IV charge. Document as appropriate, but you do not have to concern yourself with as much detail. Just be sure that at the end of your visit documentation you describe the content of your counseling or care coordination and report the total visit time and counseling time (e.g., “total visit time was 25 minutes, half of which was spent counseling the patient and coordinating care”).
On the back of the worksheet, you will find six documented cases of level-IV established patient visits. At the top of each one, the two key qualifying components are noted in parentheses. As you can see, it is not the length of the documentation that is important. (Be aware that most of the notes fulfill minimum requirements only.)
These days, undercoding is not financially viable. You may have incorrectly coded in the past due to lack of knowledge, or even out of fear. In the future, strive to be properly compensated for the complex work that you perform every day, and use this worksheet to help you code established patient level-IV visits with confidence.
Copyright © 2006 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact firstname.lastname@example.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions
More in FPM
Related Topic Searches
MOST RECENT ISSUE
Access the latest issue
of FPM journal
Maternal Immunization Task Force for Pregnant Women: A Call to Action
The current increase in hesitancy about the safety and efficacy of vaccines has created an environment that calls for physicians’ urgent commitment to discussing the evidence-based benefits of vaccination with pregnant women.
Keys to High-Quality, Low-Cost Care: Empanelment, Attribution, and Risk Stratiﬁcation
Understand attribution and alignment methodologies in value-based payment arrangements to know which patients are assigned to you. Use empanelment and risk stratification to better understand where to expend your practice's care management and care coordination resources.