Vision Loss in Older Persons

ALLEN L. PELLETIER, MD
JEREMY THOMAS, PharmD
FAWWAZ R. SHAW, MD

American Family Physician. 2009;79(11):963-970.

Author disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Patient information: See related handout on glaucoma.

Family physicians have an essential role in assessing, identifying, treating, and preventing or delaying vision loss in the aging population. Approximately one in 28 U.S. adults older than 40 years is visually impaired. Vision loss is associated with depression, social isolation, falls, and medication errors, and it can cause disturbing hallucinations. Adults older than 65 years should be screened for vision problems every one to two years, with attention to specific disorders, such as diabetic retinopathy, refractive error, cataracts, glaucoma, and age-related macular degeneration. Vision-related adverse effects of commonly used medications, such as amiodarone or phosphodiesterase inhibitors, should be considered when evaluating vision problems. Prompt recognition and management of sudden vision loss can be vision saving, as can treatment of diabetic retinopathy, refractive error, cataracts, glaucoma, and age-related macular degeneration. Aggressive medical management of diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia; encouraging smoking cessation; reducing ultraviolet light exposure; and appropriate response to medication adverse effects can preserve and protect vision in many older persons. Anti-oxidant and mineral supplements do not prevent age-related macular degeneration, but may play a role in slowing progression in those with advanced disease.

Loss of vision is one of the most feared complications of aging.1 Approximately one in 28 U.S. adults older than 40 years is visually impaired. Adults older than 80 years comprise 8 percent of the U.S. population, but account for 70 percent of cases of severe visual impairment.2 With a rapidly aging population, the number of persons with visual impairment in the United States and worldwide is expected to increase significantly in the next decade.

SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Clinical recommendationEvidence ratingReferences
All persons older than 65 years should be screened periodically for vision problems.C1014
All older persons with diabetes should have a dilated eye examination within one year of diabetes diagnosis, and at least annually thereafter.C17
Tight control of glucose and blood pressure lowers the risk of progressive diabetic retinopathy.A25, 31, 3335
Controlling blood pressure in older persons with and without diabetes may reduce the risk of ischemic vascular complications that can cause vision loss.B36
Smoking is linked to several causes of progressive visual impairment; smoking cessation counseling should be a routine aspect of care for older persons.B3840
Antioxidant and zinc supplements, alone or in combination, do not prevent or delay onset of age-related macular degeneration.A42
Antioxidant and zinc supplementation may delay the progression of age-related macular degeneration in some persons with advanced disease.B43

A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, go to https://www.aafp.org/afpsort.xml.

Adults with low vision are at high risk of depression, social withdrawal, and isolation.1,3 Vision loss in older persons is an independent risk factor for falls.4 Progressive vision loss can be associated with a syndrome of hallucinations which, although benign, can be disturbing to patients.5 Older persons with visual impairments are more likely to be institutionalized.6,7 Adults who are visually impaired are at risk of self-administered medication errors, which may result in an increased rate of hospitalization.8 A retrospective study of adult Medicare beneficiaries found that those with impaired vision incur significantly higher treatment costs for eye- and non–eye-related disease.9 Family physicians have an essential role in assessing, identifying, treating, and preventing or delaying vision loss in the aging population. Table 1 lists resources for older persons who are visually impaired.

Table 1 Resources for Older Persons with Impaired Vision

Lighthouse International
Telephone: (800) 829-0500
Web site: http://www.lighthouse.org
Mission is to fight vision loss through prevention, treatment, and empowerment; provides free literature on glaucoma, macular degeneration, diabetes, cataracts, and other causes of impaired vision; Web site includes a searchable library, information on low vision rehabilitation services, and links to rehabilitation agencies, state agencies, advocacy groups, and optometrists and ophthalmologists nationwide
National Federation of the Blind
Telephone: (410) 659-9314
Web site: http://www.nfb.org
More than 50,000 members and affiliates in all 50 states; the largest organization of persons in the United States who are blind; offers advocacy for persons with visual impairments; provides individual, group, and community education; supports research, technology, and programs encouraging independence and self-confidence
VisionAWARE
Telephone: (914) 528-5120
Web site: http://www.visionaware.org/
Primary focus is a “self-help for vision loss” Web site; produces self-help publications that provide adaptive techniques for persons with impaired vision; sponsors online education; committed to increasing the visibility of other organizations and resources that address the unmet needs of persons who are blind or who have low vision

