brand logo

Am Fam Physician. 2026;113(3):281-282

This clinical content conforms to AAFP criteria for CME.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

CLINICAL QUESTION

Do sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors increase the risk of urogenital infections?

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

Physicians should counsel adults treated with SGLT-2 inhibitors about an increased risk of urogenital infections. (Strength of Recommendation: A, meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [RCTs].) Groups at highest risk include women, patients with obesity, and patients treated for 6 months or longer. There is also a small increase in the risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) in patients treated with SGLT-2 inhibitors. These medications do not appear to increase the risk of Fournier gangrene.

EVIDENCE SUMMARY

Urogenital Infections

A 2024 network meta-analysis evaluated the risk of urogenital infections in adults and compared SGLT-2 inhibitors with placebo or standard care. Of the 264 included studies, 62% specifically enrolled patients with type 2 diabetes. All but two studies included male and female patients. Patient mean ages ranged from 22 to 81 years.1

The meta-analysis showed an increased risk of genital infections with SGLT-2 inhibitor treatment compared with placebo or standard care (188 trials; n = 121,275; odds ratio [OR] = 3.5; 95% CI, 3.1–3.9). Number needed to harm values across studies ranged between 16 and 31. There was a significantly lower risk of treatment-associated infections in male vs female patients (69 trials; n = 63,248; OR = 0.4; 95% CI, 0.4–0.5). In meta-regression analysis, a body mass index of 30 kg/m2 or greater (compared with a body mass index less than 25 kg/m2; OR = 3.3; 95% CI, 1.1–10.3) and use of SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy for 6 months or longer (compared with less than 6 months; OR = 1.7; 95% CI, 1.3–2.3) appeared to increase the risk of treatment-related genital infection.1

Already a member/subscriber?  Log In

Subscribe

From $180
  • Immediate, unlimited access to all AFP content
  • More than 125 CME credits/year
  • Print delivery available
Subscribe

Issue Access

$59.95
  • Immediate, unlimited access to this issue's content
  • CME credits
  • Print delivery available
Interested in AAFP membership?  Learn More

Clinical Inquiries provides answers to questions submitted by practicing family physicians to the Family Physicians Inquiries Network (FPIN). Members of the network select questions based on their relevance to family medicine. Answers are drawn from an approved set of evidence-based resources and undergo peer review. The strength of recommendations and the level of evidence for individual studies are rated using criteria developed by the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (https://www.cebm.net).

The complete database of evidence-based questions and answers is copyrighted by FPIN. If interested in submitting questions or writing answers for this series, go to https://www.fpin.org or email questions@fpin.org.

Copyright © Family Physicians Inquiries Network. Used with permission.

This series is coordinated by John E. Delzell Jr., MD, MSPH, associate medical editor.

A collection of FPIN’s Clinical Inquiries published in AFP is available at https://www.aafp.org/afp/fpin.

Continue Reading

More in AFP

More in PubMed

Copyright © 2026 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP.  See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.