Rosacea: Common Questions and Answers

Winfred Frazier, MD, MPH
Raquel K. Zemtsov, MD, MPH
Yufei Ge, MD, MS

American Family Physician. 2024;109(6):533-542.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

This clinical content conforms to AAFP criteria for CME.

Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory skin disease of the central face, affecting 5% of the population. The exact etiology is unknown. A diagnosis is made based on the updated 2017 National Rosacea Society Expert Committee guidelines, including fixed erythema, phymatous changes of skin thickening due to sebaceous gland hyperplasia and fibrosis, papules, pustules, telangiectasia, and flushing. Delays in an accurate diagnosis and treatment may occur in skin of color due to difficulty visualizing erythema and telangiectasia. The daily use of sunscreen, moisturizers, and mild skin cleansers and avoidance of triggers are essential aspects of maintenance treatment. Effective topical treatment options include alpha-adrenergic receptor agonists for flushing and ivermectin, metronidazole, and azelaic acid for papules and pustules. Systemic treatments include nonselective beta blockers for flushing, low-dose doxycycline, and isotretinoin for papules and pustules. Rosacea can significantly affect a patient's emotional health and quality of life. A referral for care is recommended for fixed phymatous changes and ocular rosacea. (Am Fam Physician. 2024;109(6):533-542. Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Family Physicians.)

Rosacea is a chronic, relapsing, remitting cutaneous disease primarily affecting the cheeks, nose, chin, and central forehead, typically sparing the skinfolds.1,2 Rosacea is a common condition affecting 1 in 20 adults worldwide.3 Although the etiology is unclear, rosacea pathogenesis involves exaggerated inflammatory, immune, and vascular responses to identifiable triggers and environmental exposures.2 Table 1 lists common rosacea triggers.4

WHAT'S NEW ON THIS TOPIC

Rosacea
The classification of rosacea was updated in 2017 to better represent rosacea as a disease with a spectrum of several phenotypes. The updated classification emphasizes the diagnostic certainty associated with phymatous changes while downgrading the importance of papules, pustules, telangiectasia, and flushing.
A cohort study of 82,737 women found a positive correlation between alcohol intake and the risk of rosacea compared with never-drinkers, with white wine and liquor consumption having the strongest association with an increased rosacea risk. A systematic review and meta-analysis found alcohol consumption increased the risk of phymatous changes fourfold.

SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, go to https://www.aafp.org/afpsort.

TABLE 1. Common Rosacea Triggers

TriggerPatients reporting
Sun exposure81%
Emotional stress79%
Hot weather75%
Wind57%
Heavy exercise56%
Alcohol consumption52%
Hot baths51%
Cold weather46%
Spicy food42%

Adapted with permission from the National Rosacea Society. Rosacea triggers survey. Accessed June 13, 2023. https://www.rosacea.org/patients/rosacea-triggers/rosacea-triggers-survey.

The Demodex mite may play an inflammatory role in rosacea by disrupting the skin microbiome and triggering an immune response; however, the extent of the mite's contribution to pathogenesis is unclear.2,5 Rosacea is most common in Fitzpatrick skin types I to III, which are the least pigmented types of a subjective determination of skin color based on the propensity to sunburn, but rosacea can be present in all skin types.1,6,7 The lower incidence of rosacea in Fitzpatrick skin types IV to VI may be due to misdiagnosis and underdiagnosis.1,8 Rosacea typically presents in adults older than 30 years and is more common in females.1,9

How Is Rosacea Diagnosed?

Rosacea is diagnosed clinically without the need for specific diagnostic testing. The 2017 National Rosacea Society Expert Committee updated the guidelines with diagnostic, major, and secondary phenotypes.1 The diagnosis of rosacea requires one diagnostic or two major phenotypes. Secondary phenotypes are not required for diagnosis but aid in assessing rosacea severity. A rosacea diagnosis may be considered with fixed central facial erythema in a characteristic pattern that may intermittently intensify phymatous changes, including facial fibrosis with sebaceous gland hyperplasia.1 These phymatous changes may be further classified as active (if inflamed) or fixed (if not inflamed).10,11 Table 2 provides diagnostic criteria for rosacea using dermatologic and ocular manifestations.1,12

TABLE 2. Rosacea Classification: Dermatologic and Ocular Phenotypes

DiagnosticMajorSecondary*

One or more of these phenotypes are diagnostic of rosaceaTwo or more of these phenotypes suggest rosacea
DermatologicFixed erythema
May intermittently intensify
Presents in a characteristic centrofacial distribution

Phymatous changes
Flushing

Papules and pustules

Telangiectasia
Burning
Dryness
Stinging
Swelling
OcularSclerokeratitis/scleritis/keratitis/conjunctivitis/anterior uveitis
Spade-shaped corneal infiltrates
Telangiectasia of the lid margin
Dry eye (evaporative)
Nonuniform lid margins
Waxy, collarette build-up at lash bases (i.e., honey crust)

*—Secondary features are subjective signs and symptoms that often appear with one or more major features that help assess the severity of rosacea.

