FPIN's Clinical Inquiries
From the Family Practice Inquiries Network

Arthroscopic Surgery vs. Physical Therapy for Degenerative Meniscal Tears

Jason W. Deck, MD
Lamont Cavanagh, MD
William Dudney, MD
Joshua Hansen, MD
Thomas Kern, MD
Emrys Moreau, MFA, MLIS

American Family Physician. 2024;110(4):421-422.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

CLINICAL QUESTION

Is arthroscopic surgery superior to physical therapy (PT) for degenerative meniscal tears?

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

Arthroscopic surgery, PT, and exercise can be offered to patients with degenerative meniscal tears; none of these is considered superior. Compared with PT, arthroscopic surgery does not result in any clinically significant differences in pain, symptoms, function, activities of daily living, knee-specific quality of life, or generic quality of life. (Strength of Recommendation [SOR]: A, multiple meta-analyses.) Arthroscopic surgery may worsen range of motion in the knee and cartilage surface area compared with PT. (SOR: C, randomized controlled trials [RCTs].)

EVIDENCE SUMMARY

A 2022 Cochrane review compared arthroscopic surgery for degenerative knee disease with several nonsurgical treatments.1 A subset of the review included five trials comparing arthroscopic surgery plus exercise with exercise alone and three trials comparing arthroscopic surgery with exercise. Seven of the trials included patients with degenerative meniscal tears and excluded patients with severe osteoarthritis (OA).

For pain, arthroscopic surgery showed little or no benefit at any point in time compared with exercise. A 0- to 100-point scale was used to assess pain, with a threshold for clinical significance of 15 points. Although there was statistical improvement in pain at the “up to 3 months” and “3 to 6 months” time points, these translated to clinically unimportant mean differences on the pain scale of −4.2 points (95% CI, −6.6 to −1.6) at up to 3 months and −4.0 points (95% CI, −6.6 to −1.6) between 3 and 6 months. Arthroscopic surgery minimally affected function, knee-specific quality of life, and generic quality of life compared with exercise.

A 2023 systematic review and meta-analysis of four RCTs (N = 713) compared the effectiveness of PT with arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in patients 18 years and older with degenerative meniscal tears.2 All studies included a 5-year follow-up to assess pain or physical function as an outcome measure. The analysis found no significant differences on the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, or quality of life.

A 2020 RCT (N = 286) compared arthroscopic partial meniscectomy with PT in patients with a degenerative meniscal tear, focusing on the patients' most significant functional limitations.3 This study was part of the Cost-effectiveness of Early Surgery versus Conservative Treatment with Optional Delayed Meniscectomy for Patients over 45 years with non-obstructive meniscal tears (ESCAPE) trial. The Dutch-language equivalent of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) was the main outcome measure. Exclusion criteria included severe OA, body mass index greater than 35 kg per m2, and previous knee surgery.

In the RCT, 139 patients underwent arthroscopic partial meniscectomy, whereas 147 patients participated in 16 PT sessions over 8 weeks. After their respective interventions, patients completed the PSFS, which assesses subjective functional status by measuring perceived difficulty in performing activities valued most in daily life and at which patients would like to improve. At 24-month follow-up, the PSFS scores of the surgery group improved by a mean of 4.8 ± 2.6 points (from 6.8 ± 1.9 at baseline to 2.0 ± 2.2 after intervention), and the scores of the PT group improved by a mean of 4.0 ± 3.1 points (from 6.7 ± 2.0 at baseline to 2.7 ± 2.5 after intervention). The between-group difference was −0.6 points (95% CI, −1.0 to −0.2; P = .004) in favor of the surgery group, which was statistically significant but less than the clinically meaningful threshold (2.5 points on an 11-point scale).

JASON W. DECK, MD; LAMONT CAVANAGH, MD; WILLIAM DUDNEY, MD; JOSHUA HANSEN, MD; and THOMAS KERN, MD, Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Oklahoma School of Community Medicine in Tulsa

EMRYS MOREAU, MFA, MLIS, Schusterman Library, University of Oklahoma-Tulsa

Copyright © Family Physicians Inquiries Network. Used with permission.

Address correspondence to Jason W. Deck, MD, at Jason-Deck@ouhsc.edu.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

  1. 1.O'Connor D, Johnston RV, Brignardello-Petersen R, et al. Arthroscopic surgery for degenerative knee disease (osteoarthritis including degenerative meniscal tears). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022(3):CD014328.
  2. 2.Fernández-Matías R, García-Pérez F, Gavín-González C, et al. Effectiveness of exercise versus arthroscopic partial meniscectomy plus exercise in the management of degenerative meniscal tears at 5-year follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023;143(5):2609-2620.
  3. 3.Noorduyn JCA, Glastra van Loon T, van de Graaf VA, et al.; ESCAPE Research Group. Functional outcomes of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus physical therapy for degenerative meniscal tears using a patient-specific score: a randomized controlled trial. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020;8(10) ): 2325967120954392.
  4. 4.Başar B, Başar G, Büyükkuşçu MÖ, et al. Comparison of physical therapy and arthroscopic partial meniscectomy treatments in degenerative meniscus tears and the effect of combined hyaluronic acid injection with these treatments: a randomized clinical trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2021;34(5):767-774.
  5. 5.Collins JE, Shrestha S, Losina E, et al.; METEOR Investigator Group. Five-year structural changes in the knee among patients with meniscal tear and osteoarthritis: data from a randomized controlled trial of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus physical therapy. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022;74(8):1333-1342.

Clinical Inquiries provides answers to questions submitted by practicing family physicians to the Family Physicians Inquiries Network (FPIN). Members of the network select questions based on their relevance to family medicine. Answers are drawn from an approved set of evidence-based resources and undergo peer review. The strength of recommendations and the level of evidence for individual studies are rated using criteria developed by the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (https://www.cebm.net).

The complete database of evidence-based questions and answers is copyrighted by FPIN. If interested in submitting questions or writing answers for this series, go to https://www.fpin.org or email questions@fpin.org.

Copyright © Family Physicians Inquiries Network. Used with permission.

This series is coordinated by John E. Delzell Jr., MD, MSPH, associate medical editor.

A collection of FPIN’s Clinical Inquiries published in AFP is available at https://www.aafp.org/afp/fpin.

Copyright © 2026 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.