Neck Pain: Initial Evaluation and Management

Marc A. Childress, MD
Samantha Jayne Stuek, MD

American Family Physician. 2020;102(3):150-156.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations.

Neck pain is a common presenting symptom in the primary care setting and causes significant disability. The broad differential diagnosis requires an efficient but global assessment; therefore, emphasis is typically placed on red flags that can assist in the early recognition and treatment of more concerning diagnoses, such as traumatic injuries, infection, malignancy, vascular emergencies, and other inflammatory conditions. The critical element in appropriate diagnosis and management of these conditions is an accurate patient history. Physical examination findings complement and refine diagnostic cues from the history but often lack the specificity to be of value independently. Diagnostic tools such as imaging and electrodiagnostic tests have variable utility, especially in chronic or degenerative conditions. Treatment of mechanical or nonneuropathic neck pain includes short-term use of medications and possibly injections. However, long-term data for these interventions are limited. Acupuncture and other complementary and alternative therapies may be helpful in some cases. Advanced imaging and surgical evaluation may be warranted for patients with worsening neurologic function or persistent pain.

Neck pain is a common presenting symptom in primary care, with an incidence of 10.4% to 21.3% per year.1 It is the fourth leading cause of disability worldwide.1 The prevalence of neck pain is higher in older adults because of degenerative changes in facet joints and the collapse of intervertebral disks.2 It is estimated that only one in five people with neck pain seeks medical care.3 The differential diagnosis is broad and includes common conditions such as muscular strains and arthritis, as well as more dire conditions such as fractures, spinal cord and nerve injuries, neoplastic disorders, infections, and inflammatory conditions. Family physicians must be able to recognize when neck pain signals a potentially serious condition and should be able to generate an accurate diagnosis through findings from the patient's history, physical examination, and appropriate testing.

SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, go to https://www.aafp.org/afpsort.

BEST PRACTICES IN NEUROLOGY

Recommendations from the Choosing Wisely Campaign
RecommendationSponsoring organization
Do not do nerve conduction studies without also doing a needle electromyogram for testing for radiculopathy, a pinched nerve in the neck or back.American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine

Source: For more information on the Choosing Wisely Campaign, see https://www.choosingwisely.org. For supporting citations and to search Choosing Wisely recommendations relevant to primary care, see https://www.aafp.org/afp/recommendations/search.htm.

Focused History

Obtaining an accurate clinical history is critical in the initial evaluation of neck pain. Acute vs. chronic timing of symptoms and the presence of neuropathic vs. nonneuropathic symptoms can help determine the urgency of the evaluation.

When evaluating a patient with neck pain, the physician must be alert for red flags in the history and physical examination that may indicate the need for urgent testing and intervention. Similar to guidelines for the evaluation of lower back pain, a systematic approach that maintains vigilance for severe pathology in the neck is recommended.4 Table 1 summarizes some of the more serious diagnoses and their associated clinical findings, as well as recommended diagnostic tests. Figure 1 is a recommended approach to patients with neck pain. This article does not focus on acute traumatic injuries or vascular emergencies, but these elements warrant consideration based on the presentation.

TABLE 1. Findings That Warrant Urgent Evaluation in Patients with Neck Pain

ConditionHistorical findingsPhysical examination findingsNext steps
Infection (e.g., diskitis, epidural abscess, herpes zoster, meningitis, osteomyelitis)Fever, meningism, night sweats, photophobiaKernig sign, nuchal rigidity, photophobiaAntibiotics, CRP, ESR, lumbar puncture, MRI with or without contrast, white blood cell count
Inflammatory condition (e.g., ankylosing spondylitis, polymyalgia rheumatica, rheumatoid arthritis)Generalized joint pain, morning stiffness that improves with exerciseOther joints affectedCRP, ESR, radiography, rheumatoid factor testing
Malignancy (e.g., chordoma, metastasis, multiple myeloma, spinal cord tumor)Anorexia, fever, history of malignancy, intractable night pain, pain not relieved at rest, weight lossSignificant bony tenderness, other signs similar to myelopathyMRI
Myelopathy (e.g., amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, cervical cord compression, transverse myelitis)Ataxia, bowel and bladder dysfunction, deep aching neck pain, gait changes, tremor, possible radicular symptoms or weaknessBabinski reflex, clonus, fasciculations, Hoffmann sign, hyperreflexia, increased muscle tone, Lhermitte signElectromyelography, MRI, urgent neurosurgical consultation
Thoracic outlet syndromeIntermittent paresthesias, pain worsened by use, unilateral symptoms; may be confused with cervical radiculopathyPositive Roos test, tenderness to palpation over distal arm veins or at insertion of pectoralis minorMRI or ultrasonography (duplex or arterial)
Vascular emergency (e.g., arterial dissection, vertebrobasilar insufficiency)Ripping or tearing sensation in neck, diplopia, drop attacks, headache, syncope, transient ischemic attack symptoms, vertigo, vision changesKernig sign, unilateral decrease in sensation, unilateral weaknessUrgent referral and imaging (CT or CT angiography)

CRP = C-reactive protein; CT = computed tomography; ESR = erythrocyte sedimentation rate; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging.

