Treatment-Resistant Depression

ALISON LITTLE, MD, MPH

American Family Physician. 2009;80(2):167-172.

Author disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Up to two thirds of patients with major unipolar depression will not respond to the first medication prescribed. Depression may be considered resistant to treatment when at least two trials with antidepressants from different pharmacologic classes (adequate in dose, duration, and compliance) fail to produce a significant clinical improvement. Evidence regarding the effectiveness of psychotherapy for treatment-resistant depression is limited. A recent high-quality trial found that patients who did not respond to citalopram and who received cognitive behavior therapy (with or without continued citalopram) had similar response and remission rates to those who received other medication regimens. Initial remission rates in that trial were 37 percent, and even after three additional trials of different drugs or cognitive behavior therapy, the cumulative remission rate was only 67 percent. In general, patients who require more treatment steps have higher relapse rates, and fewer than one half of patients achieve sustained remission. No treatment strategy appears to be better than another. Electroconvulsive therapy is effective as short-term therapy of treatment-resistant depression. There is no good-quality evidence that vagal nerve stimulation is an effective treatment for this condition.

Depression is a common condition in the United States, with 12-month and lifetime prevalence rates of approximately 5 and 13 percent, respectively.1 The mean age of onset is 30 years, and there is a higher prevalence in women, whites, and Native Americans. Only 60 percent of persons with depression are treated for the disorder,1 and primary care physicians detect major depression in only one third to one half of their patients who have the condition.2 Although options for pharmacologic treatment have expanded significantly in the past 20 years, between one and two thirds of patients will not respond to the first antidepressant prescribed, and 15 to 33 percent will not respond to multiple interventions.35

SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Clinical recommendationEvidence ratingReferencesComments
Augmentation of drug therapy with cognitive behavior therapy is reasonable for patients who fail to achieve remission with an antidepressant.B14 One large, high-quality RCT
Intolerance or lack of effectiveness of one SSRI does not imply lack of response to another SSRI.B5, 11 One large, high-quality RCT
No medication treatment strategy is better than another for treatment-resistant depression.B5, 11 One large, high-quality RCT
Electroconvulsive therapy has short-term effectiveness in treatment-resistant depression.B24 Multiple limited-quality trials and case series

RCT = randomized controlled trial; SSRI = selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.

A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, go to https://www.aafp.org/afpsort.xml.

Definition

Studies of treatment-resistant depression have used a variety of definitions.6 A general consensus is emerging that unipolar major depression is considered resistant or refractory when at least two trials with antidepressants from different pharmacologic classes (adequate in dose, duration, and compliance) fail to produce a significant clinical improvement.7 Before determining that a patient is nonresponsive to an initial trial of antidepressants, he or she should be reassessed to confirm the accuracy of the diagnosis, medication adherence, and whether the depression is being exacerbated by coexisting medical, psychiatric, or psychosocial disorders.3

Confirming the Diagnosis

Before deciding that a patient is treatment resistant, physicians should assess the adequacy of treatment by determining adherence to the medication. Nonadherence is estimated to be between 20 and 50 percent of all patients.8 It is particularly common in persons with cognitive defects and feelings of worthlessness and hopelessness. Ongoing cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) and frequent follow-up with the physician may encourage adherence during the early stages of treatment. In patients who have been determined adherent, obtaining serum drug levels may be helpful, especially in those taking tricyclic antidepressants.3 A variety of conditions that can cause or exacerbate depression are listed in Table 19 and Table 2.10 Particular attention should be paid to comorbid substance abuse or other psychiatric conditions, because they can significantly complicate treatment of the underlying depression.

