Fetal Growth Restriction Before and After Birth

Andrea Westby, MD
Laura Miller, MD, MPH

American Family Physician. 2021;104(5):486-492.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations.

Fetal growth restriction, previously called intrauterine growth restriction, is a condition in which a fetus does not achieve its full growth potential during pregnancy. Early detection and management of fetal growth restriction are essential because it has significant clinical implications in childhood. It is diagnosed by estimated fetal weight or abdominal circumference below the 10th percentile on formal ultrasonography. Early-onset fetal growth restriction is diagnosed before 32 weeks' gestation and has a higher risk of adverse fetal outcomes. There are no evidence-based measures for preventing fetal growth restriction; however, aspirin used for the prevention of preeclampsia in high-risk pregnancies may reduce the likelihood of developing it. Timing of delivery for pregnancies affected by growth restriction must be adjusted based on the risks of premature birth and ongoing gestation, and it is best determined in consultation with maternal-fetal medicine specialists. Neonates affected by fetal growth restriction are at risk of feeding difficulties, glucose instability, temperature instability, and jaundice. As these children age, they are at risk of abnormal growth patterns, as well as later cardiac, metabolic, neurodevelopmental, reproductive, and psychiatric disorders.

Fetal growth restriction, previously called intrauterine growth restriction, is a condition in which a fetus does not achieve its optimal growth potential. It impacts up to 10% of pregnancies and has significant prenatal and postnatal consequences, including increased risk of perinatal death, neurodevelopmental abnormalities, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular disease.14 For fetuses affected by growth restriction, adverse outcomes such as intraventricular hemorrhage, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, necrotizing enterocolitis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, sepsis, and death are more common and severe when estimated fetal weight is below the third percentile, or the 10th percentile if uterine artery flow is abnormal.5

SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, go to https://www.aafp.org/afpsort.

Definition

The term fetal growth restriction is recommended instead of intrauterine growth restriction.1,2,6,7 Fetal growth restriction is a pathologic process and indicates distress preventing the fetus from achieving its ultimate growth potential. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) defines a fetus with fetal growth restriction as having an estimated fetal weight below the 10th percentile for gestational age,1 whereas the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine recommends an additional criterion of an abdominal circumference below the 10th percentile for gestational age.7 Severe fetal growth restriction is defined as estimated fetal weight below the third percentile.7 Population-based fetal growth references, such as the Hadlock formula, should be used to determine fetal weight percentiles instead of growth standards based on race and sex.7 Although the Hadlock formula was developed from a small, middle-class population in Texas that was almost exclusively White, it is more accurate at predicting adverse outcomes from fetal growth restriction than more diverse growth standards.810

The term small for gestational age (SGA) applies to newborns whose measured birth weight is less than the 10th percentile for gestational age.1 SGA newborns may have had fetal growth restriction, but may also be constitutionally small, physiologically normal, and have reached their growth potential. Some infants with normal birth weight who experienced growth restriction in utero are at risk of postnatal complications.

Etiology

Fetal, maternal, uteroplacental, and external factors can lead to fetal growth restriction through limited uteroplacental perfusion that limits fetal nutrition (Table 1).1,1114 Placentation and umbilical cord abnormalities are the most common causes of fetal growth restriction.1 Factors associated with fetal growth restriction include multiple gestation, structural anomalies including congenital heart disease and gastroschisis, and genetic abnormalities including trisomies 13, 18, and 21.1113 Maternal nutrition, chronic diseases such as hypertensive disorders and pregestational diabetes mellitus, infections, and external factors such as drug or toxin exposure increase the risk of fetal growth restriction.1113 Although race and ethnicity are identified as risk factors, exposure to structural racism and socioeconomic inequality contributes to fetal growth restriction, not race or ethnicity themselves.14

