Rheumatoid Arthritis: Common Questions About Diagnosis and Management

 

Rheumatoid arthritis is the most commonly diagnosed systemic inflammatory arthritis, with a lifetime prevalence of up to 1% worldwide. Women, smokers, and those with a family history of the disease are most often affected. Rheumatoid arthritis should be considered if there is at least one joint with definite swelling that is not better explained by another disease. In a patient with inflammatory arthritis, the presence of a rheumatoid factor and/or anti-citrullinated protein antibody, elevated C-reactive protein level, or elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate is consistent with a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatoid arthritis may impact organs other than the joints, including lungs, skin, and eyes. Rapid diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis allows for earlier treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, which is associated with better outcomes. The goal of therapy is to initiate early medical treatment to achieve disease remission or the lowest disease activity possible. Methotrexate is typically the first-line agent for rheumatoid arthritis. Additional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs or biologic agents should be added if disease activity persists. Comorbid conditions, including hepatitis B or C or tuberculosis infections, must be considered when choosing medical treatments. Although rheumatoid arthritis is often a chronic disease, some patients can taper and discontinue medications and remain in long-term remission.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most common autoimmune inflammatory arthritis, with a lifetime prevalence of up to 1% worldwide.1 It has a significant impact on occupational and daily activities, as well as mortality.24 This article reviews common questions on the diagnosis and management of RA, and presents evidence-based answers.

WHAT IS NEW ON THIS TOPIC

The 2015 American College of Rheumatology guidelines continue to recommend methotrexate as the first-line treatment for rheumatoid arthritis, unless contraindications (e.g., frequent alcohol use, preexisting liver disease) are present.

In a randomized trial of patients who were on stable disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) regimens and in clinical remission for at least six months, 84% of patients who continued full DMARD treatment remained in remission after 12 months, compared with 61% who tapered DMARDs by 50%, and with 48% of those who stopped all DMARDs.

 Enlarge     Print

SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Clinical recommendationEvidence ratingReferences

Methotrexate should be the first-line disease-modifying antirheumatic drug in patients with rheumatoid arthritis unless there are contraindications.

A

1618

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis should be treated as early as possible to have the best chance of remission.

A

1925

Patients should be screened for chronic infections, including latent tuberculosis, hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus, before starting rheumatoid arthritis treatment.

C

16, 27, 28

Patients who are in remission from rheumatoid arthritis for more than six months and on stable medication regimens are candidates for tapering or discontinuing disease-modifying antirheumatic drug or biologic treatment.

B

35, 36


A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, go to http://www.aafp.org/afpsort.

SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Clinical recommendationEvidence ratingReferences

Methotrexate should be the first-line disease-modifying antirheumatic drug in patients with rheumatoid arthritis unless there are contraindications.

A

1618

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis should be treated as early as possible to have the best chance of remission.

A

1925

Patients should be screened for chronic infections, including latent tuberculosis, hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus, before starting rheumatoid arthritis treatment.

C

16, 27, 28

Patients who are in remission from rheumatoid arthritis for more than six months and on stable medication regimens are candidates for tapering or discontinuing disease-modifying antirheumatic drug or biologic treatment.

B

35, 36


A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, go to http://www.aafp.org/afpsort.

 Enlarge     Print

BEST PRACTICES IN RHEUMATOLOGY

Recommendations from the Choosing Wisely Campaign

RecommendationSponsoring organization

Do not prescribe biologics for rheumatoid arthritis before a trial of methotrexate (or other conventional nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs).

American College of Rheumatology


Source: For more information on the Choosing Wisely Campaign, see http://www.choosingwisely.org. For supporting citations and to search Choosing Wisely recommendations relevant to primary care, see http://www.aafp.org/afp/recommendations/search.htm.

BEST PRACTICES IN RHEUMATOLOGY

Recommendations from the Choosing Wisely Campaign

RecommendationSponsoring organization

Do not prescribe biologics for rheumatoid arthritis before a trial of methotrexate (or other conventional nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs).

American College of Rheumatology


Source: For more information on the Choosing Wisely Campaign, see http://www.choosingwisely.org. For supporting citations and to search Choosing Wisely recommendations relevant to primary care, see http://www.aafp.org/afp/recommendations/search.htm.

What Is the Typical Presentation of RA, and How Is It Diagnosed?

RA onset can occur at any age, but it peaks between 30 and 50 years of age. Women, smokers, and those with a family history of the disease are at higher risk. RA typically presents with pain and stiffness in multiple joints, most often the wrists, proximal interphalangeal joints, and metacarpophalangeal joints. The distal interphalanges and lumbar spine are not typically impacted by RA. Morning stiffness lasting more than one hour suggests an inflammatory etiology. Patients may also present with systemic symptoms of fatigue, weight loss, and anemia. Boggy swelling caused by synovitis may be visible (Figure 15), or subtle synovial thickening may be palpable on joint examination.

 Enlarge     Print

FIGURE 1.

Boggy swelling in proximal interphalangeal and metacarpophalangeal joints (more prominent on patient's right hand) in a patient with new-onset rheumatoid arthritis. Note that the skin creases over the proximal interphalangeal joints become less apparent with swelling.