Adapted with permission from Gallo RL, Granstein RD, Kang S, et al. Standard classification and pathophysiology of rosacea: the 2017 update by the National Rosacea Society Expert Committee. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78(1):152, with additional information from reference 12.

EVIDENCE SUMMARY

The classification of rosacea was updated to better represent rosacea as a disease with a spectrum of several phenotypes.1 The updated classification emphasized the diagnostic certainty associated with phymatous changes while downgrading the importance of papules, pustules, telangiectasia, and flushing.13,14 Diagnostic and major criteria clarify the rosacea diagnosis, whereas secondary features, including burning, stinging, dryness, and edema, aid in grading severity when their duration, frequency, intensity, and impact are assessed.1,14 Despite this diagnostic criteria, the differential diagnosis for rosacea is broad (Table 3).15,16 Acne vulgaris can present with central facial pustules and papules, typically without telangiectasia. The malar rash seen in patients with lupus does not affect the nasolabial folds, unlike the facial erythema of rosacea. Although seborrheic dermatitis often presents with facial erythema, including the nasolabial folds, scalp, and hairlines, rosacea typically does not affect the hairline or scalp.

TABLE 3. Differential Diagnosis of Rosacea

DiagnosisDistinguishing features from rosacea
Acne vulgarisPresence of comedonal lesions and hyperpigmented macules; lack of telangiectasia or ocular symptoms
Atopic dermatitisPresence of dryness and scaling; commonly affects other areas of the body; history of eczema triggers
CarcinoidSystemic symptoms experienced during flushing
DermatomyositisInvolvement of periorbital region and periocular edema; involvement of other nonfacial areas; presence of violaceous hue
Gram-negative folliculitisHistory of prolonged oral antibiotics for acne or rosacea; sudden flare-up despite no changes in treatment or triggers
Keratosis pilaris rubraAsymptomatic, lacks other rosacea features such as triggers; may involve cheeks rather than a full centrofacial distribution
Lupus erythematosusMalar rash in lupus typically spares nasolabial folds; possible presence of systemic symptoms in systemic lupus erythematosus; may have edema; less likely to have papules and pustules; may have sharp demarcations
Perioral dermatitisInflammatory eruption around the mouth, nasolabial folds, and chin with sparing of a clear area between the eruption and the vermilion border
PheochromocytomaPresence of systemic symptoms; flush without other rosacea features
PhotodamagePresence of rough skin and wrinkles; may involve the lateral face more and other sun-exposed areas
SarcoidosisPresence of other rashes such as erythema nodosum and plaques; may involve scaling; lack of additional rosacea features other than inflammatory rash
Seborrheic dermatitisPresence of erythematous patches and plaques involving the scalp, anterior and posterior hairlines, preauricular and postauricular areas, and medial eyebrows; presence of scaling
Steroid dermatitisCovers entire facial area rather than centrofacial distribution; history of prolonged topical steroid use or rebound after discontinuation of topical steroids
Tinea barbaePustular eruption usually presents on the chin and jawline
Tinea facieiRash has sharp demarcations; presence of scaling

Information from references 15 and 16.

What Are Diagnostic and Treatment Considerations for Skin of Color?

The diagnosis of rosacea in skin of color is often delayed or misdiagnosed due to difficulty visualizing erythema and telangiectasia6,17 (Figure 1). Treatment for rosacea is similar across skin types, although many treatments have an additional risk of altering local pigmentation.

FIGURE 1.

Rosacea in skin of color with papules and pustules present.

EVIDENCE SUMMARY

Rosacea in skin of color is likely underestimated due to misdiagnosis.16,17 A history focusing on symptoms of facial stinging, burning, dryness, and subjective flushing and more subtle examination findings than erythema and telangiectasia, such as postinflammatory hyperpigmentation, are especially important to assess skin of color. Diascopy, a clinical test for skin blanching performed by applying pressure with a glass slide to the skin, can help discern telangiectasia on examination. Dermatoscopy can also help demonstrate telangiectasia by differentiating small blood vessels.16 Taking patient photographs against a blue background may also help visualize the erythema.16 Granulomatous rosacea, a histologic subtype characterized by facial papules and nodules with granulomatous changes seen on microscopy, is more common in skin of color, possibly due to a delayed diagnosis.1820 The treatment approach for skin of color is similar to treatment in lighter skin types, although treatment data for skin of color are limited.15 Certain therapies carry a risk of hypo- and hyperpigmentation.

