Return to Healing and Whole Person Care in Family Medicine

Wayne B. Jonas, MD
Allen F. Shaughnessy, PharmD, MMedEd

American Family Physician. 2026;113(1):13-15.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

Published online November 19, 2025.

Starting in the 1960s, a new specialty called family practice (later family medicine) emerged as a form of primary care, based on the biopsychosocial model of human health.1 For many, it was an exciting and inspiring time for a type of medicine grounded in care for the whole person. Family medicine, seen as a revolution by its founders in the 1960s and 1970s, was a model of care anchored in trusting relationships, prevention and health promotion, and community chronic disease management.2 It was health care for the person across their lifespan, not just for treating diseases as they arose. It was a call to be healers in the truest sense by seeing the sanctity of each person and seeking to restore individuals and communities to a sense of wholeness and well-being.3

Extensive research shows that continuous, whole person primary care, as in family medicine, improves health, prevents disease, and keeps costs down.4,5 Yet, the concept of family medicine with continuity of care over the lifespan is in decline.6,7 Corporate interests, financial pressures, and documentation needs now incentivize fragmented care and care delivered in short time frames with emphasis on advances in medical technology, medications, and procedures, which are profitable.4,5,811

These advances have been supported by health care policies, US Food and Drug Administration drug approvals, American Medical Association billing codes, and Medicare and Medicaid coverage. There was not, however, a similar rise in reimbursement for the time and teams needed to care for the whole person. Although the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has made modest progress in payments for whole person care, the core drivers of payment tracked by Relative Value Units (RVUs) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes have not sufficiently changed. Time to build trusting relationships and maintain continuous and comprehensive care, the factors known to reduce costs and improve health over the long term, still is not adequately covered. The rise in direct primary care, whereby clinicians work directly with patients to provide all primary care for a transparent fee that bypasses insurance payment models, is a response to those inadequate changes.12

The decline in whole person care is now fully reflected in the state of our health care system and our nation's health, with decreased patient satisfaction, increased clinician burnout, rising costs, rising rates of chronic disease, and lower life expectancy than other industrialized countries.1317 The substantial data documenting this decline and its link to the loss of whole person care have been summarized by the National Academy of Medicine.1820

Now, more than ever, is the time to reboot family medicine as the nation's primary model for preventive and chronic disease care. The current political milieu represents both a threat and an opportunity. The desire to reduce chronic disease, lower health care costs, and bolster the agency of communities to enhance their own health and well-being cannot be accomplished without a workforce able to do it. Let's take the principles of family medicine from the 1970s and enhance them with the technologies, teams, training, and health promotion science of our modern world.

The activities needed for this revision have been described in three major reports from the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine and tested in communities of practice.21,22 Those reports show where investments can make America healthy, especially our families and children.2325 Guideposts from the reports for renewing family medicine and operational principles are described in Table 12325 and Table 2.22 The main drivers of health in whole person care for chronic disease in practice are listed in Table 3.

TABLE 1. Principles of Whole Person Care

Seeing and engaging the person around what matters to them in their life goals and how health care can support those on a continuous basis. This is person-centered care, not just patient-centered care.
Investing in the science and services of salutogenesis (health creation) by focusing on the drivers of healing and the factors that promote well-being, rather than solely on the treatment of disease, and by giving health promotion and risk reduction equal weight to disease treatment.
Assuring that no personal driver of health is ignored. This means asking about and addressing the physical, behavioral, social, emotional, mental, and spiritual dimensions of a person.

Information from references 2325.

TABLE 2. Operationalizing the Principles of Whole Person Care

Educate the patient about whole person care (pocket guides are often useful [eg, https://healingworksfoundation.org/resource/primary-care-personal-health-inventory/])
Complete a whole person care visit exploring the patients' needs and goals (personal health inventory streamlines this visit)
Formalize a personal health plan with the patient
Document the visit and care plan in the electronic health record (using HOPE or similar note)
Address immediate needs
Communicate patient goals and roles to team members
Support proactive follow-up and adjustment of the personal health plan, as needed

HOPE = Healing Oriented Practices and Environments.

Information from reference 22.

TABLE 3. Most Common Drivers of Health in Whole Person Care

Patient goals: symptoms, social engagement, meaning and purpose, work, play
Medical needs: access, payment, prescription coordination, transitions
Social drivers: housing, food, transportation, safety, child/parent care, income
Behavioral/mental health: stress, anxiety, depression, loneliness, social support
Lifestyle: sleep, food, activity, nature, tobacco, alcohol, drug use

It is time for family medicine to again take the lead in articulating a renewed vision of whole person health care. Like the family medicine founders did in the 60s and 70s, we need to create a version of family medicine today that will embrace current knowledge, technology, and policy opportunities and show how this vision of care is essential and can be inspiring again.26

Editor’s Note: Dr. Shaughnessy is assistant medical editor for AFP.

