GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for Stroke Prevention in Type 2 Diabetes or Obesity

Drew Keister, MD
Mahvesh Shabbir, MD
Haidar Alwaeli, MD

American Family Physician. 2026;114(2):187-188.

Author Disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

CLINICAL QUESTION

What is the efficacy of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists for stroke prevention in patients with type 2 diabetes or obesity?

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

Patients with type 2 diabetes who took GLP-1 receptor agonists had a 0.4% lower absolute risk of nonfatal stroke compared with patients who took a placebo, with the number needed to treat (NNT) of 257 over 3.6 years. (Strength of Recommendation [SOR]: A, systematic review and meta-analysis.) In adults with obesity but not type 2 diabetes, GLP-1 receptor agonist treatment is associated with a 47% lower rate of stroke compared with no GLP-1 receptor agonist treatment. (SOR: B, single large retrospective cohort study.)

EVIDENCE SUMMARY

A 2024 systematic review and meta-analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials (N = 82,140) examined the effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists on stroke risk, including in patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients were adults, and 35% were female, 73% identified as Caucasian, 78% had type 2 diabetes, 19% had heart failure, and 17% (eight trials, n = 11,340) experienced a previous stroke. The intervention included one of seven GLP-1 receptor agonists taken orally or by injection weekly or daily for an average duration of 3.6 years. The comparator was matching placebo. The primary outcome was reduction of stroke risk. Secondary outcomes included reduction in the risks of nonfatal and fatal stroke. A secondary analysis investigated stroke reduction in patients with diabetes compared with those without diabetes.1

The overall stroke risk was lower in the GLP-1 receptor agonist group vs the placebo group, with an NNT of 200 (risk ratio [RR] = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.77–0.93). Overall, GLP-1 receptor agonists also were associated with a significantly decreased risk of nonfatal stroke vs placebo, with an NNT of 250 (RR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.79–0.95). However, there was no significant difference in the risk of fatal stroke.1

In a subgroup analysis, the stroke risk in patients with type 2 diabetes was significantly lower in patients taking GLP-1 receptor agonists, with an NNT of 257 (RR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77–0.95). No difference was found in patients without type 2 diabetes. Limitations included use of various treatment regimens and medications, and no evaluation of safety outcomes or adverse reactions. The standard of care for adding other medications for cardiovascular event prevention differed between the studies, and one study had a high rate of early treatment discontinuation.1

A 2024 retrospective, observational cohort study (N = 24,246) examined the long-term effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists on cardiovascular health in patients with obesity. Patients had a mean age of 43 years with a body mass index of 30 kg/m2 or greater and without type 2 diabetes. The study group was 80% female. Patients were from the United States, Australia, Europe, and Asia. All patients experienced an index event (ie, mortality, thyroid disease, cardiovascular event [including stroke], kidney disease) during the 5-year study period.2

The study authors excluded patients taking an additional glucose-lowering medication, those who used the study drugs for less than 6 months, patients who had index events before the study baseline, those using other weight management medications, and those with a history of bariatric surgery, cancer, kidney failure, HIV infection, pancreatitis, or kidney transplant. The intervention was a prescription for GLP-1 receptor agonists for at least 6 consecutive months before any index event. The comparator was a propensity score-matched cohort of patients with no history of GLP-1 receptor agonist use. The primary outcomes were safety and cardiovascular (including stroke), thyroid, and clinical biochemical profile outcomes.2

DREW KEISTER, MD, is the vice chair for Education in Family Medicine at the Walter and Irene Baran Rural Family Medicine Residency in the Lehigh Valley Health Network in Pottsville, Pennsylvania.

MAHVESH SHABBIR, MD, and HAIDAR ALWAELI, MD, are residents at the Walter and Irene Baran Rural Family Medicine Residency in the Lehigh Valley Health Network in Pottsville.

Address correspondence to Drew Keister, MD, at drew_m.keister@lvhn.org.

Author Disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

  1. 1.Adamou A, Barkas F, Milionis H, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials. Int J Stroke. 2024;19(8):876-887.
  2. 2.Huang YN, Liao WL, Huang JY, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in individuals with obesity and without type 2 diabetes: a global retrospective cohort study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024;26(11):5222-5232.

Help Desk Answers provides answers to questions submitted by practicing family physicians to the Family Physicians Inquiries Network (FPIN). Members of the network select questions based on their relevance to family medicine. Answers are drawn from an approved set of evidence-based resources and undergo peer review. The strength of recommendations and the level of evidence for individual studies are rated using criteria developed by the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (https://www.cebm.net).

The complete database of evidence-based questions and answers is copyrighted by FPIN. If interested in submitting questions or writing answers for this series, go to https://www.fpin.org or email: questions@fpin.org.

This series is coordinated by John E. Delzell Jr., MD, MSPH, associate medical editor.

A collection of FPIN’s Help Desk Answers published in AFP is available at https://www.aafp.org/afp/hda.

Copyright © 2026 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.