What Lifestyle Interventions Are Important for Rosacea?

Patient education on trigger identification and avoidance is important for rosacea management.4,21,22 Optimal rosacea treatment includes photoprotection, cleansing, and moisturization.23 Sunscreen use is recommended because ultraviolet (UV) radiation can worsen rosacea in all skin types.24,25

EVIDENCE SUMMARY

More than 90% of patients identify triggers that worsen their rosacea.21 Advising patients to journal their symptoms and dietary, emotional, and environmental exposures can help identify triggers.22 A survey of 400 patients with rosacea showed that 78% changed their diet to control rosacea symptoms, with reduced rosacea flare-ups in 95% of the patients who changed their diet.26 In the same survey, at least monthly, 69% of patients experienced a flare-up related to emotional stress.26

Alcohol use appears to increase the risk of rosacea and severity of presentation, whereas tobacco use does not. A cohort study involving 82,737 women found a positive correlation between alcohol intake and the risk of rosacea compared with never-drinkers, with white wine and liquor consumption having the strongest association with an increased risk.27 A systematic review and meta-analysis of 152,381 patients found that alcohol consumption increased the risk of phymatous changes fourfold.28 Two systematic reviews and meta-analyses found that tobacco use did not increase rosacea risk.29,30

Proper skin care can decrease symptoms of rosacea. Acute UV radiation causes skin inflammation, neoangiogenesis, and telangiectasia; chronic UVA radiation causes fibrosis. Using a water-based broad-spectrum sun-screen with zinc oxide or titanium dioxide and a sun protection factor of 30 or more reduces symptoms in rosacea.25 The application of fragrance-free cream moisturizers to improve skin hydration and barrier function, and twice-daily gentle cleansing using a soap-free cleanser reduce rosacea symptoms.23,25,3133

There is limited evidence on the effectiveness of dietary supplements in rosacea. Zinc and vitamin D supplementation do not appear to improve symptoms.34 Two systematic reviews of small, low-quality studies suggest that polyphenols (i.e., plant-derived supplements with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties) may reduce erythema, papules, and pustules.35,36 More studies are needed to examine the role of oral and topical pre- and probiotics.34

Which Topical Options Are Effective for Rosacea?

Topical therapies are first-line treatments for mild to moderate rosacea with persistent erythema, papules, and pustules (Table 4).10,11,37 Alpha-adrenergic receptor agonists are first-line treatments for persistent erythema. Ivermectin, metronidazole (Metrogel), and azelaic acid can be used to treat the papules and pustules phenotype, with ivermectin showing the highest effectiveness.10,31,3841 For moderate to severe rosacea or persistent symptoms despite topical treatment, systemic therapies can be added to topical treatments and be discontinued when symptoms are controlled.10,11

EVIDENCE SUMMARY

Topical alpha-adrenergic receptor agonists, brimonidine and oxymetazoline, temporarily reduce persistent erythema with rapid onset (30 minutes or less) and peak effectiveness of 3 to 6 hours with an eventual return to baseline.10 Two studies showed that topical brimonidine improved persistent erythema with a number needed to treat (NNT) of 5 for a two-grade improvement compared with placebo, whereas oxymetazoline had an NNT of 11 for the same benefit.4244 Although brimonidine and oxymetazoline are well tolerated, few patients treated with oxymetazoline experience rebound erythema, with no rebound erythema seen in patients treated with brimonidine.10 In a randomized controlled trial, using brimonidine 0.33% gel for 8 days increased the likelihood of satisfaction with facial erythema, with an NNT of 7 compared with placebo.45

For papules and pustules, metronidazole and ivermectin are effective, and metronidazole gel is considered the standard of care due to its well-proven effectiveness and tolerability.10 Topical metronidazole 0.75% gel and 1% cream were twice as effective in improving papules and pustules compared with placebo based on a systematic review of 152 studies.10 Ivermectin cream used daily for 12 weeks had an NNT of 3 for good-to-excellent improvement of papules and pustules compared with placebo.39 In another study, ivermectin 1% gel was more likely to clear papules and pustules than 0.75% metronidazole, with an NNT of 10 with fewer adverse effects in the ivermectin group.38 Azelaic acid is an alternative treatment for papules and pustules that appears slightly less tolerable compared with metronidazole.10 Twice-daily azelaic acid at 15% to 20% improved papules and pustules markedly or excellently based on patient assessment, with an NNT of 6 compared with placebo.10 Patients with skin of color should be counseled on the risk of altering skin pigmentation with azelaic acid.46 Minocycline 1.5% foam applied once daily for 12 weeks also improved papules and pustules compared with placebo.47

Which Systemic Therapy Options Are Effective for Rosacea?