Table 1 Selected Organic Causes of Depression

Cardiovascular conditions
Chronic heart failure
Hypoxia
Post-myocardial infarction or -coronary artery bypass graft
Collagen-vascular conditions
Giant cell arteritis
Rheumatoid arthritis
Systemic lupus erythematosus
Commonly abused substances
Alcohol
Amphetamine (withdrawal)
Cocaine (withdrawal)
Opiates
Infectious disease
Brucellosis
Encephalitis
Human immunodeficiency virus
Infectious endocarditis
Infectious hepatitis
Influenza
Lyme disease
Mononucleosis
Syphilis
Tuberculosis
Medications
Analgesics (e.g., indomethacin [formerly Indocin], opiates)
Antibiotics and antiinfectives (e.g., interferon)
Antihypertensive agents with catecholamine effects (e.g., clonidine [Catapres], methyldopa [formerly Aldomet], propranolol [formerly Inderal], reserpine)
Antineoplastic agents (e.g., amphotericin B [Amphocin], cycloserine [formerly Seromycin], interferon, procarbazine [Matulane], vinblastine [formerly Velban], vincristine [formerly Oncovin])
Corticosteroids
Gastrointestinal motility drugs (e.g., metoclopramide [Reglan])
Heavy metals (e.g., mercury, lead)
Histamine2 receptor antagonists (e.g., cimetidine [Tagamet], ranitidine [Zantac])
Insecticides (e.g., organophosphates)
Levodopa (formerly Larodopa)
Oral contraceptives
Sedative-hypnotics (e.g., barbiturates, benzodiazepines)
Metabolic and endocrine disorders
Addison disease
Anemia
Apathetic hyperthyroidism
Cushing disease
Diabetes mellitus
Hepatic disease
Hypokalemia
Hyponatremia
Hypoparathyroidism
Hypopituitarism
Hypothyroidism
Porphyria
Thiamine, B12, and folate deficiencies
Uremia
Neoplasm
Bronchogenic carcinoma
Central nervous system tumors
Disseminated carcinomatosis
Lymphoma
Pancreatic cancer
Neurologic disease
Chronic subdural hematoma
Dementia
Huntington disease
Migraine
Multiple sclerosis
Normal pressure hydrocephalus
Parkinson disease
Stroke
Temporal lobe epilepsy
Wilson disease
Other conditions
Chronic pyelonephritis
Pancreatitis
Postpartum depression

Adapted with permission from Loosen PT, Shelton RC. Mood disorders. In: Ebert MH. Current Diagnosis and Treatment Psychiatry . 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2008:312–313.

Table 2 Likelihood of Developing Major Depression Following Diagnosis of a Specific Medical Condition

ConditionLikelihood of developing depression (%)
Cushing syndrome67
Epilepsy55
Huntington disease41
Hypothyroidism40
Hyperthyroidism31
Human immunodeficiency virus infection30
Stroke27
Diabetes mellitus24
Parkinson disease21
Chronic pain21 to 32
Cancer20 to 38
Chronic fatigue syndrome17 to 47
Coronary artery disease16 to 19
Dementia11
Hemodialysis7
Multiple sclerosis6 to 57

Adapted with permission from Rouchell AM, Pounds R, Tierney JG. Depression. In: Textbook of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry . Rundell JR, Wise MG, eds. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1996:315.

Treatment

Treatment options for depression include psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, and electroconvulsive therapy (Figure 1). Evidence regarding psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy has recently been enhanced by results from the STAR*D (Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression) study, a seven-year randomized controlled trial (RCT) that evaluated medication switching and augmentation in 3,671 outpatients with unipolar depression.11 Citalopram (Celexa) was the initial treatment (20 mg daily, titrated to 60 mg daily if needed). Three additional levels of treatment were included, based on response. Each treatment level was sustained for at least 12 weeks (if the drug was tolerated) before response was determined.

Figure 1. Approach to Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression

Algorithm for management of treatment-resistant depression. (CBT = cognitive behavior therapy; ECT = electroconvulsive therapy; TCA = tricyclic antidepressant.)