Reprinted with permission from Wasserman AM. Diagnosis and management of rheumatoid arthritis. Am Fam Physician. 2011;84(11):1246.


FIGURE 1.

Boggy swelling in proximal interphalangeal and metacarpophalangeal joints (more prominent on patient's right hand) in a patient with new-onset rheumatoid arthritis. Note that the skin creases over the proximal interphalangeal joints become less apparent with swelling.

Reprinted with permission from Wasserman AM. Diagnosis and management of rheumatoid arthritis. Am Fam Physician. 2011;84(11):1246.

Physicians must use history and physical examination findings to differentiate the inflammatory arthritis in RA from another etiology, including systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, psoriatic arthritis, sarcoidosis, crystal arthropathy, and spondyloarthropathy. Radiography may be helpful in differentiation if the typical periarticular erosions of RA are present. The updated classification criteria for RA from the American College of Rheumatology (Table 16) no longer include the presence of rheumatoid nodules or radiographic erosive changes, both of which are less likely in early presentation. Positive serology (rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated protein antibody), as well as elevated inflammatory markers, may help confirm the diagnosis.

 Enlarge     Print

TABLE 1.

The 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Classification Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis

Target population (who should be tested): patients who

(1) have at least one joint with definite clinical synovitis (swelling)*

(2) with the synovitis not better explained by another disease†

Classification criteria for RA (score-based algorithm: add score of categories A through D; a score ≥ 6 out of 10 is needed for classification of a patient as having definite RA)‡

Criteria

Score


A. Joint involvement§

One large joint||

0

Two to 10 large joints

1

One to three small joints¶ (with or without involvement of large joints)

2

Four to 10 small joints (with or without involvement of large joints)

3

> 10 joints (at least one small joint)**

5

B. Serology (at least one test result is needed for classification)††

Negative RF and negative ACPA

0

Low-positive RF or low-positive ACPA

2

High-positive RF or high-positive ACPA

3

C. Acute phase reactants (at least one test result is needed for classification)‡‡

Normal CRP and normal ESR

0

Abnormal CRP or abnormal ESR

1

D. Duration of symptoms§§

< 6 weeks

0

≥ 6 weeks

1


ACPA = anti-citrullinated protein antibody; CRP = C-reactive protein; ESR = erythrocyte sedimentation rate; RA = rheumatoid arthritis; RF = rheumatoid factor.

*—The criteria are aimed at classification of newly presenting patients. In addition, patients with erosive disease typical of RA who have a history compatible with prior fulfillment of the 2010 criteria should be classified as having RA. Patients with long-standing disease, including those whose disease is inactive (with or without treatment), who, based on retrospectively available data, have previously fulfilled the 2010 criteria should be classified as having RA.

†—Differential diagnoses differ in patients with different presentations, but they may include conditions such as systemic lupus erythematosus, psoriatic arthritis, and gout. If it is unclear about the relevant differential diagnoses to consider, an expert rheumatologist should be consulted.

‡—Although patients with a score of less than 6 out of 10 are not classifiable as having RA, their status can be reassessed, and the criteria might be fulfilled cumulatively over time.

§—Joint involvement refers to any swollen or tender joint on examination, which may be confirmed by imaging evidence of synovitis. Distal interphalangeal joints, first carpometacarpal joints, and first metatarsophalangeal joints are excluded from assessment. Categories of joint distribution are classified according to the location and number of involved joints, with placement into the highest category possible based on the pattern of joint involvement.

||—Large joints are shoulders, elbows, hips, knees, and ankles.

¶—Small joints are metacarpophalangeal joints, proximal interphalangeal joints, second to fifth metatarsophalangeal joints, thumb interphalangeal joints, and wrists.

**—In this category, at least one of the involved joints must be a small joint; the other joints can include any combination of large and additional small joints, as well as other joints not specifically listed elsewhere (e.g., temporomandibular, acromioclavicular, sternoclavicular).

††—Negative refers to international unit values that are less than or equal to the upper limit of normal for the laboratory and assay; low-positive refers to international unit values that are higher than the upper limit of normal but three or less times the upper limit of normal for the laboratory and assay; high-positive refers to international unit values that are more than three times the upper limit of normal for the laboratory and assay. When RF information is only available as positive or negative, a positive result should be scored as low-positive for RF.

‡‡—Normal/abnormal is determined by local laboratory standards.

§§—Duration of symptoms refers to patient self-report of the duration of signs or symptoms of synovitis (e.g., pain, swelling, tenderness) of joints that are clinically involved at the time of assessment, regardless of treatment status.

Adapted with permission from Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, et al. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative [published correction appears in Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(10):1892]. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(9):1583.

TABLE 1.