Systemic treatment should be considered for severe rosacea, or when milder forms do not respond adequately to topical options (Table 4).10,11,37 Nonselective beta blockers can improve flushing and erythema.31,48 Subantimicrobial-dose doxycycline administered for an average of 3 months is the first-line systemic therapy for the papules and pustules rosacea phenotype.10,31,49 Isotretinoin, which requires safety registration with the iPLEDGE program, is effective for severe and persistent papules and pustules and may be superior to doxycycline with a similar frequency of adverse effects.31 Isotretinoin may also be superior to doxycycline for the treatment of active phymatous changes.11 Doxycycline is first-line treatment over isotretinoin because of the potential for serious adverse effects, the monitoring needs of isotretinoin, and lack of strength of evidence proving benefit over doxycycline.11

TABLE 4. Topical and Systemic Medications for Rosacea

PhenotypeMedication classMedicationDosage and formulationCommon adverse effectsCost*
Topical
Fixed erythemaAlpha-1A adrenergic receptor agonistOxymetazoline (Rhofade)1% cream once dailyApplication-site dermatitis, pain, worsening erythema30-g tube: — ($150)
Fixed erythemaAlpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonistBrimonidine0.33% gel once dailyDryness, erythema (including rebound), flushing, irritation, pruritus, stinging30-g gel pump: $150
Papules and pustulesAntiparasitic agentIvermectin1% cream once dailyBurning, dryness, peeling, pruritus45-g tube: $140
Papules and pustulesAntibioticMetronidazole (Metrogel)0.75% gel, cream, or lotion twice daily
1% gel once daily
Burning, dryness, peeling, pruritusGel, 45-g tube: $35
Cream, 45-g tube: $30
Lotion, 59-mL bottle: $70
1% gel, 60-g tube: $60
Papules and pustulesAntibioticMinocycline1.5% foam once dailyBurning, dryness, itching, stinging30-g can: $370
Papules and pustulesAntibioticSulfacetamide/sulfur10% lotion, 10% suspension, 10% cream twice dailyErythema, irritation, local edemaLotion, 60-g bottle: $120
Suspension, 1-oz bottle: $70
Cream, 57-g tube: $80
Papules and pustulesDicarboxylic acidAzelaic acid15% gel or foam twice dailyBurning, change in skin pigmentation (especially in skin of color), dryness, peeling, pruritus50-g tube: $50
Papules and pustules
Telangiectasia
Vitamin A derivativeRetinoidsCream: 0.02%, 0.025%, 0.05%, 0.1%
Gel: 0.01%, 0.025%, 0.04%, 0.05%, 0.08%, 0.1%
Lotion (isotretinoin [Altreno]): 0.05% once daily at bedtime
Change in skin pigmentation, irritation (burning, dryness, peeling, pruritus), photosensitivity0.025% cream, 20-g tube: $15
0.025% gel, 45-g tube: $45
0.05% lotion, 45-g tube: — ($125)
Systemic
Fixed erythema
Papules and pustules
AntibioticDoxycycline (subantimicrobial)40-mg delayed-release capsule once daily or 20-mg immediate-release tablets twice dailyAbdominal pain and distention, diarrhea, esophagitis, nausea/vomiting, photosensitivity, tooth discoloration, vulvovaginal candidiasis40-mg delayed-release capsules: $270 for 30
20-mg immediate-release tablets: $15 for 60
Fixed erythema
Ocular rosacea
Papules and pustules
AntibioticDoxycycline (antimicrobial)50- to 100-mg immediate-release capsule or tablet twice dailyAbdominal pain and distention, diarrhea, esophagitis, nausea/vomiting, photosensitivity, tooth discoloration, vulvovaginal candidiasis50-mg immediate-release capsules: $15 for 60
50-mg immediate-release tablets: $50 for 60
Fixed erythema
Papules and pustules
Phymatous changes
Vitamin A derivativeIsotretinoinLidose: 0.5 mg per kg per day rounded to nearest capsule dosage in two divided doses for 1 month, then increase to 1 mg per kg per day in two divided doses as tolerated
Micronized: 0.4 to 0.8 mg per kg per day in two divided doses with dosage adjustments based on treatment response
Arthralgias, cheilitis, conjunctivitis, elevated liver enzymes, elevated triglycerides, erythema, myalgias, photosensitivity, scaling, seborrhea, xeroderma, xerophthalmia
Contraindications: pregnancy
30-mg lidose capsules: $180 for 60
30-mg micronized capsules: $200 for 60
FlushingNonselective beta-adrenergic antagonistCarvedilol (Coreg)Several regimens available, including:
One 31.25-mg immediate-release tablet or one 6.25-mg immediate-release tablet two to three times daily, titrated as tolerated up to 31.25 mg daily
One 6.25-mg immediate-release tablet once or twice daily, titrated up to 12.5 mg twice daily
Hypotension including orthostatic, diarrhea, weight gain6.25-mg tablets: $4 ($450) for 60
FlushingNonselective beta-adrenergic antagonistPropranololOne 10-mg immediate-release tablet three times daily; this can be increased as tolerated until symptoms improve
One study suggested 20 to 40 mg two to three times daily
Bradyarrhythmias, bronchospasm, fatigue, hypoglycemia10-mg tablets: $5 for 60