PSYCHOTHERAPY

A variety of psychotherapeutic techniques can be used to treat depression, including CBT, interpersonal psychotherapy, nondirective counseling, befriending, problem-solving therapy, psychodynamic psychotherapy, group psychoeducation, cognitive behavior analysis, and exercise.3,12 However, evidence regarding the effectiveness of psychotherapeutic techniques in patients with treatment-resistant depression is limited. One systematic review found no adequate-quality RCTs that assessed the effectiveness of psychotherapy on treatment-refractory depression.13 The STAR*D trial found that patients who received CBT after failing to respond to citalopram (with or without continued citalopram) had similar rates of response (i.e., at least 50 percent improvement in symptoms compared with baseline) and remission (i.e., resolution of symptoms) as those who received other medication regimens.14 Patients who received CBT alone (rather than in conjunction with citalopram) achieved remission less rapidly, but they also had fewer adverse effects than those who were switched to other medications.14

PHARMACOTHERAPY

For initial treatment of depression, the effectiveness of antidepressant medication is comparable between classes; therefore, selection of a particular antidepressant should largely be based on the side effect profile of the drug, any history of response in the patient or a family member, and the cost of the medication.3 Drug classes used for treatment of depression include tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), triiodothyronine (T3), and a group of drugs collectively referred to as second-generation antidepressants. The latter group includes selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotoninnorepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, as well as drugs with other mechanisms of action (e.g., mirtazapine [Remeron], bupropion [Wellbutrin], nefazodone [formerly Serzone]).

The most significant side effects of tricyclic anti-depressants are cardiovascular (proarrhythmic and hypotensive effects) and anticholinergic (dry mouth, constipation, urinary retention), as well as sedation and weight gain. MAOIs are associated with serious side effects (hypertensive crisis) and require dietary restriction; these drugs should generally be reserved for patients who do not respond to other treatments. A systematic review comparing the second-generation antidepressants found that venlafaxine (Effexor) has a higher rate of nausea and vomiting, paroxetine (Paxil) has a higher rate of sexual side effects, mirtazapine results in more weight gain, and sertraline (Zoloft) has a higher rate of diarrhea than other second-generation antidepressants.15

A systematic review identified 16 RCTs of treatment-resistant depression, all of which were considered too small to detect an important clinical response.13 The STAR*D trial significantly expanded the evidence base for pharmacotherapy of treatment-resistant unipolar major depression. Medications included in the trial are presented in Table 3.11,14,1620 Remission rates (as determined by the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomology–Self Report) after the first level of treatment were 37 percent; after the second level, 31 percent; after the third level, 14 percent; and after the fourth level, 13 percent.21 The cumulative remission rate was 67 percent.21 In general, patients who required more treatment steps had higher relapse rates.11 Ultimately, fewer than one half of patients achieved sustained remission, even after all four treatment levels.5

Table 3 Selected Results of the STAR*D Trial

TreatmentResponse rate (%)* Remission rate (%) Comments
Level 1 (initial treatment)16
Citalopram (Celexa)4728 to 33
Level 2 (failed or did not tolerate level 1 treatment)11,14,17
Citalopram plus CBT35 23 to 31 Slower time to remission compared with augmentation of citalopram with buspirone (Buspar) or sustained-release bupropion (Wellbutrin SR)
Bupropion plus citalopram32 30 to 39 Greater reduction in symptoms and fewer adverse effects than buspirone
Venlafaxine, extended-release (Effexor XR)28 25
Buspirone plus citalopram27 30 to 33
Sertraline (Zoloft)27 18 to 27
Bupropion, sustained-release26 21 to 25
CBT22 25 to 31 Fewer adverse effects than pharmacotherapy
Level 3 (failed or did not tolerate level 2 treatment)18,19
Augmentation with triiodothyronine§23 25 Fewer adverse effects than lithium
Augmentation with lithium16 13 to 16
Nortriptyline (Pamelor)16 12 to 20 Tolerability similar to mirtazapine (Remeron)
Mirtazapine13 8 to 12
Level 4 (failed or did not tolerate level 3 treatment)20
Venlafaxine, extended-release, plus mirtazapine23 14 to 16 Greater reduction in symptoms and fewer adverse effects than tranylcypromine (Parnate)
Tranylcypromine12 7 to 14

CBT = cognitive behavior therapy; STAR*D = Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression.

*— Response is defined as 50 percent or more reduction in baseline score on the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology–Self Report.

†— Remission is defined as a score of 7 or less on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale or a score of 5 or less on the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology–Self Report.

‡— Not statistically significant.

‖— Triiodothyronine plus level 2 drug.

§— Lithium plus level 2 drug.

Information from references 11, 14, and 16 though 20.