Screening for Vision Loss

Because many causes of vision loss in older adults (estimates vary from 40 to 50 percent) are preventable or treatable,1,3 vision screening should be a part of the periodic health examination in all persons older than 65 years (Table 2).1014

Table 2 Guidelines for Vision Screening in Older Persons as Part of a Periodic Health Examination

American Academy of Family Physicians10
Older adults should be screened with the Snellen chart; interval not stated.
American Academy of Ophthalmology11
Adults older than 65 years with no risk factors or identifiable eye disease should have a comprehensive medical eye evaluation every one to two years.
Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination12
Visual acuity screening by chart should be part of the periodic health examination in adults older than 65 years.
Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement13
Routine visual acuity screening should be performed in adults older than 65 years; interval not stated.
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force14
Visual acuity screening by Snellen chart should be part of the periodic health examination in adults older than 65 years.

Information from references 10 through 14.

Visual acuity screening is easily accomplished using a wall or handheld chart, such as the Snellen chart. The Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart (ftp://ftp.nei.nih.gov/charts/EC02_300.tif) was developed by the National Eye Institute and is the accepted international reference standard for determining visual acuity in clinical trials.15 Modifications of the ETDRS chart are available for use with low-literacy and non–English-speaking populations.

Visual acuity screening alone has limitations. Chart screening may not detect visual field loss or discriminate central versus peripheral vision loss, and is not sensitive to loss of accommodation, color vision change, or low-light vision impairment. Visual acuity screening alone cannot identify functional impairment or functional adaptation to vision loss.15 Inquiring about specific symptoms and the functional impact of vision loss should therefore be a part of the vision screening process.3,15

DISEASE-SPECIFIC SCREENING

Diabetic retinopathy is one of the leading causes of blindness in persons older than 40 years in North America.2 Diabetic retinopathy is classified as nonproliferative or proliferative, with or without macular edema. Up to 10 percent of persons newly diagnosed with diabetes will have retinopathy within one year of diagnosis. In persons with severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy, the risk of progression to vision-threatening proliferative retinopathy within one year is 50 to 75 percent.1 Recommendations for eye evaluation in persons with diabetes are summarized in Table 3.16,17

Table 3 Disease-Specific Eye Evaluation in Older Persons

Disease or conditionRecommended screening protocol
Age-related macular degenerationNo established screening protocol
CataractsNo established screening protocol
GlaucomaInsufficient evidence to recommend for or against routine screening in the general population; consider periodic screening with tonometry and automated visual field testing in high-risk groups (e.g., black persons, persons with strong family history)16
Persons with diabetes and without retinopathy or with minimal nonproliferative retinopathyDilated eye examination within one year of diabetes diagnosis, and annually thereafter17
Persons with diabetes and stable nonproliferative retinopathyDilated eye examination every six to 12 months17
Persons with diabetes and unstable proliferative retinopathy or macular edemaDilated eye examination every two to four months, depending on degree of disease and visual impairment17

Information from references 16 and 17.

Refractive error affects up to one third of persons older than 50 years.18 Refractive error can be detected with office-based visual acuity testing using the Snellen or ETDRS chart. Improvement in acuity with pinhole testing usually indicates some degree of potentially correctable refractive error. Older adults with refractive error should be referred to an eye care specialist for further evaluation and treatment.

Cataracts are the leading cause of blindness worldwide, and are the most common cause of low vision (but not blindness) in the United States.2 Cataracts can be readily detected with a handheld ophthalmoscope during vision screening. Cataracts that do not cause significant visual impairment may be followed medically. If the cataract is suspected of causing impaired vision, referral to an ophthalmologist is warranted.

The natural history and progression of open-angle glaucoma is poorly understood. Forty percent of persons with vision-threatening primary open-angle glaucoma have normal intraocular pressures, and the glaucoma will be missed by intraocular pressure measurements alone.16 Complete screening for open-angle glaucoma should include pressure measurement and automated visual field testing. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force does not recommend for or against routine screening for glaucoma in older adults, but recognizes that some subgroups at higher risk (e.g., black persons) may benefit from periodic screening.16

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is responsible for nearly 60 percent of blindness in adults of European descent older than 65 years.2 AMD is classified aswet(neovascularorexudative)ordry(non-neovascular or nonexudative). The Amsler grid may be used as a screening test for AMD. The grid detects linear distortion, metamorphopsia, and central scotomas, which are characteristic of AMD. The patient is instructed to look at the grid and report any wavy lines or areas that are missing or distorted (Figure 1).19 The specificity and sensitivity of the Amsler grid for detecting AMD in primary care practices are not known.