FIGURE 1.

Algorithm for evaluation and treatment of patients with neck pain.

Rapidly progressive neuropathic symptoms warrant more aggressive evaluation. Injury to the central spinal cord or nerve roots may be the result of degenerative changes, trauma, mass effect, infection, or other inflammatory or demyelinating conditions. Even without an acute presentation, physicians should be mindful of myelopathic signs and symptoms.4 Myelopathy refers to neurologic compromise resulting from a disturbance of spinal cord tracts within the spinal canal. Initial symptoms include deep, aching neck pain with possible radicular symptoms and muscle weakness; these can quickly progress to gait changes, ataxia, and bowel and bladder dysfunction.5 Physical examination findings associated with a myelopathic disease process include increased muscle tone, fasciculation, clonus, hyperreflexia, the Babinski reflex, and the Lhermitte and Hoffmann signs.

Concurrent systemic symptoms of fever, fatigue, or rash could indicate an infectious etiology. These symptoms in a patient with neck stiffness, photophobia, or other focal neuropathic findings should raise concern for meningitis, epidural abscess, or diskitis (i.e., a bacterial infection of the intervertebral disk tissue). Similarly, neck pain in the setting of described or observed weight loss, significant lymphadenopathy, unexplained fever, or fatigue may signal malignancy or an underlying inflammatory condition.

Certain comorbid disorders and patient factors increase the risk of cervical spine conditions (Table 2). Cervical spine pathology is present in more than one-half of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and the long-term risk of severe pathology in these patients is higher than in unaffected people.6 Individuals with trisomy 21 are at risk of atlanto-occipital instability, which should prompt concern for complications of even mild trauma, as well as for advanced or premature degenerative changes.7 Ankylosing spondylitis can cause neck stiffness and pain. Patients with this condition also have an increased risk of complications from mild trauma.8 Numerous other processes and conditions can be considered in the differential of neck pain, including herpes zoster, angina, endocrine and compressive tumors, fibromyalgia, and psychogenic pain. Many of these conditions can overlap and be part of multifactorial presentations. One study estimated that 43% of neck pain cases are nonneuropathic, 7% are neuropathic, and 50% are mixed.9

TABLE 2. Comorbid Conditions and Patient Factors Associated with Neck Pain

Condition/patient factorPotential pathology
Age > 50 yearsDegenerative changes that narrow the spinal canal, potentially leading to myelopathy
Chronic inflammation, Marfan syndrome, rheumatoid arthritisFrailty fracture
Diabetes mellitus, immunosuppression, injection drug use, kidney failure, liver failure, long-term steroid useInfection
Previous or current malignancySpinal metastasis vs. primary malignancy
Previous traumaBony or ligamentous disruption, whiplash-associated disorder
Trisomy 21Subluxation from atlantoaxial ligament laxity

The remainder of the patient history should focus on specific descriptions of any injury, including potential mechanism, inciting and relieving factors, and pain patterns throughout the day.

Physical Examination

The physical examination should target concerns revealed in the history and distinguish between mechanical and neuropathic symptoms. Localized bony tenderness or prominence is an indication for imaging, whereas soft tissue tenderness may represent myofascial pain, infection, or lymphadenopathy. Although range of motion measurements are widely referenced, their diagnostic relevance is limited and nonspecific.10,11 Range of motion can be more useful in identifying asymmetry or provocation of local or radiating symptoms (e.g., shooting pain down the spine with neck flexion or extension).

