brand logo

Am Fam Physician. 2022;106(1):online

Clinical Question

Is mortality improved in patients with left main coronary artery disease that is managed with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous interventions (PCI) with drug-eluting stents?

Bottom Line

The five- and 10-year all-cause mortality rates are similar in people with left main coronary artery disease whether it is managed with PCI with drug-eluting stents or with CABG. (Level of Evidence = 1a)

Synopsis

The team searched several databases and identified four randomized trials that compared PCI (n = 2,197) with CABG (n = 2,197) in adults with left main coronary artery disease and reported five-year mortality outcomes. The authors were able to obtain the data on the individual participants in these trials. Three of the trials recruited only people with left main disease. Although the fourth trial included people with multivessel disease, the authors were able to isolate the subgroups with left main disease. After five years, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between the two groups (slightly more than 10%), and no significant difference in cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular deaths. The authors found no significant difference in 10-year mortality (slightly more than 20%). The patients whose left main coronary artery disease was managed by PCI had slightly more spontaneous myocardial infarctions (6.2% vs. 2.6%; number needed to harm = 31; 95% CI, 23 to 47) and subsequent revascularizations (18.3% vs. 10.7%; number needed to harm = 14; 95% CI, 11 to 19).

Study design: Meta-analysis (randomized controlled trials)

Funding source: Self-funded or unfunded

Setting: Various (meta-analysis)

Reference: Sabatine MS, Bergmark BA, Murphy SA, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in left main coronary artery disease: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet. 2021;398(10318):2247-2257.

POEMs (patient-oriented evidence that matters) are provided by Essential Evidence Plus, a point-of-care clinical decision support system published by Wiley-Blackwell. For more information, see http://www.essentialevidenceplus.com. Copyright Wiley-Blackwell. Used with permission.

For definitions of levels of evidence used in POEMs, see https://www.essentialevidenceplus.com/Home/Loe?show=Sort.

To subscribe to a free podcast of these and other POEMs that appear in AFP, search in iTunes for “POEM of the Week” or go to http://goo.gl/3niWXb.

This series is coordinated by Natasha J. Pyzocha, DO, contributing editor.

A collection of POEMs published in AFP is available at https://www.aafp.org/afp/poems.

Continue Reading


More in AFP

More in PubMed

Copyright © 2022 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP.  See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.