Figure 1.

Amsler Grid, showing defect in central vision typical of macular degeneration.

Reprinted from the National Eye Institute. Amsler grid. ftp://ftp.nei.nih.gov/charts/grid2300.tif. Accessed April 22, 2009.

SCREENING FOR MEDICATION ADVERSE EFFECTS

Taking a thorough medication history in older persons is essential because they are generally more susceptible to adverse effects associated with nonophthalmic medications and herbal products. Table 4 summarizes medications that are known to have ocular adverse effects.20,21

Table 4 Ocular Adverse Effects of Medications Used by Older Persons

Drug or productEffect (certain)Effect (probable or possible)Action
Amiodarone (Cordarone)Blepharoconjunctivitis, colored halos around lights, glare, hazy vision, thyroid ophthalmopathyCorneal ulceration, loss of eyelashes or eyebrows, nonarteritic ischemic optic neuropathy, pseudotumor cerebriConsider eye examination every six to 12 months (for lifetime) because of the long half-life of the drug (controversial); if symptomatic, consider other causes of nonarteritic ischemic optic neuropathy and refer to an eye care specialist
Bisphosphonates (except risedronate [Actonel])*Painful ocular inflammation including episcleritis, nonspecific conjunctivitis, scleritisDiplopia, eyelid edema, glaucoma (with alendronate [Fosamax] only)Nonspecific conjunctivitis generally resolves without discontinuing drug; if pain or severe symptoms persist, consult an eye care specialist
Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitorsBlurred vision, conjunctivitisNo other effects reportedDiscontinue; symptoms should resolve in 72 hours
Ethambutol, isoniazid†Color perception changes, optic neuritis, optic neuropathy, visual field deficitNo other effects reportedBaseline comprehensive eye examination; periodic follow-up as recommended by an eye care specialist
Hydroxychloroquine (Plaquenil)Corneal and retinal deposits with prolonged use, distorted color vision, maculopathyDry eyes, may decrease contact lens toleranceMinimal risk with short-term (antimalarial) use
Adults older than 60 years with prolonged use are at increased risk of ocular toxicity; eye care specialist consult advised
Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (for erectile dysfunction)Blurred vision, changes in color perception, photophobia, ocular painSubconjunctival hemorrhage; nonarteritic ischemic optic neuropathy, permanent vision loss (latter is rare, association controversial)Ocular effects dose-dependent
Pilots may not take per Federal Aviation Administration regulation
Discontinue and refer to an eye care specialist if visual symptoms persist or are severe
Tamoxifen (formerly Nolvadex)Corneal or retinal opacities, loss of visual acuity, retinal degeneration or hemorrhageNo other effects reportedOcular risk over time is 1 to 2 percent Consider baseline comprehensive eye examination, baseline color vision testing; joint eye care specialist/oncology consult advised if vision changes during therapy
Vitamin ABlurry vision, optic disc edema (caused by intracranial hypertension)No other effects reportedEffects reported with excessive doses only

*— Likely bisphosphonate class effect; association with risedronate unclear.

Optic neuropathy reportedly less likely with isoniazid than with ethambutol; ocular adverse effects rare with ethambutol dosage less than 15 mg per kg per day.

Information from references 20 and 21.

Management of Vision-Threatening Conditions

SUDDEN VISION LOSS

Causes of sudden vision loss in older persons include giant cell arteritis, stroke or transient ischemic attacks, ophthalmic artery or central retinal vein occlusion, acute angle-closure glaucoma, retinal detachment, and vitreous hemorrhage. Sudden vision loss most often stems from the abrupt evolution of one or more significant chronic medical problems.22,23

Some etiologies of sudden vision loss in older persons constitute ophthalmologic emergencies, and appropriate treatment necessitates a high index of suspicion and swift diagnosis. High-dose prednisone should be started immediately in suspected cases of giant cell arteritis; this can prevent vision loss, which is usually irreversible after the fact.24 Acute angle-closure glaucoma should be considered in any patient with severe headaches, nausea, vomiting, and visual acuity changes; confirmatory physical findings, such as acute red eye, cloudy cornea, and a sluggishly responsive, mid-dilated pupil, should be sought. Figure 2 will aid in the differential diagnosis of sudden vision loss in older persons.

