FPIN's Clinical Inquiries
From the Family Practice Inquiries Network

Bempedoic Acid for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease

Anne Mounsey, MD,
Maniraj Jeyaraju, MD,
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

American Family Physician. 2024;109(6):573-574.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

Clinical Question

Is bempedoic acid (Nexletol) effective for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease?

Evidence-Based Answer

Bempedoic acid can be used to effectively treat hyperlipidemia. (Strength of Recommendation [SOR]: B, single, high-quality, randomized controlled trial [RCT].) Bempedoic acid decreases the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events, with insignificant increases in liver enzyme and creatine kinase levels, gout, myalgia, and cholelithiasis. When bempedoic acid is used for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease, it is more effective than placebo at lowering non–high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and total cholesterol. (SOR: C, disease-oriented evidence based on a single meta-analysis of RCTs.) In patients prescribed a maximum dosage of tolerated statins, bempedoic acid added to ezetimibe, compared with either agent alone, is more effective at lowering LDL cholesterol. (SOR: C, disease-oriented evidence based on a single RCT.)

Evidence Summary

A 2023 subgroup analysis of a double-blind RCT evaluated the benefit of bempedoic acid (180 mg) vs. placebo for primary cardiovascular disease prevention in patients with statin intolerance.1 The subgroup analysis included 4,206 patients (59% were female between 18 and 85 years of age; 92% identified as White) who met the criteria for high cardiovascular risk without a previous cardiovascular event and intolerance to the guideline-recommended dosage of statins. Most patients had diabetes mellitus (66%) or hypertension (88%). Patients were permitted to continue adjunct antihyperlipidemic agents; 19.3% took a very low-dose statin (defined as less than 10 mg daily of simvastatin or atorvastatin), and 8% took ezetimibe. The primary outcome was the time to first incidence of a four-component major adverse cardiovascular event (i.e., death from cardiovascular cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, coronary revascularization).

Secondary outcomes included the time to other cardiovascular end points and all-cause mortality. After 36 months of follow-up, bempedoic acid significantly decreased the primary outcome (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.89]; number needed to treat [NNT] = 44) compared with placebo. Bempedoic acid also decreased the risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted HR = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.98; NNT = 63). Compared with placebo, the bempedoic acid–only cohort had insignificant increases in liver enzyme and uric acid levels, kidney injury, myalgia, gout, and cholelithiasis. Study limitations included underpowered subgroup analysis.

A 2020 meta-analysis of 10 phase 2 and 3 RCTs (n = 3,788) evaluated the benefit and safety profile of bempedoic acid compared with placebo in treating hypercholesterolemia for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.2 The study outcome measures were lipid and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels, treatment discontinuation, and drug-related adverse effects.

Compared with placebo, bempedoic acid reduced the levels of total cholesterol (mean difference [MD] = −14.94%; 10 studies; n = 3,485), non-HDL cholesterol (MD = −18.17%; nine studies; n = 3,485), LDL cholesterol (MD = −22.94%; 10 studies; n = 3,483), apolipoprotein B (MD = −15.18%; eight studies; n = 3,402), HDL cholesterol (MD = −5.83%; nine studies; n = 3,453), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (MD = −27.03%; five studies; n = 3,179). Compared with placebo, bempedoic acid had no significant effect on triglycerides, very low LDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein A-1 levels. Bempedoic acid increased liver enzymes (odds ratio [OR] = 4.28; 95% CI, 1.34 to 13.71; five studies; n = 2,363), creatine kinase levels (OR = 3.79; 95% CI, 1.06 to 13.51; four studies; n = 2,718), and treatment discontinuation rates (OR = 1.37; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.76; nine studies; n = 3,731). There was significant heterogeneity between studies for most outcomes.

Address correspondence to Anne Mounsey, MD, at anne_mounsey@med.unc.edu. Reprints are not available from the authors.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

  1. 1.Nissen SE, Menon V, Nicholls SJ, et al. Bempedoic acid for primary prevention of cardiovascular events in statin-intolerant patients. JAMA. 2023;330(2):131-140.
  2. 2.Cicero AFG, Fogacci F, Hernandez AV, et al.; Lipid and Blood Pressure Meta-Analysis Collaboration Group and the International Lipid Expert Panel. Efficacy and safety of bempedoic acid for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2020;17(7):e1003121.
  3. 3.Ballantyne CM, Laufs U, Ray KK, et al. Bempedoic acid plus ezetimibe fixed-dose combination in patients with hypercholesterolemia and high CVD risk treated with maximally tolerated statin therapy. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020;27(6):593-603.
  4. 4.Ballantyne CM, Banach M, Mancini GBJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of bempedoic acid added to ezetimibe in statin-intolerant patients with hypercholesterolemia: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Atherosclerosis. 2018;277:195-203.
  5. 5.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Bempedoic acid with ezetimibe for treating primary hypercholesterolaemia or mixed dyslipidaemia. April 28, 2021. Accessed December 5, 2023. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta694/chapter/2-Information-about-bempedoic-acid
  6. 6.Banach M, Penson PE, Farnier M, et al. Bempedoic acid in the management of lipid disorders and cardiovascular risk. 2023 position paper of the International Lipid Expert Panel. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2023;79:2-11.

Clinical Inquiries provides answers to questions submitted by practicing family physicians to the Family Physicians Inquiries Network (FPIN). Members of the network select questions based on their relevance to family medicine. Answers are drawn from an approved set of evidence-based resources and undergo peer review. The strength of recommendations and the level of evidence for individual studies are rated using criteria developed by the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (https://www.cebm.net).

The complete database of evidence-based questions and answers is copyrighted by FPIN. If interested in submitting questions or writing answers for this series, go to https://www.fpin.org or email questions@fpin.org.

Copyright © Family Physicians Inquiries Network. Used with permission.

This series is coordinated by John E. Delzell Jr., MD, MSPH, associate medical editor.

A collection of FPIN’s Clinical Inquiries published in AFP is available at https://www.aafp.org/afp/fpin.

Copyright © 2026 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.