Adenomyosis: Diagnosis and Management

Sarina Schrager, MD, MS
Lashika Yogendran, MD, MS
Crystal M. Marquez, MD
Elizabeth A. Sadowski, MD

American Family Physician. 2022;105(1):33-38.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

Patient information: See related handout on adenomyosis, written by the authors of this article.

Adenomyosis is a clinical condition where endometrial glands are found in the myometrium of the uterus. One in three patients with adenomyosis is asymptomatic, but the rest may present with heavy menstrual bleeding, pelvic pain, or infertility. Heavy menstrual bleeding is the most common symptom. Adenomyosis is distinct from endometriosis (the presence of endometrial glands outside of the uterus), but the two conditions often occur simultaneously. Risk factors for developing adenomyosis include increasing age, parity, and history of uterine procedures. Most patients are diagnosed from 40 to 50 years of age, but younger patients with infertility are increasingly being diagnosed with adenomyosis as imaging modalities improve. Diagnosis of adenomyosis begins with clinical suspicion and is confirmed with transvaginal ultrasonography and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging. Treatment of adenomyosis typically starts with hormonal menstrual suppression. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems have shown some effectiveness. Patients with adenomyosis may ultimately have a hysterectomy if symptoms are not controlled with medical therapy.

Adenomyosis is a benign uterine disorder in which endometrial glands are found in the myometrium of the uterus. Adenomyosis is distinct from endometriosis, which is the presence of endometrial glands outside of the uterus. Adenomyosis is a poorly understood condition.

SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, go to https://www.aafp.org/afpsort.

Two theories prevail regarding the pathogenesis of adenomyosis.1,2 The first theory suggests that with injury of the endometrium, the basalis endometrium invaginates into the myometrium through an altered or interrupted junctional zone creating adenomyotic lesions. The tissue injury and repair theory may help explain why having a previous uterine procedure (e.g., cesarean delivery, dilation and curettage) increases the risk of subsequent adenomyosis. The second theory suggests that adenomyotic lesions arise from metaplasia of embryonic pluripotent Müllerian remnants. Adenomyosis can be classified as diffuse (involving a large area of endometrium) or focal.1

Epidemiology

The diagnosis of adenomyosis was previously confirmed in only post-hysterectomy cases, and it was thought to predominate in patients older than 40 years. Improved imaging makes it clear that younger patients also have adenomyosis.1 In one study of 985 symptomatic patients seen in a gynecology clinic using specific ultrasound diagnostic criteria, adenomyosis had a 20.9% prevalence in the study population (including pre- and postmenopausal, nulligravid, and multiparous patients), with a range of 10% to 35% in histology reports after hysterectomy.3

A population-based study of 650,000 patients estimated the overall incidence of adenomyosis at 1%, or 29 per 10,000 person-years, over a 10-year period based on International Classification of Diseases, 10th ed. (ICD-10) coding.4 Of those with adenomyosis, 90.8% had associated clinical symptoms based on chart review.4 The incidence of adenomyosis in the study was highest among patients 41 to 45 years of age.4 The overall prevalence of adenomyosis in 2015 was 0.8%, with a high of 1.5% among patients 41 to 45 years of age.4 The large variations in estimating incidence and prevalence of adenomyosis could be because there are no standard histologic criteria for diagnosis, as well as the recent advent of laparoscopic surgery creating morcellating specimens that alter the arrangement of tissue, leading to a more difficult diagnosis.5 Table 1 lists populations in which adenomyosis is commonly diagnosed.1

TABLE 1. Patients in Whom Adenomyosis Is Commonly Diagnosed

Most common
Multiparous
Older than 40 years
Prior cesarean delivery
Prior uterine surgery
Increasingly diagnosed
Infertile
Younger than 40 years
With dysmenorrhea, abnormal uterine bleeding, or both

Information from reference 1.

CASE

A 42-year-old patient presents with a six-month history of chronic pelvic pain. The patient describes the pain as aching and deep in the pelvis. The patient has regular menses but notes that it has been getting progressively heavier with more dysmenorrhea for the past few years. The patient has a history of infertility, and the uterus feels mildly enlarged and tender on bimanual examination. Pelvic ultrasonography suggests diffuse adenomyosis.