*—Estimated lowest GoodRx price. Actual cost will vary with insurance and by region. Generic price listed first; brand name price listed in parentheses. Information obtained at https://www.goodrx.com (accessed March 7, 2024; zip code: 66211).

Information from references 10, 11, and 37.

EVIDENCE SUMMARY

A cross-sectional survey reported persistent facial erythema (69%) and flushing (61%) as the most bothersome symptoms.50 Oral beta blockers are effective for erythema and flushing. A systematic review of nine studies showed that nonselective beta blockers, specifically carvedilol (Coreg; 6.25 to 25 mg per day) and propranolol (30 to 40 mg per day), could improve persistent facial erythema and flushing.48 In a 2023 randomized controlled trial on refractory erythema in rosacea, a 12-week course of daily paroxetine improved erythema scores (43% vs. 21%) and flushing (45% vs. 25%) compared with placebo.37

Systemic antibiotic treatment is effective against papules and pustules, but the effect on erythema and telangiectasia is limited. Modified-release doxycycline, 40 mg once daily, administered via 30-mg immediate-release and 10-mg delayed-release capsules, is the only U.S. Food and Drug Administration–approved oral treatment for rosacea with papules and pustules.51 A Cochrane review demonstrated that doxycycline was more effective for moderate to severe rosacea than placebo.41 Doxycycline had similar effectiveness at 100 mg daily and 40 mg daily, with fewer adverse effects at the lower dosage.41 Combining doxycycline, 40-mg modified-release capsules, and daily ivermectin 1% cream improved the response rate and speed while increasing patient satisfaction compared with 1% ivermectin alone in severe rosacea.52

Low-dose oral isotretinoin at 0.25 to 0.30 mg per kg per day for 16 weeks in studies was effective for patients with severe papules and pustules not responding to oral antibiotics or recurring after completing oral antibiotics.53,54 In a single study, patients were more likely to report rosacea improvement on low-dose isotretinoin at 0.3 per mg per kg per day compared with doxycycline at 100 mg daily for 14 days followed by 50 mg daily, with an NNT of 7.55 Physicians assessed more improvement with isotretinoin than doxycycline, with an NNT of 9.41

When Should Patients With Rosacea Be Referred for Care?

Providing a referral to dermatology is appropriate when the initial treatment is not effective or for consideration of intervention therapies. If phymatous changes are fixed, a dermatology or plastic surgery referral is indicated. Patients with ocular symptoms should be urgently referred to ophthalmology.

EVIDENCE SUMMARY

Laser and light-based therapies can treat severe rosacea associated with persistent centrofacial erythema, telangiectasia, and phymatous changes.1,11 Although artificial tears and lid hygiene can mitigate mild ocular symptoms with a twice-daily warm water compress to reduce meibomian gland dysfunction and oral doxycycline, patients with moderate to severe ocular manifestations, including diminished visual acuity, should be referred for urgent ophthalmologic evaluation.11,56

What Other Medical Conditions Are Common in Patients With Rosacea?

Rosacea is associated with an increased risk of systemic diseases, including gastroesophageal reflux disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, depression, and anxiety.57,58

EVIDENCE SUMMARY

Patients with rosacea are more likely to have gastrointestinal disorders, including gastroesophageal reflux disease, independent of doxycycline use (odds ratio = 4.2).58 A systematic review and meta-analysis of 42 articles showed a weak association between rosacea and Helicobacter pylori infection.59

Rosacea negatively effects psychosocial factors such as self-esteem, confidence, and the ability to socialize.6062 A systematic review demonstrated a high prevalence of depression and anxiety in patients with rosacea.63 Another demonstrated that patients with rosacea are more likely to develop depression and anxiety than those without rosacea.64 Clinicians can consider screening patients with rosacea for depression, anxiety, and cardiovascular risk.

This article updates previous articles on this topic by Oge’, et al.12; Goldgar, et al.65; and Blount, et al.66

Data Sources: A PubMed search was completed in Clinical Queries using the key terms rosacea, acne rosacea, phymatous changes, telangiectasia, and papulopustular. The search included meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, and systematic reviews. We also searched the Cochrane database, DynaMed, and Essential Evidence Plus. We critically reviewed studies that used patient categories such as race and/or gender but did not define how these categories were assigned, stating their limitations in the text. Search dates: April to December 2023 and April 11, 2024.

