Septic Arthritis: Diagnosis and Treatment

John Scott Earwood, MD
Tyler R. Walker, MD
Gregory J. C. Sue, DO

American Family Physician. 2021;104(6):589-597.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations.

Septic arthritis must be considered and promptly diagnosed in any patient presenting with acute atraumatic joint pain, swelling, and fever. Risk factors for septic arthritis include age older than 80 years, diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, recent joint surgery, hip or knee prosthesis, skin infection, and immunosuppressive medication use. A delay in diagnosis and treatment can result in permanent morbidity and mortality. Physical examination findings and serum markers, including erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein, are helpful in the diagnosis but are nonspecific. Synovial fluid studies are required to confirm the diagnosis. History and Gram stain aid in determining initial antibiotic selection. Staphylococcus aureus is the most common pathogen isolated in septic arthritis; however, other bacteria, viruses, fungi, and mycobacterium can cause the disease. After synovial fluid has been obtained, empiric antibiotic therapy should be initiated if there is clinical concern for septic arthritis. Oral antibiotics can be given in most cases because they are not inferior to intravenous therapy. Total duration of therapy ranges from two to six weeks; however, certain infections require longer courses. Consideration for microorganisms such as Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Borrelia burgdorferi, and fungal infections should be based on history findings and laboratory results.

Septic arthritis should be considered in adults presenting with acute monoarticular arthritis. A delay in diagnosis and treatment of septic arthritis can lead to permanent morbidity and mortality. Subcartilaginous bone loss, cartilage destruction, and permanent joint dysfunction can occur if appropriate antibiotic therapy is not initiated within 24 to 48 hours of onset.1 The reported incidence of septic arthritis is four to 29 cases per 100,000 person-years, and risk increases with age, use of immunosuppressive medications, and lower socioeconomic status.2

SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, go to https://www.aafp.org/afpsort.

Intra-articular infection is typically monoarticular, with up to 20% of cases occurring in multiple joints (oligoarticular [also called polyarticular]).1,3 A joint is most commonly infected hematogenously from bacteremia. Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus species are the most common causes. Septic arthritis is diagnosed through laboratory testing, particularly synovial fluid studies.

Diagnosis

HISTORY AND CLINICAL PRESENTATION

The presentation of septic arthritis may vary based on pathogen, underlying medical conditions, or exposures (Table 1).1,2,47 Septic arthritis may present similarly to other types of arthritis. More than 50% of patients with septic arthritis have a history of joint swelling, joint pain, and fever. Sweats or rigors are less common. Native joint infections most commonly occur in the knee, followed by the hip, shoulder, ankle, elbow, and wrist.1 Patients with septic arthritis may present with an acutely painful atraumatic joint, which should be differentiated from other causes of monoarticular joint pain (Figure 1810 and Table 21 ).

TABLE 1. Clinical Presentations of Septic Arthritis

Clinical history or exposureJoint involvementPathogen
Cleaning fish tankSmall joints (fingers, wrists)Mycobacterium marinum
Dog or cat biteSmall joints (fingers, toes)Capnocytophaga species, Pasteurella multocida
Exposure to soil or dust containing decomposed wood (North Central and Southern United States)Monoarticular; knee, ankle, or elbowBlastomyces dermatitidis
Ingestion of unpasteurized dairy productsMonoarticular, sacroiliac jointBrucella species
Intravenous drug abuseAxial joints, such as sternoclavicular or sacroiliac jointPseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus
Nail through shoeFootP. aeruginosa
Older ageIncreased risk of gram-negative infections
Prosthetic jointAny prosthetic jointCoagulase-negative staphylococci, Pseudomonas species, Pneumococcus species
Sexually activeTenosynovial component in hands, wrists, or anklesNeisseria gonorrhoeae
Soil exposure/gardeningMonoarticular; knee, hand, or wristNocardia species, Pantoea agglomerans, Sporothrix schenckii
Southwestern United States, Central and South America (primary respiratory illness)KneeCoccidioides immitis
Underlying medical conditions
 Diabetes mellitus or immunocompromiseIncreased risk of fungal infection (most commonly Candida), Pseudomonas, and Escherichia coli
 GoutIncreased risk of Pseudomonas and E. coli
 Rheumatoid arthritisOligoarticular (also called polyarticular)Increased risk of fungal (most commonly Candida) and pneumococcus infections
 Systemic lupus erythematosus (particularly with functional hyposplenism)N. gonorrhoeae, Proteus species, Salmonella species
 Terminal complement deficiencyTenosynovial component in hands, wrists, or anklesN. gonorrhoeae