Clinical Presentation

Up to one-third of patients with adenomyosis can be asymptomatic.5 Symptoms typically arise between 40 and 50 years of age.5 There is no pathognomonic sign or symptom of adenomyosis. Common symptoms include abnormal uterine bleeding (heavy menstrual bleeding and irregular menses) and dysmenorrhea (Table 2). Less common symptoms include dyspareunia and chronic pelvic pain.6,7

TABLE 2. Symptoms and Signs of Adenomyosis

Symptoms
Abnormal uterine bleeding
Chronic pelvic pain
Dysmenorrhea
Dyspareunia
Signs
Infertility
Uterine enlargement and boggy consistency
Uterine tenderness

Heavy menstrual bleeding occurs in 40% to 60% of patients with adenomyosis.6 Heavy bleeding is likely caused by the increased surface area of the endometrium, subsequent increase in total volume of the endometrium and endometrial glands, or the increased vascularization of the lining of the endometrium and is directly correlated with the extent of myometrial invasion.5,6 Adenomyosis is part of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists PALM-COEIN acronym for the evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding in reproductive-aged patients (Table 3).8

TABLE 3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists PALM-COEIN Acronym for Etiology of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding

Structural (PALM)
Polyps (endometrial or cervical)
Adenomyosis
Leiomyoma
Malignancy and hyperplasia
Nonstructural (COEIN)
Coagulopathy
Ovulatory dysfunction
Endometrial
Iatrogenic
Not yet classified

Information from reference 8.

Dysmenorrhea occurs in 15% to 30% of patients with adenomyosis.6 It is postulated that dysmenorrhea is related to the increased number of oxytocin receptors in the endometrium and increased prostaglandin production contributing to uterine contractions causing dysmenorrhea.5,9 Adenomyosis in a patient with fibroids can cause more severe dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, or chronic pelvic pain. If a patient with fibroids is having significant dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, or chronic pelvic pain, an evaluation for adenomyosis may be warranted.

Common signs of adenomyosis include uterine enlargement, uterine tenderness with boggy consistency, and infertility. Coexisting conditions such as leiomyomas could contribute to an enlarged uterus. As many as 50% of patients with adenomyosis have leiomyomas; 11% have endometriosis.6 In patients undergoing hysterectomy for fibroids, adenomyosis was reported in 15% to 57% of specimens.10 In 25% to 70% of patients with endometriosis, adenomyosis was also reported; in patients with deep endometriosis, the prevalence of adenomyosis was found to be 49% to 66%.10

Impaired fertility in adenomyosis is thought to be attributable to abnormal thickening of the junctional zone of the myometrium, abnormal uterine peristalsis, and altered sperm transport.10 Because patients are typically diagnosed with adenomyosis after childbearing age, the incidence of adenomyosis in patients with infertility is unclear. But, a meta-analysis found that patients with adenomyosis had a 28% decreased probability of clinical pregnancy using in-vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection vs. patients without adenomyosis.11

Diagnosis

Diagnosis of adenomyosis is based on clinical suspicion as well as imaging. With improvements in transvaginal ultrasonography and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), more cases of adenomyosis are being diagnosed.6,9 Similar to endometriosis, adenomyosis does not have any classic physical examination findings or laboratory studies that identify it as a likely diagnosis. On transvaginal ultrasonography, diffuse adenomyosis has a variable appearance. An attempt by gynecologists to define the various features resulted in the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment criteria.12 These criteria have low reproducibility between imagers and unknown predictive value in the diagnosis of adenomyosis.13,14 Adenomyosis is considered when the uterus is globular in configuration and multiple areas of shadowing are visible, sometimes described as fan shaped, with difficulty differentiating the outer myometrium from the junctional zone and cystic changes in the junctional zone and myometrium12,13 (Figure 1). Additional features that may be seen include an irregular, or interrupted, junctional zone with hyperechoic islands. When multiple signs are present, the diagnosis is more certain; however, adenomyosis can be focal rather than diffuse. When focal adenomyosis occurs, only a few focal areas of shadowing might be visible, which can be confused with fibroids. In these cases, MRI can differentiate adenomyosis from fibroids with greater certainty (Figure 2).

