Management of Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery

Kathryn A. McKenna, MD, MPH
Laura Leaman, MD

American Family Physician. 2024;109(6):525-532.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

This clinical content conforms to AAFP criteria for CME.

Pregnancy dating is determined by the patient's last menstrual period or an ultrasound measurement. A full-term pregnancy is considered 37 weeks' gestation or more. Spontaneous labor begins when regular painful uterine contractions result in a cervical change. Active labor begins at 6 cm dilation and is marked by more predictable, accelerated cervical change. In the absence of pregnancy complications, intermittent fetal auscultation may be considered as an alternative to continuous electronic fetal monitoring, which is associated with a high false-positive rate. Intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis is indicated in patients with group B streptococcus colonization or those at high risk to prevent newborn early-onset group B streptococcus. The likelihood of vaginal delivery is increased by providing continuous nonmedical support during labor, encouraging mobility, and using a peanut ball with epidural analgesia. Neuraxial analgesia is more effective for pain control than systemic opioids and is associated with fewer adverse effects. Delayed pushing during the second stage of labor has risks but does not affect the mode of delivery. Routine oropharyngeal suctioning of the newborn is not recommended, even with meconium-stained amniotic fluid. Delayed cord clamping reduces newborn anemia. Prevention of postpartum hemorrhage in patients at risk includes prophylactic uterotonic administration and controlled cord traction. Perineal lacerations that alter anatomy or are not hemostatic should be repaired. (Am Fam Physician. 2024;109(6):525-532. Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Family Physicians.)

Approximately 2.5 million infants were born via spontaneous vaginal delivery in the United States in 2021.1 The estimated due date of a pregnancy is 40 weeks after the first day of the patient's last menstrual period; a full-term pregnancy is considered 37 weeks' gestation or more.2 Pregnancy dating can be confirmed by an ultrasound measurement of the fetal crown-rump length early in the first trimester. Ultrasound dating should be used for irregular or unknown menstrual timing or a significant discrepancy between menstrual and ultrasound dating (Table 1).2 Accurate dating guides surveillance and management, including the timing of medically indicated delivery when needed.3

SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Clinical recommendation Evidence rating Comments
Do not routinely admit patients who are full-term and in uncomplicated labor before active labor begins when patient and fetal status is reassuring and accelerated dilation is expected (often starting at 6 cm dilation).13,17 C Consensus guidelines
Continuous nonmedical support during labor from a hospital staff member, doula, or personal companion is recommended to shorten the first stage of labor and increase the chance of vaginal delivery.18,19 B Randomized controlled trials that were limited by lower-quality evidence
Consider intermittent auscultation in place of continuous electronic fetal monitoring in low-risk pregnancies. Continuous electronic fetal monitoring improves recognition of fetal hypoxia but has a high false-positive rate and may increase unnecessary interventions.17,3032 C Consensus guidelines
Patients with GBS colonization on a universal 36-week screening culture, GBS bacteriuria during the pregnancy, a history of a newborn with GBS infection, or unknown GBS status in those at risk of GBS early-onset disease should receive intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis during labor to decrease the risk of GBS early-onset disease in the newborn. Antibiotic prophylaxis should be initiated in active labor or after premature rupture of membranes, with a goal of at least 4 hours before delivery.3335 B Consensus guideline and consistent findings from cohort studies
Immediate pushing in nulliparous patients with epidural analgesia is recommended. Immediate pushing does not affect the mode of delivery, and risks of delayed pushing include small increases in infection, hemorrhage, and neonatal acidemia.52,53 B Patient-oriented evidence from lower-quality randomized controlled trials and a systematic review
Do not routinely perform nasal, oral, or oropharyngeal suctioning at the perineum, even with meconium-stained amniotic fluid. Suctioning does not prevent meconium aspiration syndrome or improve outcomes.62,63 B Large multicenter randomized controlled trial and expert guideline
Delayed clamping of the umbilical cord for at least 30 to 60 seconds after delivery of a stable newborn reduces newborn anemia while slightly increasing the risk of hyperbilirubinemia and polycythemia.6365 B Limited-quality patient-oriented evidence from randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and expert guideline
Administer prophylactic uterotonics and provide controlled cord traction for active management of the third stage of labor to prevent postpartum hemorrhage in patients at risk of bleeding.6671 B Limited-quality patient-oriented evidence from randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and practice guidelines

GBS = group B streptococcus.