TABLE 1. Etiologies and Risk Factors for Fetal Growth Restriction

Fetal
Genetic: gene disorders such as Fanconi anemia and Cornelia de Lange syndrome, trisomies 13, 18, and 21
Major congenital anomalies: anencephaly, congenital heart disease, diaphragmatic hernia, gastroschisis/omphalocele, transesophageal fistula
Maternal
Assisted reproduction
Chronic disease
 Autoimmune: systemic lupus
 Cardiovascular: atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, congestive heart failure, cyanotic congenital heart disease
 Lung: asthma, chronic obstructive lung disease, cystic fibrosis
 Gastrointestinal: Crohn disease, ulcerative colitis
 Hematologic: severe anemia including sickle cell anemia and sickle cell trait
 Hypertensive disorders: chronic or gestational hypertension, preeclampsia
 Pregestational diabetes
 Renal insufficiency
Environmental or social factors: air pollution, exposure to structural racism and discrimination, high altitude, lower socioeconomic status, malnutrition
Fibroids (limit space for growth)
History of growth restriction or infant is small for gestational age
Infections: cytomegalovirus, HIV, malaria, rubella, syphilis, toxoplasmosis, tuberculosis, varicella
Multiple gestation
Short interpregnancy interval
Toxin/drug exposure: alcohol, antithrombotic drugs other than low-dose aspirin, cocaine, cyclophosphamide, opioids, tobacco, valproic acid (Depakene)
Uteroplacental
Placental abnormalities: abnormal placentation, placental abruption, placental infarcts
Umbilical cord abnormalities: velamentous or marginal cord insertion, single fetal umbilical artery (two-vessel cord)

Information from references 1 and 1114.

Screening and Prevention

All pregnant patients should be screened for fetal growth restriction. A detailed medical and obstetric history should be obtained and risk factors, especially modifiable risk factors, should be identified (Table 11,1114 ). Serial growth ultrasonography performed in pregnancies complicated by risk factors including chronic disease in the birthing parent, substance use, or a history of fetal growth restriction allows for earlier diagnosis.1 In the absence of risk factors, fundal height measurements should be obtained at every obstetric visit after 24 weeks' gestation, preferably by the same clinician. If fundal height is more than 3 cm (1.2 in) below gestational age, formal ultrasonography is recommended. Body habitus, multiple gestation, and uterine fibroids limit the effectiveness of fundal height measurements for screening. Formal growth ultrasonography may be considered for these patients.

No interventions decrease the risk of fetal growth restriction.1,7,1519 Heparin, including low-molecular-weight heparin, sildenafil (Viagra), dietary changes, vitamin supplementation, and bed rest do not reduce the likelihood of fetal growth restriction.1519 Aspirin prophylaxis for preeclampsia reduces the incidence of fetal growth restriction, but aspirin use does not reduce fetal growth restriction when there are no indications for preeclampsia prophylaxis.7,15,20,21

Diagnosis

Formal ultrasonography is the standard for diagnosing fetal growth restriction if estimated fetal weight or abdominal circumference is below the 10th percentile for gestational age.7 Although weight and abdominal circumference predict postnatal complications, fetal asymmetry does not predict complications and is no longer a recommended criteria.7,22,23 Early-onset fetal growth restriction, which is growth restriction diagnosed before 32 weeks' gestation and accounts for 20% to 30% of cases, is typically more severe and progressive.24 Early-onset fetal growth restriction results in deterioration of umbilical artery flow and perinatal death in 70% and 7% of affected pregnancies, respectively.25,26 Initial diagnosis of fetal growth restriction after 32 weeks' gestation is more common and tends to be milder in severity and progression, with abnormal umbilical artery flow occurring less than 10% of the time, and peri-natal death is rare.25,26 Preeclampsia is present in 35% of pregnancies affected by early-onset fetal growth restriction, but it is present in only 12% of cases diagnosed after 32 weeks' gestation.26 Chromosomal or genetic abnormalities are present in 20% of pregnancies with early-onset fetal growth restriction, so detailed comprehensive anatomy (Level II) ultrasonography should be performed in these pregnancies.7,25,27

Treatment

PRENATAL MANAGEMENT

Prenatal management of fetal growth restriction is primarily surveillance to determine when delivery should be expedited, with the goal of preventing fetal morbidity and mortality. Based on limited evidence, the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine recommends chromosomal microarray analysis in isolated, unexplained early-onset fetal growth restriction and growth restriction at any gestational age with an ultrasonography-identified structural anomaly or polyhydramnios.7 Options for chromosomal microarray analysis include noninvasive testing such as cell-free DNA or invasive testing such as chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis. There is no consensus for which testing method should be used. Chromosomal microarray analysis has a false-positive rate of 5%, and this should be taken into consideration when balancing procedure benefits with the risk of pregnancy loss from chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis. Serial ultrasonography with fetal biometry and amniotic fluid volume measurements is recommended for monitoring the growth-restricted fetus. Although the optimal surveillance interval is unclear, ACOG suggests every three to four weeks beginning when fetal growth restriction is diagnosed or at 24 weeks' gestation.1 Referral to a maternal-fetal medicine specialist for consultation or transfer of care is recommended after a diagnosis of fetal growth restriction (Figure 1).7

FIGURE 1.