The 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Classification Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis

Target population (who should be tested): patients who

(1) have at least one joint with definite clinical synovitis (swelling)*

(2) with the synovitis not better explained by another disease†

Classification criteria for RA (score-based algorithm: add score of categories A through D; a score ≥ 6 out of 10 is needed for classification of a patient as having definite RA)‡

Criteria

Score


A. Joint involvement§

One large joint||

0

Two to 10 large joints

1

One to three small joints¶ (with or without involvement of large joints)

2

Four to 10 small joints (with or without involvement of large joints)

3

> 10 joints (at least one small joint)**

5

B. Serology (at least one test result is needed for classification)††

Negative RF and negative ACPA

0

Low-positive RF or low-positive ACPA

2

High-positive RF or high-positive ACPA

3

C. Acute phase reactants (at least one test result is needed for classification)‡‡

Normal CRP and normal ESR

0

Abnormal CRP or abnormal ESR

1

D. Duration of symptoms§§

< 6 weeks

0

≥ 6 weeks

1


ACPA = anti-citrullinated protein antibody; CRP = C-reactive protein; ESR = erythrocyte sedimentation rate; RA = rheumatoid arthritis; RF = rheumatoid factor.

*—The criteria are aimed at classification of newly presenting patients. In addition, patients with erosive disease typical of RA who have a history compatible with prior fulfillment of the 2010 criteria should be classified as having RA. Patients with long-standing disease, including those whose disease is inactive (with or without treatment), who, based on retrospectively available data, have previously fulfilled the 2010 criteria should be classified as having RA.

†—Differential diagnoses differ in patients with different presentations, but they may include conditions such as systemic lupus erythematosus, psoriatic arthritis, and gout. If it is unclear about the relevant differential diagnoses to consider, an expert rheumatologist should be consulted.

‡—Although patients with a score of less than 6 out of 10 are not classifiable as having RA, their status can be reassessed, and the criteria might be fulfilled cumulatively over time.

§—Joint involvement refers to any swollen or tender joint on examination, which may be confirmed by imaging evidence of synovitis. Distal interphalangeal joints, first carpometacarpal joints, and first metatarsophalangeal joints are excluded from assessment. Categories of joint distribution are classified according to the location and number of involved joints, with placement into the highest category possible based on the pattern of joint involvement.

||—Large joints are shoulders, elbows, hips, knees, and ankles.

¶—Small joints are metacarpophalangeal joints, proximal interphalangeal joints, second to fifth metatarsophalangeal joints, thumb interphalangeal joints, and wrists.

**—In this category, at least one of the involved joints must be a small joint; the other joints can include any combination of large and additional small joints, as well as other joints not specifically listed elsewhere (e.g., temporomandibular, acromioclavicular, sternoclavicular).

††—Negative refers to international unit values that are less than or equal to the upper limit of normal for the laboratory and assay; low-positive refers to international unit values that are higher than the upper limit of normal but three or less times the upper limit of normal for the laboratory and assay; high-positive refers to international unit values that are more than three times the upper limit of normal for the laboratory and assay. When RF information is only available as positive or negative, a positive result should be scored as low-positive for RF.

‡‡—Normal/abnormal is determined by local laboratory standards.

§§—Duration of symptoms refers to patient self-report of the duration of signs or symptoms of synovitis (e.g., pain, swelling, tenderness) of joints that are clinically involved at the time of assessment, regardless of treatment status.

Adapted with permission from Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, et al. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative [published correction appears in Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(10):1892]. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(9):1583.

EVIDENCE SUMMARY

Large multicenter prospective cohorts of patients with new-onset inflammatory arthritis have shown female predominance (77% of patients in cohort).7 The mean age at onset was 48 years, and patients had an average of seven swollen and eight tender joints.7 The C-reactive protein level was elevated in 39% of patients, 44% had elevated immunoglobulin M (IgM) rheumatoid factor, and 39% had anti-citrullinated protein antibody.7 An international cohort with early RA reported similar percentages of females, rheumatoid factor, and anti-citrullinated protein antibody positivity.8 Clinical trials including more patients with long-standing RA found higher rates of positive rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated protein antibody (close to 90%).9,10

What Are the Extra-Articular Manifestations of RA, and How Common Are They?

Extra-articular manifestations of RA include keratoconjunctivitis sicca, episcleritis, interstitial lung disease, pulmonary nodules, rheumatoid nodules, and pleural effusions (Table 25). The prevalence of extra-articular manifestation varies from approximately 8% to 40%, depending on the patient population and how the manifestations are defined.

 Enlarge     Print

TABLE 2.

Extra-Articular Manifestations of Rheumatoid Arthritis

ManifestationCharacteristics

Cardiac

Accelerated atherosclerosis

Leading cause of death in patients with RA

Pericarditis

Present in 30% to 50% of persons with RA on autopsy, rarely leads to tamponade

Eye

Episcleritis/scleritis

Acute, red, painful eye; occurs in less than 1% of patients with RA

Keratoconjunctivitis sicca

Secondary Sjögren syndrome, dry mouth may also occur

Peripheral ulcerative keratitis

More severe scleritis, if untreated can perforate anterior chamber

Hematologic

Amyloidosis

Caused by chronic inflammation

Felty syndrome

Splenomegaly, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia

Nervous system

Cervical myelopathy

Caused by C1–C2 subluxation, seen on flexion-extension radiography

Neuropathy

Carpal tunnel, mononeuritis multiplex (foot drop)

Pulmonary

Caplan syndrome

Nodules and pneumoconiosis (e.g., in coal miners)

Interstitial lung disease

May resemble bronchiolitis obliterans with organizing pneumonia, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, patient may also have pulmonary arterial hypertension

Pleural effusion

Exudative effusion with markedly low glucose level

Pulmonary nodules

Can be asymptomatic

Skin

Rheumatoid nodules

Firm or rubbery, located on pressure areas (e.g., olecranon)

Vasculitis

Poor prognosis, increased mortality, rare but occurs with severe RA (i.e., erosive, deforming, and seropositive disease)


RA = rheumatoid arthritis.

