POEMs
Patient-Oriented Evidence That Matters

Active Monitoring Is Not Inferior to Surgery With or Without Radiation in Women With Low-Risk DCIS

American Family Physician. 2025;112(2):216.

CLINICAL QUESTION

In women with low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), is active monitoring for evidence of invasive progression noninferior to guideline-concordant usual care, including surgery with or without radiation?

BOTTOM LINE

At 2 years of follow-up, the study found that active monitoring in women with low-risk DCIS was not inferior to current guideline-based usual care (surgery with or without radiation). Results were similar in women who initiated endocrine therapy. The investigators will report further results to assess the continued safety and patient acceptability of active monitoring. (Level of Evidence = 1b−)

SYNOPSIS

DCIS is conventionally treated with surgery, with or without radiation or endocrine therapy, similar to low- to intermediate-risk invasive cancer. The investigators identified women with newly diagnosed, screen-detected low-risk DCIS (hormone receptor–positive grade 1 or 2 without evidence of invasive cancer). Eligible patients (n = 957; median age 64 years) were randomly assigned to guideline-concordant usual care or active monitoring. Guideline-concordant usual care included surgery with or without radiation treatment depending on choice of surgery. Diagnostic mammography was performed every 12 months for the affected and unaffected breast. Active monitoring consisted of diagnostic mammography every 6 months for the affected breast and every 12 months for the unaffected breast. Patients with physical examination or imaging findings concerning for disease progression underwent core needle biopsy and surgery for identified invasive cancer.

Using intention-to-treat analysis, the 2-year cumulative rate of invasive cancer was similar in the guideline-concordant care and active monitoring groups (5.9% vs 4.2%, respectively), which supports the noninferiority of active monitoring. The tumor size of invasive cancers and the rate of all-cause mortality did not differ between groups. Results were similar in the subgroup of women who initiated endocrine therapy.

Study design: Randomized controlled trial (single-blinded)

Funding source: Government

Allocation: Uncertain

Setting: Outpatient (specialty)

Reference: Hwang ES, Hyslop T, Lynch T, et al.; COMET Study Investigators. Active monitoring with or without endocrine therapy for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ: the COMET randomized clinical trial [published online December 12, 2024]. JAMA.

David C. Slawson, MD

POEMs (patient-oriented evidence that matters) are provided by Essential Evidence Plus, a point-of-care clinical decision support system published by Wiley-Blackwell. For more information, see http://www.essentialevidenceplus.com. Copyright Wiley-Blackwell. Used with permission.

For definitions of levels of evidence used in POEMs, see https://www.essentialevidenceplus.com/Home/Loe.

Primary Care Update, a free podcast focused on POEMs, is available on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

This series is coordinated by Natasha J. Pyzocha, DO, contributing editor.

A collection of POEMs published in AFP is available at https://www.aafp.org/afp/poems.

Copyright © 2026 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.