Algorithm for diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction.

Information from reference 7.

Consensus guidelines include performing non-stress tests or biophysical profiles twice weekly to assess fetal well-being in viable pregnancies with severe fetal growth restriction or other concerning findings (e.g., oligohydramnios, preeclampsia, decelerating growth velocity, increasing umbilical artery Doppler index).1,7 Umbilical artery flow measurements allow assessment of placental blood flow. Once fetal growth restriction is diagnosed, umbilical artery Doppler index assessments are recommended every one to two weeks, which can be spaced to every four weeks if consistently normal flow is observed.7 Abnormal measurements suggest uterine placental insufficiency, which may require early delivery.7

LABOR AND DELIVERY CONSIDERATIONS

Timing of delivery in a pregnancy complicated by fetal growth restriction balances the risks of prematurity and stillbirth. There are no consensus criteria for early delivery, and consultation with a maternal-fetal medicine specialist is recommended.7 Continuous fetal monitoring is recommended during labor.7 Preterm delivery should be managed per ACOG guidelines, including administration of antenatal steroids for fetal lung maturity and magnesium for neuroprotection.7

Caring for the Child Affected by Fetal Growth Restriction

Growth-restricted neonates are at high risk of feeding difficulties, jaundice, glucose and temperature instability, late-onset sepsis, and other high-risk conditions28 (Table 22840 ). Avoiding excessive catch-up growth may mitigate the metabolic and cardiovascular effects of fetal growth restriction.41,42 One retrospective study suggests the optimal growth trajectory after birth for SGA infants may be to target the 30th percentile by four months of life, and the 50th percentile by seven years.43

TABLE 2. Effects of Fetal Growth Restriction After Birth

NeonatalChildhoodAdolescent/adult

InfantsChildren
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia
Feeding difficulties
Glucose instability: hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia
Jaundice
Late-onset sepsis
Necrotizing enterocolitis
Persistent pulmonary hypertension
Polycythemia
Temperature instability
Bronchiolitis
Cerebral palsy
Developmental delay (psychomotor, language)
Growth retardation
Aggressive pubarche/adrenarche
Anxiety
Asthma
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
Cardiovascular disease
Cerebral palsy
Cognitive impairment
Dyslipidemia
Early epiphyseal maturation and short stature
Epilepsy
Hypertension
Impaired insulin sensitivity
Learning difficulties
Precocious puberty
Accelerated atherosclerosis
Anxiety
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
Cardiovascular disease
Chronic kidney disease
Dyslipidemia
Hypertension
Hypofertility
Impaired insulin sensitivity/type 2 diabetes mellitus
Polycystic ovary syndrome
Substance use disorders

Information from references 2840.

Children affected by fetal growth restriction have an increased long-term risk of developing reproductive problems, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, impaired insulin resistance, and cognitive and neurodevelopmental impairments (Table 2).2840 Children born after fetal growth restriction should have their weight, length, and head circumference monitored every three months for the first year of life and every six months thereafter, which can be accomplished by following the American Academy of Pediatrics schedule for well-child visits.34,44 Growth standards are not specified, but growth charts from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization are appropriate for term infants, and the Fenton prematurity chart can be used for premature infants. Children younger than two years with a length below the third percentile should be referred for evaluation by an endocrinologist and consideration of growth hormone treatment.33 Cognitive and psychomotor development should be monitored with early intervention referrals as needed.34 Annual blood pressure monitoring is recommended for all children starting at three years of age, and earlier for SGA infants, those born before 32 weeks' gestation, or those with complications requiring neonatal intensive care.45

Effects of fetal growth restriction presenting in adolescence and adulthood include early puberty, hypofertility, kidney dysfunction, elevated cardiovascular risk, psychiatric disorders, and addictive behaviors.34

This article updates a previous article on this topic by Peleg, et al.46

Data Sources: A PubMed search was completed in Clinical Queries using the key terms “intrauterine growth restriction” and “fetal growth restriction.” The search included meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, and reviews. Also searched were the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Effective Healthcare Reports, the Cochrane database, and DynaMed. Search dates: February 18, 2020, December 15, 2020, January 9, 2021, July 27, 2021.

ANDREA WESTBY, MD, FAAFP, is a faculty physician at the University of Minnesota North Memorial Family Medicine Residency Program, and an assistant professor in the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health at the University of Minnesota Medical School in Minneapolis.

