Using Artificial Intelligence in Screening Mammography

Karl T. Clebak, MD, MHA
Michael T. Partin, MD
Nathan J. Hemerly, DO

American Family Physician. 2024;110(5):535-536.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

KARL T. CLEBAK, MD, MHA, FAAFP; MICHAEL T. PARTIN, MD, FAAFP; and NATHAN J. HEMERLY, DO, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania

Address correspondence to Karl T. Clebak, MD, MHA, FAAFP, at kclebak@pennstatehealth.psu.edu.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

  1. 1.U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Breast cancer: screening. April 30, 2024. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/breast-cancer-screening#bcei-recommendation-title-area
  2. 2.Lehman CD, Arao RF, Sprague BL, et al. National performance benchmarks for modern screening digital mammography: update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Radiology. 2017;283(1):49-58.
  3. 3.Lamb LR, Lehman CD, Gastounioti A, et al. Artificial intelligence (AI) for screening mammography, from the AJR special series on AI applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022;219(3):369-380.
  4. 4.Bahl M. Artificial intelligence: a primer for breast imaging radiologists. J Breast Imaging. 2020;2(4):304-314.
  5. 5.Taylor CR, Monga N, Johnson C, et al. Artificial intelligence applications in breast imaging: current status and future directions. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;13(12):2041.
  6. 6.Fenton JJ, Taplin SH, Carney PA, et al. Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(14):1399-1409.
  7. 7.Freeman K, Geppert J, Stinton C, et al. Use of artificial intelligence for image analysis in breast cancer screening programmes: systematic review of test accuracy. BMJ. 2021;374:n1872.
  8. 8.Lång K, Josefsson V, Larsson AM, et al. Artificial intelligence-supported screen reading versus standard double reading in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): a clinical safety analysis of a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, single-blinded, screening accuracy study. Lancet Oncol. 2023;24(8):936-944.
  9. 9.Kaushal A, Altman R, Langlotz C. Geographic distribution of US cohorts used to train deep learning algorithms. JAMA. 2020;324(12):1212-1213.
  10. 10.Geis JR, Brady AP, Wu CC, et al. Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statement. Radiology. 2019;293(2):436-440.
  11. 11.Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Physician fee schedule. Updated July 1, 2024. https://www.cms.gov/medicare/physician-fee-schedule/search
  12. 12.Mital S, Nguyen HV. Cost-effectiveness of using artificial intelligence versus polygenic risk score to guide breast cancer screening. BMC Cancer. 2022;22(1):501.
  13. 13.Andrews M. Mammography AI can cost patients extra - is it worth it? J Health Econ Outcomes Res. January 30, 2024. https://jheor.org/post/2330-mammography-ai-can-cost-patients-extra-is-it-worth-it

This series is coordinated by Natasha Pyzocha, DO, contributing editor.

A collection of Diagnostic Tests published in AFP is available at https://www.aafp.org/afp/diagnostic.

Copyright © 2026 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.