Provocative tests can be helpful in the evaluation of suspected neuropathic conditions (Table 3).1215 The specificity of the Spurling test (Figure 212 ) and the high sensitivity of the upper limb tension test (Figure 312 ) make these evaluations particularly valuable if radiculopathy is suspected.16

TABLE 3. Provocative Tests for the Evaluation of Neck Pain

TestDescriptionClinical relevance
Babinski reflexDorsiflexion of the big toe when the plantar aspect of the foot is stimulated with the blunt end of a reflex hammer (typically lateral to medial from heel to metatarsal)Limited stand-alone value, but can be more specific when evaluating compressive upper motor neuron conditions (e.g., myelopathy)
Hoffmann signThumb adduction and flexion at the distal phalanx with possible finger flexion after flicking the distal tip of the third or fourth fingerUpper motor neuron test; has low positive predictive value for localizing spinal vs. brain lesions
Lhermitte signElectric shock sensation down the spine or into the limbs with neck flexion or extensionSuggests nonspecific central cord compression or provocation; can be positive in patients with cervical myelopathy, multiple sclerosis, intraspinal masses, or certain acute infections
Spurling test (Figure 2)Passively move the patient's neck into lateral flexion and extension, then apply gentle downward axial compression; a positive result is pain radiating to the upper limb ipsilateral to the rotation positionWell-established specificity and sensitivity for cervical radiculopathy
Upper limb tension test (Figure 3)With patient supine and the shoulder in a neutral position with the elbow flexed, depress the shoulder, abduct it to 90 degrees, extend the elbow and fingers, then extend and supinate the wrist while the patient flexes the neck to the contralateral and then ipsilateral sides; a positive result is reproduction of pain at any stepHighest sensitivity for cervical radiculopathy; recommended for combined use with the Spurling test in patients with suspected cervical radiculopathy

Information from references 1215.

FIGURE 2.

Demonstration of the Spurling test. Lateral flexion and extension of the neck with axial compression.

Illustration by Marcia Hartsock

Adapted with permission from Childress MA, Becker BA. Nonoperative management of cervical radiculopathy [published correction appears in Am Fam Physician. 2017;96(9):566]. Am Fam Physician. 2016;93(9):749.

FIGURE 3.

Upper limb tension test. (A) Scapular depression with shoulder abduction. (B) Contralateral flexion of the neck with extension of the elbow, wrist, and fingers, and supination of the wrist.

Reprinted with permission from Childress MA, Becker BA. Non-operative management of cervical radiculopathy [published correction appears in Am Fam Physician. 2017;96(9):566]. Am Fam Physician. 2016;93(9):749.

Further examination should include upper and lower extremity strength and deep tendon reflexes if neuropathic conditions are suspected. Radiculopathy is manifested by dermatomal-based upper extremity pain (Figure 412 ), changes in sensation, and weakness. In contrast, myelopathy at similar levels in the neck can provoke less overt lower extremity findings, such as balance difficulties, spasticity, and weakness. Examination may reveal atrophy of the hands, hyperreflexia, and the Lhermitte sign.5

FIGURE 4.

Dermatomal distribution of common cervical radicular symptoms.

Illustration by John Karapelou

Adapted with permission from Childress MA, Becker BA. Nonoperative management of cervical radiculopathy [published correction appears in Am Fam Physician. 2017;96(9):566]. Am Fam Physician. 2016;93(9):748.

Imaging and Other Diagnostic Tests

The American College of Radiology recommends plain radiography as the initial imaging modality in patients with new or increasing nontraumatic neck pain who do not have red flag symptoms.17 Validated clinical tools such as the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study criteria and the Canadian C-Spine Rule can help determine when radiography may be helpful.17,18 Immediate radiography does not improve patient-oriented outcomes in those who do not have recent trauma or red flag symptoms.18 In addition, imaging can detect abnormalities even in asymptomatic patients; for example, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detects degenerative cervical disks in 15% of asymptomatic patients in their 20s, increasing to more than 85% of asymptomatic patients older than 65.19

The time to diagnosis and intervention can be critical when serious conditions are suspected. MRI is recommended for patients with suspected infection, overt neurologic compromise, or progressive neurologic symptoms; it may be appropriate for patients with moderate to severe neck pain that lasts longer than six weeks and does not resolve with standard treatment.20 Computed tomography may be useful in trauma cases, when bony disruption is suspected, or when MRI is contraindicated.

