• Changes to 2018 Quality Payment Program aim to help participation

    The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has proposed a series of changes in the second year of the Quality Payment Program (QPP) that attempts to address some of the complaints from physicians that the original rules make participation in QPP difficult. As a reminder, the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 created the QPP with two payment tracks:  the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and Alternative Payment Models (APMs).

    Under MIPS, some of the proposed changes in 2018 include:

    • Offering a Virtual Groups participation option.
    • Increasing the low-volume threshold so that more small practices and eligible clinicians in rural and Health Professional Shortage Areas are exempt from MIPS participation.
    • Allowing physicians to continue using 2014 Edition Certified Electronic Health Record Technology (CEHRT).
    • Awarding bonus points in the scoring methodology to physicians who care for complex patients and only use 2015 Edition CEHRT.

    For the APM track, some of the proposed changes include:

  • Extending for two performance years (to 2020) the revenue-based nominal amount standard, which CMS previously finalized through performance year 2018. This standard would allow an APM to qualify as an Advanced APM under the financial risk criterion if the group’s physicians bore total risk of at least 8 percent of their Medicare Parts A and B revenue.
  • Altering the nominal amount standard for Medical Home Models so that the minimum required amount of total risk increases more slowly.
  • Both the full rule and an abbreviated fact sheet are available. CMS is accepting comments on its proposals through Aug. 21.

    – Kent Moore, Senior Strategist for Physician Payment for the American Academy of Family Physicians

    Posted on Jun 21, 2017 by Kent Moore

    Disclaimer: The opinions and views expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent or reflect the opinions and views of the American Academy of Family Physicians. This blog is not intended to provide medical, financial, or legal advice. Some payers may not agree with the advice given. This is not a substitute for current CPT and ICD-9 manuals and payer policies. All comments are moderated and will be removed if they violate our Terms of Use.