A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, go to https://www.aafp.org/afpsort.

BEST PRACTICES IN OBSTETRICS

Recommendations From Choosing Wisely
RecommendationSponsoring organization
Do not routinely exclude women with two previous transverse cesarean deliveries from choosing a trial of labor after cesarean delivery.Society for Maternal- Fetal Medicine
Do not automatically initiate continuous electronic fetal heart rate monitoring during labor for women without risk factors; consider intermittent auscultation first.American Academy of Nursing
Do not separate mothers and their newborns at birth unless medically necessary; help the mother place the newborn in skin-to-skin contact immediately after birth and encourage her to keep the newborn in the patient's room during hospitalization after the birth.American Academy of Nursing

Note: To search Choosing Wisely recommendations relevant to primary care, see https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/collections/choosing-wisely.html.

TABLE 1. Guidelines for Redating Based on Ultrasonography

Gestational age range* Method of measurementDiscrepancy between ultrasound dating and last menstrual period dating that supports redating
≤ 13 6/7 weeks
≤ 8 6/7 weeks
9 0/7 to 13 6/7 weeks
Crown-rump length
More than 5 days
More than 7 days
14 0/7 to 15 6/7 weeksBiparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, femur lengthMore than 7 days
16 0/7 to 21 6/7 weeksBiparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, femur lengthMore than 10 days
22 0/7 to 27 6/7 weeksBiparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, femur lengthMore than 14 days
28 0/7 and greater weeksBiparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, femur lengthMore than 21 days

*—Based on last menstrual period.

†—Because of the risk of redating a small fetus that may be growth restricted, management decisions based on third-trimester ultrasonography alone are especially problematic and need to be guided by careful consideration of the entire clinical picture and close surveillance.

Reprinted with permission from Committee Opinion No. 700: methods for estimating the due date. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(5):e152.

The birthing process has the potential for psychological and physical morbidity. Patient autonomy must be respected, and patients should provide consent for each examination. Not every pregnant patient identifies as a female; attention should be given to respecting the patient's gender identity and pronouns.

There are only a few absolute contraindications to vaginal delivery, including an active genital herpes simplex outbreak, unknown or elevated HIV viral load, malpresentation, complete placenta previa, and a history of specific uterine incisions.46 Relative contraindications to vaginal delivery may be identified before labor, such as suspected fetal macrosomia or malpresentation of the first fetus in multiple gestation, or may present during labor, including labor dystocia or abnormal fetal heart tracing (Table 2).46

TABLE 2. Contraindications to Vaginal Delivery

Absolute
Active genital herpes simplex lesions or prodromal (warning) symptoms
Complete placenta previa
HIV with a viral load of 1,000 copies per mL or greater or unknown
Malpresentations (e.g., nonfrank breech, transverse, face with mentum posterior)
Maternal preference to not have vaginal birth after cesarean delivery
Previous vertical uterine incision or transfundal uterine surgery
Other: placental abruption (complicated by life-threatening bleeding or nonreassuring fetal heart tones), vasa previa, cord prolapse, placenta accreta
Relative
Abnormal or indeterminate fetal heart tracing
Fetal malpresentation (e.g., breech, oblique, brow, face)
Labor dystocia or arrest of labor
Multiple gestation (dependent on presentation of first fetus)
Pelvic or genital tract conditions (obstructing fibroids, cervical cancer, florid or obstructing vaginal or cervical human papillomavirus infection, displaced pelvic fractures)
Suspected fetal macrosomia (estimated fetal weight of 5,000 g or greater in patients without diabetes mellitus and 4,500 g or less with diabetes)
Other: unrepaired cerebral aneurysm, aortic root dilation

Adapted with permission from Dresang LT, Yonke N. Management of spontaneous vaginal delivery. Am Fam Physician. 2015;92(3):204, with additional information from references 4 and 5.

Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery

Patients with a history of up to two transverse cesarean deliveries may be candidates for a trial of labor, depending on patient preference and patient and neonatal risk.7,8 The risk-based vaginal birth after cesarean calculator from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development can guide a shared decision-making discussion for candidates, with a minimum of 60% to 70% predicted success (https://www.mdcalc.com/calc/10433/vaginal-birth-after-cesarean-vbac).8,9 The discussion should include the increased risk of uterine rupture or dehiscence associated with a trial of labor after cesarean delivery and increased patient and neonatal morbidity if an urgent cesarean delivery becomes necessary.8 Because complications may be unpredictable, a trial of labor after cesarean delivery should only be pursued where resources for an emergency cesarean delivery are immediately available.8

Out-of-Hospital Birth

Patients may choose to have a vaginal delivery at home instead of in the hospital setting, often with the goal of reducing interventions.10 Although hospital births are safer, a patient's choice should be approached without judgment and with respect for autonomy over an important life event. A planned home birth is associated with an average absolute increased risk of perinatal death of up to 2 deaths per 1,000 patients.10 Home births are safest for appropriate low-risk candidates when assisted by licensed clinicians who meet standards set by the International Confederation of Midwives or who are integrated into a regulated health care system. Standardized guidelines for safe and timely transport to a nearby hospital should be used if needed.11

Stages of Labor

Spontaneous labor is when regular uterine contractions result in a cervical change via dilation or effacement and is divided into three stages (Table 3).12,13 If amniotic membranes rupture at term but before the onset of labor (i.e., premature rupture of membranes [PROM]), immediate labor induction reduces the time to birth and decreases infection risk without increasing cesarean delivery risk.14 For patients with reassuring fetal status after PROM, a limited period of expectant management (monitoring for labor progression without intervention) is also reasonable.15 Most patients begin spontaneous labor within 12 hours, and nearly all within 24 to 28 hours.15

TABLE 3. Stages of Labor

StageDefinition
FirstOnset of labor through complete cervical dilation
LatentOnset of labor through 5 cm dilation
Active6 cm through complete 10 cm dilation
SecondComplete cervical dilation through delivery of the infant
ThirdDelivery of the infant through separation and expulsion of the placenta and fetal membranes

Information from references 12 and 13.

FIRST STAGE

The first stage of labor progresses to complete cervical dilation and effacement.12 For most patients, the transition from the passive to active phase begins at 6 cm dilation.16 Active labor is consistently marked by accelerated cervical dilation, which is more variable at 6 cm or less.13,17 Patients at 37 weeks' gestation or later without maternal or neonatal concerns are not typically admitted to labor and delivery until reaching active labor.13,17 Admission during latent labor in the setting of maternal fatigue or a need for pain management may be appropriate.17

Interventions that may shorten the first stage of labor and increase the chance of vaginal delivery include continuous nonmedical support from a hospital staff member, doula, or personal companion; mobility, including walking, sitting, standing, and kneeling; and the use of a peanut ball (a peanut-shaped plastic ball placed between the knees of a person laboring in the lateral recumbent position) after epidural anesthesia.1822 Amniotomy also shortens the duration of labor without affecting the mode of delivery or maternal infection risk compared with waiting for the spontaneous rupture of membranes.23

Although food intake has traditionally been restricted during labor to minimize gastric aspiration risk in case of emergent general anesthesia, this practice should be readdressed because the safety of anesthesia has advanced. Even though gastric emptying is delayed in pregnant patients, epidural analgesia appears to facilitate gastric emptying.24 A large review of obstetric analgesia complications did not find cases of aspiration during cesarean delivery, and a systematic review found that less restrictive food intake was associated with a slightly shorter duration of labor but similar operative rates without increased vomiting or other obstetric or neonatal harms.25,26

Assessment and Augmentation. Serial cervical examinations are performed throughout labor to assess cervical dilation, effacement, and fetal station.27 Frequent examinations may decrease the risk of cesarean delivery and neonatal morbidity27; however, cervical examinations are invasive and may cause discomfort. Examinations should be deferred until a change in management may be indicated, and unnecessary examinations should be avoided to reduce the risk of chorioamnionitis.28 Augmentation with pharmacologic stimulation of uterine contractions or artificial rupture of membranes to increase the frequency and strength of contractions may be indicated when the first stage of labor extends beyond the expected timeframe.29

Electronic Fetal Monitoring. Electronic fetal monitoring records the fetal heart rate in relation to maternal uterine contractions as a measure of fetal well-being during labor. Continuous electronic fetal monitoring is recommended in patients with prenatal or intrapartum risk factors for neonatal compromise.17,30,31 Although continuous electronic fetal monitoring improves the recognition of fetal hypoxia, use is limited by a high false-positive rate, which may increase unnecessary interventions, including instrumental vaginal birth and cesarean delivery. Continuous electronic fetal monitoring should not be used as the only diagnostic tool for intervention.30,32

