Letters to the Editor

An Osteopathic Approach to Neck Pain

 

Am Fam Physician. 2021 Mar 1;103(5):262-263.

Original Article: Neck Pain: Initial Evaluation and Management

Issue Date: August 1, 2020

See additional reader comments at: https://www.aafp.org/afp/2020/0801/p150.html

We thank Drs. Childress and Stuek for presenting a best practice approach to the initial evaluation and treatment of neck pain. We propose also considering an osteopathic approach.

In the absence of red flag findings, we agree that clinicians should consider treatment focused on the patient's level of pain and function. With this same approach, we encourage clinicians to use osteopathic techniques to treat neck pain and consider the relationship between structure and function. Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) is a group of related techniques used to manage somatic dysfunction (see https://www.aafp.org/afp/2019/0215/p248.html). The goals of applying manual medicine are to restore maximal, pain-free movement of the musculoskeletal system; enhance neuromuscular function; and improve biomechanical balance.1 The evidence indicates that manual therapy is equally or more effective at treating pain and improving function compared with oral analgesics.2 Cervical manipulation and mobilization may be considered to provide short-term improvement in pain relief and function in patients with neck pain.3

In our office, we teach and use OMT in addition to the treatments outlined in the article by Drs. Childress and Stuek. Our patients appreciate the hands-on approach that OMT allows while we are able to minimize the adverse effects of pharmacologic therapies.

Editor's Note: This letter was sent to the authors of “Neck Pain: Initial Evaluation and Management,” who declined to reply.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations.

References

1. Gunnar Brolinson P, McGinley SMG, Kerger S. Osteopathic manipulative medicine and the athlete. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2008;7(1):49–56.

2. Bodine WA. Osteopathic manipulative treatment: a primary care approach. Am Fam Physician. 2019;99(4):214. Accessed September 2, 2020. https://www.aafp.org/afp/2019/0215/p214.html

3. Gross A, Langevin P, Burnie SJ, et al. Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(9):CD004249.

Send letters to afplet@aafp.org, or 11400 Tomahawk Creek Pkwy., Leawood, KS 66211-2680. Include your complete address, e-mail address, and telephone number. Letters should be fewer than 400 words and limited to six references, one table or figure, and three authors.

Letters submitted for publication in AFP must not be submitted to any other publication. Possible conflicts of interest must be disclosed at time of submission. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting the AAFP permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. The editors may edit letters to meet style and space requirements.

This series is coordinated by Kenny Lin, MD, MPH, Associate Deputy Editor for AFP Online.

 

 

Copyright © 2021 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions

MOST RECENT ISSUE


Apr 15, 2021

Access the latest issue of American Family Physician

Read the Issue


Email Alerts

Don't miss a single issue. Sign up for the free AFP email table of contents.

Sign Up Now

Navigate this Article