Note: The clinical presentation of septic arthritis can vary widely from the typical acute monoarticular large joint arthritis. Distinctive presentations may occur with certain organisms or patient history.

Adapted with permission from Horowitz DL, Katzap E, Horowitz S, et al. Approach to septic arthritis. Am Fam Physician. 2011;84(6):656–657, with additional information from references 2 and 47.

FIGURE 1.

Algorithm for differentiating septic arthritis from other acute mono- or oligoarthropathy.

Information from references 8–10.

TABLE 2. Differential Diagnosis of Acute Arthritis

DiagnosisEtiology
Crystal-induced arthritisCalcium oxalate, cholesterol, gout, hydroxyapatite crystals, pseudogout
Infectious arthritisBacteria, fungi, mycobacteria, spirochetes, viruses
Inflammatory arthritisBehçet syndrome,* rheumatoid arthritis,* sarcoidosis, seronegative spondyloarthropathy (e.g., ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, reactive arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease), Still disease,* systemic lupus erythematosus,* systemic vasculitis*
OsteoarthritisErosive/inflammatory variants*
Systemic infectionBacterial endocarditis, HIV infection
TumorMetastasis, pigmented villonodular synovitis
OtherAmyloidosis, avascular necrosis, clotting disorders/anti-coagulant therapy, familial Mediterranean fever,* foreign body, fracture, hemarthrosis, hyperlipoproteinemia,* meniscal tear

*—Not usually monoarticular.

Adapted with permission from Horowitz DL, Katzap E, Horowitz S, et al. Approach to septic arthritis. Am Fam Physician. 2011;84(6):654.

Oligoarticular septic arthritis is more likely to present with symptoms of systemic infection and more commonly affects the shoulder, wrist, and elbow.11 Bacteremia is especially common with septic arthritis of the shoulder.

RISK FACTORS

Risk factors for septic arthritis are listed in Table 3.1,11 Patients with rheumatoid arthritis and a flare-up in one or multiple joints are at particularly high risk. In one study, the incidence of septic arthritis was 1.8 per 1,000 patient-years in those treated with nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs vs. 4.2 per 1,000 patient-years in those treated with anti–tumor necrosis factor therapy.12 People who smoke tobacco also have an increased risk of septic arthritis.2

TABLE 3. Risk Factors for Septic Arthritis

Contiguous spread
Skin infection, cutaneous ulceration
Direct inoculation
Previous intra-articular injection
Prosthetic joint (within two years)
Recent joint surgery
Hematogenous spread
Diabetes mellitus
HIV infection
Immunosuppressive medication use
Intravenous drug abuse
Osteoarthritis
Other causes of sepsis
Prosthetic joint (more than two years)
Rheumatoid arthritis
Sexual activity (gonococcal arthritis)
Other
Age older than 80 years
Smoking

Adapted with permission from Horowitz DL, Katzap E, Horowitz S, et al. Approach to septic arthritis. Am Fam Physician. 2011;84(6):654, with additional information from reference 11.

PHYSICAL EXAMINATION

The physical examination of patients with septic arthritis almost always reveals a severely painful joint with motion, often including an obvious effusion. The presentation is typically more subtle in those with periprosthetic joint infections, small joint infections, atypical infections (e.g., fungal, Lyme disease, tuberculosis), or immunosuppression. An overlying skin infection can be the source of pain or the entry point of the intra-articular infection.