The use of continuous electronic fetal monitoring is associated with a lower risk of neonatal seizures without affecting cerebral palsy risk or perinatal mortality.32 Patients at low risk of complications who want and consent to less frequent monitoring may be offered intermittent auscultation. This option for fetal heart rate assessment, which includes the use of a handheld Doppler every 5 to 15 minutes during labor, may depend on staff training and availability.17,31

Group B Streptococcus Prophylaxis. Group B streptococcus (GBS) is the most common cause of neonatal infection, with vertical transmission occurring in 50% of patients with colonization in the genitourinary or gastrointestinal tract.33 Universal screening for GBS colonization at 36 weeks' gestation via vaginal-rectal culture is recommended. Patients with a positive result on screening culture, GBS bacteriuria during the pregnancy, or a history of a newborn with GBS infection, even with a negative culture result during the current pregnancy, should receive intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis during labor to reduce the risk of early-onset GBS disease in the newborn.33 Prophylaxis is also indicated in patients with unknown GBS status and if risk factors for early-onset GBS disease are present (Table 4).33

TABLE 4. Indications for Intrapartum GBS Prophylaxis With Unknown GBS Status

Birth at less than 37 0/7 weeks' gestation
Amniotic membrane rupture time of 18 hours or more
Intrapartum temperature 100.4°F (38°C) or greater
Intrapartum nucleic acid amplification positive for GBS (when available)
Known GBS-positive status in a previous pregnancy

GBS = group B streptococcus.

Information from reference 33.

Antibiotic prophylaxis is initiated in active labor or following PROM and continued through delivery. It is most effective when administered for at least 4 hours before delivery, although 2 hours of administration reduces vaginal colony counts and the risk of neonatal sepsis.3335 Intravenous penicillin is the preferred antibiotic for prophylaxis; second-line antibiotics may be required for patients with a severe immunoglobulin E–mediated penicillin allergy based on GBS susceptibility testing.33

Pain Management. Labor is a painful process. Because empowerment improves patient satisfaction, and analgesia does not affect the mode of delivery, pain should be assessed frequently and managed based on patient preference.3638 Nonpharmacologic options such as water immersion, pelvic motion exercises, lumbosacral massage, and sterile water injections can help ease pain and delay or reduce the use of pharmacologic analgesia.3942

Nonopioid medications for pain management, including antihistamines, sedatives, and acetaminophen, are more satisfactory than placebo but provide less pain relief than opioids.43 Intramuscular or intravenous opioids provide moderate pain relief but can be associated with adverse effects, including maternal nausea, vomiting, and drowsiness.44 Opioids cross the placenta and can cause newborn respiratory depression when administered closer to the time of delivery.38 Neuraxial analgesia, via epidural or spinal techniques, results in better pain control than systemic opioids and is associated with fewer adverse effects.38,45 Self-administered inhaled nitrous oxide reduces pain intensity without limiting mobility, with similar maternal adverse effects as systemic opioids.46 A previous article in American Family Physician provides more information about analgesia during labor.42

SECOND STAGE

The second stage of labor proceeds from complete cervical dilation to delivery of the infant.12 During this stage, the fetus progresses through head engagement with the maternal pelvis, head flexion, descent through the birth canal, internal rotation, head extension, external rotation or restitution, and expulsion. Although the duration of the second stage is variable, suggested maximum durations based on parity and analgesia are provided in Table 5.13,29,47 Longer durations may be appropriate with documented fetal descent; however, the chance of successful spontaneous vaginal delivery decreases with each additional hour.5,16

TABLE 5. Suggested Duration of the Second Stage of Labor

Birth historyNo epidural analgesiaEpidural analgesia
Nulliparous3 hours4 hours
Multiparous2 hours3 hours

Information from references 13, 29, and 47.

