Surgical vs Nonsurgical Treatments for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Thomas M. Neubauer, MD
Jason B. Alisangco, DO

American Family Physician. 2025;112(1):20-21.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

DETAILS FOR THIS REVIEW

Study Population: Adults 32 to 53 years of age; 84% women; varying severity of carpal tunnel syndrome; average duration of symptoms between 31 weeks and 3.5 years

Efficacy End Points: Primary outcomes: short-term (less than 3 months follow-up) and long-term (greater than 3 months follow-up) clinical improvement; secondary outcomes: symptoms, function, pain, and health-related quality of life; the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire was used in 8 of 14 studies to quantify symptoms and function

Harm End Points: Secondary outcomes: adverse effects (eg, painful neuroma, tender or hypertrophic scar, subluxation of flexor tendons, wound infection, complex regional pain syndrome, sectioning of motor branch of medial nerve) and need for surgery

THE NUMBERS

Surgery vs splinting, long term (> 3 months follow-up)
Benefits
Number needed to treat of 4 for clinical improvement after initial surgery
Number needed to treat of 3 to reduce risk for further surgery after initial surgery
Harms
Uncertain or insufficient evidence to draw conclusions
Surgery vs corticosteroid injection, long term (> 3 months follow-up)
Uncertain or insufficient evidence to draw conclusions

Narrative: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most prevalent mononeuropathy, occurring in 1% to 5% of the general population. It has a female to male ratio of 3:1.1,2 CTS is caused by compression and traction of the median nerve as it passes through the volar side of the wrist under the transverse carpal ligament in the carpal tunnel. Patients report pain, numbness, or paresthesia in the first three digits and radial half of the fourth digit. As severity increases, hand dexterity can decrease due to weakness of the thenar muscles, including the abductor pollicis brevis, flexor pollicis brevis, and opponens pollicis.3 Combining history, examination, and provocative test findings using the CTS-6 tool enhances clinical diagnosis.4 Electrodiagnostic studies of the median nerve can be obtained for moderate to severe disease or diagnostic uncertainty. Treatment is guided by shared decision-making, with consideration of disease severity and symptom duration. Clinical practice guidelines recommend surgical referral for patients with severe symptoms, thenar atrophy, or positive findings on electrodiagnostic testing.5 Mild to moderate CTS should be treated with splinting, injections, occupational therapy, or surgery.4

The 2024 Cochrane review discussed here evaluated the benefits and harms of surgical vs various nonsurgical treatments for CTS in adults.6 The systematic review found 14 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing surgery vs splinting, corticosteroid injection, splinting plus corticosteroid injection, platelet-rich plasma injection, manual therapy, multimodal nonoperative treatment, and unspecified medical treatment and hand support. Studies comparing surgery vs surgery with corticosteroid injections were also included.

There were 1,231 total participants 32 to 53 years of age, of which 84% were women, resulting in 1,293 participating or symptomatic wrists. Symptom severity varied among the studies, and symptom duration ranged from 31 weeks to 3.5 years. The primary outcome of clinical improvement was defined as the patient reporting they were completely satisfied or almost satisfied with clinical response at less than 3 months (short term) and greater than 3 months (long term) of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included symptoms, function, pain, health-related quality of life, adverse effects, and need for surgery or reoperation.

THOMAS M. NEUBAUER, MD, CAQSM, FAAFP, Battalion Surgeon, Fort Carson, Colorado

JASON B. ALISANGCO, DO, CAQSM, FAAFP, Deputy Commander and Division Surgeon, Moncrief Army Health Center, Fort Jackson, South Carolina

Address correspondence to Thomas M. Neubauer, MD, at Thomas.m.neubauer.mil@army.mil

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

  1. 1.Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, et al. Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA. 1999;282(2):153-158.
  2. 2.Jackson R, Beckman J, Frederick M, et al. Rates of carpal tunnel syndrome in a state workers' compensation information system, by industry and occupation—California, 2007–2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(39):1094-1097.
  3. 3.Padua L, Coraci D, Erra C, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome: clinical features, diagnosis, and management. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(12):1273-1284.
  4. 4.Wipperman J, Penny ML. Carpal tunnel syndrome: rapid evidence review. Am Fam Physician. 2024;110(1):52-57.
  5. 5.Carpal tunnel syndrome: a summary of clinical practice guideline recommendations—using the evidence to guide physical therapist practice. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019;49(5):359-360.
  6. 6.Lusa V, Karjalainen TV, Pääkkönen M, et al. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024(1):CD001552.

Copyright ©2026 MD Aware, LLC (theNNT.com). Used with permission.

This series is coordinated by Christopher W. Bunt, MD, AFP assistant medical editor, and the NNT Group.

A collection of Medicine by the Numbers published in AFP is available at https:// www.aafp.org/afp/mbtn.

Copyright © 2026 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.