LABORATORY EVALUATION

Serum markers may be helpful in evaluating for septic arthritis but are not diagnostic. A 2011 study showed that serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) level are each more than 90% sensitive for septic arthritis when low cutoffs are used (98% for ESR of 10 mm per hour or greater, 94% for ESR of 15 mm per hour or greater, and 92% for CRP of 2.0 mg per dL [20 mg per L] or greater), which is helpful in ruling out septic arthritis.8 A 2017 meta-analysis showed that with a cutoff of 0.5 ng per mL or greater, procalcitonin has a higher specificity than CRP (95% CI, 0.87 to 0.98; positive likelihood ratio = 10.97).13 Blood cultures should be considered when bacteremia or fungemia is suspected.

Analysis of synovial fluid obtained via arthrocentesis is necessary to differentiate septic arthritis from other forms of arthritis and to determine the causative pathogen.1,4 Synovial fluid analysis should include Gram stain, aerobic and anaerobic cultures, and white blood cell count with differential (Table 41,1416 ).

TABLE 4. Synovial Fluid Analysis in Patients with Suspected Septic Arthritis

Arthritis diagnosisColorTransparencyViscosityWBC count (per μL [× 109 per L])PMN cell count (%)Gram stainCulturePCR testCrystalsMultiplex PCR test*
NormalClearTransparentHigh/thick< 200 (0.20)< 25NegativeNegativeNegativeNegativeNegative
NoninflammatoryStrawTranslucentHigh/thick200 to 2,000 (0.20 to 2)< 25NegativeNegativeNegativeNegativeNegative
Inflammatory
 Crystalline diseaseYellowCloudyLow/thin2,000 to 100,000 (2 to 100)> 50NegativeNegativeNegativePositiveNegative
 Noncrystalline diseaseYellowCloudyLow/thin2,000 to 100,000> 50NegativeNegativeNegativeNegativeNegative
Infectious
 Lyme diseaseYellowCloudyLow3,000 to 100,000 (3 to 100)> 75NegativeNegativePositiveNegativePositive
 GonococcalYellowCloudy-opaqueLow34,000 to 68,000 (34 to 68)> 75Variable (< 50%)Positive (25% to 70%)Positive (> 75%)NegativePositive
 NongonococcalYellow-greenOpaqueVery low> 50,000 (50); > 100,000 is more specific, < 50,000 is common in atypical infection and periprosthetic joint infection> 75Positive (60% to 80%)Positive (> 90%)NegativePositive

Note: These are general guidelines in the interpretation of synovial fluid. Many parameters vary widely and must be interpreted in the clinical context. Three bedside observations (color, transparency, and viscosity) are quick and easy to assess. With normal transparent fluid, words can be read clearly through the fluid. The words become less crisp and gradually obscured with increasing turbidity. Viscosity is assessed by observing the fluid dropping from the syringe. Normal viscosity has a long, stringy tail.

PCR = polymerase chain reaction; PMN = polymorphonuclear; WBC = white blood cell.

*—This information is based on limited data. Multiplex PCR is not as readily available as many other tests, and its use is still being investigated.

†—Crystalline disease can coexist with septic arthritis. A positive result does not exclude infection.

Adapted with permission from Horowitz DL, Katzap E, Horowitz S, et al. Approach to septic arthritis. Am Fam Physician. 2011;84(6):656–657, with additional information from references 1416.

A white blood cell count less than 50,000 per μL (50 × 109 per L) does not exclude septic arthritis.1,14,15 Crystal analysis is appropriate if crystalline arthritis is suspected, but the presence of crystals does not exclude septic arthritis.1,4 Elevated levels of white blood cells and CRP in synovial fluid are common in both crystalline arthritis and septic arthritis.810 A synovial biopsy may be needed if synovial fluid findings are negative and suspicion for septic arthritis remains.4

Other laboratory tests are being investigated for use in the diagnosis of septic arthritis. Synovial fluid lactate may be useful in differentiating septic arthritis from other types of acute arthritis, but data are limited.17 A calprotectin measurement at a threshold of 50 mg per L or greater may also be useful for making the diagnosis.17 In addition, multiplex polymerase chain reaction testing may be at least as effective as synovial fluid culture in diagnosing septic arthritis but with a shorter turnaround time (within five hours).15

