Letters to the Editor

Racial Bias in the Medical One-Liner

American Family Physician. 2025;112(3):240.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

To the Editor:

I am grateful to Drs. Roth and Lazris for their article on racist clinical documentation and the medical one-liner.1 They state that although medical education traditionally called for the inclusion of race in the history of present illness, this practice must be unlearned due to its effects on stereotyping and bias, suggesting that bias is merely a downstream effect of racial labels. However, the very use of racial labels in the history of present illness is itself an expression of bias.

White people are less likely than Black people to receive a racial descriptor in the medical one-liner,2 which suggests that unconscious bias drives the inclusion of race. The absence of racial labels for White individuals reveals assumptions of White as the “default race,” whereas the relatively higher prevalence of racial labels for Black individuals reveals a tendency to regard them as “other.” Black clinicians are also less likely to document race in the history of present illness than White clinicians,2 indicating the role of unconscious bias in prompting mention of a patient's race. In fact, some medical schools now actively educate students against using race in the medical one-liner.3

The consequences of using racial labels include not just propagation of bias but also medical errors, such as missing a sickle cell disease diagnosis in those of Indian ancestry and failing to consider cystic fibrosis in Black patients.4,5

We need to stop including race in the medical one-liner. It biases us and our medical decision-making.

Editor’s Note: This letter was sent to the authors of “Avoiding Racist and Judgmental Clinical Documentation: Helping to Achieve Health Equity,” who declined to reply.

Reem Al-Atassi, MD

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

  1. 1.Roth AR, Lazris A, Haskell H, et al. Avoiding racist and judgmental clinical documentation: helping to achieve health equity. Am Fam Physician. 2024;109(6):575-577.
  2. 2.Balderston JR, Gertz ZM, Seedat R, et al. Differential documentation of race in the first line of the history of present illness. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181(3):386-388.
  3. 3.Brett AS, Goodman CW. First impressions – should we include race or ethnicity at the beginning of clinical case presentations? N Engl J Med. 2021;385(27):2497-2499.
  4. 4.Gau J, Nwora C, Eldakar-Hein ST, et al. Things We Do for No Reason™: routine inclusion of race in the history of present illness. J Hosp Med. 2022;17(2):123-126.
  5. 5.Amutah C, Greenidge K, Mante A, et al. Misrepresenting race – the role of medical schools in propagating physician bias. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(9):872-878.

Email letter submissions to afplet@aafp.org. Letters should be fewer than 400 words and limited to six references, one table or figure, and three authors. Letters submitted for publication in AFP must not be submitted to any other publication. Letters may be edited to meet style and space requirements.

This series is coordinated by Kenny Lin, MD, MPH, deputy editor.

Copyright © 2026 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.