LAURA MILLER, MD, MPH, FAAFP, is a faculty physician at the University of Minnesota North Memorial Family Medicine Residency Program, and an assistant professor in the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health at the University of Minnesota Medical School.

Address correspondence to Andrea Westby, MD, FAAFP, University of Minnesota Medical School, 1020 W. Broadway, Minneapolis, MN 55455 (email: westby@umn.edu). Reprints are not available from the authors.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations.

  1. 1.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine; ACOG practice bulletin no. 204: fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(2):e97-e109.
  2. 2.McCowan LM, Figueras F, Anderson NH. Evidence-based national guidelines for the management of suspected fetal growth restriction: comparison, consensus, and controversy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(2S):S855-S868.
  3. 3.Bernstein IM, Horbar JD, Badger GJ, et al.; The Vermont Oxford Network. Morbidity and mortality among very-low-birth-weight neonates with intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182(1 pt 1):198-206.
  4. 4.Unterscheider J, O'Donoghue K, Daly S, et al. Fetal growth restriction and the risk of perinatal mortality-case studies from the multicentre PORTO study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:63.
  5. 5.Unterscheider J, Daly S, Geary MP, et al. Optimizing the definition of intrauterine growth restriction: the multi-center prospective PORTO Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208(4):290.e1-290.e6.
  6. 6.Battaglia FC, Lubchenco LO. A practical classification of newborn infants by weight and gestational age. J Pediatr. 1967;71(2):159-163.
  7. 7.Martins JG, Biggio JR, Abuhamad A; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM). Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #52: diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction: (replaces clinical guideline number 3, April 2012). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(4):B2-B17.
  8. 8.Blue NR, Beddow ME, Savabi M, et al. Comparing the Hadlock fetal growth standard to the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development racial/ethnic standard for the prediction of neonatal morbidity and small for gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(5):474.e1-474.e12.
  9. 9.Blue NR, Savabi M, Beddow ME, et al. The Hadlock method is superior to newer methods for the prediction of the birth weight percentile. J Ultrasound Med. 2019;38(3):587-596.
  10. 10.Monier I, Ego A, Benachi A, et al. Comparison of the Hadlock and INTERGROWTH formulas for calculating estimated fetal weight in a preterm population in France. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(5):476.e1-476.e12.
  11. 11.Nardozza LMM, Caetano ACR, Zamarian ACP, et al. Fetal growth restriction: current knowledge. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295(5):1061-1077.
  12. 12.Sharma D, Shastri S, Farahbakhsh N, et al. Intrauterine growth restriction–part 1. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(24):3977-3987.
  13. 13.Sharma D, Farahbakhsh N, Shastri S, et al. Intrauterine growth restriction–part 2. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(24):4037-4048.
  14. 14.Wallace ME, Mendola P, Liu D, et al. Joint effects of structural racism and income inequality on small-for-gestational-age birth. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(8):1681-1688.
  15. 15.Groom KM, David AL. The role of aspirin, heparin, and other interventions in the prevention and treatment of fetal growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(2S):S829-S840.
  16. 16.Kafatos AG, Vlachonikolis IG, Codrington CA. Nutrition during pregnancy: the effects of an educational intervention program in Greece. Am J Clin Nutr. 1989;50(5):970-979.
  17. 17.Khoury J, Henriksen T, Christophersen B, et al. Effect of a cholesterol-lowering diet on maternal, cord, and neonatal lipids, and pregnancy outcome: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(4):1292-1301.
  18. 18.De-Regil LM, Palacios C, Lombardo LK, et al. Vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(1):CD008873.
  19. 19.Gülmezoglu AM, Hofmeyr GJ. Bed rest in hospital for suspected impaired fetal growth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;1996(2):CD000034.
  20. 20.Roberge S, Nicolaides K, Demers S, et al. The role of aspirin dose on the prevention of preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(2):110-120.e6.
  21. 21.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists committee opinion no. 743: low-dose aspirin use during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(1):e44-e52.
  22. 22.Bocca-Tjeertes I, Bos A, Kerstjens J, et al. Symmetrical and asymmetrical growth restriction in preterm-born children. Pediatrics. 2014;133(3):e650-e656.