WAYNE B. JONAS, MD, Healing Works Foundation, Alexandria, Va.

ALLEN F. SHAUGHNESSY, PharmD, MMedEd, Dept. of Family Medicine, Cambridge Health Alliance, Malden, Mass.

Address correspondence to Wayne B. Jonas, MD, at wjonas@healingworksfoundation.org.

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

  1. 1.Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science. 1977;196(4286):129-136.
  2. 2.The intellectual basis of family medicine revisited. Proceedings of the Advanced Forum in Family Medicine; 1984 September 23–28; Keystone Resort, CO. Fam Med. 1985;5:225.
  3. 3.Borrell-Carrió F, Suchman AL, Epstein RM. The biopsychosocial model 25 years later: principles, practice, and scientific inquiry. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(6):576-582.
  4. 4.Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q. 2005;83(3):457-502.
  5. 5.Missiou A, Lionis C, Evangelou E, et al. Health outcomes in primary care: a 20-year evidence map of randomized controlled trials. Fam Pract. 2023;40(1):128-137.
  6. 6.Eden AR, Morgan ZJ, Jetty A, et al. Proportion of family physicians caring for children is declining. J Am Board Fam Med. 2020;33(6):830-831.
  7. 7.Carek PJ. Potentially alarming trends in the scope of practice for family physicians. J Am Board Fam Med. 2018;31(2):178-180.
  8. 8.Satterwhite S, Nguyen MT, Honcharov V, et al. “Good Care Is Slow Enough to Be Able to Pay Attention”: primary care time scarcity and patient safety. J Gen Intern Med. 2024;39(9):1575-1582.
  9. 9.Hoffer EP. Primary care in the United States: past, present and future. Am J Med. 2024;137(8):702-705.
  10. 10.Rotenstein LS, Holmgren AJ, Horn DM, et al. System-level factors and time spent on electronic health records by primary care physicians. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(11):e2344713.
  11. 11.Shaughnessy AF, Slawson DC, Duggan AP. “Alexa, can you be my family medicine doctor?” the future of family medicine in the coming techno-world. J Am Board Fam Med. 2021;34(2):430-434.
  12. 12.Mechley AR. Direct primary care: a successful financial model for the clinical practice of lifestyle medicine. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2021;15(5):557-562.
  13. 13.Burch P, Whittaker W, Lau YS. Relationship between the volume and type of appointments in general practice and patient experience: an observational study in England. Br J Gen Pract. 2025;75(754):e375-e381.
  14. 14.Ofei-Dodoo S, Mullen R, Pasternak A, et al. Loneliness, burnout, and other types of emotional distress among family medicine physicians: results from a national survey. J Am Board Fam Med. 2021;34(3):531-541.
  15. 15.Dewa CS, Loong D, Bonato S, et al. How does burnout affect physician productivity? A systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:325.
  16. 16.Watson KB, Wiltz JL, Nhim K, et al. Trends in multiple chronic conditions among US adults, by life stage, behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 2013–2023. Prev Chronic Dis. 2025;22:E15.
  17. 17.World Population Review. Life expectancy by country. 2025. Accessed October 15, 2025. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/life-expectancy-by-country
  18. 18.National Academy of Medicine. Commission on Investment Imperatives for a Healthy Nation. Accessed October 15, 2025. https://nam.edu/our-work/programs/leadership-consortium/commission-on-investment-imperatives-for-a-healthy-nation/
  19. 19.McDonald A. Incorporating lifestyle medicine into practice: a prescription for better health. Am Fam Physician. 2022;106(3):229-230.
  20. 20.Milbank Memorial Fund. 2025 primary care scorecard data dashboard. Accessed October 15, 2025. https://www.milbank.org/primary-care-scorecard/
  21. 21.Rosenbaum E, Gordon AE, Cresta J, et al. Implementing whole person primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2023;21(2):188.
  22. 22.Rosenbaum E, Gordon AE, Cresta J, et al. Implementing whole person primary care: results from a year-long learning collaborative. J Am Board Fam Med. 2023;36(4):542-549.
  23. 23.McCauley L, Phillips RL Jr, Meisnere M, et al., eds; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Implementing High-Quality Primary Care. 2021. The National Academies Press; 2021.
  24. 24.Krist AH, South-Paul J, Meisnere M, eds.; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Achieving Whole Health: A New Approach for Veterans and the Nation. The National Academies Press; 2023.
  25. 25.Pham H, Chesney M, Chisolm D, et al., eds; National Academy of Medicine. Valuing America's Health: Aligning Financing to Reward Better Health and Well-Being. The National Academies Press; 2024.
  26. 26.JonasWB. How Healing Works: Get Well and Stay Well Using Your Hidden Power to Heal. Lorena Jones Books; 2018.

Copyright © 2026 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.