Fetal Head Position. According to a small cohort study, the occiput posterior is the most common fetal head position within the maternal pelvis during the first stage of labor. Most fetuses have rotated to the occiput anterior position by complete cervical dilation.48 Manual rotation of the fetal head in persistent occiput posterior position during the second stage modestly increases the rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery and decreases the use of episiotomy 49; the success of this maneuver improves when the fetal spine location is identified by ultrasonography.50 Maternal hands and knees position during labor may improve back pain but does not result in rotation of the fetal head.51

Pushing Strategies. Historically, delaying pushing by 1 or more hours after complete dilation was thought to decrease active pushing time and increase the rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous patients with epidural analgesia. A newer systematic review demonstrated that delayed pushing does not increase vaginal delivery rates compared with immediate pushing.52 Risks of delayed pushing, including a small increase in infection, hemorrhage, and neonatal acidemia, should be shared with patients before initiating this approach.52,53

There is little evidence to guide positioning and pushing. In a large trial of nulliparous patients with epidural analgesia, patients who chose to push lying on their side were more likely to deliver vaginally than those in upright positions.54 For patients without epidural analgesia, vertical positioning may shorten the second stage of labor at the risk of higher blood loss.55 There is no difference between coached and spontaneous pushing on the duration or mode of delivery.56,57 Patients without other clinical concerns should be encouraged to change positions and use their preferred pushing technique.

Delivery Technique. Applying warm packs to the perineum during the second stage of labor reduces perineal lacerations, including second- and third-degree lacerations, episiotomy rates, and postpartum pain.58 Selective use of episiotomy in an unassisted vaginal birth reduces perineal trauma compared with routine episiotomy.59

Delivery of the fetus is imminent at the time of +5 fetal station (crowning). The physician's dominant hand should support the fetal head and maintain its flexed position, while the other hand supports the perineum by squeezing the lateral perineal tissue toward the midline. Encouraging small pushes allows controlled delivery of the fetal head.

After delivery of the jaw, the fetal neck should be examined for the presence of a nuchal cord. If not overly tight, a nuchal cord may be reduced at the perineum or after delivery. Following delivery of the head, gentle downward or axial traction allows for the delivery of the anterior shoulder under the maternal pubic symphysis. Gentle upward traction allows for delivery of the posterior shoulder and the rest of the fetus. Shoulder dystocia (i.e., failure of the anterior shoulder to deliver with gentle axial traction) is an obstetric emergency and requires immediate intervention.60

Initial Newborn Management. For infants who do not need resuscitation, delivery directly onto the mother's chest allows for the immediate initiation of skin-to-skin care, which increases bonding, improves neonatal transition, and improves breastfeeding outcomes.61 Routine nasal, oral, or oropharyngeal suctioning is not recommended after delivery.62,63 In the setting of meconium-stained amniotic fluid, oropharyngeal suctioning does not prevent meconium aspiration syndrome or improve outcomes, but a credentialed and skilled neonatal resuscitation team should be available.63

Delayed clamping of the umbilical cord for at least 30 to 60 seconds after delivery of a stable infant reduces newborn anemia while slightly increasing the risk of hyperbilirubinemia and polycythemia.6365 Following this delay, the umbilical cord is cut with sterile scissors between two clamps to separate the infant from the placenta.

THIRD STAGE

The third stage of labor proceeds from delivery of the infant through delivery of the placenta.12 This stage generally lasts 30 minutes or less.

Reducing Postpartum Hemorrhage. Postpartum hemorrhage is the most common cause of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide.66 Postpartum hemorrhage is defined as blood loss greater than 1,000 mL or less than 1,000 mL with signs or symptoms of hypovolemia in the first 24 hours following delivery. Active management of the third stage is the standard of care to reduce postpartum hemorrhage and lower the risk of maternal hemoglobin levels of less than 9 g per dL (90 g per L) postpartum. However, less evidence supports this approach in patients with a low risk of bleeding.67

Active management includes prophylactic uterotonic administration and controlled traction on the umbilical cord.66,67 Intravenous or intramuscular oxytocin is an effective and well-tolerated uterotonic medication.66,68 Oxytocin combined with methylergonovine or misoprostol is more effective than oxytocin alone in preventing blood loss greater than 500 mL, with increased adverse effects.69 Although uterotonic administration before delivery of the placenta may reduce postpartum hemorrhage while increasing retained placenta, evidence is insufficient.70 Some sources also recommend early cord clamping and uterine massage as active third-stage management components.66,67 Early cord clamping may reduce postpartum hemorrhage; however, evidence is insufficient.67 Similarly, the importance of uterine massage is unproven.66

Delivery of the Placenta. Controlled cord traction, with one hand applying traction on the cord and the other providing suprapubic pressure on the uterus toward the umbilicus, reduces manual placental removal without affecting postpartum hemorrhage.71