WINFRED FRAZIER, MD, MPH, FAAFP, is the associate program director and director of scholarly activity of the UPMC St. Margaret Family Medicine Residency Program, Pittsburgh, Pa., and medical director of the UPMC St. Margaret New Kensington Family Health Center, New Kensington, Pa.

RAQUEL K. ZEMTSOV, MD, MPH, is a resident physician in the UPMC St. Margaret Family Medicine Residency Program.

YUFEI GE, MD, MS, is the assistant medical director of the UPMC St. Margaret Lawrenceville Family Health Center, Pittsburgh, Pa., and director of didactic education of the UPMC St. Margaret Family Medicine Residency Program.

Address correspondence to Winfred Frazier, MD, MPH, FAAFP, UPMC St. Margaret, 1072 5th Ave., New Kensington, PA 15068 (frazierwt2@upmc.edu). Reprints are not available from the authors.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

  1. 1.Gallo RL, Granstein RD, Kang S, et al. Standard classification and pathophysiology of rosacea: the 2017 update by the National Rosacea Society Expert Committee. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78(1):148-155.
  2. 2.Vemuri RC, Gundamaraju R, Sekaran SD, et al. Major pathophysiological correlations of rosacea: a complete clinical appraisal. Int J Med Sci. 2015;12(5):387-396.
  3. 3.Gether L, Overgaard LK, Egeberg A, et al. Incidence and prevalence of rosacea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Dermatol. 2018;179(2):282-289.
  4. 4.National Rosacea Society. Rosacea triggers survey. Accessed June 13, 2023. https://www.rosacea.org/patients/rosacea-triggers/rosacea-triggers-survey
  5. 5.Chang YS, Huang YC. Role of Demodex mite infestation in rosacea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;77(3):441-447.e6.
  6. 6.Frazier WT, Proddutur S, Swope K. Common dermatologic conditions in skin of color. Am Fam Physician. 2023;107(1):26-34.
  7. 7.Fitzpatrick TB. Ultraviolet-induced pigmentary changes: benefits and hazards. Curr Probl Dermatol. 1986;15:25-38.
  8. 8.Sarkar R, Podder I, Jagadeesan S. Rosacea in skin of color: a comprehensive review. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2020;86(6):611-621.
  9. 9.van Zuuren EJ. Rosacea. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(18):1754-1764.
  10. 10.van Zuuren EJ, Fedorowicz Z, Tan J, et al. Interventions for rosacea based on the phenotype approach: an updated systematic review including GRADE assessments. Br J Dermatol. 2019;181(1):65-79.
  11. 11.Thiboutot D, Anderson R, Cook-Bolden F, et al. Standard management options for rosacea: the 2019 update by the National Rosacea Society Expert Committee. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82(6):1501-1510.
  12. 12.Oge' LK, Muncie HL, Phillips-Savoy AR. Rosacea: diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2015;92(3):187-196.
  13. 13.Tan J, Almeida LMC, Bewley A, et al. Updating the diagnosis, classification and assessment of rosacea: recommendations from the global ROSacea COnsensus (ROSCO) panel. Br J Dermatol. 2017;176(2):431-438.
  14. 14.Schaller M, Almeida LMC, Bewley A, et al. Recommendations for rosacea diagnosis, classification and management: update from the global ROSacea COnsensus 2019 panel. Br J Dermatol. 2020;182(5):1269-1276.
  15. 15.Alexis AF, Callender VD, Baldwin HE, et al. Global epidemiology and clinical spectrum of rosacea, highlighting skin of color: review and clinical practice experience. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80(6):1722-1729.e7.
  16. 16.Onalaja AA, Lester JC, Taylor SC. Establishing the diagnosis of rosacea in skin of color patients. Cutis. 2019;104(1):38-41.
  17. 17.Al-Dabagh A, Davis SA, McMichael AJ, et al. Rosacea in skin of color: not a rare diagnosis. Dermatol Online J. 2014;20(10) ): 13030/qt1mv9r0ss.
  18. 18.Maruthappu T, Taylor M. Acne and rosacea in skin of colour. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2022;47(2):259-263.
  19. 19.Dlova NC, Mosam A. Rosacea in Black South Africans with skin phototypes V and VI. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2017;42(6):670-673.
  20. 20.Lee GL, Zirwas MJ. Granulomatous rosacea and periorificial dermatitis: controversies and review of management and treatment. Dermatol Clin. 2015;33(3):447-455.
  21. 21.Yamasaki K, Miyachi Y. Perspectives on rosacea patient characteristics and quality of life using baseline data from a phase 3 clinical study conducted in Japan. J Dermatol. 2022;49(12):1221-1227.
  22. 22.Odom R, Dahl M, Dover J, et al.; National Rosacea Society Expert Committee on the classification and staging of rosacea. Standard management options for rosacea, part 1: overview and broad spectrum of care. Cutis. 2009;84(1):43-47.
