Letters to the Editor

Treatment for Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosed in Primary Care

American Family Physician. 2022;106(5):485B-485C.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

To the Editor: Evidence shows that patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) can be treated as outpatients effectively and safely.1 Guidelines recommend outpatient treatment for patients who meet low-risk criteria; however, eligibility criteria vary.2,3 The American College of Chest Physicians recommends outpatient care for adults who meet the following criteria: “(1) clinically stable with good cardiopulmonary reserve; (2) no contraindications such as recent bleeding, severe renal or liver disease, or severe thrombocytopenia (i.e., < 50,000 per mm3); (3) expected to be compliant with treatment; and (4) the patient feels well enough to be treated at home.”2 The patient must also have access to treatment and follow-up care.

The definition of outpatient care varies in the literature.4 PE is most commonly diagnosed in the emergency department, but some studies include patients diagnosed in outpatient clinics.1 Another point of variation besides diagnostic location is the location and duration of medical observation between diagnosis and discharge. Most studies include an observation period involving prolonged emergency department monitoring and at least one night in an observation unit or inpatient ward.4 Until recently, only case reports described patients treated in the primary care setting without referral to a more specialized level of care.1,5

We recently published a retrospective multicenter cohort study describing the characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of adult patients diagnosed with acute PE in the primary care setting.6 From 2013 to 2019, investigators identified 652 patients whose community-based primary care clinicians (98% family medicine or internal medicine physicians) secured a diagnosis using computed tomographic pulmonary angiography or ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. Outcomes of patients treated without hospitalization included seven-day hospitalization with symptoms related to PE and 30-day serious outcomes (i.e., major bleeding, recurrent venous thromboembolism, or all-cause mortality).

One-third of these patients were treated with a direct oral anticoagulant, and 20.5% (n = 134) went home from the clinic. Of the 79.5% (n = 518) who were referred to the emergency department, 196 (30% of the entire cohort) were discharged home after a brief evaluation (median = 3 hours). Of the 50.5% (n = 330) of total patients treated without hospitalization, 1.8% (n = 6) required hospitalization within seven days for symptoms related to PE, and 0.3% (n = 1) experienced a 30-day outcome (nonfatal worsening PE). This study is the first to demonstrate that outpatient treatment of patients in the primary care setting with acute PE can be feasible and safe (Table 11 ).6

David R. Vinson, MD, FAAFP, FACEP

Roseville, Calif.

Suresh Rangarajan, MD, MSc

Oakland, Calif.

Erik R. Hofmann, MD, MS

Sacramento, Calif.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

  1. 1.Vinson DR, Aujesky D, Geersing GJ, et al. Comprehensive outpatient management of low-risk pulmonary embolism: can primary care do this? A narrative review. Perm J. 2020;24 : 19.163.
  2. 2.Stevens SM, Woller SC, Baumann Kreuziger L, et al. Executive summary: antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: second update of the CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest. 2021;160(6):2247-2259.
  3. 3.Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C, et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J. 2020;41(4):543-603.
  4. 4.Shan J, Isaacs DJ, Bath H, et al. Outpatient management of pulmonary embolism defined in the primary literature: a narrative review. Perm J. 2021;25 : 20.233.
  5. 5.Chang J, Isaacs DJ, Leung J, et al. Comprehensive management of acute pulmonary embolism in primary care using telemedicine in the COVID-era. BMJ Case Rep. 2021;14(6):e243083.
  6. 6.Vinson DR, Hofmann ER, Johnson EJ, et al. Management and outcomes of adults diagnosed with acute pulmonary embolism in primary
    care: community-based retrospective cohort study [published online
    January 12, 2022]. J Gen Intern Med. Accessed May 2, 2022. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11606-021-07289-0

Email letter submissions to afplet@aafp.org. Letters should be fewer than 400 words and limited to six references, one table or figure, and three authors. Letters submitted for publication in AFP must not be submitted to any other publication. Letters may be edited to meet style and space requirements.

This series is coordinated by Kenny Lin, MD, MPH, deputy editor.

Copyright © 2026 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.