Methotrexate for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Kento Sonoda, MD, AAHIVS, FAAFP, FASAM
Kelly Dougherty, MD

American Family Physician. 2025;111(5):402-403.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

DETAILS FOR THIS REVIEW

Study Population: 575 children and young adults with active juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)

Efficacy End Points: Treatment response, sustained clinically inactive disease, function, pain, and participant global assessment of well-being

Harm End Points: Serious adverse events and withdrawals due to adverse events

THE NUMBERS

Methotrexate vs placebo for JIA
Benefits: 1 in 7 had better treatment response with methotrexate compared with placebo for up to 6 months
Harms: None, with little or no difference in serious adverse events or withdrawal due to adverse events
Methotrexate plus intra-articular glucocorticoid injection vs intra-articular glucocorticoid injection alone for JIA
Benefits: None, with little or no benefit on sustained clinically inactive disease
Harms: No difference in withdrawals due to adverse events
Methotrexate vs leflunomide for JIA
Benefits: None, with little or no benefit on sustained clinically inactive disease
Harms: No difference in withdrawals due to serious adverse events or withdrawals due to adverse events

JIA = juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Narrative: JIA is arthritis of unknown etiology with onset before 16 years of age and symptoms lasting 6 weeks or longer. JIA is the most common childhood rheumatologic disease; its incidence rate per 100,000 person-years is 16.5 in girls and 7.7 in boys.1 JIA can diminish health-related quality of life and impose a significant economic burden on patients and their families.2 The 2021 American College of Rheumatology clinical practice guideline recommends methotrexate as a preferred agent for JIA vs other conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), such as leflunomide and hydroxychloroquine, because of its well-established evidence and safety profile.3

A 2024 Cochrane review evaluated weekly oral methotrexate for patients with active JIA in an outpatient setting.4 This review included five randomized controlled trials (three placebo-controlled trials), with 575 children or young adults (mean age 4–10 years) from 16 different countries. All interventions used varying regimens of weekly oral methotrexate. Four of the five trials permitted participants to take nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), oral glucocorticoids, or both agents during treatment, whereas one trial required participants to have ceased NSAIDs before study enrollment. Comparators across the five studies included placebo, no treatment, methotrexate plus a cointervention (eg, NSAIDs, intra-articular glucocorticoids) compared with the cointervention alone and alternative DMARDs (eg, leflunomide).

JIA treatment response was measured using the validated American College of Rheumatology Pediatric 70, 50, or 30 improvement criteria (numbers refer to percentage of improvement in core JIA symptoms) or other defined criteria from previous JIA studies that included at least 50% or 25% improvement in symptoms. Low-certainty evidence showed that compared with placebo, oral methotrexate (5–15 mg/m2 per week) may improve treatment response for up to 6 months (risk ratio = 1.67; 95% CI, 1.21–2.31; absolute risk difference = 16.3%; number needed to treat = 7; three trials, 328 participants). Low-certainty evidence also demonstrated little or no difference between methotrexate and placebo in participant global assessment of well-being, pain, serious adverse events, or withdrawal due to adverse events. Function was not assessed in any studies comparing methotrexate and placebo.

KENTO SONODA, MD, AAHIVS, FAAFP, FASAM, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri

KELLY DOUGHERTY, MD, Mercy St. Louis Family Medicine Residency, St. Louis

Address correspondence to Kento Sonoda, MD, AAHIVS, FAAFP, FASAM, at kento.sonoda@health.slu.edu.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

  1. 1.Harrold LR, Salman C, Shoor S, et al. Incidence and prevalence of juvenile idiopathic arthritis among children in a managed care population, 1996–2009. J Rheumatol. 2013;40(7):1218-1225.
  2. 2.Tharwat S, Nassar MK, Salem KM, et al. Extraarticular manifestations of juvenile idiopathic arthritis and their impact on health-related quality of life. Clin Rheumatol. 2024;43(7):2295-2305.
  3. 3.Onel KB, Horton DB, Lovell DJ, et al. 2021 American College of Rheumatology guideline for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: therapeutic approaches for oligoarthritis, temporomandibular joint arthritis, and systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2022;74(4):521-537.
  4. 4.Tan J, Renton WD, Whittle SL, et al. Methotrexate for juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024(2):CD003129.
  5. 5.Ferrara G, Mastrangelo G, Barone P, et al.; Rheumatology Italian Study Group. Methotrexate in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: advice and recommendations from the MARAJIA expert consensus meeting. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2018;16(1):46.

Copyright ©2026 MD Aware, LLC (theNNT.com). Used with permission.

This series is coordinated by Christopher W. Bunt, MD, AFP assistant medical editor, and the NNT Group.

A collection of Medicine by the Numbers published in AFP is available at https:// www.aafp.org/afp/mbtn.

Copyright © 2026 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.