Although based on very low-certainty evidence, umbilical vein injection with oxytocin may decrease the need for manual placenta removal when placental delivery is delayed.72 If the placenta has not been delivered within 30 minutes, manual removal of the placenta with a gloved hand may be required. The placenta should be inspected to ensure that it has been removed intact since a retained placenta can lead to postpartum hemorrhage and infection. There is no evidence to support administration of prophylactic antibiotics to prevent endometritis following the manual removal of the placenta.73

Perineal Lacerations

Before and after placental delivery, the vagina and perineum should be inspected for lacerations, including obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Lacerations that alter anatomy or are not hemostatic should be repaired. Techniques for laceration repair are discussed in a previous American Family Physician article.74

This article updates previous articles on this topic by Dresang and Yonke6 and Patterson, et al.75

Data Sources: A search was completed in Essential Evidence Plus, POEMs, the Cochrane database, and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines using the key terms spontaneous vaginal delivery with systematic reviews, practice guidelines, diagnosis, and therapy. Search dates: April to July 2023; October to December 2023; and March 2024.

KATHRYN A. MCKENNA, MD, MPH, is associate director of the Penn Medicine Lancaster (Penn.) General Health Family Medicine Residency Program.

LAURA LEAMAN, MD, is associate director of the Penn Medicine Lancaster General Health Family Medicine Residency Program.

Address correspondence to Kathryn A. McKenna MD, MPH, Lancaster General Health Family Medicine Residency Program, 540 N. Duke St., 3rd Floor, Lancaster, PA 17604 (kathryn.mckenna@pennmedicine.upenn.edu). Reprints are not available from the authors.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