There were significant differences between only three treatment strategies tested in the STAR*D trial. Augmentation of citalopram with bupropion resulted in slightly improved response rates and fewer adverse effects compared with buspirone (Buspar), but no difference in remission rates.17 Augmentation of the level 2 treatment with T3 resulted in fewer adverse effects than augmentation with lithium, but there was no difference in effectiveness.18 Venlafaxine plus mirtazapine resulted in slightly improved response rates and fewer adverse effects compared with tranylcypromine (Parnate).20 Beyond these findings, the STAR*D trial did not find that any of the studied treatments are better than another. Other evidence suggests that augmentation of second-generation antidepressants or TCAs with pindolol, lithium, or methylphenidate (Ritalin) is not effective for treatment-refractory depression.22,23

ELECTROCONVULSIVE THERAPY

Electroconvulsive therapy is used primarily for treatment-resistant depression, although it may be used in high-risk cases of severe or psychotic depression, or when pharmacotherapy is contraindicated or not tolerated. Multiple reviews have found it to be more effective than placebo, simulated electroconvulsive therapy, or antidepressants, although the long-term effectiveness is unclear.22 There is some evidence that bilateral electroconvulsive therapy improves symptoms more than unilateral therapy, and that high-dose therapy is more effective than low-dose therapy.22 The effectiveness in older patients with depression has not been established.24 The primary side effect is short-term cognitive impairment (learning impairment and memory deficit), which generally resolves within days to weeks. Cognitive impairment may be inversely related to treatment effectiveness (greater with bilateral and high-dose therapy).22

VAGAL NERVE STIMULATION AND OTHER THERAPIES

Vagal nerve stimulation refers to electrical stimulation of the cervical portion of the left vagus nerve. This treatment was approved in 2005 for treatment-resistant depression (inadequate response to at least four antidepressant drugs). The only RCT of this therapy included 235 patients and found no difference in the primary outcome between active therapy and sham groups.25 In addition, two serious adverse events occurred in the active therapy group: one infection that required removal of the device, and one suicide. Case series have shown response rates of 30 to 40 percent, and observational studies have shown few statistically significant differences in outcomes.26 Side effects of vagal nerve stimulation include hoarseness, headache, neck pain, and cough.

Other treatments for which there is no or limited evidence of effectiveness for treatment-resistant depression include light therapy, transcranial magnetic stimulation, magnetic seizure therapy, deep brain stimulation, St. Johns wort, and acupuncture.2

ALISON LITTLE, MD, MPH, is a clinical assistant professor in the Department of Family Medicine at the Oregon Health & Science University in Portland. She received her medical degree from the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, and completed a family practice residency at Valley Medical Center, Renton, Wash. Dr. Little received her master of public health degree from the University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle.

Address correspondence to Alison Little, MD, MPH, Oregon Health & Science University, Mail Code MQ280, 2611 SW Third Ave., Portland, OR 97201 (e-mail: littleal@ohsu.edu). Reprints are not available from the author.