Figure 2. Differentiation of Common Causes of Sudden Vision Loss

Algorithm differentiating some common causes of sudden vision loss.

TREATMENT OF EYE DISEASE IN PERSONS WITH DIABETES

The treatment of choice for persons with diabetes and severe retinopathy is panretinal laser photocoagulation. In severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy, panretinal laser photocoagulation reduces the risk of severe vision loss by at least 50 percent.25 Macular edema is treated with focal laser photocoagulation, which may prevent or delay vision loss in up to 70 percent of cases.25 Persons with diabetes are at increased risk of vitreous hemorrhage and retinal detachment. Specific treatment of these conditions is beyond the scope of this article.

TREATMENT OF AMD

Retinal photodynamic therapy may arrest progression in the neovascular form of AMD.2 Pegaptanib (Macugen) and ranibizumab (Lucentis) inhibit vascular endothelial growth factors involved in angiogenesis,26,27 and have shown promising results in treating neovascular AMD. Intravitreal injection is required, which may limit patient acceptance. The place of these agents and timing of their administration in AMD therapy is the subject of ongoing clinical trials.

TREATMENT OF PRIMARY OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA

The most commonly administered ophthalmic preparations in older persons are for the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma. The aim of these agents is to lower intraocular pressure in persons with ocular hypertension and evidence of optic nerve damage.28 Systemic absorption of these ophthalmic preparations can be reduced by nasolacrimal occlusion (finger pressed on the caruncle) and eyelid closure for 30 seconds after instillation of the drop.29 Topical ophthalmic agents used for the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma are summarized in Table 5.30

Table 5 Topical Agents for Treatment of Primary Open-angle Glaucoma

Drug class and agentsMechanism of actionSelected drug interactions and effectsPrecautions or warnings
Alpha-adrenergic agonists
Apraclonidine (Iopidine), brimonidine (Alphagan)Decrease aqueous humor productionMonoamine oxidase inhibitors: contraindicated because of hypertensive urgency or emergencyNot studied in persons with hepatic or renal impairment
Beta-adrenergic antagonists
Betaxolol (Betoptic), carteolol, levobunolol (Betagan), metipranolol (Optipranolol), timolol (Betimol)Decrease aqueous humor productionCalcium antagonists and digitalis: prolong atrioventricular conduction timeAsthma, cardiac conduction abnormalities, heart failure
Oral beta antagonists: hypotension and bradycardia
Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors
Brinzolamide (Azopt), dorzolamide (Trusopt Ocumeter)Decrease aqueous humor productionNo significant interactions reportedSulfonamides: potential for Stevens-Johnson syndrome
Parasympathomimetics
Carbachol (Isopto Carbachol), pilocarpineIncrease aqueous humor outflowTopical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: unconfirmed reports of rendering carbachol ineffectiveGastric or urinary tract obstruction, peptic ulcer disease, asthma
Do not use in retinal disease
Prostaglandin analogues
Latanoprost (Xalatan), travoprost (Travatan), bimatoprost (Lumigan)Increase aqueous humor outflowThimerosal: precipitation of latanoprostIntraocular inflammation, macular edema
Sympathomimetics
Dipivefrin (Propine), epinephrineDecrease aqueous humor production and increase aqueous humor outflowLevothyroxine, antihistamines, tricyclic antidepressants: potential for systemic interaction with increased pressor responseHypertension, coronary artery disease, known arrhythmia, diabetes, asthma (epinephrine)
Systemic effects rare with dipivefrin

Information from reference 30.

Prevention of Vision Loss

Aggressive management of chronic medical disorders in older persons can help preserve vision. Smoking cessation, limiting exposure to ultraviolet light, and (possibly) dietary changes and selected use of antioxidant or trace mineral supplements may preserve vision in older persons.

AGGRESSIVE BLOOD GLUCOSE CONTROL

Intensive control of blood glucose has been shown to reduce the progression of diabetic retinopathy in persons with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.25 A 10-year poststudy analysis of survivors in the U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) showed a persistent and significant 24 percent decrease in relative risk of microvascular events in the intensive blood glucose control group, even if tight glucose control was subsequently lost.31 It is challenging to apply this evidence to older persons with diabetes, however, because older adults are particularly susceptible to hypoglycemia with tight glucose control.32 Therapy must be individualized to the patient; as a general rule, blood glucose in older persons with diabetes should be as tightly controlled as possible while avoiding hypoglycemia and its attendant risks.

