Family Medicine Research Is Not a Federal Priority

Alison Huffstetler, MD
Hoon Byun, PhD
Yalda Jabbarpour, MD

American Family Physician. 2023;108(6):541B-541C.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

Research in family medicine produces clinical information and improves care delivery, but it has yet to receive equitable federal investment. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is the primary funder of medical research in the United States. In 2021, the NIH received $45 billion.1 Between 2017 and 2021, the NIH spent only 0.2% of its budget on family medicine research (Figure 1). Although other funding organizations exist, the NIH is the largest funder of biomedical research, and because it continues to undervalue family medicine research, its underinvestment impacts clinical care.

Primary care research activities are essential to implementing high-quality primary care, innovating new care approaches, adapting and disseminating population health and primary care systems, and measuring health outcomes.2 In their 2021 report, the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine charged the federal government to place more emphasis on and invest more dollars into primary care research.3

Of the $45 billion budget given to the NIH, 84% was spent on extramural research, and approximately 10% supported internal investigations and projects.1 Overall, $42.3 billion was spent on disease-specific research. Compared with the NIH budget, the annual budget of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) is $488 million. In 2022, the AHRQ received an increase in direct primary care research funding of only $10 million.4 Of the total AHRQ budget, health services research was allocated only $128 million, and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Trust Fund received $109 million.

In 2023, the Robert Graham Center evaluated research funding disparities.5 Funding for family medicine research was determined based on methods from a previous study and included only grants allocated to family medicine departments.6 Data were collected over a five-year interval. Pediatric and internal medicine departments receive federal funding as well; however, this funding does not correlate directly with general primary care research because it is often distributed to subspecialties and inpatient care.

Between 2017 and 2021, the funding stream to primary care was just above 0.2% of the total funding from the NIH. This was essentially unchanged from the last time these data were collected more than a decade ago.6 The total spending in dollars from the NIH peaked at $108.4 million.5 When funding from the AHRQ was added, primary care received approximately $357 million in 2021.4

For comparison, Congress passed a bill in 2022 that provided $200 million in research funding for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis alone.7 Complementary and integrative health (including grants that address the topic through any NIH institute) received $577 million in 2022.8 Although these topics are important, family medicine is foundational to disease prevention, managing complications of chronic disease, and implementation of evidence-based interventions to keep people living longer and healthier lives. Research is necessary in primary care to identify care models and delivery systems that actualize basic science knowledge generated by other researchers. Making primary care research funding a federal priority could potentially lead to a more proactive health care system that better supports disease prevention and improves community and population health.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

  1. 1.National Institutes of Health. What we do: budget. August 1, 2023. Accessed August 10, 2023. https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/what-we-do/budget
  2. 2.Mendel P, Gidengil CA, Tomoaia-Cotisel A, et al. Health services and primary care research study: comprehensive report. Accessed August 8, 2023. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1503-1.html
  3. 3.National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Implementing high-quality primary care: rebuilding the foundation of health care. Accessed August 10, 2023. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/25983/implementing-high-quality-primary-care-rebuilding-the-foundation-of-health
  4. 4.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Budget estimates for appropriations committees. Fiscal year 2022. Last reviewed May 2021. Accessed May 25, 2023. https://www.ahrq.gov/cpi/about/mission/budget/2022/index.html
  5. 5.Jabbarpour Y, Petterson S, Jetty A, et al.; Milbank Memorial Fund and Physician’s Foundation. The health of US primary care: a baseline scorecard tracking support for high-quality primary care. February 22, 2023. Accessed August 8, 2023. https://www.milbank.org/publications/health-of-us-primary-care-a-baseline-scorecard
  6. 6.Lucan SC, Phillips RL, Bazemore AW. Off the roadmap? Family medicine’s grant funding and committee representation at NIH. Ann Fam Med. 2008;6(6):534-542.
  7. 7.ALS Association. Federal budget bill boosts spending on ALS research. March 11, 2022. Accessed August 10, 2023. https://www.als.org/blog/federal-budget-bill-boosts-spending-als-research#:~:text=The%20fiscal%20year%202022%20government,%2D%20Sept%2030%2C%202022
  8. 8.National Institutes of Health. Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools. Estimates for funding for various research, condition, and disease categories. March 31, 2023. Accessed August 10, 2023. https://report.nih.gov/funding/categorical-spending

The information and opinions contained in research from the Graham Center do not necessarily reflect the views or the policy of the AAFP.

This series is coordinated by Kenny Lin, MD, MPH, deputy editor.

A collection of Graham Center Policy One-Pagers published in AFP is available at https://www.aafp.org/afp/graham. One-Pagers are also available at https://www.graham-center.org.

Copyright © 2026 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.