Electromyography and nerve conduction studies are not recommended for patients with neck pain unless they also have numbness, weakness, or pain in the arms or legs. There is insufficient evidence for electrodiagnostic testing, even in cases of suspected radiculopathy.20 Electromyography may be useful when peripheral neuropathy of the upper extremity is a suspected alternative diagnosis.20

Treatment Principles

In the absence of red flag findings that require urgent care, treatment can generally focus on the patient's level of pain and function. Many patients will improve over time, regardless of treatment or whether the cause is neuropathic or nonneuropathic. For example, most patients with cervical radiculopathy will improve with nonsurgical care: 80% to 90% have significantly improved pain and resolution of weakness or reflex deficits within four weeks.21,22

Conservative care for patients with neck pain often includes medications for pain relief. Although practice patterns may prompt the use of specific agents, there is little evidence to support the long-term use of these medications in most patients with neck pain. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and oral muscle relaxants are commonly recommended for patients with nonneuropathic pain. Data on the effectiveness of these medications for neck pain are limited; however, these agents are not effective for similar musculoskeletal conditions, such as low back pain.23 Although there is some evidence that oral corticosteroids provide short-term pain relief in patients with acute radiculopathy,24 there is little evidence that any medication affects recovery. Tramadol may have some benefit, but only in the short term.25 Narcotics can provide modest short-term pain relief, but there is no evidence of sustained benefit, and the risks of cognitive impairment and abuse limit their use.26 Inflammatory conditions may briefly respond to steroids or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, but there is minimal evidence that these medications provide lasting benefit in degenerative conditions, despite their widespread use.4 Similarly, injections of anesthetics, corticosteroids, or botulinum toxin have shown little or no long-term benefit in acute or chronic neck pain.27,28 There is limited evidence for the short-term use (one to two months) of radiofrequency ablation in patients with persistent cervical pain.29

Given the broad range of potential neck pain etiologies and the variety of complementary and alternative treatment options, it is challenging to determine the value of these treatments for neck pain. They generally provide modest benefit compared with medication alone or no therapy.30 Acupuncture has modest benefit in patients with mechanical neck pain.31 Isolated manipulation and mobilization may provide temporary pain relief but not consistent long-term benefit.32 Treatments such as dry needling, low-level laser therapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, and compression therapy have some potential for short-term pain relief, but no reliable long-term data exist to offer specific guidance for these options.33,34

Surgical referral is warranted in cases of progressive neurologic deficit. For persistent but nonprogressive cases, appropriate thresholds and timing for referral are unclear. There is some evidence to support surgical referral after four to eight weeks of ongoing pain, but long-term data are limited.35

Data Sources: A PubMed search was completed in Clinical Queries using the key term neck pain in combination with the following varied strings: diagnosis, evaluation, and differential diagnosis. The search included meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, and reviews. Also searched were the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Effective Healthcare Reports, the Cochrane database, DynaMed, and Essential Evidence Plus. Search dates: May 1 and July 18, 2019, and May 16, 2020.

MARC A. CHILDRESS, MD, is chair of the Department of Family Medicine at Inova Fairfax (Va.) Hospital and associate director of the Primary Care Sports Medicine Fellowship at Virginia Commonwealth University Fairfax Family Practice.

SAMANTHA JAYNE STUEK, MD, is a second-year resident at Virginia Commonwealth University Fairfax Family Practice.

Address correspondence to Marc A. Childress, MD, Virginia Commonwealth University Fairfax Family Practice, 3650 Joseph Siewick Dr., Ste. 400, Fairfax, VA 22033 (email: mchildress@ffpcs.com). Reprints are not available from the authors.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations.