BLOOD PRESSURE MANAGEMENT

Aggressive blood pressure control with a target of less than 150/85 mm Hg is likely to be vision preserving in older persons, especially those with diabetes. The UKPDS demonstrated that lowering blood pressure to below 150/85 mm Hg in persons with diabetes reduces the risk of progressive diabetic retinopathy, irrespective of A1C level.33 A 10 mm Hg decrease in systolic blood pressure provided an 11 percent relative risk reduction in the incidence of photocoagulation or vitreous hemorrhage; however, unlike intensive blood glucose control, blood pressure lowering must be sustained over time to preserve any benefit.34,35

Hypertension (with or without a diagnosis of diabetes) is associated with a higher risk of ischemic eye events, such as central retinal vein occlusion.36

LIPID MANAGEMENT

Hyperlipidemia is an independent risk factor for central retinal artery and vein occlusion.36,37 Observational studies suggest that control of hyperlipidemia in older persons with and without diabetes may independently reduce the risk of vision loss; however, this has not been confirmed in randomized controlled trials.1,3

SMOKING CESSATION

Smoking has been linked to a variety of causes of visual impairment in older persons, including AMD,38 cataracts,39 and progressive diabetic retinopathy.40 For ophthalmic health, as well as numerous other benefits, older persons who smoke should be advised to quit and offered smoking cessation counseling.

ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT EXPOSURE

Cumulative ultraviolet light exposure is linked to the development of cataracts.41 Older adults should be advised to consider the routine use of sunglasses that filter out ultraviolet light when driving or engaged in outdoor activity.

DIET AND SUPPLEMENTS

A Cochrane meta-analysis reviewed three large prospective clinical trials of antioxidant supplements or zinc to prevent or delay the onset of AMD, and found no demonstrable benefit.42

The Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) enrolled 3,640 persons with established AMD in a four-arm, randomized, prospective clinical trial of antioxidant supplementation, antioxidants plus zinc, zinc plus copper, and placebo. High-risk persons (those with more advanced disease at enrollment) randomized to the antioxidants plus zinc group had statistically significant preservation of vision compared with the placebo group (estimated odds reduction of 27 percent).43

Important caveats are attached to the use of these supplements. Excessive intake of vitamins A and E, especially in smokers, has been linked with an increased risk of lung cancer, and possibly higher rates of congestive heart failure.44,45 Reanalysis of the AREDS data suggests that zinc supplementation is associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for urologic problems.46

There are no prospective or randomized trials of anti-oxidant supplementation for prevention or treatment of eye diseases other than AMD. Observational studies have shown conflicting association between high levels of dietary intake of antioxidants and cataract formation.47

Routine antioxidant or mineral supplementation in all older adults for prevention of AMD or other eye diseases cannot yet be recommended until ongoing, prospective trials clarify who may benefit and what harms, if any, might result from long-term supplementation. There is encouraging evidence, which needs to be further validated, that specific antioxidant and zinc supplementation (the regimen used in AREDS) may preserve vision in some persons with advanced AMD.

ALLEN L. PELLETIER, MD, FAAFP, is an associate professor of family medicine at the Medical College of Georgia, Augusta. He received his medical degree from Louisiana State University School of Medicine, Shreveport, and completed a family medicine residency at the Louisiana State University Health Science Center-Monroe/E.A. Conway Medical Center.

JEREMY THOMAS, PharmD, is an assistant professor of pharmacy and family medicine at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis. He received his pharmacy degree from the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences College of Pharmacy, Little Rock, and completed a pharmacy practice residency at the Regional Medical Center at Memphis.

FAWWAZ R. SHAW, MD, is a general surgery resident at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center. He received his medical degree from the American International School of Medicine, Georgetown, Guyana, and completed a family medicine residency at the University of Tennessee/St. Francis Family Practice Residency Program, Memphis.

Address correspondence to Allen L. Pelletier, MD, FAAFP, Dept. of Family Medicine HB-4020, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912-3500 (e-mail: apelletier@mcg.edu). Reprints are not available from the authors.