IMAGING

No imaging finding is pathognomonic for septic arthritis in adults. Plain radiography establishes a baseline and can evaluate for fractures. Ultrasonography can guide arthrocentesis for inaccessible joints, such as the hips, and small joints. Magnetic resonance imaging, preferably with and without contrast, is useful in assessing for osteomyelitis and soft tissue infections.1,18

ORGANISMS

In adults, S. aureus is the most common cause of native joint septic arthritis, followed by Streptococcus species. Native joint septic arthritis can be associated with some viral infections, including chikungunya, rubella, and parvovirus B19. Methicillin-sensitive S. aureus infection is a common cause of oligoarticular arthritis, and group B streptococci are more common in oligoarticular arthritis than in monoarticular septic arthritis.1,4 In older people, gram-negative bacteria, especially Escherichia coli, cause about 23% to 30% of septic arthritis cases.11 In adolescents and young adults, Neisseria gonorrhoeae should be considered.

Management

Empiric systemic antibiotics should be initiated after obtaining synovial fluid if there is a clinical concern for septic arthritis. Antibiotic treatment should be based on results of a synovial fluid Gram stain or suspicion of a pathogen from the clinical scenario (Table 5).1,1924

TABLE 5. Antibiotic Therapy for Suspected Septic Arthritis

Gram stain resultAntibiotics

Empiric antibiotics based on Gram stain result
Gram-positive cocciVancomycin or daptomycin (Cubicin), plus a cephalosporin, carbapenem, or fluoroquinolone
Alternative: oral clindamycin plus fluoroquinolone
Gram-negative cocciCeftriaxone
Gram-negative rodsCeftazidime (Fortaz), cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam (Zosyn), or carbapenem
Penicillin or cephalosporins allergy: IV aztreonam (Azactam) or IV fluoroquinolone
Negative result on Gram stain but strong clinical suspicion for septic arthritisVancomycin plus ceftazidime or an aminoglycoside
Isolated speciesAntibiotics

Antibiotics based on culture, acid-fast stain, RNA probe, or antibody findings
Borrelia burgdorferiOral doxycycline, amoxicillin, or cefuroxime; IV ceftriaxone if no resolution after oral therapy
Mycobacterium tuberculosisRifampin, often with a multidrug regimen (in consultation with an infectious disease specialist)
Neisseria gonorrhoeaeIV ceftriaxone or cefotaxime; switch to oral after 2 days, following antimicrobial susceptibility testing and substantial clinical improvement, for at least 7 days total

IV = intravenous.

Information from references 1 and 1924.

Antibiotics should initially cover gram-positive cocci because they are most common (in particular Staphylococcus and Streptococcus species). Gram-negative coverage should be considered for patients with other risk factors, such as older age, immunosuppression, or bacteremia from a urinary or gastrointestinal source. Treatment should be individualized according to clinical response and microbiology results.11

Oral antibiotics were not inferior to intravenous antibiotics when started within one week of surgery or arthrocentesis and intravenous therapy in a study evaluating the first six weeks of therapy and treatment failures within one year.25 Clindamycin-based therapy appears to be a safe, effective alternative to the traditional regimen of vancomycin or daptomycin (Cubicin) plus a cephalosporin, carbapenem, or fluoroquinolone, especially when it is combined with fluoroquinolones. Clindamycin-based therapy also allows direct conversion from intravenous to oral therapy.23

Cohort studies demonstrated that medical management is not inferior to surgical management of septic arthritis. However, 30% of cases ultimately required surgical management, including about one-half of shoulder and hip arthritis cases, because of poor response to medical therapy.26,27

Optimal duration of treatment for nongonococcal septic arthritis is uncertain but is at least two weeks for small joints; at least six weeks is more commonly prescribed for all joints.2 One randomized trial showed that after surgical lavage, two weeks of antibiotic therapy is not inferior to four weeks of antibiotic therapy.28 However, because most cases in the study involved the hand and wrist, the researchers cautioned against applying the findings to septic arthritis affecting other joints.