FIGURE 1.

Sagittal gray-scale transvaginal ultrasound image with two focal areas of shadowing (thin arrows), rather than the typical fan-shaped shadowing seen in adenomyosis. The endometrium is distinct from the myometrium (thick arrows); however, the junctional zone is difficult to identify. These imaging findings may represent adenomyosis, although the lack of fan-shaped shadowing and other diagnostic features makes the diagnosis less certain.

FIGURE 2.

Sagittal T2-weighted magnetic resonance image with signs of adenomyosis, including a widened junctional zone (asterisks) causing thickening of the anterior and posterior myometrium and high signal related to cystic changes and edema (arrow). The normal myometrium (M) is higher in signal intensity than the darker junctional zone (asterisks).

Both a systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that transvaginal ultrasonography has a sensitivity for diagnosing adenomyosis of 83.8% and a specificity of 63.9%.15 MRI has a sensitivity of 77% with a specificity of 89%, making it a better confirmatory diagnostic test than transvaginal ultrasonography.16,17 However, because of cost, transvaginal ultrasonography is the first-line imaging technique used in most patients with suspected adenomyosis. In cases where the diagnosis is in question, hysteroscopy may be a helpful adjunct tool. Several changes in the endometrium such as hypervascularization, endometrial defects, and submucosal hemorrhagic cysts can suggest a diagnosis of adenomyosis.10

Treatment

Treatment of adenomyosis focuses on symptom control. There are no medical treatments approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for adenomyosis; however, many medical therapies that are successful in treating endometriosis are also used off label for adenomyosis18 (Table 41,6,18,19 ). Definitive therapy for adenomyosis is hysterectomy if other therapies are not effective. In a large population-based study, more than 80% of women with adenomyosis had a hysterectomy, and almost 40% used chronic pain medications.4 Uterine artery embolization is a potential minimally invasive option to treat focal adenomyosis.20 Figure 3 shows an approach to diagnosis and treatment of adenomyosis.1822

TABLE 4. Nonsurgical Treatment of Adenomyosis

Intervention*Mechanism of actionAdverse effects
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugsDecreased pain and abnormal bleeding from decreasing circulating prostaglandinPotential for renal toxicity and gastrointestinal irritation
Combined oral contraceptivesAtrophy of endometrial tissue causing decreased menstrual bleedingContraception, irregular bleeding, thromboembolism
ProgestinsAtrophy of endometriumIrregular bleeding, weight gain
Progestin-releasing intrauterine deviceAtrophy of endometrium from local progestinIrregular bleeding, contraception
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analoguesHypoestrogenism, endometrial atrophyVasomotor symptoms, risk of osteoporosis
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonistsEndometrial atrophy, mild hypoestrogenismVasomotor symptoms

*—Listed in order from most to least commonly used.

Information from references 1, 6, 18, and 19.

FIGURE 3.

Algorithm for diagnosis and treatment of adenomyosis.

Information from references 1822.

CASE RESOLUTION

The use of MRI vs. treating symptoms empirically with a progestin-releasing intrauterine device is discussed with your patient. The patient elects to try the device and returns in six months reporting that pain is 50% better; however, one year later the patient reports worsening pain. After gynecology consultation and MRI confirmation of the diagnosis, the patient elects to have a hysterectomy.

Data Sources: A PubMed search was completed in Clinical Queries using the key terms adenomyosis, diagnosis, and treatment. The search included meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, and reviews. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality evidence reports, Clinical Evidence, Cochrane database, Essential Evidence Plus, Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement, and DynaMed were also searched. Search dates: November 20, 2020, and November 7, 2021.

SARINA SCHRAGER, MD, MS, is a professor in the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison.

LASHIKA YOGENDRAN, MD, MS, is an assistant professor in the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health.