Author disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

  1. 1.Rosenberg EA, Sperazza LC. The visually impaired patient. Am Fam Physician. 2008;77(10):1431-1436.
  2. 2.Congdon N, O'Colmain B, Klaver CC, et al.; for the Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group. Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122(4):477-485.
  3. 3.Rowe S, MacLean CH, Shekelle PG. Preventing visual loss from chronic eye disease in primary care. JAMA. 2004;291(12):1487-1495.
  4. 4.Campbell AJ, Robertson MC, LaGrow SJ, et al. Randomised controlled trial of prevention of falls in people > or = 75 with severe visual impairment: the VIP trial. BMJ. 2005;331(7520):817.
  5. 5.Menon GJ. Complex visual hallucinations in the visually impaired: a structured history taking approach. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(3):349-355.
  6. 6.Brézin AP, Lafuma A, Fagnani F, Mesbah M, Berdeaux G. Blindness, low vision, and other handicaps as risk factors attached to institutional residence. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88(10):1330-1337.
  7. 7.Elliot DB, Trukolo-Ilic M, Strong JG, Pace R, Plotkin A, Bevers P. Demographic characteristics of the vision-disabled elderly. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38(12):2566-2575.
  8. 8.Field TS, Mazor KM, Briesacher B, Debellis KR, Gurwitz JH. Adverse drug events resulting from patient errors in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(2):271-276.
  9. 9.Javitt JC, Zhou Z, Willke RJ. Association between vision loss and higher medical care costs in Medicare beneficiaries costs are greater for those with progressive vision loss. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(2):238-245.
  10. 10.American Academy of Family Physicians. American Academy of Family PhysiciansRecommendations for clinical preventive servicesRevision 6.9, January 2009. https://www.aafp.org/online/etc/medialib/aafp_org/documents/clinical/CPS/rcps08-2005.Par.0001.File.tmp/BOD-CPS-Approved-changes.pdf. Accessed April 22, 2009.
  11. 11.American Academy of Ophthalmology. American Academy of OphthalmologyPreferred practice pattern: comprehensive adult medical eye evaluation.http://one.aao.org/CE/PracticeGuidelines/PPP.aspx. Accessed April 22, 2009.
  12. 12.Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. Periodic health examination, 1995 update: 3. Screening for visual problems among elderly patientsCMAJ1995;152(8):1211–1222http://www.ctfphc.org/. Accessed April 22, 2009.
  13. 13.Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI). Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI)Preventive services for adults. http://www.icsi.org/preventive_services_for_adults/preventive_services_for_adults_4.html. Accessed April 22, 2009.
  14. 14.US Preventive Services Task Force. US Preventive Services Task ForceScreening for visual impairmentRockville, Md:Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality1996http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf/uspsvisi.htm. Accessed April 22, 2009.
  15. 15.Kniestedt C, Stamper RL. Visual acuity and its measurement. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2003;16(2):155-170.
  16. 16.US Preventive Services Task Force. US Preventive Services Task ForceScreening for glaucoma: recommendation statementRockville, MdAgency for Healthcare Research and QualityMarch2005. http://www.guidelines.gov/summary/summary.aspx?ss=15&doc_id=6194&nbr=003990&string=glaucoma. Accessed April 22, 2009.
  17. 17.American Academy of Ophthalmology. Preferred practice patterns: diabetic retinopathy. http://one.aao.org/CE/PracticeGuidelines/PPP.aspx. Accessed April 22, 2009.
  18. 18.Kempen JH, Mitchell P, Lee KE, et al.; for the Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group. The prevalence of refractive errors among adults in the United States, Western Europe, and Australia [published correction appears in Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(10):1314]. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122(4):495-505.
  19. 19.National Eye Institute. Amsler grid. ftp://ftp.nei.nih.gov/charts/grid2300.tif. Accessed April 22, 2009.
  20. 20.Santaella RM, Fraunfelder FW. Ocular adverse events associated with systemic medications: recognition and management. Drugs. 2007;67(1):75-93.
  21. 21.Fraunfelder FW. Visual side effects associated with erectile dysfunction agents. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140(4):723-724.
  22. 22.Pokhrel PK, Loftus SA. Ocular emergencies [published correction appears in Am Fam Physician. 2008;77(7):920]. Am Fam Physician. 2007;76(6):829-836.
  23. 23.Fontal MR, Kerrison JB, Garcia R, Oria V. Ischemic optic neuropathy. Semin Neurol. 2007;27(3):221-232.
  24. 24.Warrington KJ, Matteson EL. Management guidelines and outcome measures in giant cell arteritis (GCA). Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007;25(6 suppl 47):137-141.
