POEMs
Patient-Oriented Evidence That Matters

Beta-Lactam Monotherapy for Patients with Sepsis

ALLEN F. SHAUGHNESSY , PHARM.D.

American Family Physician. 2004;70(1):174.

Clinical Question: Is adding an aminogly-coside antibiotic to a beta-lactam antibiotic more effective than use of a beta-lactam antibiotic alone for treating sepsis in immu-nocompetent patients?

Setting: Inpatient (any location)

Study Design: Meta-analysis (randomized controlled trials)

Synopsis: The investigators of this meta-analysis combined the results of 64 studies enrolling 7,568 patients with sepsis caused by a variety of conditions, including pneumonia, urinary tract infections, and abdominal infections. The randomized or quasirandomized studies compared therapy with a beta-lactam antibiotic alone or in combination with an aminoglyco-side antibiotic. Results of 43 trials that included 5,527 patients showed no difference between monotherapy and combination therapy in all-cause mortality by the end of the study and for up to 30 days of follow-up. Treatment failure occurred less often with monotherapy (number needed to treat = 34; 95 percent confidence interval [CI], 20 to 147). Subgroup analysis found no difference when examining patients with documented Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection, any gram-negative infection, bacteremia, or nonurinary tract infections. Nephrotoxicity occurred significantly more often in patients treated with the aminoglycoside antibiotic (number needed to harm = 15; 95 percent CI, 14 to 17).

Bottom Line: When used alone, a beta-lactam antibiotic is as effective as a combination with an aminoglycoside antibiotic in the treatment of sepsis caused by a variety of infections in immunocompetent patients. (Level of Evidence: 1a)

ALLEN F. SHAUGHNESSY, PHARM.D.

  1. 1.Paul M, et al. Beta lactam monotherapy versus beta lactam-aminoglycoside combination therapy for sepsis in immunocompetent patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ. March 20, 2004;328:668-72.

POEMs (patient-oriented evidence that matters) are provided by Essential Evidence Plus, a point-of-care clinical decision support system published by Wiley-Blackwell. For more information, see http://www.essentialevidenceplus.com. Copyright Wiley-Blackwell. Used with permission.

For definitions of levels of evidence used in POEMs, see https://www.essentialevidenceplus.com/Home/Loe?show=Sort.

Primary Care Update, a free podcast focused on POEMs, is available on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

This series is coordinated by Natasha J. Pyzocha, DO, contributing editor.

A collection of POEMs published in AFP is available at https://www.aafp.org/afp/poems.

Copyright © 2026 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.