brand logo

Am Fam Physician. 2023;107(5):539-540

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

Clinical Question

What is the most effective medical therapy for preventing postpartum hemorrhage after vaginal delivery?

Evidence-Based Answer

Oxytocin plus misoprostol is more effective than oxytocin alone in reducing postpartum hemorrhage after vaginal delivery. (Strength of Recommendation [SOR]: A, network meta-analysis of a randomized controlled trial [RCT] and subsequent large RCT.) However, this combination causes more nausea and vomiting than oxytocin alone. Tranexamic acid plus oxytocin does not significantly reduce the rate of postpartum hemorrhage compared with oxytocin alone. (SOR: B, large RCT.) Overall, oxytocin is the medication of choice for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage because of the balance of high effectiveness and low incidence of adverse effects. (SOR: C, expert opinion.)

Evidence Summary

A systematic review and network meta-analysis involving 137 RCTs (many multinational) and 87,466 women examined uterotonic medications for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage and ranked their effectiveness.1 Trials examined oxytocin, ergometrine (not available in the United States; similar to methylergonovine), misoprostol, and carbetocin (not available in the United States; similar to oxytocin) as single agents and the combinations of oxytocin plus misoprostol and oxytocin plus ergometrine. Patients delivered by vaginal birth or cesarean section. The medication was administered prophylactically by a systemic route: sublingually, subcutaneously, intramuscularly, rectally, orally, via intravenous bolus, or intravenous infusion; the timing of administration varied. These interventions were compared with other uterotonics, placebo, or no treatment. Two medication combinations—misoprostol plus oxytocin and ergometrine plus oxytocin—were more effective than standard oxytocin but had higher rates of nausea and vomiting (Table 1).1 A subanalysis of data from vaginal deliveries only (85 trials, N not provided) yielded similar reductions in hemorrhages of 500 mL or greater compared with oxytocin alone (relative risk [RR] of oxytocin plus misoprostol = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.99; and RR of oxytocin plus ergometrine = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.84). Most trials (71%) had a high risk or unclear risk of bias.

Relative risk of specified outcome (95% CI)

MedicationsBlood loss ≥ 500 mL*Need for transfusionNauseaVomiting
Misoprostol plus oxytocin0.73 (0.60 to 0.90)0.56 (0.40 to 0.80)2.07 (1.12 to 3.82)2.16 (1.37 to 3.39)
Ergometrine plus oxytocin0.69 (0.57 to 0.83)0.81 (0.61 to 1.09)2.27 (1.52 to 3.38)3.10 (2.11 to 4.56)
Carbetocin0.72 (0.52 to 1.00)0.64 (0.33 to 1.25)0.94 (0.61 to 1.44)0.89 (0.55 to 1.42)

A subsequent multicenter randomized trial in England compared the effectiveness of intramuscular oxytocin, carbetocin, and Syntometrine (a fixed combination of oxytocin and ergometrine) in the prevention of primary postpartum hemorrhage after vaginal delivery.2 Researchers enrolled 5,929 normotensive pregnant women older than 18 years who were beyond 24 weeks' gestation with a singleton pregnancy and were in early labor from six maternity units across England. Patients were randomized to 10 IU of oxytocin, 100 mcg of carbetocin, or 5 IU per 500 mcg of Syntometrine, all administered intramuscularly after placental expulsion. Patients receiving Syntometrine were significantly less likely to need additional uterotonics than patients given oxytocin (odds ratio [OR] = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.65 to0.91; P =.002) or carbetocin (OR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.93; P = .004). The difference in hemorrhage between oxytocin and carbetocin was not statistically significant (19.5% vs. 19.1%; P = .78). Syntometrine, compared with carbetocin and oxytocin, resulted in more nausea (24%, 8%, and 8.9%, respectively), vomiting (17.6%, 4.8%, and 4.9%, respectively), hypertension (12.3%, 7.0%, and 7.1%, respectively), and trouble with infant bonding due to symptoms (8.4%, 2.9%, and 4.4%, respectively; P < .001 for all pairwise comparisons of Syntometrine with oxytocin and carbetocin).

A double-blind noninferiority RCT (n = 29,645) conducted across 23 sites in 10 countries compared the effectiveness of carbetocin vs. oxytocin in preventing postpartum hemorrhage.3 Researchers randomized patients to receive carbetocin, 100 mcg intramuscularly, or oxytocin, 10 IU intramuscularly, immediately after delivery of the infant. The two primary outcomes were the rate of blood loss of at least 500 mL or the need for additional uterotonic agents and a rate of blood loss of at least 1,000 mL. Patients who received carbetocin had a rate of postpartum hemorrhage of at least 500 mL or a need for uterotonics similar to those who received oxytocin (14.5% vs. 14.4%; RR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.06). The rates of postpartum hemorrhage of at least 1,000 mL were also similar (1.51% for carbetocin vs. 1.45% for oxytocin; RR = 1.04; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.25).

A recent RCT from France randomized 4,079 women delivering at 35 weeks' gestation or later to 1 g of intravenous tranexamic acid infusion over two minutes or placebo infusion in addition to a standard oxytocin injection upon delivery of the infant's anterior shoulder.4 The primary outcome was a postpartum hemorrhage of 500 mL or greater, measured in a collection bag. Among the 3,891 patients who delivered vaginally, the rate of postpartum hemorrhage was similar between the two groups (8.1% for tranexamic acid vs. 9.8% for placebo; RR = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.01; P = .07).

Already a member/subscriber?  Log In

Subscribe

From $145
  • Immediate, unlimited access to all AFP content
  • More than 130 CME credits/year
  • AAFP app access
  • Print delivery available
Subscribe

Issue Access

$59.95
  • Immediate, unlimited access to this issue's content
  • CME credits
  • AAFP app access
  • Print delivery available
Purchase Access:  Learn More

Clinical Inquiries provides answers to questions submitted by practicing family physicians to the Family Physicians Inquiries Network (FPIN). Members of the network select questions based on their relevance to family medicine. Answers are drawn from an approved set of evidence-based resources and undergo peer review. The strength of recommendations and the level of evidence for individual studies are rated using criteria developed by the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (https://www.cebm.net).

The complete database of evidence-based questions and answers is copyrighted by FPIN. If interested in submitting questions or writing answers for this series, go to https://www.fpin.org or email: questions@fpin.org.

This series is coordinated by John E. Delzell Jr., MD, MSPH, associate medical editor.

A collection of FPIN’s Clinical Inquiries published in AFP is available at https://www.aafp.org/afp/fpin.

Continue Reading

More in AFP

More in Pubmed

Copyright © 2023 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP.  See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.