The Case for Supervised Injection Sites in the United States

Jorge Finke, MD,
Jie Chan, MD,
Bowdoin Street Health Center, Dorchester, Massachusetts

American Family Physician. 2022;105(5):454-455.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

The opioid epidemic continues to ravage the nation, and overdose deaths in the United States are increasing every year. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated this public health emergency. As a result, the number of annual overdose deaths increased by 37% to more than 96,000 from 2020 to 2021.1,2 Overdose deaths are so high that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has introduced harm reduction initiatives that have historically been controversial: needle exchange programs to slow the spread of bloodborne diseases and provision of fentanyl test strips to help people who inject drugs identify contaminated street drugs.3 However, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services stopped short of supporting supervised injection sites, a harm reduction strategy that has been proven to save lives in other countries.4 Supervised injection sites have been legally operating in Europe, Canada, and Australia since 1986.4

With the 2021 opening of the nation's first supervised injection sites in New York City and a growing movement advocating for expanding them to other U.S. cities, family physicians should be knowledgeable about the potential impacts of these sites.5,6 These facilities are over-seen by health care personnel who provide sterile injection supplies, counseling on safe injection techniques, emergency care in the event of an overdose, primary medical care, and referrals to appropriate social and addiction services.7 The personnel in the facilities are able to offer services to people who would otherwise inject drugs in public spaces.8 Unfortunately, because of legal considerations, the U.S. Justice Department has fought to prevent the opening of supervised injection sites despite evidence that they lower death rates and decrease disease transmission.3

Supervised injection sites improve health outcomes. One study found a 26% net reduction in overdose deaths in the area surrounding a supervised injection site in Vancouver, Canada, compared with the rest of the city.9 A supervised injection site in Barcelona, Spain, was associated with a 50% reduction in overdose mortality from 1991 to 2008.4 People who inject drugs are significantly less likely to share needles if they regularly use supervised injection sites.10 These sites could be effective in reducing the rates of HIV and hepatitis C in people who inject drugs.11 Supervised injection sites can also reduce the number of publicly discarded syringes, and they improve public safety.7 A 2019 article from American Family Physician discusses ways that physicians can counsel patients who inject drugs about safer injection practices.12

Concerns about these sites leading to increased criminal activity or drug use are not supported by the evidence. One study in Vancouver, Canada, observed an abrupt, persistent decrease in crime after the opening of a supervised injection site.9 These sites reduce public nuisance because patients can inject drugs and discard used needles safely rather than in public spaces.9 In a study of an unsanctioned supervised injection site in the United States, 90% of people using the site reported that they would otherwise be injecting in a public restroom, street, park, or parking lot.11

Several modeling studies predict that legally sanctioning supervised injection sites in the United States would reduce health care costs by preventing HIV, hepatitis C, hospitalizations for skin and soft-tissue infections, overdose deaths, ambulance calls, and emergency department visits and by increasing uptake of addiction treatment.13,14 A cost-benefit analysis of a hypothetical site in Baltimore, Md., predicted that it would generate $7.8 million in savings at an annual cost of $1.8 million.13 Another estimate in New York City predicted that one supervised injection site could save $800,000 to $1.6 million in annual health care costs from opioid overdoses.14

Supervised injection sites effectively reduce overdose deaths, and many of the fears about them are unfounded. The American Academy of Family Physicians issued a policy statement supporting these facilities.15 Although federal support is lacking, individual cities and states are leading the efforts to increase harm reduction strategies to prevent overdose deaths. In 2021, Rhode Island became the first state to legalize supervised injection sites, with locations to be decided in 2022.16 Family physicians have several opportunities to promote this needed change, including speaking in support of the sites at town halls, working with local advocacy groups to promote efforts to create the sites, and working with physician organizations such as the American Academy of Family Physicians to develop supportive policies. Even something as simple as writing a letter to your senator or representative could be hugely impactful.

Overall, supervised injection sites reduce overdose deaths, infectious diseases, and public nuisance crimes. Patients who have opioid use disorder deserve access to safe, effective harm reduction interventions that save lives and connect them to treatment. These facilities are already saving lives in other countries, and the United States should follow suit by supporting supervised injection sites to reduce overdose deaths.

Editor's Note: Dr. Finke is the medical editing fellow for American Family Physician.

Address correspondence to Jorge Finke, MD, at jfinke@bidmc.harvard.edu. Reprints are not available from the authors.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

  1. 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Drug overdose deaths. March 3, 2021. Accessed November 1, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/deaths/index.html
  2. 2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Center for Health Statistics. Vital statistics rapid release: provisional drug overdose death counts. January 2022. Accessed March 22, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/drug-overdose-data.htm
  3. 3.Mann B. Overdose deaths are so high that the Biden team is embracing ideas once seen as taboo. NPR. Updated October 27, 2021. Accessed November 1, 2021. https://www.npr.org/2021/10/27/1049245787/biden-hhs-tackle-drug-overdose-deaths
  4. 4.Gostin LO, Hodge JG, Gulinson CL. Supervised injection facilities: legal and policy reforms. JAMA. 2019;321(8):745-746.
  5. 5.Allyn B. Cities planning super vised drug injection sites fear Justice Department reaction. NPR. July 12, 2018. Accessed November 1, 2021. https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2018/07/12/628136694/harm-reduction-movement-hits-obstacles
  6. 6.Mays JC, Newman A. Nation's first supervised drug-injection sites open in New York. The New York Times. November 30, 2021. Accessed March 22, 2022. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/30/nyregion/supervised-injection-sites-nyc.html
  7. 7.European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. Drug consumption rooms: an overview of provision and evidence. Updated June 7, 2018. Accessed November 1, 2021. https://www.emcdda.europa.eu/topics/pods/drug-consumption-rooms
  8. 8.Beletsky L, Davis CS, Anderson E, et al. The law (and politics) of safe injection facilities in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(2):231-237.
  9. 9.Levengood TW, Yoon GH, Davoust MJ, et al. Supervised injection facilities as harm reduction: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2021;61(5):738-749.
  10. 10.Wood E, Tyndall MW, Montaner JS, et al. Summary of findings from the evaluation of a pilot medically supervised safer injecting facility. CMAJ. 2006;175(11):1399-1404.
  11. 11.Kral AH, Davidson PJ. Addressing the nation's opioid epidemic: lessons from an unsanctioned supervised injection site in the U.S. Am J Prev Med. 2017;53(6):919-922.
  12. 12.Visconti AJ, Sell J, Greenblatt AD. Primary care for persons who inject drugs. Am Fam Physician. 2019;99(2):109-116. Accessed February 2, 2022. https://www.aafp.org/afp/2019/0115/p109.html
  13. 13.Irwin A, Jozaghi E, Weir BW, et al. Mitigating the heroin crisis in Baltimore, MD, USA: a cost-benefit analysis of a hypothetical supervised injection facility. Harm Reduct J. 2017;14(1):29.
  14. 14.Behrends CN, Paone D, Nolan ML, et al. Estimated impact of supervised injection facilities on overdose fatalities and healthcare costs in New York City. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019;106:79-88.
  15. 15.American Academy of Family Physicians. Needle exchange programs and safe injection sites. 2019. Accessed November 1, 2021. https://www.aafp.org/about/policies/all/needle-exchange.html
  16. 16.Wernau J. Rhode Island set to be first state to pilot safe-injection sites for drug users. The Wall Street Journal. October 24, 2021. Accessed October 31, 2021. https://www.wsj.com/articles/rhode-island-set-to-be-first-state-to-pilot-safe-injection-sites-for-drug-users-11635067801

Copyright © 2026 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.