CRYSTAL M. MARQUEZ, MD, is an assistant clinical professor in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at State University of New York—Downstate, Brooklyn.

ELIZABETH A. SADOWSKI, MD, is the director of Gynecologic Imaging and a professor in the Departments of Radiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health.

Address correspondence to Sarina Schrager, MD, MS, University of Wisconsin, 1100 Delaplaine Ct., Madison, WI 53715 (email: sbschrag@wisc.edu). Reprints are not available from the authors.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

  1. 1.Vannuccini S, Petraglia F. Recent advances in understanding and managing adenomyosis. F1000Res. 2019;8:F1000.
  2. 2.Guo S-W. The pathogenesis of adenomyosis vis-à-vis endometriosis. J Clin Med. 2020;9(2):485.
  3. 3.Naftalin J, Hoo W, Pateman K, et al.; How common is adenomyosis? A prospective study of prevalence using transvaginal ultrasound in a gynaecology clinic. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(12):3432-3439.
  4. 4.Yu O, Schulze-Rath R, Grafton J, et al.; Adenomyosis incidence, prevalence and treatment: United States population-based study 2006–2015. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(1):94.e1-94.e10.
  5. 5.Cunningham RK, Horrow MM, Smith RJ, et al.; Adenomyosis: a sonographic diagnosis. Radiographics. 2018;38(5):1576-1589.
  6. 6.Struble J, Reid S, Bedaiwy MA. Adenomyosis: a clinical review of a challenging gynecologic condition. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(2):164-185.
  7. 7.Peric H, Fraser IS. The symptomatology of adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;20(4):547-555.
  8. 8.Munro MG, Critchley HOD, Broder MS, et al; FIGO Working Group on Menstrual Disorders; FIGO classification system (PALM-COEIN) for causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in nongravid women of reproductive age. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;113(1):3-13.
  9. 9.Abbott JA. Adenomyosis and abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB-A)—pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;40:68-81.
  10. 10.Gordts S, Grimbizis G, Campo R. Symptoms and classification of uterine adenomyosis, including the place of hysteroscopy in diagnosis. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(3):380-388.e1.
  11. 11.Vercellini P, Consonni D, Dridi D, et al.; Uterine adenomyosis and in vitro fertilization outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(5):964-977.
  12. 12.Van den Bosch T, Dueholm M, Leone FPG, et al.; Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(3):284-298.
  13. 13.Munro MG. Classification and reporting systems for adenomyosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(2):296-308.
  14. 14.Rasmussen CK, Van den Bosch T, Exacoustos C, et al.; Intra- and inter-rater agreement describing myometrial lesions using morphologic uterus sonographic assessment: a pilot study. J Ultrasound Med. 2019;38(10):2673-2683.
  15. 15.Andres MP, Borrelli GM, Ribeiro J, et al.; Transvaginal ultrasound for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(2):257-264.
  16. 16.Bazot M, Daraï E. Role of transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(3):389-397.
  17. 17.Liu L, Li W, Leonardi M, et al.; Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for adenomyosis: systematic review and meta-analysis and review of sonographic diagnostic criteria. J Ultrasound Med. 2021;40(11):2289-2306.
  18. 18.Pontis A, D'Alterio MN, Pirarba S, et al.; Adenomyosis: a systematic review of medical treatment. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016;32(9):696-700.
  19. 19.Vannuccini S, Luisi S, Tosti C, et al.; Role of medical therapy in the management of uterine adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(3):398-405.
  20. 20.Dessouky R, Gamil SA, Nada MG, et al.; Management of uterine adenomyosis: current trends and uterine artery embolization as a potential alternative to hysterectomy. Insights Imaging. 2019;10(1):48.
  21. 21.Krentel H, Cezar C, Becker S, et al.; From clinical symptoms to MR imaging: diagnostic steps in adenomyosis. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:1514029.
  22. 22.Chapron C, Vannuccini S, Santulli P, et al.; Diagnosing adenomyosis: an integrated clinical and imaging approach. Hum Reprod Update. 2020;26(3):392-411.

Copyright © 2026 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.