Adapted with permission from Wasserman AM. Diagnosis and management of rheumatoid arthritis. Am Fam Physician. 2011;84(11):1250.

TABLE 2.

Extra-Articular Manifestations of Rheumatoid Arthritis

ManifestationCharacteristics

Cardiac

Accelerated atherosclerosis

Leading cause of death in patients with RA

Pericarditis

Present in 30% to 50% of persons with RA on autopsy, rarely leads to tamponade

Eye

Episcleritis/scleritis

Acute, red, painful eye; occurs in less than 1% of patients with RA

Keratoconjunctivitis sicca

Secondary Sjögren syndrome, dry mouth may also occur

Peripheral ulcerative keratitis

More severe scleritis, if untreated can perforate anterior chamber

Hematologic

Amyloidosis

Caused by chronic inflammation

Felty syndrome

Splenomegaly, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia

Nervous system

Cervical myelopathy

Caused by C1–C2 subluxation, seen on flexion-extension radiography

Neuropathy

Carpal tunnel, mononeuritis multiplex (foot drop)

Pulmonary

Caplan syndrome

Nodules and pneumoconiosis (e.g., in coal miners)

Interstitial lung disease

May resemble bronchiolitis obliterans with organizing pneumonia, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, patient may also have pulmonary arterial hypertension

Pleural effusion

Exudative effusion with markedly low glucose level

Pulmonary nodules

Can be asymptomatic

Skin

Rheumatoid nodules

Firm or rubbery, located on pressure areas (e.g., olecranon)

Vasculitis

Poor prognosis, increased mortality, rare but occurs with severe RA (i.e., erosive, deforming, and seropositive disease)


RA = rheumatoid arthritis.

Adapted with permission from Wasserman AM. Diagnosis and management of rheumatoid arthritis. Am Fam Physician. 2011;84(11):1250.

EVIDENCE SUMMARY

The prevalence of extra-articular manifestations of RA varies widely in the literature, likely because of the different populations and definitions of extra-articular disease. A study cohort in Sweden noted severe extra-articular manifestations in 8% of patients, but these excluded more common extra-articular manifestations, such as rheumatoid nodules.11 A retrospective study of an RA cohort at the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota included 609 patients with RA, 41% of whom had evidence of extra-articular manifestations, most commonly skin nodules and keratoconjunctivitis sicca.12 More recent studies on multiethnic populations with RA in Korea and California noted an extra-articular manifestation prevalence of 22%.13,14 Risk factors for developing extra-articular manifestations include male sex and seropositivity (rheumatoid factor, anti-citrullinated protein antibody, and antinuclear antibodies). A history of smoking is also strongly associated with the development of extra-articular manifestations, especially rheumatoid nodules (odds ratio = 7.3), vasculitis, and interstitial lung disease.15

What Are the First-Line Treatments for RA?

The American College of Rheumatology has updated guidelines on the treatment of RA and continues to recommend methotrexate as the first-line treatment, unless contraindications are present.16 Methotrexate may not be appropriate in patients with increased risk of hepatotoxicity, such as those with frequent alcohol use or with preexisting liver disease. Other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs; Table 35) can be considered for first-line treatment, including leflunomide (Arava), hydroxychloroquine (Plaquenil), and sulfasalazine (Azulfidine). If disease activity is high, glucocorticoids may also be added.16 Typically, 5 to 10 mg of prednisone daily for four to six weeks is sufficient, but the lowest possible dosage for the shortest possible duration should be used as a bridge until DMARD therapy is effective.

 Enlarge     Print

TABLE 3.

Biologic and Nonbiologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs

DrugMechanism for rheumatoid arthritisAdverse effectsTypical dosageCost*

Nonbiologic

Methotrexate

Inhibits dihydrofolate reductase

Liver effects, teratogenesis, hair loss, oral ulcers

Up to 25 mg orally or subcutaneously every week

$60 for 40 2.5-mg tablets $10 for one 2-mL vial (25 mg per mL)

Leflunomide (Arava)

Inhibits pyrimidine synthesis

Liver effects, gastrointestinal effects, teratogenesis

10 to 20 mg orally every week

$30 ($175)

Hydroxychloroquine (Plaquenil)

Antimalarial, blocks toll-like receptors

Rare ocular toxicity

200 to 400 mg daily

$55 ($210)

Sulfasalazine (Azulfidine)

Folate depletion, other mechanisms unknown

Anemia in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, gastrointestinal effects

500 to 1,500 mg twice per day

$15 ($90)

Biologic

Anti-TNF agents

Adalimumab (Humira)