Author disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

  1. 1.Hasin DS, Goodwin RD, Stinson FS, Grant BF. Epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcoholism and Related Conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62(10):1097-1106.
  2. 2.Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement. Health Care Guideline: Major Depression in Adults in Primary Care. http://www.icsi.org/depression_5/depression__major__in_adults_in_primary_care_3.html. Accessed February 3, 2009.
  3. 3.American Psychiatric Association. Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients with Major Depressive Disorder. American Psychiatric AssociationPractice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients with Major Depressive Disorder2nd ed.Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association;2000.
  4. 4.Berlim MT, Fleck MP, Turecki G. Current trends in the assessment and somatic treatment of resistant/refractory major depression: an overview. Ann Med. 2008;40(2):149-159.
  5. 5.Cain RA. Navigating the sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D) study: practical outcomes and implications for depression treatment in primary care. Prim Care. 2007;34(3):505-519.
  6. 6.Berlim MT, Turecki G. What is the meaning of treatment resistant/refractory major depression (TRD)? A systematic review of current randomized trials. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2007;17(11):696-707.
  7. 7.Berlim MT, Turecki G. Definition, assessment, and staging of treatment-resistant refractory major depression: a review of current concepts and methods. Can J Psychiatry. 2007;52(1):46-54.
  8. 8.Kripalani S, Yao X, Haynes RB. Interventions to enhance medication adherence in chronic medical conditions: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(6):540-550.
  9. 9.Loosen PT, Shelton RC. Current Diagnosis and Treatment Psychiatry. LoosenPTSheltonRCMood disorders. In:EbertMH.Current Diagnosis and Treatment Psychiatry2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Medical;2008:312–313.
  10. 10.Rouchell AM, Pounds R, Tierney JG. Textbook of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry. RouchellAMPoundsRTierneyJGDepression. In:Textbook of Consultation-Liaison PsychiatryRundellJRWiseMGWashington, DCAmerican Psychiatric Press;1996.
  11. 11.Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, et al.; for the STAR*D Study Team. Bupropion-SR, sertraline, or venlafaxine-XR after failure of SSRIs for depression. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(12):1231-1242.
  12. 12.Butler R, Hatcher S, Price J, Von Korff M. Depression in adults: psychological treatments and care pathways. BMJ. Clin Evid. 2007;8:1016. Accessed February 3, 2009. http://clinicalevidence.bmj.com/ceweb/conditions/meh/1016/1016-get.pdf
  13. 13.Stimpson N, Agrawal N, Lewis G. Randomised controlled trials investigating pharmacological and psychological interventions for treatment-refractory depression. Systematic review. Br J Psychiatry. 2002;181:284-294.
  14. 14.Thase ME, Friedman ES, Biggs MM, et al. Cognitive therapy versus medication in augmentation and switch strategies as second-step treatments: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164(5):739-752.
  15. 15.Gartlehner G, Hansen RA, Kahwati L, Lohr KN, Gaynes B, Carey T. Drug Class Review on Second Generation Antidepressants. Final Report, September 2006. http://www.ohsu.edu/ohsuedu/research/policycenter/customcf/derp/product/AD2_Final_Report_%20Update%203.pdf. Accessed February 3, 2009.
  16. 16.Trivedi MH, Rush AJ, Wisniewski SR, et al.; for the STAR*D Study Team. Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement-based care in STAR*D: implications for clinical practice. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(1):28-40.
  17. 17.Trivedi MH, Fava M, Wisniewski SR, et al.; for the STAR*D Study Team. Medication augmentation after the failure of SSRIs for depression. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(12):1243-1252.
  18. 18.Nierenberg AA, Fava M, Trivedi MH, et al. A comparison of lithium and T(3) augmentation following two failed medication treatments for depression: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(9):1519-1530.
  19. 19.Fava M, Rush AJ, Wisniewski SR, et al. A comparison of mirtazapine and nortriptyline following two consecutive failed medication treatments for depressed outpatients: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(7):1161-1172.
  20. 20.McGrath PJ, Stewart JW, Fava M, et al. Tranylcypromine versus venlafaxine plus mirtazapine following three failed antidepressant medication trials for depression: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(9):1531-1541.
  21. 21.Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, et al. Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(11):1905-1917.
  22. 22.Barbui C, Butler R, Cipriani A, Geddes J, Hatcher S. Depression in adults (drug and other physical treatments). BMJ Clin Evid. 2007;6:1003. Accessed February 3, 2009. http://clinicalevidence.bmj.com/ceweb/conditions/meh/1003/1003-get.pdf
  23. 23.Patkar AA, Masand PS, Pae CU, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of augmenation with an extended release formulation of methylphenidate in outpatients with treatment-resistant depression. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006;26(6):653-656.
  24. 24.Van der Wurff FB, Stek ML, Hoogendijk WL, Beekman AT. Electroconvulsive therapy for the depressed elderly. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2:CD003593.
  25. 25.Rush AJ, Marangell LB, Sackeim HA, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a randomized, controlled acute phase trial. Biol Psychiatry. 2005;58(5):347-354.
  26. 26.BlueCross BlueShield Technology Evaluation Center. Vagus nerve stimulation for treatment-resistant depression. http://www.bcbs.com/blueresources/tec/vols/21/21_07.html. Accessed February 4, 2009.

Copyright © 2026 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.