Septic arthritis caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus requires drainage or debridement and three to four weeks of antibiotics. Parenteral options include intravenous vancomycin and daptomycin. Parenteral and oral options include trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole with rifampin, linezolid (Zyvox), and clindamycin, but there is no specific guidance regarding the duration of intravenous therapy before initiation of oral therapy.7

Prognosis

A large cohort study showed that the 90-day mortality rate for septic arthritis is 7% and increases to 22% to 69% in patients 80 years and older.29 Other comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, bacteremia, and low creatinine clearance are also associated with increased mortality.30 Oligoarticular septic arthritis is associated with higher mortality compared with monoarticular septic arthritis.11 Septic arthritis affecting small native joints has a better prognosis and may require a shorter duration of antibiotic therapy than large native joints.2 Poor functional outcomes such as amputation, arthrodesis, prosthetic surgery, and severe functional deterioration occur in about 24% to 33% of patients with septic arthritis and are more likely with older age, preexisting joint disease, and synthetic intraarticular material.2

Special Considerations

See Table 5 for antibiotic recommendations.1,1924

GONOCOCCAL ARTHRITIS

Gonococcal arthritis is caused by bacteremia from a sexually transmitted N. gonorrhoeae infection. Two forms of disseminated gonococcal infection that present with arthritis are localized septic arthritis and an arthritis-dermatitis syndrome that is characterized by malaise, polyarthralgias, tenosynovitis, and dermatitis.31,32 Gonococcal arthritis can present as a monoarthritis, oligoarthritis, or polyarthritis and affect any joint.33

If gonococcal septic arthritis is suspected, polymerase chain reaction testing of potentially infected mucosal sites, such as the urethra, rectum, pharynx, and cervix, should be performed.19 If gonococcal arthritis is confirmed, further evaluation for sexually transmitted infections is recommended.

LYME ARTHRITIS

Lyme disease, caused by the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi, can lead to arthritis in the later stages. Lyme arthritis should be suspected in a patient presenting in an endemic area with a history of a tick bite and acute-onset arthritis with or without an erythema migrans rash.24,34

Lyme arthritis can be monoarticular or oligoarticular and intermittent or persistent, and it typically affects the knee. It is the most common manifestation of disseminated Lyme disease in the United States.34 Fever is less common with Lyme arthritis than with other causes of septic arthritis. Among patients with Lyme arthritis, 10% to 20% will have persistent symptoms, including joint pain, after appropriate antibiotic therapy.35,36

Serum antibody testing is recommended first (with an estimated 96% sensitivity and 94% specificity). If positive, polymerase chain reaction testing of synovial fluid should be performed.16,24,37 Polymerase chain reaction testing of synovial fluid is nearly 100% sensitive and 42% to 100% specific for Lyme arthritis.16

TUBERCULOSIS ARTHRITIS

Joint infections are a known extrapulmonary manifestation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection, occurring in 2% of patients with tuberculosis.38 The spine is the most common site of tuberculosis arthritis, followed by the knee.39

Mycobacterial joint infections are more indolent than other bacterial joint infections, and it can take months to years for symptoms such as recurrent joint effusions to manifest. In addition, a patient with a mycobacterial joint infection may not have radiologic evidence of pulmonary involvement.40

FUNGAL ARTHRITIS

The presentation of fungal infections varies significantly. Many infections are indolent in presentation, whereas some cause rapid destruction.22 Risk factors for fungal arthritis include diabetes, HIV infection, immunosuppression from disease or medication use, organ transplantation, parenteral hyperalimentation, indwelling catheter, substance abuse, and use of broad-spectrum antibiotics.41 Candida is the most common pathogen causing fungal septic arthritis, although it is normal flora found on the skin and mucous membranes of healthy individuals. Other species that can cause fungal septic arthritis include Aspergillus, Coccidioides, Histoplasma, Blastomyces, and Cryptococcus. It is best to manage fungal septic arthritis in coordination with orthopedic surgery and infectious disease specialists.

PERIPROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION

Periprosthetic joint infection is becoming a more common presentation in primary care because of increasing numbers of joint replacement surgeries performed each year. The projected number of total hip and knee arthroplasty procedures in the United States in 2020 was 1.5 million, with an expected increase to more than 4 million by 2040.42

The prevalence of periprosthetic joint infection two years after total hip or knee arthroplasty is 1.63% and 1.55%, respectively, with an anticipated prevalence of more than 2% at 10 years for each of these procedures.43 A large European study found that 47% of periprosthetic joint infections occur within the first three months after surgery, 32% at three to 24 months, and 21% at greater than two years.44

Obesity has the strongest evidence for increased risk of periprosthetic joint infection after total hip or knee arthroplasty. Other risk factors with limited evidence include cardiac disease, immunocompromise, peripheral vascular disease, inflammatory arthritis, prior joint infection, renal or liver disease, mental health disorder (including depression), alcohol use, anemia, tobacco use, malnutrition, and diabetes.43

A validated clinical scoring system for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection was developed in 2018 (Table 6).45 If one of the major criteria is positive, no other evaluation is necessary for diagnosis. Otherwise, serum tests; synovial fluid tests; and, if the diagnosis is still unclear, intraoperative criteria are used.

TABLE 6. Diagnostic Criteria for Periprosthetic Joint Infection

CriteriaPoints
Major
Two joint cultures positive for the same organism
Sinus tract communicating with joint
Scoring: Positive for infection if at least one major criterion is present; no further evaluation is needed.
Minor
Serum
 C-reactive protein > 1 mg per dL (10 mg per L) or d-dimer > 860 ng per mL2
 Estimated erythrocyte sedimentation rate > 30 mm per hour1
Synovial fluid
 White blood cell count > 3,000 per μL (3 × 109 per L) or leukocyte esterase (++)3
 Alpha-defensin (signal-to-cutoff ratio > 1)3
 Polymorphonuclear leukocytes > 80%2
 C-reactive protein > 0.69 mg per dL (6.9 mg per L)1
Scoring: ≥ 6 points = infection; 2 to 5 points = inconclusive; 0 to 1 = no infection.
Optional intraoperative criteria if diagnosis is still unclear (2 to 5 points using minor criteria)
Positive histology3
Purulence3
Single culture positive2
Scoring (pre- and intraoperative criteria): ≥ 6 points = infection; 4 to 5 points = inconclusive; ≤ 3 = no infection.

Adapted with permission from Parvizi J, Tan TL, Goswami K, et al. The 2018 definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection: an evidence-based and validated criteria. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(5):1312.

In patients with joint replacements, prophylactic antibiotic therapy to prevent joint infections is not recommended before routine dental, urologic, or gastrointestinal procedures.4648

This article updates a previous article on this topic by Horowitz, et al.1

Data Sources: A PubMed search was initially completed using the key terms septic arthritis, Lyme arthritis, gonococcal arthritis, fungal arthritis, periprosthetic joint infection, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. An evidence summary from Essential Evidence Plus was also completed. Additional PubMed searches used the following key terms: erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, lactate, radiologic evaluation, antimicrobial therapy, and prosthetic joint prophylaxis. Search dates: October and November 2020, March 2021, and September 2021.

The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the U.S. Army Medical Department or the U.S. Army at large.

JOHN SCOTT EARWOOD, MD, is assistant program director of the Family Medicine Residency Program at Dwight D. Eisenhower Army Medical Center, Fort Gordon, Ga., and an assistant professor in the Department of Family Medicine at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Md.

TYLER R. WALKER, MD, is a flight surgeon with the 3rd Military Intelligence Battalion, Camp Humphreys, South Korea. At the time this article was written, he was a resident in the Family Medicine Residency Program at Dwight D. Eisenhower Army Medical Center.

GREGORY J. C. SUE, DO, is a resident in the Family Medicine Residency Program at Dwight D. Eisenhower Army Medical Center.

Address correspondence to John Scott Earwood, MD, Dwight D. Eisenhower Army Medical Center, 300 Hospital Rd., Fort Gordon, GA 30905 (email: john.s.earwood.civ@mail.mil). Reprints are not available from the authors.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial affiliations.