  25. 25.Mohadmed Q, Gillies MC, Wong TY. Management of diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007;298(8):902-916.
  26. 26.Gragoudes ES, Adamis AP, Cunningham ET, Feinsod M, Guyer DR. for the VEGF Inhibition Study in Ocular Neovascularization Clinical Trial Group. Pegaptanib for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(27):2805-2816.
  27. 27.Chang TS, Bressler NM, Fine JT, Dolan CM, Ward J, Klesert TR for the MARINA Study Group. Improved vision-related function after ranibizumab treatment of age-related macular degeneration: results of a randomized clinical trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(11):1460-1469.
  28. 28.Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(6):701-713.
  29. 29.Zimmerman TJ, Kooner KS, Kandarakis AS, Ziegler LP. Improving the therapeutic index of topically applied ocular drugs. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;102(4):551-553.
  30. 30.Drug Facts and Comparisons 2008. Drug Facts and Comparisons 200862nd ed.St Louis, Mo:Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;2007:1725–1745.
  31. 31.Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR, Neil HA. 10 year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(15):1577-1589.
  32. 32.Lassmann-Vague V. Hypoglycaemia in elderly diabetic patients. Diabetes Metab. 2005:5S53-5S57.
  33. 33.Matthews DR, Stratton IM, Aldington SJ, Holman RR, Kohner EM for the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Risks of progression of retinopathy and vision loss related to tight blood pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus: UKPDS 69. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122(11):1631-1640.
  34. 34.Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Neil HA, Matthews DR. Long term follow-up after tight blood pressure control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(15):1565-1576.
  35. 35.Kohner EM. Microvascular disease: what does the UKPDS tell us about diabetic retinopathy?. Diabet Med. 2008;25(suppl 2):20-24.
  36. 36.The Eye Disease Case Control Study Group. Risk factors for central retinal vein occlusion. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114(5):545-554.
  37. 37.Solomon O, Huna-Baron B, Kurtz S, et al. Analysis of prothrombotic and vascular risk factors in patients with nonartertic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Ophthalmology. 1999;106(4):739-742.
  38. 38.Clemons TE, Milton RC, Klein R, Seddon JM, Ferris FL for the Age Related Eye Disease Study Group. Risk factors for the incidence of advanced age-related macular degeneration in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) AREDS report No. 19. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(4):533-539.
  39. 39.Weintraub JM, Willet WC, Rosner B, Colditz GA, Seddon JM, Hankinson SE. Smoking cessation and risk of cataract extraction among US men and women. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155(1):72-79.
  40. 40.Stratton IM, Kohner EM, Aldington SJ, et al. UKPDS 50: risk factors for the incidence and progression of retinopathy in type II diabetes over 6 years from diagnosis. Diabetologia. 2001;44(2):156-163.
  41. 41.Cruickshanks KJ, Klein BE, Klein R. Ultraviolet light exposure and lens opacities: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Am J Public Health. 1992;82(12):1658-1662.
  42. 42.Evans JR, Henshaw K. Antioxidant vitamin and mineral supplements for preventing age-related macular degeneration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;1:CD000253.
  43. 43.Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group. A randomized, placebo controlled clinical trial of high dose supplementation with vitamins C and E, beta carotene and zinc for age-related macular degeneration and vision loss [published correction appears in Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(9):1251]. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(10):1417-1436.
  44. 44.Lonn E, Bosch J, Yusuf S, et al.; for the HOPE and HOPE-TOO Trial Investigators. Effects of long term vitamin E supplementation on cardiovascular events and cancer: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005;293(11):1338-1347.
  45. 45.Goodman GE, Thornquist MD, Balmes J, et al. The Beta-Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial: incidence of lung cancer and cardiovascular disease mortality during 6-year follow-up after stopping beta-carotene and retinol supplements. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(23):1743-1750.
  46. 46.Johnson AR, Munoz A, Gottleib JL, Jarrard DF. High dose zinc increases hospitalizations due to genitourinary complications. J Urol. 2007;177(2):639-643.
  47. 47.Fernandez MM, Afshari NA. Nutrition and the prevention of cataracts. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008;19(1):66-70.

Copyright © 2026 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.