Am Fam Physician. 2023;107(2):133-134
Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.
Which strategies for using topical corticosteroids in the treatment of eczema increase effectiveness and avoid adverse effects?
High- and medium-potency topical corticosteroids increase treatment success compared with low-potency topical corticosteroids, but there is no difference in effectiveness between high- and medium-potency topical corticosteroids. (Strength of Recommendation [SOR]: C, limited-quality disease-oriented evidence.) Application of topical corticosteroids once daily is probably as effective as twice daily. Weekend therapy (i.e., application on two consecutive days per week) likely prevents eczema relapses without an increased risk of adverse effects.1 (SOR: B, inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence.)
Eczema, also known as atopic dermatitis, is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that is common worldwide and has a significant impact on quality of life. It affects up to 20% of children and 5% of adults.1 Topical corticosteroids are the most commonly prescribed treatment, and prescribing patterns vary widely in the United States.2 The authors of this review sought to identify the most effective strategies for topical corticosteroid use to treat eczema in adults and children, including different potencies, frequencies, and techniques of application. They also identified potential adverse effects.
The Cochrane review included 104 randomized controlled trials and 8,443 participants in several separate meta-analyses.1 Most were conducted in high-income countries over a short period, ranging from one to six weeks. Primary outcomes were clinician-assessed improvement in signs of eczema using scaled instruments and clinician-reported local adverse effects (mainly thinning of the skin). Secondary outcomes were patient-reported symptoms and systemic adverse effects (i.e., abnormal cortisol levels).
Although several validated instruments for grading eczema severity are available, 62 trials reported the primary outcome using investigator global assessment scores on a 4-, 5-, or 6-point scale of eczema severity, with lower numbers indicating milder disease.1 To compare the effectiveness of different topical corticosteroid strategies, the authors pooled data from studies that used investigator global assessment scales and created a dichotomous outcome of treatment success (i.e., cleared or markedly improved by investigator global assessment) vs. not successful (i.e., all other categories). Examples of topical corticosteroids used in the studies included hydrocortisone 0.5% to 2.5% cream/ointment (low potency), desonide (Desowen) 0.05% to 0.1% cream/ointment (medium potency), triamcinolone 0.1% cream/ointment (high potency), and clobetasol 0.05% cream/ointment (very high potency).
Medium-potency topical corticosteroids were more effective than low-potency corticosteroids (four trials; n = 420; number needed to treat [NNT] = 6; 95% CI, 4 to 12). No adverse effects were reported in either group. High-potency topical corticosteroids were more effective than low-potency corticosteroids (nine trials; n = 392; NNT = 3; 95% CI, 2.4 to 5.7). A comparison of high-potency and medium-potency topical corticosteroids showed no significant difference in treatment success (15 trials; n = 1,053; odds ratio [OR] = 1.33; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.89). A comparison of very high-potency and high-potency topical corticosteroids showed no significant difference (three trials; n = 216; OR = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.13 to 2.09). When reported, low-certainty evidence demonstrated that the rates of local and systemic adverse effects were low across all comparison groups. For the secondary outcome of patient-reported symptoms, there were few data for meta-analysis; few studies reported this outcome, but data generally favored high- and medium-potency topical corticosteroids over low-potency topical corticosteroids.
In trials that compared the frequency of topical corticosteroid use, there was no significant difference between a twice-daily and once-daily application for clinician-reported investigator global assessment (15 trials; n = 1,821; OR = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.38) and patient-reported symptoms (two trials; n = 300; OR = 1.91; 95% CI, 0.62 to 5.83). The authors compared weekend therapy (i.e., treatment over two consecutive days each week) with no topical corticosteroid use or a reactive application when a flare-up was present for the prevention of eczema relapses following a two- to four-week stabilization phase. Clinician-reported data showed a lower risk of relapse with weekend therapy (seven trials; n = 1,149; NNT = 3; 95% CI, 2.6 to 4.0). Patient-reported data showed better response to weekend therapy (one trial; n = 343; NNT = 2.5; 95% CI, 1.6 to 4.4). No adverse effects were reported in the trials analyzing weekend therapy.
- Immediate, unlimited access to all AFP content
- More than 130 CME credits/year
- AAFP app access
- Print delivery available
- Immediate, unlimited access to this issue's content
- CME credits
- AAFP app access
- Print delivery available