  1. 1.Horowitz DL, Katzap E, Horowitz S, et al. Approach to septic arthritis. Am Fam Physician. 2011;84(6):653-660. Accessed September 4, 2021. https://www.aafp.org/afp/2011/0915/p653.html
  2. 2.McBride S, Mowbray J, Caughey W, et al. Epidemiology, management, and outcomes of large and small native joint septic arthritis in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;70(2):271-279.
  3. 3.Weston VC, Jones AC, Bradbury N, et al. Clinical features and outcome of septic arthritis in a single UK Health District 1982–1991. Ann Rheum Dis. 1999;58(4):214-219.
  4. 4.Miller JM, Binnicker MJ, Campbell S, et al. A guide to utilization of the microbiology laboratory for diagnosis of infectious diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;67(6):813-816.
  5. 5.Ross JJ, Saltzman CL, Carling P, et al. Pneumococcal septic arthritis: review of 190 cases. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36(3):319-327.
  6. 6.Lin W-T, Tang H-J, Lai C-C, et al. Clinical manifestations and bacteriological features of culture-proven Gram-negative bacterial arthritis. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2017;50(4):527-531.
  7. 7.Liu C, Bayer A, Cosgrove SE, et al. Clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children: executive summary. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(3):285-292.
  8. 8.Hariharan P, Kabrhel C. Sensitivity of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein for the exclusion of septic arthritis in emergency department patients. J Emerg Med. 2011;40(4):428-431.
  9. 9.Thornton L, Ormsby N, Allgar V, et al. Can C-reactive protein be used to predict acute septic arthritis in the adult population? South Med J. 2019;112(2):108-111.
  10. 10.Becker JA, Daily JP, Pohlgeers KM. Acute monoarthritis: diagnosis in adults. Am Fam Physician. 2016;94(10):810-816. Accessed September 4, 2021. https://www.aafp.org/afp/2016/1115/p810.html
  11. 11.Lieber SB, Fowler ML, Zhu C, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes in polyarticular septic arthritis. Joint Bone Spine. 2018;85(4):469-473.
  12. 12.Galloway JB, Hyrich KL, Mercer LK, et al.; BSR Biologics Register. Risk of septic arthritis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and the effect of anti-TNF therapy: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(10):1810-1814.
  13. 13.Zhao J, Zhang S, Zhang L, et al. Serum procalcitonin levels as a diagnostic marker for septic arthritis. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;35(8):1166-1171.
  14. 14.Papanicolas LE, Hakendorf P, Gordon DL. Concomitant septic arthritis in crystal monoarthritis. J Rheumatol. 2012;39(1):157-160.
  15. 15.Sigmund IK, Holinka J, Sevelda F, et al. Performance of automated multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) using synovial fluid in the diagnosis of native joint septic arthritis in adults. Bone Joint J. 2019;101-B(3):288-296.
  16. 16.Dunaj J, Moniuszko A, Zajkowska J, et al. The role of PCR in diagnostics of Lyme borreliosis. Przegl Epidemiol. 2013;67(1):35-39.
  17. 17.Shu E, Farshidpour L, Young M, et al. Utility of point-of-care synovial lactate to identify septic arthritis in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 2019;37(3):502-505.
  18. 18.Beaman FD, von Herrmann PF, Kransdorf MJ, et al.; Expert Panel on Musculoskeletal Imaging. ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® suspected osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, or soft tissue infection (excluding spine and diabetic foot). J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(5S):S326-S337.
  19. 19.Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, et al. Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021;70(4):1-187.
  20. 20.Nahid P, Dorman SE, Alipanah N, et al. Executive summary: official American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guidelines: treatment of drug-susceptible tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63(7):853-867.
  21. 21.Lantos PM, Charini WA, Medoff G, et al. Final report of the Lyme disease review panel of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51(1):1-5.
  22. 22.Gamaletsou MN, Kontoyiannis DP, Sipsas NV, et al. Candida osteomyelitis: analysis of 207 pediatric and adult cases (1970–2011). Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55(10):1338-1351.
  23. 23.Courjon J, Demonchy E, Cua E, et al. Efficacy and safety of clindamycin-based treatment for bone and joint infections: a cohort study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017;36(12):2513-2518.
