Already a member or subscriber? Sign in now

Three questions to ask before using race-adjusted clinical algorithms

FPM Editors
November 21, 2020

Over the years medical groups have adopted diagnostic algorithms and practice guidelines that include “race corrections” intended to control for biological differences. But there is mounting evidence that race is not a reliable proxy for genetic variation.

When developing or applying algorithms and practice guidelines with a racial component, physicians should ask these three questions:1

1. Is the need for race correction based on robust evidence and statistical analyses (with consideration of internal and external validity, potential confounders, and bias)?

2. Is there a plausible causal mechanism for the racial difference that justifies the race correction?

3. Would implementing this race correction relieve or exacerbate health inequities?

1. Vyas DA, Eisenstein LG, Jones DS. Hidden in plain sight — reconsidering the use of race correction in clinical algorithms. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(9):874–882.

Read more Practice Pearls from the literature and from your colleagues in FPM. Got a Pearl you’d like to share? Comment below or send it to FPM.

Posted on Nov 20, 2020 by FPM Editors

Copyright © 2026 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.