  23. 23.Zip C. The role of skin care in optimizing treatment of acne and rosacea. Skin Therapy Lett. 2017;22(3):5-7.
  24. 24.Rigel DS, Taylor SC, Lim HW, et al. Photoprotection for skin of all color: consensus and clinical guidance from an expert panel. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;86(3S):S1-S8.
  25. 25.Morgado-Carrasco D, Granger C, Trullas C, et al. Impact of ultraviolet radiation and exposome on rosacea: key role of photoprotection in optimizing treatment. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021;20(11):3415-3421.
  26. 26.National Rosacea Society. Hot sauce, wine and tomatoes cause flare-ups, survey finds. Fall 2005. Accessed December 12, 2023. https://www.rosacea.org/rosacea-review/2005/fall/hot-sauce-wine-and-tomatoes-cause-flare-ups-survey-finds
  27. 27.Li S, Cho E, Drucker AM, et al. Alcohol intake and risk of rosacea in US women. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(6):1061-1067.e2.
  28. 28.Liu L, Xue Y, Chen Y, et al. Alcohol consumption and the risk of rosacea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022;21(7):2954-2961.
  29. 29.Yuan X, Yin D. Association between rosacea and smoking: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dermatol Ther. 2021;34(2):e14747.
  30. 30.Zhang L, Wang L, Jiang X. The relationship between rosacea and smoking: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Australas J Dermatol. 2021;62(4):e600-e602.
  31. 31.Hampton PJ, Berth-Jones J, Duarte Williamson CE, et al.; British Association of Dermatologists' Clinical Standards Unit. British Association of Dermatologists guidelines for the management of people with rosacea 2021. Br J Dermatol. 2021;185(4):725-735.
  32. 32.Del Rosso JQ, Thiboutot D, Gallo R, et al. Consensus recommendations from the American Acne & Rosacea Society on the management of rosacea, part 1: a status report on the disease state, general measures, and adjunctive skin care. Cutis. 2013;92(5):234-240.
  33. 33.American Academy of Dermatology. Sunscreen FAQs. Updated October 19, 2023. Accessed December 12, 2023. https://www.aad.org/media/stats-sunscreen
  34. 34.Weiss E, Katta R. Diet and rosacea: the role of dietary change in the management of rosacea. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2017;7(4):31-37.
  35. 35.Saric S, Clark AK, Sivamani RK, et al. The role of polyphenols in rosacea treatment: a systematic review. J Altern Complement Med. 2017;23(12):920-929.
  36. 36.Fisk WA, Lev-Tov HA, Clark AK, et al. Phytochemical and botanical therapies for rosacea: a systematic review. Phytother Res. 2015;29(10):1439-1451.
  37. 37.Wang B, Huang Y, Tang Y, et al. Paroxetine is an effective treatment for refractory erythema of rosacea: primary results from the prospective rosacea refractory erythema randomized clinical trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023;88(6):1300-1307.
  38. 38.Taieb A, Ortonne JP, Ruzicka T, et al.; Ivermectin Phase III study group. Superiority of ivermectin 1% cream over metronidazole 0.75% cream in treating inflammatory lesions of rosacea: a randomized, investigator-blinded trial. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172(4):1103-1110.
  39. 39.Stein L, Kircik L, Fowler J, et al. Efficacy and safety of ivermectin 1% cream in treatment of papulopustular rosacea: results of two randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled pivotal studies. J Drugs Dermatol. 2014;13(3):316-323.
  40. 40.Miyachi Y, Yamasaki K, Fujita T, et al. Metronidazole gel (0.75%) in Japanese patients with rosacea: a randomized, vehicle-controlled, phase 3 study. J Dermatol. 2022;49(3):330-340.
  41. 41.van Zuuren EJ, Fedorowicz Z, Carter B, et al. Interventions for rosacea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015(4):CD003262.
  42. 42.Fowler J, Jackson M, Moore A, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-daily topical brimonidine tartrate gel 0.5% for the treatment of moderate to severe facial erythema of rosacea: results of two randomized, double-blind, and vehicle-controlled pivotal studies. J Drugs Dermatol. 2013;12(6):650-656.
  43. 43.Kircik LH, DuBois J, Draelos ZD, et al. Pivotal trial of the efficacy and safety of oxymetazoline cream 1.0% for the treatment of persistent facial erythema associated with rosacea: findings from the first REVEAL trial. J Drugs Dermatol. 2018;17(1):97-105.
  44. 44.Baumann L, Goldberg DJ, Stein Gold L, et al. Pivotal trial of the efficacy and safety of oxymetazoline cream 1.0% for the treatment of persistent facial erythema associated with rosacea: findings from the second REVEAL trial. J Drugs Dermatol. 2018;17(3):290-298.