  24. 24.Lantos PM, Rumbaugh J, Bockenstedt LK, et al.; Infectious Diseases Society of America, American Academy of Neurology, American College of Rheumatology. 2020 guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of Lyme disease. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021;73(1):1-9.
  25. 25.Li H-K, Rombach I, Zambellas R, et al. Oral versus intravenous antibiotics for bone and joint infection. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(5):425-436.
  26. 26.Flores-Robles BJ, Jiménez Palop M, Sanabria Sanchinel AA, et al. Medical versus surgical approach to initial treatment in septic arthritis. J Clin Rheumatol. 2019;25(1):4-8.
  27. 27.Ravindran V, Logan I, Bourke BE. Medical vs surgical treatment for the native joint in septic arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009;48(10):1320-1322.
  28. 28.Gjika E, Beaulieu J-Y, Vakalopoulos K, et al. Two weeks versus four weeks of antibiotic therapy after surgical drainage for native joint bacterial arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(8):1114-1121.
  29. 29.Abram SGF, Alvand A, Judge A, et al. Mortality and adverse joint outcomes following septic arthritis of the native knee. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(3):341-349.
  30. 30.Ferrand J, El Samad Y, Brunschweiler B, et al. Morbimortality in adult patients with septic arthritis. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16:239.
  31. 31.Beatrous SV, Grisoli SB, Riahi RR, et al. Cutaneous manifestations of disseminated gonococcemia. Dermatol Online J. 2017;23(1) ):13030/qt33b24006.
  32. 32.Wang C-H, Lu C-W. Disseminated gonococcal infection presenting as the arthritis-dermatitis syndrome. Clin Med (Lond). 2019;19(4):340-341.
  33. 33.Vidaurrazaga MM, Perlman DC. A case of purulent gonococcal arthritis. IDCases. 2019;19:e00662.
  34. 34.Bush LM, Vazquez-Pertejo MT. Tick borne illness-Lyme disease. Dis Mon. 2018;64(5):195-212.
  35. 35.Grillon A, Scherlinger M, Boyer P-H, et al. Characteristics and clinical outcomes after treatment of a national cohort of PCR-positive Lyme arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019;48(6):1105-1112.
  36. 36.Melia MT, Auwaerter PG. Time for a different approach to Lyme disease and long-term symptoms. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(13):1277-1278.
  37. 37.Leeflang MMG, Ang CW, Berkhout J, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of serological tests for Lyme borreliosis in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16(1):140.
  38. 38.Peto HM, Pratt RH, Harrington TA, et al. Epidemiology of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in the United States, 1993–2006. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49(9):1350-1357.
  39. 39.Johansen IS, Nielsen SL, Hove M, et al. Characteristics and clinical outcome of bone and joint tuberculosis from 1994 to 2011: a retrospective register-based study in Denmark. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(4):554-562.
  40. 40.Hogan JI, Hurtado RM, Nelson SB. Mycobacterial musculoskeletal infections. Thorac Surg Clin. 2019;29(1):85-94.
  41. 41.Bariteau JT, Waryasz GR, McDonnell M, et al. Fungal osteomyelitis and septic arthritis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014;22(6):390-401.
  42. 42.Singh JA, Yu S, Chen L, et al. Rates of total joint replacement in the United States. J Rheumatol. 2019;46(9):1134-1140.
  43. 43.Tubb CC, Polkowksi GG, Krause B. Diagnosis and prevention of periprosthetic joint infections. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020;28(8):e340-e348.
  44. 44.Huotari K, Peltola M, Jämsen E. The incidence of late prosthetic joint infections. Acta Orthop. 2015;86(3):321-325.
  45. 45.Parvizi J, Tan TL, Goswami K, et al. The 2018 definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(5):1309-1314.e2.
  46. 46.Watters W III, Rethman MP, Hanson NB, et al.; American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; American Dental Association. Prevention of orthopaedic implant infection in patients undergoing dental procedures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013;21(3):180-189.
  47. 47.Gupta A, Osmon DR, Hanssen AD, et al. Genitourinary procedures as risk factors for prosthetic hip or knee infection: a hospital-based prospective case-control study. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2015;2(3):ofv097.
  48. 48.Banerjee S, Shen B, Nelson DB, et al. Infection control during GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67(6):781-790.

Copyright © 2026 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.