Anti-TNF-α

TB, opportunistic infection

40 mg subcutaneously every two weeks

NA ($4,500)

Certolizumab pegol (Cimzia)

Anti-TNF-α, pegylated

TB, opportunistic infection

400 mg subcutaneously every four weeks

NA ($4,000)

Etanercept (Enbrel)

Anti-TNF-α, receptor

TB, opportunistic infection

50 mg subcutaneously every week

NA ($4,500)

Golimumab (Simponi)

Anti-TNF-α

TB, opportunistic infection

100 mg every four weeks

NA ($4,900)

Infliximab (Remicade)

Anti-TNF-α

TB, opportunistic infection, infusion reaction

3 to 5 mg per kg intravenously every six to eight weeks

NA ($2,500) for two 100-mg vials

Other biologic agents

Abatacept (Orencia)

Costimulator blocker, cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4

Opportunistic infection

125 mg subcutaneously every week, or 500 to 1,000 mg intravenously every four weeks

NA ($4,000)

Anakinra (Kineret)

Anti-interleukin-1 receptor blocker

Opportunistic infection, injection site pain

100 mg subcutaneously daily

NA ($4,000)

Rituximab (Rituxan)

Anti-CD20, eliminates B cells

Infusion reaction, opportunistic infection, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy

1,000 mg intravenously every six months

NA (> $5,000‡)

Sarilumab (Kevzara)

Anti-interleukin-6 receptor blocker

Opportunistic infection

150 to 200 mg subcutaneously every two weeks

NA ($2,700)

Tocilizumab (Actemra)

Anti-interleukin-6 receptor blocker

Opportunistic infection, hyperlipidemia

4 to 8 mg per kg intravenously every four weeks, or 162 mg subcutaneously every week or every two weeks

NA ($2,000) for one 20-mL vial (20 mg per mL)

Tofacitinib (Xeljanz)

Janus kinase inhibitor

TB, opportunistic infection

5 mg daily or twice per day, or 11 mg daily extended release

NA ($2,000) NA ($4,000) for extended release


NA = not available; TB = tuberculosis; TNF = tumor necrosis factor.

*—Estimated retail price of one month's treatment (lower dose used for pricing purposes) based on information obtained at http://www.goodrx.com (accessed October 20, 2017). Generic price listed first; brand price listed in parentheses.

†—Nonbiologic drugs listed in approximate order of priority.

‡—Cost of a single dose; typically infused in a hospital setting.

Adapted with permission from Wasserman AM. Diagnosis and management of rheumatoid arthritis. Am Fam Physician. 2011;84(11):1249.

TABLE 3.

Biologic and Nonbiologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs

DrugMechanism for rheumatoid arthritisAdverse effectsTypical dosageCost*

Nonbiologic

Methotrexate

Inhibits dihydrofolate reductase

Liver effects, teratogenesis, hair loss, oral ulcers

Up to 25 mg orally or subcutaneously every week

$60 for 40 2.5-mg tablets $10 for one 2-mL vial (25 mg per mL)

Leflunomide (Arava)

Inhibits pyrimidine synthesis

Liver effects, gastrointestinal effects, teratogenesis

10 to 20 mg orally every week

$30 ($175)

Hydroxychloroquine (Plaquenil)

Antimalarial, blocks toll-like receptors

Rare ocular toxicity

200 to 400 mg daily

$55 ($210)

Sulfasalazine (Azulfidine)

Folate depletion, other mechanisms unknown

Anemia in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, gastrointestinal effects

500 to 1,500 mg twice per day

$15 ($90)

Biologic

Anti-TNF agents

Adalimumab (Humira)

Anti-TNF-α

TB, opportunistic infection

40 mg subcutaneously every two weeks

NA ($4,500)

Certolizumab pegol (Cimzia)

Anti-TNF-α, pegylated

TB, opportunistic infection

400 mg subcutaneously every four weeks

NA ($4,000)

Etanercept (Enbrel)

Anti-TNF-α, receptor

TB, opportunistic infection

50 mg subcutaneously every week

NA ($4,500)

Golimumab (Simponi)

Anti-TNF-α

TB, opportunistic infection

100 mg every four weeks

NA ($4,900)

Infliximab (Remicade)

Anti-TNF-α

TB, opportunistic infection, infusion reaction

3 to 5 mg per kg intravenously every six to eight weeks

NA ($2,500) for two 100-mg vials

Other biologic agents

Abatacept (Orencia)

Costimulator blocker, cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4

Opportunistic infection

125 mg subcutaneously every week, or 500 to 1,000 mg intravenously every four weeks

NA ($4,000)

Anakinra (Kineret)

Anti-interleukin-1 receptor blocker

Opportunistic infection, injection site pain

100 mg subcutaneously daily

NA ($4,000)

Rituximab (Rituxan)

Anti-CD20, eliminates B cells

Infusion reaction, opportunistic infection, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy

1,000 mg intravenously every six months

NA (> $5,000‡)

Sarilumab (Kevzara)

Anti-interleukin-6 receptor blocker

Opportunistic infection

150 to 200 mg subcutaneously every two weeks

NA ($2,700)

Tocilizumab (Actemra)

Anti-interleukin-6 receptor blocker

Opportunistic infection, hyperlipidemia

4 to 8 mg per kg intravenously every four weeks, or 162 mg subcutaneously every week or every two weeks

NA ($2,000) for one 20-mL vial (20 mg per mL)

Tofacitinib (Xeljanz)

Janus kinase inhibitor

TB, opportunistic infection

5 mg daily or twice per day, or 11 mg daily extended release

NA ($2,000) NA ($4,000) for extended release


NA = not available; TB = tuberculosis; TNF = tumor necrosis factor.