  45. 45.Layton AM, Schaller M, Homey B, et al. Brimonidine gel 0.33% rapidly improves patient-reported outcomes by controlling facial erythema of rosacea: a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29(12):2405-2410.
  46. 46.Maliyar K, Abdulla SJ. Dermatology: how to manage rosacea in skin of colour. Drugs Context. 2022;11 : 2021-11-1.
  47. 47.Stein Gold L, Del Rosso JQ, Kircik L, et al. Minocycline 1.5% foam for the topical treatment of moderate to severe papulopustular rosacea: results of 2 phase 3, randomized, clinical trials. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82(5):1166-1173.
  48. 48.Logger JGM, Olydam JI, Driessen RJB. Use of beta-blockers for rosacea-associated facial erythema and flushing: a systematic review and update on proposed mode of action. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83(4):1088-1097.
  49. 49.Del Rosso JQ, Brantman S, Baldwin H. Long-term inflammatory rosacea management with subantibiotic dose oral doxycycline 40 mg modified-release capsules once daily. Dermatol Ther. 2022;35(1):e15180.
  50. 50.Baldwin HE, Harper J, Baradaran S, et al. Erythema of rosacea affects health-related quality of life: results of a survey conducted in collaboration with the National Rosacea Society. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2019;9(4):725-734.
  51. 51.Del Rosso JQ, Webster GF, Jackson M, et al. Two randomized phase III clinical trials evaluating anti-inflammatory dose doxycycline (40-mg doxycycline, USP capsules) administered once daily for treatment of rosacea. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;56(5):791-802.
  52. 52.Schaller M, Kemény L, Havlickova B, et al. A randomized phase 3b/4 study to evaluate concomitant use of topical ivermectin 1% cream and doxycycline 40-mg modified-release capsules, versus topical ivermectin 1% cream and placebo in the treatment of severe rosacea [published correction appears in J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021; 84(5): 1506]. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82(2):336-343.
  53. 53.Gollnick H, Blume-Peytavi U, Szabó EL, et al. Systemic isotretinoin in the treatment of rosacea - doxycycline- and placebo-controlled, randomized clinical study. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2010;8(7):505-515.
  54. 54.Sbidian E, Vicaut É, Chidiack H, et al. A randomized-controlled trial of oral low-dose isotretinoin for difficult-to-treat papulopustular rosacea. J Invest Dermatol. 2016;136(6):1124-1129.
  55. 55.van Zuuren EJ, Fedorowicz Z. Interventions for rosacea: abridged updated Cochrane systematic review including GRADE assessments. Br J Dermatol. 2015;173(3):651-662.
  56. 56.Tanzi EL, Weinberg JM. The ocular manifestations of rosacea. Cutis. 2001;68(2):112-114.
  57. 57.Haber R, El Gemayel M. Comorbidities in rosacea: a systematic review and update. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78(4):786-792.e8.
  58. 58.Rainer BM, Fischer AH, Luz Felipe da Silva D, et al. Rosacea is associated with chronic systemic diseases in a skin severity-dependent manner: results of a case-control study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;73(4):604-608.
  59. 59.Jørgensen AHR, Egeberg A, Gideonsson R, et al. Rosacea is associated with Helicobacter pylori: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31(12):2010-2015.
  60. 60.Huynh TT. Burden of disease: the psychosocial impact of rosacea on a patient's quality of life. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2013;6(6):348-354.
  61. 61.Zeichner JA, Eichenfield LF, Feldman SR, et al. Quality of life in individuals with erythematotelangiectatic and papulopustular rosacea: findings from a web-based survey. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2018;11(2):47-52.
  62. 62.Bewley A, Fowler J, Schöfer H, et al. Erythema of rosacea impairs health-related quality of life: results of a meta-analysis [published correction appears in Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2016; 6(2): 249]. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2016;6(2):237-247.
  63. 63.Dai R, Lin BJ, Zhang X, et al. Depression and anxiety in rosacea patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021;11(6):2089-2105.
  64. 64.Chang HC, Huang YC, Lien YJ, et al. Association of rosacea with depression and anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2022;299:239-245.
  65. 65.Goldgar C, Keahey DJ, Houchins J. Treatment options for acne rosacea. Am Fam Physician. 2009;80(5):461-468.
  66. 66.Blount BW, Pelletier AL. Rosacea: a common, yet commonly overlooked, condition. Am Fam Physician. 2002;66(3):435-440.

Copyright © 2026 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.