  1. 1.Osterman MJK, Hamilton BE, Martin JA, et al. Births: final data for 2021. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2023;72(1):1-53.
  2. 2.Committee Opinion No. 700: methods for estimating the due date. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(5):e150-e154.
  3. 3.Spong CY. Defining “term” pregnancy: recommendations from the Defining “Term” Pregnancy Workgroup. JAMA. 2013;309(23):2445-2446.
  4. 4.Tita ATN. When is primary cesarean appropriate: maternal and obstetrical indications. Semin Perinatol. 2012;36(5):324-327.
  5. 5.Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(3):693-711.
  6. 6.Dresang LT, Yonke N. Management of spontaneous vaginal delivery. Am Fam Physician. 2015;92(3):202-208.
  7. 7.King VJ, Fontaine PL, Atwood LA, et al. Clinical practice guideline executive summary: labor after cesarean/planned vaginal birth after cesarean. Ann Fam Med. 2015;13(1):80-81.
  8. 8.ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 205: vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(2):e110-e127.
  9. 9.Grobman WA, Sandoval G, Rice MM, et al.; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal- Fetal Medicine Units Network. Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in term gestations: a calculator without race and ethnicity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;225(6):664.e1-664.e7.
  10. 10.Grünebaum A, Bornstein E, McLeod-Sordjan R, et al. The impact of birth settings on pregnancy outcomes in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228(5S):S965-S976.
  11. 11.Committee on Obstetric Practice. Committee Opinion No. 697: planned home birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(4):e117-e122.
  12. 12.Liao JB, Buhimschi CS, Norwitz ER. Normal labor: mechanism and duration. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2005;32(2):145-164.
  13. 13.Zhang J, Landy HJ, Ware Branch D, et al.; Consortium on Safe Labor. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(6):1281-1287.
  14. 14.Middleton P, Shepherd E, Flenady V, et al. Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017(1):CD005302.
  15. 15.Prelabor rupture of membranes: ACOG Practice Bulletin, No. 217. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(3):e80-e97.
  16. 16.First and second stage labor management: ACOG Clinical Practice Guideline No. 8. Obstet Gynecol. 2024;143(1):144-162.
  17. 17.ACOG Committee Opinion No. 766: approaches to limit intervention during labor and birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(2):e164-e173.
  18. 18.McGrath SK, Kennell JH. A randomized controlled trial of continuous labor support for middle-class couples: effect on cesarean delivery rates. Birth. 2008;35(2):92-97.
  19. 19.Bohren MA, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C, et al. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017(7):CD003766.
  20. 20.Lawrence A, Lewis L, Hofmeyr GJ, et al. Maternal positions and mobility during first stage labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013(10):CD003934.
  21. 21.Delgado A, Katz L, Melo RS, et al. Effectiveness of the peanut ball use for women with epidural analgesia in labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022;42(5):726-733.
  22. 22.Grenvik JM, Coleman LA, Berghella V. Birthing balls to decrease labor pain and peanut balls to decrease length of labor: what is the evidence?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228(5S):S1270-S1273.
  23. 23.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Myers ER, Sanders GD, Coeytaux RR, et al. Labor dystocia. May 2020. Accessed March 19, 2024. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557137/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK557137.pdf
  24. 24.Bouvet L, Schulz T, Piana F, et al. Pregnancy and labor epidural effects on gastric emptying: a prospective comparative study [published correction appears in Anesthesiology. 2022; 136(5): 873]. Anesthesiology. 2022;136(4):542-550.
  25. 25.Ciardulli A, Saccone G, Anastasio H, et al. Less-restrictive food intake during labor in low-risk singleton pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(3):473-480.
  26. 26.D'Angelo R, Smiley RM, Riley ET, et al. Serious complications related to obstetric anesthesia: the serious complication repository project of the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology. Anesthesiology. 2014;120(6):1505-1512.
  27. 27.Hamm RF, Beidas R, Srinivas SK, et al. Identifying the effective components of a standardized labor induction protocol: secondary analysis of a randomized, controlled trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(25):6185-6191.
  28. 28.Gomez Slagle HB, Hoffman MK, Fonge YN, et al. Incremental risk of clinical chorioamnionitis associated with cervical examination. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022;4(1):100524.
  29. 29.LeFevre NM, Krumm E, Cobb WJ. Labor dystocia in nulliparous women. Am Fam Physician. 2021;103(2):90-96.
  30. 30.O'Heney J, McAllister S, Maresh M, et al. Fetal monitoring in labour: summary and update of NICE guidance. BMJ. 2022;379:o2854.
  31. 31.ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106: intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(1):192-202.
  32. 32.Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte GM, et al. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017(2):CD006066.
  33. 33.Prevention of group B streptococcal early-onset disease in newborns: ACOG Committee Opinion No. 797 [published correction appears in Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 135(4): 978–979].. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(2):e51-e72.
  34. 34.Fairlie T, Zell ER, Schrag S. Effectiveness of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(3):570-577.
  35. 35.Turrentine MA, Greisinger AJ, Brown KS, et al. Duration of intrapartum antibiotics for group B streptococcus on the diagnosis of clinical neonatal sepsis. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2013;2013:525878.
  36. 36.Jones L, Othman M, Dowswell T, et al. Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012(3):CD009234.
  37. 37.Sng BL, Leong WL, Zeng Y, et al. Early versus late initiation of epidural analgesia for labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014(10):CD007238.
  38. 38.ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 209: obstetric analgesia and anesthesia. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(3):e208-e225.
  39. 39.Cluett ER, Burns E, Cuthbert A. Immersion in water during labour and birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018(5):CD000111.