*—Estimated retail price of one month's treatment (lower dose used for pricing purposes) based on information obtained at http://www.goodrx.com (accessed October 20, 2017). Generic price listed first; brand price listed in parentheses.

†—Nonbiologic drugs listed in approximate order of priority.

‡—Cost of a single dose; typically infused in a hospital setting.

Adapted with permission from Wasserman AM. Diagnosis and management of rheumatoid arthritis. Am Fam Physician. 2011;84(11):1249.

Disease activity can be measured with a variety of validated scoring systems, including the Disease Activity Score (http://www.4s-dawn.com/DAS28/). More costly biologic drugs, which are engineered to block specific cytokines, are typically reserved for persons with refractory disease or who cannot tolerate nonbiologic DMARDs. Women of childbearing age should be counseled on medications that are known teratogens, such as methotrexate and leflunomide.

EVIDENCE SUMMARY

A randomized clinical trial demonstrated that in early RA, use of methotrexate with glucocorticoid taper led to remission after 16 weeks of therapy in nearly three-fourths of patients.17 This is a statistically similar rate of remission compared with patients who received combination therapy with methotrexate and either sulfasalazine or leflunomide, but with fewer adverse effects.17 Other clinical trials of patients with longer duration of RA have found less robust remission rates (closer to 40%) with methotrexate monotherapy.18 For patients who do not respond adequately to methotrexate monotherapy, the addition of DMARDs or biologics is indicated.16

How Do Early Intervention and Treat-to-Target Affect the Course of RA?

Longer duration of RA before initiating treatment is associated with a poorer prognosis. Patients who are treated early, typically within three months of symptom onset, have nearly twice the likelihood of achieving sustained remission.19 The goal of treatment is remission or the lowest disease activity possible. Medications are titrated as necessary to achieve this target, and frequent physician visits are required to monitor response to therapy.

EVIDENCE SUMMARY

A 1995 randomized clinical trial of the gold-containing compound auranofin (Ridaura) noted that patients who received immediate treatment vs. an eight-month delay were better off after a five-year follow-up.20 A more recent observational study reported that patients who had RA with a median disease duration of three months before initial DMARD use achieved a lower disease activity score and less radiographic joint damage compared with patients being treated after a median disease duration of 12 months.21 Large cohorts have shown that patients who had symptoms less than 12 weeks before initiation of treatment were nearly twice as likely to achieve remission off medications (18.5%) than those with longer disease duration (10.5%).22 Early RA clinics at multiple centers in France and the Netherlands noted that at five-year follow-up, 5.4% to 11.5% of patients were in DMARD-free remission.23 These patients were started on treatment after a median of 18 to 21 weeks of symptoms. Ten-year follow-up of one clinical trial demonstrated that a strategy of treating to remission was effective in maintaining patients' function and limiting joint damage progression.24,25

How Do Comorbidities Impact the Management of RA?

Patients with RA may have other diseases and conditions that require consideration before initiating treatment for RA. The American College of Rheumatology recommends screening for latent tuberculosis (TB), hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus infections before starting treatment.16 This is important because immunosuppression can reactivate infections, but also because a false-positive result on rheumatoid factor antibody testing can occur in the setting of chronic infections. Patients with congestive heart failure should avoid anti–tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy for RA. Skin cancer screening is important in all patients with RA receiving biologic therapy.

EVIDENCE SUMMARY

There is a risk of TB activation with the use of biologic therapy in patients with RA.26 It is recommended that patients be screened for latent TB infection with tuberculin skin test or interferon-gamma release assay before starting biologic immunosuppression.16 Patients who are diagnosed with latent TB infection should complete at least one month of treatment for latent TB infection before initiation of biologic therapy for RA. For patients who are diagnosed with active TB infection, the complete course of anti-TB therapy should be taken before starting biologics.16

Active hepatitis B virus infection should be screened for and treated if present in patients with RA receiving immunosuppressive therapy. Even patients with occult hepatitis B virus infection (e.g., negative hepatitis B surface antigen, positive hepatitis B core antibody, negative hepatitis B surface antibody, positive hepatitis B virus DNA) are at risk of hepatitis reactivation with immunosuppressive treatment, and can benefit from antiviral treatment.27 Patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection also require monitoring and antiviral therapy with use of immunosuppression to treat RA. In a systematic review of 153 patients with hepatitis C virus infection who were treated with anti-TNF therapy, 9% of patients with RA had increased hepatitis C viral load or elevated liver enzyme levels.28

Patients with RA and advanced congestive heart failure are typically advised to avoid anti-TNF therapy. Results from clinical trials show increased mortality and hospitalization rates for patients with chronic heart failure receiving anti-TNF therapy.29,30

Patients with RA should be screened for skin malignancy, and those with a history of skin cancer should use nonbiologic DMARDs rather than biologic treatment.31 Studies of a Swedish RA cohort suggest that there is one additional case of squamous cell carcinoma for every 1,600 person-years of anti-TNF treatment and 20 cases of malignant melanoma for every 100,000 person-years.31,32

Recent studies of large RA cohorts have not found an increased risk of solid malignancy in patients treated with biologic therapy vs. other DMARDs.33,34

Can Patients with RA Taper or Discontinue Medication Use and Remain in Remission?

