Newborn Skin: Part II. Birthmarks

Katherine A. M. Snyder, MD
Adam D. Voelckers, MD

American Family Physician. 2024;109(3):217-221.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

This is part II of a two-part article on newborn skin. “Newborn Skin: Part I. Common Rashes and Skin Changes,” appears in this issue of AFP.

Birthmarks in newborns can be classified as vascular, melanocytic or pigmented, or markers of underlying developmental abnormalities of the nervous system. A nevus simplex is a benign capillary malformation. Newborns with a nevus flammeus can be safely treated before one year of age with a pulsed dye laser to reduce the visibility of lesions. Infantile hemangiomas should be treated with systemic beta blockers if there is a risk of life-threatening complications, functional impairment, ulceration, underlying abnormalities, permanent scarring, or alteration of anatomic landmarks. Dermal melanocytosis is a benign finding that is easily recognized and does not warrant further evaluation. A solitary congenital melanocytic nevus that is less than 20 cm in diameter may be observed in primary care; children with larger or multiple nevi should be referred to pediatric dermatology due to the risk of melanoma. Newborns with skin markers of occult spinal dysraphism (other than a simple, solitary dimple) should have lumbar spine imaging using ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging.

Birthmarks are common sources of parental concern, and some require evaluation and treatment. Birthmarks can be classified as vascular, as melanocytic or pigmented, or as markers of underlying developmental abnormalities of the nervous system. Part II of this article reviews the identification and management of birthmarks that appear in the neonatal period, with an emphasis on prognosis and appropriate counseling for parents. Part I of this article, which also appears in this issue of American Family Physician, discusses the presentation, prognosis, and treatment of common rashes and skin changes that may present during an infant's first four weeks of life.1

SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, go to https://www.aafp.org/afpsort.

KATHERINE A. M. SNYDER, MD, is a staff physician and the clinical medical director at Mosaic Community Health–Madras (Ore.) Health Center.

ADAM D. VOELCKERS, MD, is a faculty physician at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Lititz (Pa.) Family Medicine Residency Program.

Address correspondence to Katherine A. M. Snyder, MD, Mosaic Community Health, 500 NE A St. Ste. 100, Madras, OR 97741 (katie.snyder@mosaicmedical.org). Reprints are not available from the authors.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

  1. 1.Snyder KAM, Voelckers AD. Newborn skin: part I. Common rashes and skin changes. Am Fam Physician. 2024;109(3):212-216.
  2. 2.Rozas-Muñoz E, Frieden IJ, Roé E, et al. Vascular stains: proposal for a clinical classification to improve diagnosis and management. Pediatr Dermatol. 2016;33(6):570-584.
  3. 3.McCuaig CC. Update on classification and diagnosis of vascular malformations. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2017;29(4):448-454.
  4. 4.Sabeti S, Ball KL, Burkhart C, et al. Consensus statement for the management and treatment of port-wine birthmarks in Sturge-Weber syndrome. JAMA Dermatol. 2021;157(1):98-104.
  5. 5.Tran JM, Kelly KM, Drolet BA, et al. Light-based treatment of pediatric port-wine birthmarks. Pediatr Dermatol. 2021;38(2):351-358.
  6. 6.Chapas AM, Eickhorst K, Geronemus RG. Efficacy of early treatment of facial port wine stains in newborns: a review of 49 cases. Lasers Surg Med. 2007;39(7):563-568.
  7. 7.Jeon H, Bernstein LJ, Belkin DA, et al. Pulsed dye laser treatment of port-wine stains in infancy without the need for general anesthesia [published correction appears in JAMA Dermatol. 2019; 155(4): 504]. JAMA Dermatol. 2019;155(4):435-441.
  8. 8.Shi MD, Yang K, Li SB, et al. Complication rates and safety of pulsed dye laser treatment for port-wine stain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci. 2023;39(1):16.
  9. 9.Püttgen KB. Diagnosis and management of infantile hemangiomas. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2014;61(2):383-402.
  10. 10.Krowchuk DP, Frieden IJ, Mancini AJ, et al.; Subcommittee on the Management of Infantile Hemangiomas. Clinical practice guideline for the management of infantile hemangiomas. Pediatrics. 2019;143(1):e20183475.
  11. 11.Fimiani M, Bilenchi R, Mandato F, et al. Neonatal skin disorders. In: Buonocore G, Bracci R, Weindling M, eds. Neonatology. A Practical Approach to Neonatal Diseases. 2nd ed. Springer International; 2018: 2391–2425.
  12. 12.Léauté-Labrèze C, Baselga Torres E, Weibel L, et al. The Infantile Hemangioma Referral Score: a validated tool for physicians. Pediatrics. 2020;145(4):e20191628.
  13. 13.Qiu T, Yang K, Dai S, et al. Analysis of therapeutic decisions for infantile hemangiomas: a prospective study comparing the Hemangioma Severity Scale with the Infantile Hemangioma Referral Score. Children (Basel). 2022;9(12):1851.
  14. 14.Léauté-Labrèze C, Frieden I, Delarue A. Early initiation of treatment with oral propranolol for infantile hemangioma improves success rate. Pediatr Dermatol. 2023;40(2):261-264.
  15. 15.Novoa M, Baselga E, Beltran S, et al. Interventions for infantile haemangiomas of the skin. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018(4):CD006545.
  16. 16.Chen T, Gudipudi R, Nguyen SA, et al. Should propranolol remain the gold standard for treatment of infantile hemangioma? A systematic review and meta-analysis of propranolol versus atenolol. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2023;132(3):332-340.
  17. 17.Dinulos JG, Graham EA. Influence of culture and pigment on skin conditions in children. Pediatr Rev. 1998;19(8):268-275.
  18. 18.Jahnke MN, O’Haver J, Gupta D, et al. Care of congenital melanocytic nevi in newborns and infants: review and management recommendations. Pediatrics. 2021;148(6):e2021051536.
  19. 19.Dinulos JGH. Habif’s Clinical Dermatology: A Color Guide to Diagnosis and Therapy. 7th ed. Elsevier; 2021.
  20. 20.McLaughlin MR, O’Connor NR, Ham P. Newborn skin: part II. Birthmarks. Am Fam Physician. 2008;77(1):56-60.
  21. 21.Zywicke HA, Rozzelle CJ. Sacral dimples [published corrections appear in Pediatr Rev. 2011; 32(4): 151 and Pediatr Rev. 2011; 32(5): 207]. Pediatr Rev. 2011;32(3):109-113.
  22. 22.Choi SJ, Yoon HM, Hwang JS, et al. Incidence of occult spinal dysraphism among infants with cutaneous stigmata and proportion managed with neurosurgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(7):e207221.
  23. 23.Medina LS, Crone K, Kuntz KM. Newborns with suspected occult spinal dysraphism: a cost-effectiveness analysis of diagnostic strategies. Pediatrics. 2001;108(6):E101.
  24. 24.Ausili E, Maresca G, Massimi L, et al. Occult spinal dysraphisms in newborns with skin markers: role of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Childs Nerv Syst. 2018;34(2):285-291.
  25. 25.Hughes JA, De Bruyn R, Patel K, et al. Evaluation of spinal ultrasound in spinal dysraphism. Clin Radiol. 2003;58(3):227-233.

Copyright © 2026 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.