  40. 40.Gallo RBS, Santana LS, Marcolin AC, et al. Sequential application of non-pharmacological interventions reduces the severity of labour pain, delays use of pharmacological analgesia, and improves some obstetric outcomes: a randomised trial. J Physiother. 2018;64(1):33-40.
  41. 41.Mårtensson L, Wallin G. Labour pain treated with cutaneous injections of sterile water: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106(7):633-637.
  42. 42.Smith A, Laflamme E, Komanecky C. Pain management in labor. Am Fam Physician. 2021;103(6):355-364.
  43. 43.Othman M, Jones L, Neilson JP. Non-opioid drugs for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012(7):CD009223.
  44. 44.Smith LA, Burns E, Cuthbert A. Parenteral opioids for maternal pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018(6):CD007396.
  45. 45.Wong CA, McCarthy RJ, Sullivan JT, et al. Early compared with late neuraxial analgesia in nulliparous labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(5):1066-1074.
  46. 46.Klomp T, van Poppel M, Jones L, et al. Inhaled analgesia for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012(9):CD009351.
  47. 47.Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, et al.; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(3):179-193.
  48. 48.Hjartardóttir H, Lund SH, Benediktsdóttir S, et al. When does fetal head rotation occur in spontaneous labor at term: results of an ultrasound-based longitudinal study in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;224(5):514.e1-514.e9.
  49. 49.Bertholdt C, Morel O, Zuily S, et al. Manual rotation of occiput posterior or transverse positions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;226(6):781-793.
  50. 50.Masturzo B, Farina A, Attamante L, et al. Sonographic evaluation of the fetal spine position and success rate of manual rotation of the fetus in occiput posterior position: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Ultrasound. 2017;45(8):472-476.
  51. 51.Hunter S, Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R. Hands and knees posture in late pregnancy or labour for fetal malposition (lateral or posterior). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007(4):CD001063.
  52. 52.Di Mascio D, Saccone G, Bellussi F, et al. Delayed versus immediate pushing in the second stage of labor in women with neuraxial analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(2):189-203.
  53. 53.Cahill AG, Srinivas SK, Tita ATN, et al. Effect of immediate vs. delayed pushing on rates of spontaneous vaginal delivery among nulliparous women receiving neuraxial analgesia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;320(14):1444-1454.
  54. 54.Epidural and Position Trial Collaborative Group. Upright versus lying down position in second stage of labour in nulliparous women with low dose epidural: BUMPES randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2017;359 : j4471.
  55. 55.Gupta JK, Sood A, Hofmeyr GJ, et al. Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017(5):CD002006.
  56. 56.Lemos A, Amorim MM, Dornelas de Andrade A, et al. Pushing/bearing down methods for the second stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017(3):CD009124.
  57. 57.Bloom SL, Casey BM, Schaffer JI, et al. A randomized trial of coached versus uncoached maternal pushing during the second stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(1):10-13.
  58. 58.Maghalian M, Alikamali M, Nabighadim M, et al. The effects of warm perineal compress on perineal trauma and postpartum pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024;309(3):843-869.
  59. 59.Jiang H, Qian X, Carroli G, et al. Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017(2):CD000081.
  60. 60.Hill DA, Lense J, Roepcke F. Shoulder dystocia: managing an obstetric emergency. Am Fam Physician. 2020;102(2):84-90.
  61. 61.Feldman-Winter L, Goldsmith JP; Committee on Fetus and Newborn; Task Force on Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. Safe sleep and skin-to-skin care in the neonatal period for healthy term newborns. Pediatrics. 2016;138(3):e20161889.
  62. 62.Vain NE, Szyld EG, Prudent LM, et al. Oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal suctioning of meconium-stained neonates before delivery of their shoulders: multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364(9434):597-602.
  63. 63.Aziz K, Lee HC, Escobedo MB, et al. Part 5: neonatal resuscitation: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2020;142(16_ suppl_2):S524-S550.
  64. 64.McDonald SJ, Middleton P, Dowswell T, et al. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013(7):CD004074.
  65. 65.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Obstetric Practice. Delayed umbilical cord clamping after birth: ACOG Committee Opinion No. 814. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;136(6):e100-e106.
  66. 66.Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 183: postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(4):e168-e186.
  67. 67.Begley CM, Gyte GM, Devane D, et al. Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019(2):CD007412.
  68. 68.Salati JA, Leathersich SJ, Williams MJ, et al. Prophylactic oxytocin for the third stage of labour to prevent postpartum haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019(4):CD001808.
  69. 69.Gallos I, Williams H, Price M, et al. Uterotonic drugs to prevent post-partum haemorrhage: a network meta-analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2019;23(9):1-356.
  70. 70.Soltani H, Hutchon DR, Poulose TA. Timing of prophylactic uterotonics for the third stage of labour after vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010(8):CD006173.
  71. 71.Hofmeyr GJ, Mshweshwe NT, Gülmezoglu AM. Controlled cord traction for the third stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015(1):CD008020.
  72. 72.Kumar N, Jahanfar S, Haas DM, et al. Umbilical vein injection for management of retained placenta. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021(3):CD001337.
  73. 73.Chibueze EC, Parsons AJ, Ota E, et al. Prophylactic antibiotics for manual removal of retained placenta during vaginal birth: a systematic review of observational studies and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:313.
  74. 74.Arnold MJ, Sadler K, Leli K. Obstetric lacerations: prevention and repair. Am Fam Physician. 2021;103(12):745-752.
  75. 75.Patterson DA, Winslow M, Matus CD. Spontaneous vaginal delivery. Am Fam Physician. 2008;78(3):336-341.

Copyright © 2026 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.