Tapering and discontinuing medication use while maintaining remission is possible. Patients who have been in remission for more than six months on a stable medication regimen and who test negative for anti-citrullinated protein antibodies are most likely to maintain remission without medication.

EVIDENCE SUMMARY

A randomized clinical trial compared remission rates at 12 months in patients who continued, tapered, or discontinued DMARD therapy. All patients in the study were on stable DMARDs and in clinical remission for at least six months at baseline. The first group of patients maintained the same DMARD regimen, the second group tapered DMARDs by 50%, and the third group tapered DMARDs for six months and then discontinued all DMARDs.35 Approximately 84% of the patients who continued full DMARD treatment remained in remission, compared with 61% in the tapering arm and 48% in the discontinuation arm.35 Patients who tested positive for anti-citrullinated protein antibodies were more likely to relapse with medication tapering.35 Another randomized clinical trial explored drug cessation in patients with early RA who achieved remission with etanercept (Enbrel) and methotrexate after nine months. Patients who received etanercept at a tapered dosage plus methotrexate were more likely to maintain remission vs. patients receiving methotrexate alone or placebo.36

Data Sources: A PubMed search was completed in Clinical Queries using the key terms rheumatoid arthritis, disease-modifying anti-rheumatic agents, extra-articular manifestations of RA, and tapering RA medications. The search included meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, and reviews. Also searched were the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality evidence reports, Clinical Evidence, the Cochrane database, and UpToDate. Search dates: September 2016 and October 2017.

The Author

AMY WASSERMAN, MD, is an assistant professor in the Rheumatology Department at Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY.

Address correspondence to Amy Wasserman, MD, Westchester Medical Center, 100 Woods Rd., Taylor Care Pavilion, 3rd Fl., Valhalla, NY 10595 (e-mail: amy.wasserman@wmchealth.org). Reprints are not available from the author.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations.

References

show all references

1. Firestein GS, Budd RC, Gabriel SE, McInnes IB, O'Dell JR, Kelley WN. Kelley's Textbook of Rheumatology. 9th ed. Philadelphia, Pa.: Elsevier/Saunders; 2013:1059-1108....

2. Mackey RH, Kuller LH, Deane KD, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide positivity, and cardiovascular disease risk in the Women's Health Initiative. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67(9):2311–2322.

3. England BR, Sayles H, Michaud K, et al. Cause-specific mortality in male US veterans with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016;68(1):36–45.

4. Verstappen SM. Rheumatoid arthritis and work: The impact of rheumatoid arthritis on absenteeism and presenteeism. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2015;29(3):495–511.

5. Wasserman AM. Diagnosis and management of rheumatoid arthritis. Am Fam Physician. 2011;84(11):1245–1252.

6. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, et al. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative [published correction appears in Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(10):1892]. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(9):1580–1588.

7. Combe B, Benessiano J, Berenbaum F, et al. The ESPOIR cohort: a ten-year follow-up of early arthritis in France: methodology and baseline characteristics of the 813 included patients. Joint Bone Spine. 2007;74(5):440–445.

8. Biliavska I, Stamm TA, Martinez-Avila J, et al. Application of the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria in patients with very early inflammatory arthritis: analysis of sensitivity, specificity and predictive values in the SAVE study cohort. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(8):1335–1341.

9. Keystone EC, Haraoui B, Guérette B, Mozaffarian N, Liu S, Kavanaugh A. Clinical, functional, and radiographic implications of time to treatment response in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: a posthoc analysis of the PREMIER study. J Rheumatol. 2014;41(2):235–243.

10. Wallenstein GV, Kanik KS, Wilkinson B, et al. Effects of the oral Janus kinase inhibitor tofacitinib on patient-reported outcomes in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: results of two Phase 2 randomised controlled trials. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016;34(3):430–442.

11. Turesson C, Jacobsson L, Bergström U. Extra-articular rheumatoid arthritis: prevalence and mortality. Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999;38(7): 668–674.

12. Gabriel SE, Crowson CS, Kremers HM, et al. Survival in rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based analysis of trends over 40 years. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48(1):54–58.

13. Kim SK, Park SH, Shin IH, Choe JY. Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody, smoking, alcohol consumption, and disease duration as risk factors for extraarticular manifestations in Korean patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2008;35(6):995–1001.

14. Richman NC, Yazdany J, Graf J, Chernitskiy V, Imboden JB. Extraarticular manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis in a multiethnic cohort of predominantly Hispanic and Asian patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2013;92(2):92–97.

