FPIN's Clinical Inquiries
From the Family Practice Inquiries Network

Intra-Articular Steroids for Adhesive Capsulitis

Andrew K. Cunningham, MD
Chih Kai (Kevin) Yang, MD

American Family Physician. 2024;110(3):307-308.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

CLINICAL QUESTION

Do intra-articular steroid injections improve pain and function in patients with adhesive capsulitis, also known as frozen shoulder?

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

Intra-articular steroid injections inconsistently improve pain and function when used to treat adhesive capsulitis in the short term (less than 12 weeks) and medium term (less than 6 months). (Strength of Recommendation [SOR]: A, multiple meta-analyses, systematic review.) Ultrasound guidance improves accuracy of injection into the glenohumeral joint, but there is no difference in pain at 3, 6, and 12 weeks compared with landmark-guided injection. (SOR: B, single randomized controlled trial [RCT].)

EVIDENCE SUMMARY

A 2020 systematic review and meta-analysis of 65 randomized trials compared the relative effectiveness of nonsurgical treatments for adhesive capsulitis.1 The systematic review included studies that were randomized designs of any type comparing treatment modalities with placebo injection, no treatment, or other treatment modalities. Primary outcomes were pain and function, and the secondary outcome was shoulder external rotation range of motion (ROM). Pain was evaluated using a 0- to 10-point visual analog scale (VAS), with lower numbers indicating less pain. Because the studies used different functional scores, standardized mean differences were used in the overall analysis. Shoulder external rotation ROM was measured in degrees. Minimal clinically important differences were defined as 1 point for VAS pain, an effect size of 0.45 for functional score, and 10 degrees for ROM.

Of the 65 eligible studies, 34 studies (n = 2,402) were included in a pairwise meta-analysis that compared the effectiveness of each intervention with other interventions or placebo injection/no treatment in the early short term (2 to 6 weeks), late short term (8 to 12 weeks), and medium term (4 to 6 months). Data beyond these periods were inadequate for analysis. Intra-articular steroid injections did not improve pain after 4 to 6 months. Significant improvement in function was present at 6 weeks but not at 6 months. The statistically significant benefits did not consistently reach the threshold of minimal clinical importance.

A limitation of the systematic review included grouping patients with various chronicities of adhesive capsulitis together, making it difficult to draw conclusions about treatment at specific presentation time frames. Also, the placebo-injection and no-treatment groups were combined, minimizing the significance of injection placebo effect.

A 2019 meta-analysis compared intra-articular and subacromial steroid injections for adhesive capsulitis.2 Seven RCTs (N = 421) were included in the study. Inclusion criteria were studies of patients older than 18 years with adhesive capsulitis and intervention comparators of intra-articular and subacromial injection. Outcomes were pain measured via a 0- to 10-point VAS, ROM in degrees, and Constant-Murley score. This score is calculated using a 100-point composite scale divided into four categories: pain (15 points), activities of daily living (20 points), strength (25 points), and ROM (i.e., forward flexion, external rotation, internal rotation, and abduction; 40 points). A higher score reflects a greater level of function. Pain outcomes were reported at 1, 2, and 3 months after the interventions. ROM and Constant-Murley score data were recorded at 1 and 2 months.

ANDREW K. CUNNINGHAM, MD, CAQSM, is program director of the primary care sports medicine fellowship program at Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan

CHIH KAI (KEVIN) YANG, MD, is a resident at Trinity Health Livingston Family Medicine Residency, Brighton, Michigan

Address correspondence to Andrew K. Cunningham, MD, CAQSM, at cunninghamak@gmail.com.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

  1. 1.Challoumas D, Biddle M, McLean M, et al. Comparison of treatments for frozen shoulder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(12):e2029581.
  2. 2.Chen R, Jiang C, Huang G. Comparison of intra-articular and subacromial corticosteroid injection in frozen shoulder: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg. 2019;68:92-103.
  3. 3.Cho CH, Min BW, Bae KC, et al. A prospective double-blind randomized trial on ultrasound-guided versus blind intra-articular corticosteroid injections for primary frozen shoulder. Bone Joint J. 2021;103-B(2):353-359.
  4. 4.Kelley MJ, Shaffer MA, Kuhn JE, et al. Shoulder pain and mobility deficits: adhesive capsulitis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43(5):A1-A31.

Clinical Inquiries provides answers to questions submitted by practicing family physicians to the Family Physicians Inquiries Network (FPIN). Members of the network select questions based on their relevance to family medicine. Answers are drawn from an approved set of evidence-based resources and undergo peer review. The strength of recommendations and the level of evidence for individual studies are rated using criteria developed by the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (https://www.cebm.net).

The complete database of evidence-based questions and answers is copyrighted by FPIN. If interested in submitting questions or writing answers for this series, go to https://www.fpin.org or email questions@fpin.org.

Copyright © Family Physicians Inquiries Network. Used with permission.

This series is coordinated by John E. Delzell Jr., MD, MSPH, associate medical editor.

A collection of FPIN’s Clinical Inquiries published in AFP is available at https://www.aafp.org/afp/fpin.

Copyright © 2026 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.