  23. 23.David C, Gabrielli S, Pilu G, et al. The head-to-abdomen circumference ratio: a reappraisal. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995;5(4):256-259.
  24. 24.Nawathe A, Lees C. Early onset fetal growth restriction. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;38:24-37.
  25. 25.Figueras F, Caradeux J, Crispi F, et al. Diagnosis and surveillance of late-onset fetal growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(2S):S790-S802.e1.
  26. 26.Savchev S, Figueras F, Sanz-Cortes M, et al. Evaluation of an optimal gestational age cut-off for the definition of early- and late-onset fetal growth restriction. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014;36(2):99-105.
  27. 27.Maulik D. Fetal growth restriction: the etiology. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;49(2):228-235.
  28. 28.Kesavan K, Devaskar SU. Intrauterine growth restriction: postnatal monitoring and outcomes. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2019;66(2):403-423.
  29. 29.Barker DJ, Osmond C, Golding J, et al. Growth in utero, blood pressure in childhood and adult life, and mortality from cardiovascular disease. BMJ. 1989;298(6673):564-567.
  30. 30.Bhargava SK, Ramji S, Srivastava U, et al. Growth and sexual maturation of low birth weight children: a 14 year follow up. Indian Pediatr. 1995;32(9):963-970.
  31. 31.Neville KA, Walker JL. Precocious pubarche is associated with SGA, prematurity, weight gain, and obesity. Arch Dis Child. 2005;90(3):258-261.
  32. 32.Pike K, Pillow JJ, Lucas JS. Long term respiratory consequences of intrauterine growth restriction. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;17(2):92-98.
  33. 33.Clayton PE, Cianfarani S, Czernichow P, et al. Management of the child born small for gestational age through to adulthood: a consensus statement of the International Societies of Pediatric Endocrinology and the Growth Hormone Research Society. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(3):804-810.
  34. 34.Giabicani E, Pham A, Brioude F, et al. Diagnosis and management of postnatal fetal growth restriction. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;32(4):523-534.
  35. 35.Crispi F, Crovetto F, Gratacos E. Intrauterine growth restriction and later cardiovascular function. Early Hum Dev. 2018;126:23-27.
  36. 36.Colella M, Frérot A, Novais ARB, et al. Neonatal and long-term consequences of fetal growth restriction. Curr Pediatr Rev. 2018;14(4):212-218.
  37. 37.Baschat AA. Neurodevelopment following fetal growth restriction and its relationship with antepartum parameters of placental dysfunction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37(5):501-514.
  38. 38.Løhaugen GCC, Østgård HF, Andreassen S, et al. Small for gestational age and intrauterine growth restriction decreases cognitive function in young adults. J Pediatr. 2013;163(2):447-453.
  39. 39.Geva R, Eshel R, Leitner Y, et al. Neuropsychological outcome of children with intrauterine growth restriction: a 9-year prospective study. Pediatrics. 2006;118(1):91-100.
  40. 40.Sacchi C, Marino C, Nosarti C, et al. Association of intrauterine growth restriction and small for gestational age status with childhood cognitive outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(8):772-781.
  41. 41.Soto N, Bazaes RA, Peña V, et al. Insulin sensitivity and secretion are related to catch-up growth in small-for-gestational-age infants at age 1 year: results from a prospective cohort. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(8):3645-3650.
  42. 42.Kelishadi R, Haghdoost AA, Jamshidi F, et al. Low birth-weight or rapid catch-up growth: which is more associated with cardiovascular disease and its risk factors in later life? A systematic review and cryptanalysis. Paediatr Int Child Health. 2015;35(2):110-123.
  43. 43.Lei X, Chen Y, Ye J, et al. The optimal postnatal growth trajectory for term small for gestational age babies: a prospective cohort study. J Pediatr. 2015;166(1):54-58.
  44. 44.Hagan JF Jr., Shaw JS, Duncan PM, eds. Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents: Pocket Guide. 4th ed. American Academy of Pediatrics; 2017.
  45. 45.Flynn JT, Kaelber DC, Baker-Smith CM, et al.; Subcommittee on Screening and Management of High Blood Pressure in Children. Clinical practice guideline for screening and management of high blood pressure in children and adolescents [published corrections appear in Pediatrics. 2018;142(3):e20181739, and Pediatrics. 2017;140(6): e20173035]. Pediatrics. 2017;140(3):e20171904.
  46. 46.Peleg D, Kennedy CM, Hunter SK. Intrauterine growth restriction: identification and management. Am Fam Physician. 1998;58(2):453-460. Accessed date February 16, 2021. https://www.aafp.org/afp/1998/0801/p453.html

Copyright © 2026 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.