15. Turesson C, Schaid DJ, Weyand CM, et al. Association of HLA-C3 and smoking with vasculitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(9):2776–2783.

16. Singh JA, Saag KG, Bridges SL Jr, et al. 2015 American College of Rheumatology guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016;68(1):1–25.

17. Verschueren P, De Cock D, Corluy L, et al. Methotrexate in combination with other DMARDs is not superior to methotrexate alone for remission induction with moderate-to-high-dose glucocorticoid bridging in early rheumatoid arthritis after 16 weeks of treatment: the CareRA trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(1):27–34.

18. Klareskog L, van der Heijde D, de Jager JP, et al.; TEMPO (Trial of Etanercept and Methotrexate with Radiographic Patient Outcomes) study investigators. Therapeutic effect of the combination of etanercept and methotrexate compared with each treatment alone in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: double-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;363(9410):675–681.

19. Anderson JJ, Wells G, Verhoeven AC, Felson DT. Factors predicting response to treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: the importance of disease duration. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43(1):22–29.

20. Egsmose C, Lund B, Borg G, et al. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis benefit from early 2nd line therapy: 5 year followup of a prospective double blind placebo controlled study. J Rheumatol. 1995;22(12):2208–2213.

21. Nell VP, Machold KP, Eberl G, Stamm TA, Uffmann M, Smolen JS. Benefit of very early referral and very early therapy with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004;43(7):906–914.

22. van der Linden MP, le Cessie S, Raza K, et al. Long-term impact of delay in assessment of patients with early arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(12):3537–3546.

23. van Nies JA, Tsonaka R, Gaujoux-Viala C, Fautrel B, van der Helmvan Mil AH. Evaluating relationships between symptom duration and persistence of rheumatoid arthritis: does a window of opportunity exist? Results on the Leiden early arthritis clinic and ESPOIR cohorts. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(5):806–812.

24. Goekoop-Ruiterman YP, de Vries-Bouwstra JK, Allaart CF, et al. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of four different treatment strategies in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (the BeSt study): a randomized, controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(11):3381–3390.

25. Markusse IM, Akdemir G, Dirven L, et al. Long-term outcomes of patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis after 10 years of tight controlled treatment: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(8): 523–531.

26. Souto A, Maneiro JR, Salgado E, Carmona L, Gomez-Reino JJ. Risk of tuberculosis in patients with chronic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases treated with biologics and tofacitinib: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and long-term extension studies. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014;53(10):1872–1885.

27. Lan JL, Chen YM, Hsieh TY, et al. Kinetics of viral loads and risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation in hepatitis B core antibody-positive rheumatoid arthritis patients undergoing anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha therapy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(10):1719–1725.

28. Brunasso AM, Puntoni M, Gulia A, Massone C. Safety of anti-tumour necrosis factor agents in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection: a systematic review. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50(9):1700–1711.

29. Mann DL, McMurray JJ, Packer M, et al. Targeted anticytokine therapy in patients with chronic heart failure: results of the Randomized Etanercept Worldwide Evaluation (RENEWAL). Circulation. 2004;109(13):1594–1602.

30. Chung ES, Packer M, Lo KH, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot trial of infliximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor-alpha, in patients with moderate-to-severe heart failure: results of the anti-TNF Therapy Against Congestive Heart Failure (ATTACH) trial. Circulation. 2003;107(25):3133–3140.

31. Raaschou P, Simard JF, Asker Hagelberg C, Askling J; ARTIS Study Group. Rheumatoid arthritis, anti-tumour necrosis factor treatment, and risk of squamous cell and basal cell skin cancer: cohort study based on nationwide prospectively recorded data from Sweden. BMJ. 2016;352:i262.

32. Raaschou P, Simard JF, Holmqvist M, Askling J; ARTIS Study Group. Rheumatoid arthritis, anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy, and risk of malignant melanoma: nationwide population based prospective cohort study from Sweden. BMJ. 2013;346:f1939.

33. Mercer LK, Lunt M, Low AL, et al.; BSRBR Control Centre Consortium. Risk of solid cancer in patients exposed to anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for Rheumatoid Arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(6):1087–1093.

34. Silva-Fernández L, Lunt M, Kearsley-Fleet L, et al. The incidence of cancer in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and a prior malignancy who receive TNF inhibitors or rituximab: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for Rheumatoid Arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016;55(11):2033–2039.

35. Haschka J, Englbrecht M, Hueber AJ, et al. Relapse rates in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in stable remission tapering or stopping anti-rheumatic therapy: interim results from the prospective randomised controlled RETRO study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75(1):45–51.

36. Emery P, Hammoudeh M, FitzGerald O, et al. Sustained remission with etanercept tapering in early rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(19):1781–1792.

 

 

Copyright © 2018 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions


More in AFP

More in Pubmed

MOST RECENT ISSUE


Oct 15, 2019

Access the latest issue of American Family Physician

Read the Issue


Email Alerts

Don't miss a single issue. Sign up for the free AFP email table of contents.

Sign Up Now

Navigate this Article