  1. 1.Murray CJ, Atkinson C, Bhalla K, et al.; U.S. Burden of Disease Collaborators. The state of US health, 1990–2010: burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. JAMA. 2013;310(6):591-608.
  2. 2.Cohen SP. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of neck pain. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(2):284-299.
  3. 3.Vasseljen O, Woodhouse A, Bjørngaard JH, et al. Natural course of acute neck and low back pain in the general population: the HUNT study. Pain. 2013;154(8):1237-1244.
  4. 4.Cohen SP, Hooten WM. Advances in the diagnosis and management of neck pain. BMJ. 2017;358:j3221.
  5. 5.Young WF. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a common cause of spinal cord dysfunction in older persons [published correction appears in Am Fam Physician. 2001;63(10):1916]. Am Fam Physician. 2000;62(5):1064-1070. Accessed March 27, 2020. https://www.aafp.org/afp/2000/0901/p1064.html
  6. 6.Laiho K, Kaarela K, Kauppi M. Cervical spine disorders in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and amyloidosis. Clin Rheumatol. 2002;21(3):227-230.
  7. 7.Nouri A, Tetreault L, Singh A, et al. Degenerative cervical myelopathy: epidemiology, genetics, and pathogenesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(12):E675-E693.
  8. 8.Lazennec JY, d'Astorg H, Rousseau MA. Cervical spine surgery in ankylosing spondylitis: review and current concept. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015;101(4):507-513.
  9. 9.Liu R, Kurihara C, Tsai HT, et al. Classification and treatment of chronic neck pain: a longitudinal cohort study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017;42(1):52-61.
  10. 10.Smith AD, Jull G, Schneider G, et al. A comparison of physical and psychological features of responders and non-responders to cervical facet blocks in chronic whiplash. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:313.
  11. 11.Stenneberg MS, Rood M, de Bie R, et al. To what degree does active cervical range of motion differ between patients with neck pain, patients with whiplash, and those without neck pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(7):1407-1434.
  12. 12.Childress MA, Becker BA. Nonoperative management of cervical radiculopathy [published correction appears in Am Fam Physician. 2017;96(9):566]. Am Fam Physician. 2016;93(9):746-754. Accessed March 27, 2020. https://www.aafp.org/afp/2016/0501/p746.html
  13. 13.Davies BM, Mowforth OD, Smith EK, et al. Degenerative cervical myelopathy. BMJ. 2018;360:k186.
  14. 14.Grijalva RA, Hsu FP, Wycliffe ND. Hoffmann sign: clinical correlation of neurological imaging findings in the cervical spine and brain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(7):475-479.
  15. 15.Cook C, Roman M, Stewart KM, et al. Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of clinical special tests for myelopathy in patients seen for cervical dysfunction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39(3):172-178.
  16. 16.Rubinstein SM, Pool JJ, van Tulder MW, et al. A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of provocative tests of the neck for diagnosing cervical radiculopathy. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(3):307-319.
  17. 17.American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria: cervical neck pain or cervical radiculopathy. Updated 2018. Accessed June 30, 2019. https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/69426/Narrative/
  18. 18.Chou R, Fu R, Carrino JA, et al. Imaging strategies for low-back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2009;373(9662):463-472.
  19. 19.Matsumoto M, Fujimura Y, Suzuki N, et al. MRI of cervical intervertebral discs in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80(1):19-24.
  20. 20.Bono CM, Ghiselli G, Gilbert TJ, et al.; North American Spine Society. An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of cervical radiculopathy from degenerative disorders. Spine J. 2011;11(1):64-72.
  21. 21.Honet JC, Puri K. Cervical radiculitis: treatment and results in 82 patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1976;57(1):12-16.
  22. 22.Radhakrishnan K, Litchy WJ, O'Fallon WM, et al. Epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy. A population-based study from Rochester, Minnesota, 1976 through 1990. Brain. 1994;117(pt 2):325-335.
  23. 23.Friedman BW, Dym AA, Davitt M, et al. Naproxen with cyclobenzaprine, oxycodone/acetaminophen, or placebo for treating acute low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314(15):1572-1580.
  24. 24.Ghasemi M, Masaeli A, Rezvani M, et al. Oral prednisolone in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy: a randomized placebo controlled trial. J Res Med Sci. 2013;18(suppl 1):S43-S46.
  25. 25.Duehmke RM, Derry S, Wiffen PJ, et al. Tramadol for neuropathic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017(6):CD003726.
  26. 26.Finnerup NB, Attal N, Haroutounian S, et al. Pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(2):162-173.
  27. 27.Langevin P, Peloso PMJ, Lowcock J, et al. Botulinum toxin for subacute/chronic neck pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011(7):CD008626.
  28. 28.Manchikanti L, Kaye AD, Boswell MV, et al. A systematic review and best evidence synthesis of the effectiveness of therapeutic facet joint interventions in managing chronic spinal pain. Pain Physician. 2015;18(4):E535-E582.
  29. 29.Niemisto L, Kalso E, Malmivaara A, et al. Radiofrequency denervation for neck and back pain. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(1):CD004058.
  30. 30.Bronfort G, Evans R, Anderson AV, et al. Spinal manipulation, medication, or home exercise with advice for acute and subacute neck pain: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(1 pt 1):1-10.
  31. 31.Trinh K, Graham N, Irnich D, et al. Acupuncture for neck disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016(5):CD004870.
  32. 32.Gross A, Langevin P, Burnie SJ, et al. Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015(9):CD004249.
  33. 33.Gattie ER, Cleland JA, Snodgrass SJ. Dry needling for patients with neck pain: protocol of a randomized clinical trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017;6(11):e227.
  34. 34.Kroeling P, Gross A, Graham N, et al. Electrotherapy for neck pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013(8):CD004251.
  35. 35.Räsänen P, Ohman J, Sintonen H, et al. Cost-utility analysis of routine neurosurgical spinal surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;5(3):204-209.

Copyright © 2026 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.