brand logo

Am Fam Physician. 2021;103(1):55-56

Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations.

Computed tomography (CT) colonography, or virtual colonoscopy, was developed in the mid-1990s and approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for colorectal cancer screening in 2006.1 Patient preparation for the study typically includes using a bowel cathartic. Following ingestion of oral contrast, insufflation of gas via the rectum, and CT of the abdomen, specialized computer software reconstructs the images to create a two- or three-dimensional image of the colon.

TestIndicationPopulationCost*
CT colonographyScreening for colorectal cancerAdults 50 to 75 years of age$610

Accuracy

Studies of CT colonography have reported a wide range of sensitivities and specificities, possibly because of differences in study design, protocols for reading imaging or test results, radiologist experience, bowel preparation, or fecal tagging (ingestion of oral contrast).

In a meta-analysis including 11,151 patients, the sensitivity of CT colonography for the detection of colorectal cancer was 96.1% (95% CI, 93.8% to 97.7%), which is similar to optical colonoscopy.2 CT colonography is less accurate for detecting polyps. In a subsequent meta-analysis, the sensitivity of CT colonography for the detection of polyps 6 mm or larger was 73% to 98%; specificity ranged from 79.6% to 93.1%.3

Accuracy of CT colonography depends on the experience of the radiologist. To perform and interpret the test, radiologists must have specific initial training that includes at least 50 cases, as well as ongoing certification.1 Overall, improvements to CT colonography over the past two decades have yielded performance similar to optical colonoscopy.1

Reporting of CT colonography results has been standardized by use of the CT Colonography Reporting and Data System (C-RADS): C0 = technically inadequate, C1 = absence of polyps larger than 5 mm, C2 = one or two small polyps (6 mm to 9 mm), C3 = large polyps (10 mm or larger), and C4 = mass lesions (3 cm or larger).

A higher C-RADS category translates to higher risk of advanced neoplasia. Among patients with C2 findings, 5.8% had advanced neoplasia on optical colonoscopy, compared with 67.1% and 79.4% of patients with C3 or C4 findings, respectively.4

Benefit

CT colonography offers important advantages over optical colonoscopy. As with stool testing, CT colonography has essentially no risk of bleeding or perforation, does not require sedation, and does not require interruption of therapeutic anticoagulation. CT colonography takes about 15 minutes to perform and offers more detailed findings (e.g., size, volume, location, and number of polyps) than stool tests, which are only positive or negative.

A potential benefit of CT colonography is visualization of extracolonic structures, providing potentially useful information, such as detection of abdominal aortic aneurysm, osteoporosis, and noncolorectal malignancy. There are no long-term studies of colorectal cancer–specific mortality and all-cause mortality in patients receiving CT colonography compared with other screening methods.

All major cancer prevention, gastroenterologic, and radiologic societies in North America support the use of CT colonography to screen for colorectal cancer.1 In 2016, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force added CT colonography every five years as an option for colorectal cancer screening in adults 50 to 75 years of age.5 However, it is not recommended for colorectal cancer screening by the American Academy of Family Physicians or guideline panels in any other countries.6,7

Harms

Although the CT colonography procedure itself is safer than optical colonoscopy, important questions exist regarding unintended consequences of extracolonic imaging. Between 5% and 37% of CT colonography examinations identify extracolonic findings that necessitate further diagnostic follow-up.3 This can lead to overdiagnosis and overtreatment of potentially benign and unrelated conditions.

In a study of 52 patients and 50 health care professionals in the United Kingdom, participants were asked to complete a choice experiment to determine tolerability of needing follow-up radiography after a hypothetical false-positive CT colonography. Patients and health care professionals were willing to accept CT colonography false-positive rates of greater than 99.8% and greater than 40%, respectively, in exchange for detection of an additional extracolonic malignancy.8 This suggests that the actual specificity will be acceptable to patients and health care professionals.

Already a member/subscriber?  Log In

Subscribe

From $145
  • Immediate, unlimited access to all AFP content
  • More than 130 CME credits/year
  • AAFP app access
  • Print delivery available
Subscribe

Issue Access

$59.95
  • Immediate, unlimited access to this issue's content
  • CME credits
  • AAFP app access
  • Print delivery available

Article Only

$25.95
  • Immediate, unlimited access to just this article
  • CME credits
  • AAFP app access
  • Print delivery available
Purchase Access:  Learn More

Continue Reading

More in AFP

More in Pubmed

Copyright © 2021 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP.  See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.